The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#26 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] deb.devuan.org doesn't respond » 2024-09-12 11:36:40

Andre4freedom wrote:

Using deb.rr.devuan.org works perfectly well, as do all (most) other mirrors as well.
deb.devuan.org remains blocking, wondering why.

Try this and reply with the result:

nslookup deb.devuan.org

#27 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] deb.devuan.org doesn't respond » 2024-09-11 22:14:29

I just checked to see if it's being blocked at the DNS level, and there's no problem here.

$ nslookup deb.devuan.org
Server:		192.168.4.1
Address:	192.168.4.1#53

Non-authoritative answer:
deb.devuan.org	canonical name = deb.rr.devuan.org.
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 131.188.12.211
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 147.78.194.22
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 195.85.215.180
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 103.146.168.12
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 95.216.15.86
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 200.236.31.1
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 46.4.50.2
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 130.225.254.116
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 141.84.43.19
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 190.64.49.124
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 160.16.137.156
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 185.178.192.43
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 198.58.118.8
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 125.228.189.120
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 94.16.114.15
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 185.236.240.103
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 106.178.112.231
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 5.161.180.234
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 67.219.104.166
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 202.61.197.17
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 185.183.113.131
;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode.
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2800:a8:c001::a
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2001:e42:102:1704:160:16:137:156
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2a03:4000:28:24c::
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2a0d:eb00:8006::acab
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 240b:10:f00:1b00::240
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2a01:4ff:f0:dd3a::1
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2401:c080:2000:229e:4b70:fe82:36ed:f788
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2a03:4000:59:123:68cc:97ff:fee1:c81
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2001:638:a000:1021:21::1
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2a0a:e5c0:10:3::6eeb
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2a01:9e40::180
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2407:b6c0::12
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2a01:4f9:2a:fa9::2
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2801:82:80ff:8000::2
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2a01:4f8:140:1102:2b76:955d:b48f:bdf3
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2001:878:346::116
Name:	deb.rr.devuan.org
Address: 2001:4ca0:4300::1:19

Try using deb.rr.devuan.org instead.

#28 Re: Other Issues » Disappearing files » 2024-09-04 19:24:00

Maybe, but I don't think so. I've never seen any error messages when running rsnapshot. I don't run it using cron, I use a script that I wrote so, unless I am mistaken, I believe that I would have seen any error messages if there had been any.

You did give me an idea, though. I am going to create a test file and then delete it after a week or two. That should allow me to determine whether rsnapshot is working correctly.

#30 Re: DIY » USB Stick, File Size > 4GB » 2024-09-03 11:15:07

delgado wrote:

Found some information on Paragon's "ntfs3" driver, e.g. https://forum.manjaro.org/t/how-to-enable-ntfs3/86049/4

$ cat /boot/config-6.9.12-amd64 | grep -i ntfs3
# CONFIG_NTFS3_FS is not set

Means recompiling the kernel to enable it.

If it turns out that you absolutely must use NTFS, then I recommend using a Liquorix kernel. According to my research, ntfs-3g is enabled in Liquorix kernels.

See: https://liquorix.net/

#31 Re: DIY » USB Stick, File Size > 4GB » 2024-09-02 22:22:14

It sounds like that TV box may be running a very old version of Linux, in which case it may only support the older filesystems. Try formatting the USB stick as XFS and, if that doesn't work, try ext2.

#32 Re: DIY » USB Stick, File Size > 4GB » 2024-09-02 10:12:50

Use GParted and format the drive as exFAT. Before doing this, make sure that exfatprogs is installed.

#33 Re: Other Issues » Disappearing files » 2024-09-01 13:47:26

Thanks for the reply.

Andre4freedom wrote:

And: tools that sync or snpashot filesystems for backup, can delete files in the backup volume if the file is no longer present in the source filesystem. Check the options.

