You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
First, I looked for this topic, didn't find it
I'm in Distro watch,I see ceres and testing with systemd included.
Why is this? I thought the point of Devuan was systemd free...
Offline
Perhaps this?
https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1925
Offline
ceres and testing specifically show systemd 232 and 238 as a package. ascii shows nothing in that field.
Seems to be a bit more going on than "harmless" systemd units files
Why does distro watch show the systemd package for ceres and testing but not for ascii?
Offline
If they are also listed here, let us know:
Offline
Well ascii shows 24 hits for systemd
https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/d1pk … ease=ascii
I guess I was mistaken about Devuan, I thought the entire point was to not use systemd.
Maybe "systemd light" would be a better motto...
"Devuan GNU+Linux is a fork of Debian without systemd that offers users control over their system by avoiding unnecessary entanglements and ensuring Init Freedom. " Just doesn't seem accurate now...
Last edited by cipher (2019-11-19 17:44:32)
Offline
The ones that are actually harmful and not just imagination are listed here:
https://pkgmaster.devuan.org/bannedpackages.txt
Offline
Well ascii shows 24 hits for systemd
https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/d1pk … ease=ascii
The pattern is improving though: 14 results for beowulf and just 7 for ceres.
And please check the package descriptions: most of that stuff is for interacting with systemd and so will do *nothing* if it isn't installed.
Brianna Ghey — Rest In Power
Offline
HoaS . . . see the link on my first post in this thread that was rejected by the OP.
Offline
cipher wrote:Well ascii shows 24 hits for systemd
https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/d1pk … ease=asciiThe pattern is improving though: 14 results for beowulf and just 7 for ceres.
And please check the package descriptions: most of that stuff is for interacting with systemd and so will do *nothing* if it isn't installed.
Good point. But if these systemd components do nothing if systemd isn't installed (weird concept that) then why have them at all?
We include stuff called systemdthisorthat but unless realsystemd is installed they do nothing.
Why include things that do nothing?
Offline
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:cipher wrote:Well ascii shows 24 hits for systemd
https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/d1pk … ease=asciiThe pattern is improving though: 14 results for beowulf and just 7 for ceres.
And please check the package descriptions: most of that stuff is for interacting with systemd and so will do *nothing* if it isn't installed.
Good point. But if these systemd components do nothing if systemd isn't installed (weird concept that) then why have them at all?
We include stuff called systemdthisorthat but unless realsystemd is installed they do nothing.
Why include things that do nothing?
Excluding packages with systemd in the name when they don't pull in systemd and their presence doesn't break anything would be a wasted effort, and in some cases, their removal would break things because of package dependencies.
Also note that some of the packages in the list you generated have '+devuan' in the version. That means we modified the package so that it will work without systemd. If we wanted to change the names of those packages, we'd have to modify any packages that depend on them to recognize the new names.
Offline
Pages: 1