You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2016-12-07 22:27:26
- ralph.ronnquist
- Administrator
- From: Battery Point, Tasmania, AUS
- Registered: 2016-11-30
- Posts: 1,251
[SPLIT] URL post limitations
@golinux maybe it's a good idea to prohibit posts to hold direct links until the user has built up a sufficient "credentials", e.g. by having taken part in a handful of threads, or something?
Offline
#2 2016-12-07 22:54:22
- Chanku
- Moderator
- Registered: 2016-11-25
- Posts: 29
Re: [SPLIT] URL post limitations
Just a quick context note. The above post was apart of another thread in which a spam thread was created that had a link. As such this response was/is a suggestion to limit the ability of users to post URLs until a certain time.
Offline
#3 2016-12-07 23:07:25
- Chanku
- Moderator
- Registered: 2016-11-25
- Posts: 29
Re: [SPLIT] URL post limitations
Also I'm going to go ahead and double post here really quick. As far as I can tell that can not be done on the forums without modifications to the code of the forums that we may have to do ourselves.
Offline
#4 2016-12-07 23:41:34
- Malinas
- Member
- Registered: 2016-12-07
- Posts: 6
Re: [SPLIT] URL post limitations
Please don't restrict the new users in any way, people coming here for help will be frustrated if they can't for instance post a link to an online dump of a log file. Others would game the system just to access these privileges (see for instance the bad example of stack overflow).
I think that measures should be taken at the source first, i.e. making the registration process a tad more difficult for bots.
Offline
#5 2016-12-07 23:45:35
- golinux
- Administrator
- Registered: 2016-11-25
- Posts: 3,316
Re: [SPLIT] URL post limitations
Malinas . . . we're working on that. We've only had about half a dozen spam posts since we went online because we're nuking spam registrations with a fury! The registration process will be upgraded hopefully soon.
Online
Pages: 1
