Good place for comprehensive reports. The ISO build team sends its "thanks!".

I don't know much about this, but my first guess would be that X is actually started via the Xorg.wrap program, which has its configuration file at /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config, and this has a line

allowed_users=console

that probably should be different.

My suggestion comes from the shallow investigation:

find /usr -perm /u=s

followed by some guess work, which made me look at man Xorg.wrap.

HTH

That same thing happens for me with the (forthcoming) beowulf installation on qemu, but this recovers by using ctrl-alt-f2 for an alternate login. Maybe it's the same for you?

@Eaglet,
you might want to read man hwclock more carefullly, and then pay special attention to the documentation of the --show option, which clearly states, in so many words:

The options --utc and --localtime are for you to tell about time basis of your clock. The program then presents the clock reading in ISO 8601 format local time with respect to that basis.

Thanks @Head_on_a_Stick.

Yes, it would be nice to have a built-in option. As is, one has to resort to manual output filtering, e.g. by adding

 | sed "/^  /{s/\\b /\n  /g}"

to the command. That merely "pretty-prints" and doesn't provide the version details.

hmm; don't you think the silent "non-" could be confusing for a casual visitor ?

I think synclient has an option to disable the "TouchPad" - see man synaptics. Though that might be co-joined with the nipple as well.

It's a good observation. The ISO sets of 2.0.0 and 2.1 where produced in different ways, and obviosuly the 2.1 method is somewhat lacking in care. A re-release of the latter would indeed be a good thing.

thanks,

Ralph.

ah right. I'm still in the ipv4 universe. lucky me

EDIT:

"onefang", who does ipv6 in his sleep, suggests that there probably are some networking issues at the client end, and that an investigation with traceroute, or traceroute6 I suppose, might tell something.

When your SSL client says the above, most likely the actual response from dev1galaxy is (in clear text):

Your IP address has been tagged as dubious. If this is in error,
please contact dev1galaxy forum adminstrators on #d1g-users at freenode.

Like many/most forum sites, dev1galaxy includes a couple of attempted barriers against spam and unwanted intrusions, which results in IP addresses becoming tagged as "dubious". Due to being fully automated, it sometimes (but rarely) makes a false positive judgement, and then it requires some corrective hands-on.

Perhaps it's worth trying an extlinux boot rather than grub. There's an excellent instruction for this at https://wiki.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=EXTLINUX, and in general it involves 3 steps:

1. install the extlinux package

2. run its boot loader installer (which replaces grub's boot loader on MBR)

3. prepare the boot configuration for your system

Notionally it follows the same procedure as a grub boot; that the boot loader loads the configuration file, which points out where the kernel and initrd are found, and then it runs that kernel. The differences between them are probably plenty in the nitty-gritty, most of which I don't know anything about.

For your system, I think the configuration file /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf could be along the lines of

DEFAULT Devuan
SAY Now booting Devuan using exlinux just like Ralph said...
LABEL Devuan
    KERNEL /vmlinuz
    APPEND ro root=/dev/sda1 initrd=/initrd.img vga=auto nomodeset

Check out https://wiki.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=Config for details and extras. Note that I dropped in a nomodeset kernel boot parameter just for illustration.

extlinux and grub are alternative bootstrap solutions, and while you may have them both installed in the sense of their software and configurations residing on the file system, the one whose boot loader gets installed to MBR (i.e., disk block zero) is the ruling one, and you may as well purge the one you are not using. As always with these things, some people prefer the one and others prefer the other, and many people don't care either way as long as it works.

Final note: the installation disk probably uses extlinux.