You are not logged in.
$ neofetch
..,,;;;::;,.. alexk@ng3
`':ddd;:,. ---------
`'dPPd:,. OS: Devuan GNU/Linux 6 (excalibur) x86_64
`:b$$b`. Model: 90BJ008CUK Lenovo H30-05
'P$$$d` Kernel: 6.12.90+deb13.1-amd64
.$$$$$` Uptime: 6 hours, 45 mins
;$$$$$P Packages: 3248 (dpkg)
.:P$$$$$$` Shell: bash 5.2.37
.,:b$$$$$$$;' Resolution: 1920x1080
.,:dP$$$$$$$$b:' DE: Xfce 4.20
.,:;db$$$$$$$$$$Pd'` WM: Xfwm4
,db$$$$$$$$$$$$$$b:'` WM Theme: Default
:$$$$$$$$$$$$b:'` Theme: Clearlooks-Phenix-Sapphire [GTK2/3]
`$$$$$bd:''` Icons: oxygen [GTK2/3]
`'''` Terminal: xfce4-terminal
Terminal Font: Monospace 12
CPU: AMD A8-7410 APU with AMD Radeon R5 Graphics (4) @ 2.200GHz
GPU: AMD ATI Radeon R4/R5 Graphics
Memory: 1556MiB / 7362MiBSomewhere after a successful upgrade to Excalibur and (I think) a kernel update I discovered that, whilst my 2GB USB-Storage was automounted + auto-accessible via Thunar & could be unmounted via GUI, the same was NO LONGER true for CDROM / DVD / Blue-Ray external devices connected to the desktop via USB. iirc the same was true for a Seagate 2TB external FAT32 usb-connected HDD (I may not have checked that one before the fix).
I'm in the middle of preparing for imminent upgrade to kitchen + house & my time is limited, but I checked the Byte Computer that I've been upgrading since January — it needs Chromium + Thunderbird sync and we shall have lift-off — and sure enough that shows the identical problem as the 10-year old Lenovo that I'm working on right now.
After a couple of days of going down rabbit holes on the Byte I transferred back to the Lenovo and hey!, after yet another trip down a rabbit-hole I got a conclusive fix. So here it is:-
Login for me is SLIM, Desktop is xfce4 whilst the File Manager is Thunar. The important thing to realise is that Automount for removable Drives, Devices & Media in that combo is mediated via Thunar and NOT via /etc/fstab, autofs nor any other source. As long as Thunar and it's dependencies are setup correctly life is simple & it just works.
With Thunar open, go:–
menu:Edit | Preferences
select tab:Advanced
(bottom of tab): Volume Management
[if working, this provides a "Configure" link to the “Removable Drives and Media” setup]
That is the case for me now, but before the fix there was a sickly-coloured background which said:
'gvfs is not available' + a 'Read More' link:
https://docs.xfce.org/xfce/thunar/unix- … ile_system
which says: "For Debian and its derivatives, the packages “gvfs-backends” and “gvfs-fuse” are required"
That is more than a little sickly for folks like me that tend to stay away from bloated products like gvfs (wiki) virtual filesystem software for the GNOME desktop environment
Here is a before result on a search, with the fix after:
before
$ apt search gvfs | fgrep install
gimp/stable,stable-security,now 3.0.4-3+deb13u8 amd64 [installed,automatic]
gvfs/stable,now 1.57.2-2+deb13u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
gvfs-common/stable,now 1.57.2-2+deb13u1 all [installed,automatic]
gvfs-daemons/stable,now 1.57.2-2+deb13u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
gvfs-libs/stable,now 1.57.2-2+deb13u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]after
$ sudo apt install gvfs-fuse gvfs-backends
$ apt search gvfs | fgrep install
gimp/stable,stable-security,now 3.0.4-3+deb13u8 amd64 [installed,automatic]
gvfs/stable,now 1.57.2-2+deb13u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
gvfs-backends/stable,now 1.57.2-2+deb13u1 amd64 [installed]
gvfs-common/stable,now 1.57.2-2+deb13u1 all [installed,automatic]
gvfs-daemons/stable,now 1.57.2-2+deb13u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
gvfs-fuse/stable,now 1.57.2-2+deb13u1 amd64 [installed]
gvfs-libs/stable,now 1.57.2-2+deb13u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
rygel/stable,now 0.44.2-1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
xfce4-goodies/stable,now 4.20.0 amd64 [installed,automatic](CDs + DVDs + Blue-Rays now auto-mount & are accessible) Hooray!
Last edited by alexkemp (Yesterday 15:43:37)
Offline
Strangely enough tools like gvfs do their job as intended. I need it on my Cinnamon to connect to my smartphone every now and then.
That is more than a little sickly for folks like me that tend to stay away from bloated products like gvfs (wiki) virtual filesystem software for the GNOME desktop environment
So what is so "bloated" about gvfs? Its from Gnome, ok. But its not the desktop. I recently looked at Gnome again because some people were raving about the desktop, but its not my beer.
Last edited by rolfie (Yesterday 17:09:48)
Offline
As long as Thunar and it's dependencies are setup correctly life is simple & it just works.
stay away from bloated products like gvfs
This is an oxymoron. GVFS is the dependency of thunar that makes this "just work". The "bloat" you want to stay away from is the very thing that makes "life is simple" possible.
"bloat" is code that does not provide sufficient functionality to justify its size, complexity, or performance impact. Clearly you value GUI automounting from your file manager and are willing to install GVFS to provide it. Therefore, GVFS is not bloat.
Last edited by steve_v (Today 01:20:02)
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
Offline
thinking about automount always reminds me of that time my kid stuffed toast loaded with cream cheese into the vhs slot...smh...
Be Excellent to each other and Party On!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rph_1DODXDU
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_%26_Ted%27s_Excellent_Adventure
Do unto others as you would have them do instantaneously back to you!
Offline
@stargate-sg1
That's a hell of a picture.
But yes, redhat's crap is like sticking a piece of toast with cream cheese into a vhs slot.
Very dumb and shocking that anyone would think such is okay.
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. Feelings are not facts
If you wish to be humbled, try to exalt yourself long term If you wish to be exalted, try to humble yourself long term
Favourite operating systems: Hyperbola Devuan OpenBSD Gnuinos
Peace Be With us All!
Offline
My description of Gnome as "bloated" appears to have triggered some folks. I do not have a dog in that fight, although I *have* sometimes been surprised at the number of dependencies that will get pulled in if I install something connected to Gnome.
To try to shed some light on this I searched DDG for Is Gnome bloated. The answer appears to be 'yes':
Search Assist
Yes, GNOME is often considered bloated, as it includes a large number of applications and features that some users find unnecessary, leading to performance issues and a cluttered experience.
Medium
forum.level1techs.com
I am happy to leave others more qualified than me to scrap over the reasonableness of the statement.
Offline