Yes, I know that, but that is not the case here. I am using rsnapshot, which creates daily, weekly, and monthly backups. Since the monthly backups cover the previous year, even if the file had been deleted from recent backups, it should still be in one or more of the older backups. The only exception to that (that I can think of) would be if the file had been deleted shortly after it was created. And I can say with certainty that such a scenario does not apply to two of the three or four files that have disappeared, including the most recent one.

#34 Other Issues » Disappearing files » 2024-08-30 21:45:55

pcalvert
Replies: 7

Has anyone else had files mysteriously disappear? When I do research on a new topic, I create a text file for it. The file includes things like snippets of text, URLs, and keywords that I used to find the information. Since 2020, at least three or four of these files have mysteriously disappeared. For example, earlier in the year I created a file on fifth-generation warfare (aka, 5GW). Recently, I found some new information that I wanted to add to it, but the file was nowhere to be found. I'm not sure if it's relevant, but the file was located on a partition that I formatted as ext3.

I just remembered something else that's a little spooky. The file was backed up, using rsnapshot, to a second HDD. It disappeared from the backup drive as well.

#35 Re: Installation » Install from Ventoy » 2024-08-09 03:53:47

In case anyone prefers to use Ventoy, I believe that I used Ventoy to install Daedalus-based Refracta on a Lenovo notebook. That being the case, I suspect that the Devuan desktop-live ISO, and maybe the Devuan minimal-live ISO, would also work.

#36 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Falkon browser not up-to-date » 2024-07-15 02:59:21

I've known for several years now that some of the web browsers packaged for Debian Stable are not kept up to date, and are therefore not safe to use. Firefox ESR and (to a lesser extent) Chromium are the only two that I know are definitely kept up to date.

I would install Falkon on Devuan using Flatpak. You can see here that there's a package for it on Flathub:

https://flathub.org/apps/org.kde.falkon

Another possible way to install Falkon is via the Nix package manager. I'm sure that there are other ways to install an up-to-date Falkon on Devuan, but those two are the ones I would focus on.

#37 Off-topic » End-to-End Encryption (E2E) is Dead » 2024-06-27 15:12:27

pcalvert
Replies: 8

This is definitely bad news.

End-to-End Encryption (E2E) is Dead. Killed By New Tech.
https://rumble.com/v52cc3w-end-to-end-e … tech..html

#38 Re: Installation » Install from Ventoy » 2024-05-20 10:48:07

As I pointed out in the past, the problem is with Ventoy and not Devuan. Ventoy uses a "hacky" method to perform its "magic", and the result of this is a solution that is not very robust.

Here's what the developer of the Limine bootloader had to say about Ventoy:

“Limine is not Ventoy, nor does it try to be. I am not a fan of Ventoy as I think it is a terrible hack (because it needs to support each and every single OS (Linux, FreeBSD...) individually. For example, it needs to load its own kernel modules for various OSes in order to add "virtual drives" since ISO files aren't really made to show up to the OS kernel as separate drives).”

Source:
https://forum.puppylinux.com/viewtopic. … 699#p88699

#39 Re: Other Issues » EML / MHT Files Convert to RTF: Help Required » 2024-05-14 06:41:55

Have you tried opening them with Chromium? I just tried opening an MHT file in Firefox, but it didn't work; however, Firefox suggested using Chromium so I tried that and it worked.

#40 Re: Devuan » liblzma CVE-2024-3094 » 2024-04-08 16:08:25

nahkhiirmees wrote:

Maybe moving on to Alpine becomes a good idea.

I think it's worth considering. At the very least, you could install Alpine in a VM in order to become more familiar with it. That's what I'm planning to do. Even if I don't use it as my main OS, I may still use it for some other purpose.

#41 Re: Devuan » this morning... » 2024-04-05 06:39:57

Debian has KTechlab. See: ktechlab.

Another one is Simulide.

Scan this list for additional possibilities: circuit simulator.

#43 Re: Off-topic » What are you reading/want to read ? » 2024-03-27 07:21:21

Blood Money by Peter Schweizer. It was just released late last month. I'm going to try to get my local library to order a copy.

