The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#1 2022-07-06 23:28:51

ndavilam
Member
Registered: 2020-07-11
Posts: 21  

[SOLVED] Synaptic Daedalus

What happened with package synaptic in daedalus?

I remember that this package did exist in the daedalus repositories.

Offline

#2 2022-07-07 00:14:59

golinux
Administrator
Registered: 2016-11-25
Posts: 3,137  

Re: [SOLVED] Synaptic Daedalus

It is currently in ceres so could still be included in daedalus or daedalus backports before it is officially released.

https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/poli … c&x=submit

Offline

#3 2022-07-07 05:45:19

Head_on_a_Stick
Member
From: London
Registered: 2019-03-24
Posts: 3,125  
Website

Re: [SOLVED] Synaptic Daedalus

It's back already. Apparently it was removed from testing on 2022-06-25 then added back this morning:

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/synaptic

Not sure why it was removed but it was an automatic operation:

https://tracker.debian.org/news/1339850 … m-testing/

EDIT: yet another indication of the superior usability of unstable compared to testing. The OP should probably at least add the ceres sources to pull from if critical system components are needed in future; testing can stay broken for a while sometimes.

https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debi … le_literal

Last edited by Head_on_a_Stick (2022-07-07 06:07:29)


Brianna Ghey — Rest In Power

Offline

#4 2022-07-07 17:51:17

thierrybo
Member
Registered: 2017-11-11
Posts: 107  

Re: [SOLVED] Synaptic Daedalus

Yes this is strange, because this should be the reverse normally, unstable broken and packages causing the error blocked in testing.
By the way three years now running testing, the only real issue I had is one time NVidia proprietary dkms drivers not building. And thee freeze period :-)

Offline

#5 2022-07-07 23:28:17

ndavilam
Member
Registered: 2020-07-11
Posts: 21  

Re: [SOLVED] Synaptic Daedalus

Thank you for your answers

Offline

#6 2022-07-08 01:27:07

brocashelm
Member
Registered: 2020-06-29
Posts: 112  

Re: [SOLVED] Synaptic Daedalus

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

EDIT: yet another indication of the superior usability of unstable compared to testing. The OP should probably at least add the ceres sources to pull from if critical system components are needed in future; testing can stay broken for a while sometimes.

https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debi … le_literal

I agree. I haven't changed back to stable for the past two years. It helps to have firsthand experience with GNU/Linux before taking this route, but I've had very little worries at most. Bugs get fixed much quicker because of active development at hand.

Offline

Board footer