You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Do we still hate systemd in 2023? Maybe they have fixed all those things for all those years, didn't they?
Offline
Waste of time asking that here!!!
We are here because we want nothing to do with systemd - Debian's biggest mistake was to try & force it onto its users, that's why Devuan exists.
Offline
Do we still hate systemd in 2023? Maybe they have fixed all those things for all those years, didn't they?
If systemd still runs as process id 1, im calling that init "not fixed".
Offline
This malware, called "systemd" added new feature:
A new "soft-reboot" mechanism has been added to the service manager. A "soft reboot" is similar to a regular reboot, except that it affects userspace only: the service manager shuts down any running services and other units, then optionally switches into a new root file system (mounted to /run/nextroot/).
Offline
Lenart now works at microsoft.
Make up your mind on that.
Last edited by czeekaj (2023-08-31 07:41:52)
Offline
Systemd still does NOT adhere to core *nix principles:
Build a tool for a single task, make it perform that task to perfection. It does NOT do other tasks as that compromises the original task execution.
Offline
If it was bad eleven years ago then it's still bad today. Probably even worse.
Offline
Systemd still does NOT adhere to core *nix principles:
Build a tool for a single task, make it perform that task to perfection. It does NOT do other tasks as that compromises the original task execution.
Yea, as promised systemd is fully modular and anyone can choose what functionality they want ... oh wait ...
Offline
...imho, it's just M$ hobbling the competition.
Offline
Yes it's bad and it has even gotten worse over the years. Gobbling up more and more features. A big blob.
Offline
Pages: 1