I ordered used copies of two of his older books yesterday. I'll read those while I'm waiting for my library to purchase a copy of his latest book.

#44 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » A devuan wiki page on virt-manager » 2024-03-16 22:39:17

I have never used virt-manager. I tried using about a year ago, but quickly became annoyed with it and gave up. Since it is unnecessary and I can use QEMU without it, that is my current preference. I only mention that because some people seem to think that using virt-manager is a requirement.

#46 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Beowulf to Chimaera - precautions II » 2024-03-11 00:48:31

Did you try connman, like I suggested here?:

https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=48061#p48061

If not, now would be a good time to do so.

#47 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Beowulf to Chimaera - precautions » 2024-03-05 19:35:17

Altoid wrote:

If I were to go ahead, I will need to make a foolproof image of my system drive, a Kingston 120Gb SSD.

Although there are a number of ways to accomplish this, I prefer to use Clonezilla. To use Clonezilla, you would need to boot to a live CD/DVD/USB system that (preferably) comes with Clonezilla. Refracta is a good choice for this. For good measure, you could also make a second backup using FSArchiver.

It would also be prudent to make separate additional backups of /etc and /home using an archiver utility like tar.

Altoid wrote:

Is disks ie: gnome-disk-utility 3.30.2 up to the task?

No.

#48 Re: Other Issues » [SOLVED] Intermittent Network Disconnections » 2024-02-28 03:49:00

@Ron,

Do you happen to have an eero router? Those things are notorious for this. In my experience, on Windows 10 the problem is very bad. I'll click on the Connect button, and it will connect after a considerable delay. But then, very often, it will disconnect immediately or within a minute or so. The problem is bad enough that when I run Windows Update I plug an Ethernet cable into the laptop and don't even bother with Wi-Fi. So far, on Devuan the problem has been nonexistent for me; however, I don't use Devuan with Wi-Fi very often, so the problem may still be there but with much less severity compared to Windows.

#49 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » Wer synchronisiert die Systemuhr? » 2024-02-25 10:41:58

On my Chimaera-based Refracta system, the responsible program is ntpdate.

$ whereis ntpdate
ntpdate: /usr/sbin/ntpdate /usr/share/man/man8/ntpdate.8.gz

#50 Re: Freedom Hacks » Securing my/our computer systems » 2024-02-19 04:10:36

zapper wrote:

Don't take that person's opinions seriously.

This person thinks that proprietary software is more secure then open source or if you prefer more secure than libre software.

Point being,  a bunch of empty air. tongue

An example:

https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/linux.html

Windows is not ahead of linux in any security focused way. Quite the opposite... which this page lies about.

I don't agree with you. It's very clear from this person's writings that he is very knowledgeable about matters of computer security.

You misrepresent what this person wrote. He never claims that Windows is more secure than GNU/Linux. What he does is provide numerous examples showing that other operating systems, including Windows, are making progress addressing different security issues, while Linux is basically standing still. And when he talks about Linux, it appears to me that he is really only talking about kernel development.

I sometimes use Windows 10 because some useful software runs only on Windows (and sometimes MacOS as well). Because it's a proprietary OS, I don't really trust it -- I believe that the likelihood of built-in backdoors is high. As such, it only gets access to the internet when it's absolutely necessary. However, in its defence, Windows 10 has built-in security features (most disabled by default) that allow me to lock it down so tightly that any unknown program that gets onto the system will be blocked and will not run. I wish that I could do the same on GNU/Linux, but so far I have not found any simple, easy way to replicate that behavior on Linux.

Getting back to Linux, one of Madaiden's recommendations is to use Alpine Linux. That seems like very good advice to me. Alpine Linux has no systemd, uses musl instead of libc, and all userland binaries are compiled as Position Independent Executables (PIE) with stack smashing protection. Unfortunately, it does not appear to be a good choices for novices.

Board footer

Forum Software