You are not logged in.
Oh, what I just found is quite interesting in this context after all (it's in German, but the charts are probably globally understandable):
https://gnulinux.ch/ressourcenverbrauch … umgebungen
Addendum: I missed an English source, it's here:
https://itvision.altervista.org/linux-d … usage.html
Last edited by jue-gen (2023-02-20 21:31:02)
Offline
Do you know about Project Gemini? Produces sane web pages . . .
Some time ago I heard about it. Yes, that is interesting ...
Offline
I've always favoured Window Managers over Desktop Environents....
Offline
Unfortunately, nobody writes HTML in the editor these days.
I'm pretty sure that a few people in this very forum still do. And I'm one of those
Offline
jue-gen wrote:Unfortunately, nobody writes HTML in the editor these days.
I'm pretty sure that a few people in this very forum still do. And I'm one of those
Indeed . . . devuan.org was crafted from scratch by hellekin. It has gone through some changes but that code is mostly still in use and I always created my sites in a text editor too.
[edit] There was a time when exploring the creative possibilities of html and css was a "thing":
The only rule is:
"You may modify the style sheet in any way you wish, but not the HTML."
Do take a tour through their gallery . . . though it seems a bit broken atm . . .
[edit2] Another interesting option to add to a site created in a text editor is Flat Press which use to be an no-database version of wordpress. Have no idea where it's gone since I last used it.
Sorry for the OT, folks . . .
Offline
jue-gen wrote:Unfortunately, nobody writes HTML in the editor these days.
I'm pretty sure that a few people in this very forum still do. And I'm one of those
Ahhh, that feels good ... 👍
Offline
... "You may modify the style sheet in any way you wish, but not the HTML." ...
Yes, and a clean HTML code is very clear. Errors are quickly detected.
You can play creatively with the style sheet. But for some things, e.g. scientific texts, you don't even need a style sheet. For me, this is currently the most economical and practical way to store texts (including links).
Offline
Going back to the subject line....
I have to use color-management by default with xfce4.
The ps output for chinaera:
colord 1777 0.1 0.1 239288 14896 ? Sl 10:16 0:00 /usr/libexec/colord
and for daedalus:
colord 2260 0.6 1.4 341496 116452 ? Sl 09:57 0:00 /usr/libexec/colord
colord_1.4.6 claims to require 7.8 times more Resident Memory as colord_1.4.5. AFAIK, nothing major has been added/incorporated which would justify this substanially encreased resident memory requirement.
This makes the 1.4.6 version the top-contender for the most memory-hungry daemon.
Soon we need 32Gig just to run a DE alone.
Offline
$ cat /etc/devuan_version ; free -m
chimaera
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 128887 102819 21226 61 4841 24548
Swap: 16383 179 16204
And this box doesn't even run a GUI
I will never understand this constant obsessing over memory, it's like some kind of religion here.
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
Offline
colord_1.4.6 claims to require 7.8 times more Resident Memory as colord_1.4.5. AFAIK, nothing major has been added/incorporated which would justify this substanially encreased resident memory requirement.
It's Gnome software, isn't that enough to explain it...? ;)
-
Since there are only 16 commits between "Release colord 1.4.5" and "Release colord 1.4.5" [sic], if someone were so inclined they could use git bisect to identify what commit might have changed things.
Though there are also several "trivial: fix a small memory leak ..." commits made in April last year, not yet in a release, so perhaps those are relevant.
Last edited by boughtonp (2023-03-31 13:16:32)
3.1415P265E589T932E846R64338
Offline