You are not logged in.
The two rules of success:
1) Don't tell everything that you know.
Shin: (n.) A device for finding furniture in the dark.
Bare foot: (n.) A device for locating thumb tack on the floor.
Question: How many guacas are in 1 guacamole?
Answer: 6.022×10²³, also known as Avocado's Number.
🤣
Kid 1: How do you spell "wrong"?
Kid 2: R-O-N-G.
Kid 1: No, that's wrong.
Kid 2: No, it's right because I spelled wrong!
How many Java programmers does it take to change a light bulb?
None; they just tell the light bulb to do it!
Roman numerals are difficult; but when you get to 159, it just CLIX!
Why ask rhetorical questions?
So are staircases. They're always up to something!
golinux muses that Devuan has the best jokes in great numbers
That may be so, but I haven't seen anything groundbreaking yet. I suggest we get a more accurate reading using a sighsmograph.
A piece of toast is a lot like the sun. It rises in the yeast, and settles in the waist.
Chinese takeout: $8
Tip: $2
Getting home and finding out they forgot part of your order: riceless
Did you know that in Israel the biggest ant always takes the lead in the ant colony? That's because it's the Aleph ant.
Please keep the jokes coming.
Q: Why do people in Finland stay home in winter?
A: For happiness -- from all the indoor Finns.
I checked out your Help Devuan link, but didn't see anything specific that I might be able to help with. No bugs to report, not sure how exactly one might contribute packages or host a mirror. Would be nice if there was a constantly updated page detailing the highest priority items to be done, and how exactly to get started on it.
I do try to answer questions on this forum when I can, but generally my environment is so radically different from most people's that I'm rarely able to actually help.
Posting jokes is low-effort whereas actually contributing takes a little more effort. 😢
Recently, I decided to take up fencing.
My neighbour, however, insists that I put it back...
Why did the train go off the rails?
Because it had a loco motive...
Wife: Honey, I'm not going to work tomorrow.
Husband: Why not? What happened?
Wife: I just can't go back there anymore after what my boss said to me today.
Husband: What did he say? Did he say something inappropriate?
Wife: He said, "You're fired!"
🤦
A couple is at the counselor's office seeking help with their marriage problems.
Counselor: Can you describe your situation?
Husband: Well, we were happy for 25 years...
Counselor: Then what happened?
Wife: Then we met.
🤦
If you're suffering from depression, there's at least one thing you don't have to worry about: flat tires. Because you'll always have despair!
Did you read the new novel about the hurricane and the tornado? The story ends with a twist!
Tennis players often have trouble with relationships. Love means nothing to them!
See, this is the crux of the problem: most people don't care about securing their WiFi router because that takes effort. And when something takes effort, the incentive is to do nothing except the default. Which will be insecure, because secure by default also means inconvenience, and manufacturers want maximum convenience in order to make more sales.
In the old days it took effort to hook up a device for online access. These days every toaster and its manufacturer's cool gadget actively want to be hooked up, with their corresponding apps automating most of the setup process. Why do people install these apps? Why do they agree to enter the WiFi password to connect the device online? Because part of the "cool features" of the IoT device they just splurged on depends on it. And nobody's gonna want to not use features they just ostensibly spent money on. So they will gladly enter Wi-Fi passwords for devices that they don't even know why it needs to have online access, because doing so lets them oh so cool control the gadget from their phones oh yeah!
Me, I'd never purchase anything that asks for online access that doesn't need to be. Nor input any password to some dumb device that I'm not confident doesn't have a ton of unpatched security holes from who knows how many years ago. But guess what's the percentage of the population that I represent? Probably some infinitesimal number. 😆 Nobody but geeks like us even know what the issue is, let alone care enough to do something about it. 99.9% of the world is insecure by default. Ignorance and apathy will be humanity's downfall, but who cares? 🤣
Anyway none of this really actually matters in this conversation. The only reason I brought this up was to point out the futility of this or that privacy concern while losing sight of the larger context of things. Security or privacy in isolation means nothing. You're just plugging one hole in a cheese grater. You need to consider the entire picture, instead of focusing on just one small point while so many other things defeat your purpose even before you began.
@zapper: how certain are you that they haven't already accessed your files?
The best hackers are not the ones you read about in the news, the ones who are careless enough to leave traces and get caught. The ones you really should be afraid of are the ones who infiltrate your system, copy data off it, and then wipe out all traces of their presence and leave your machine in pristine state, such that you wouldn't even know they had broken in at all.
Have you ever noticed your network interface blinking busily when you're not even using your computer? Do you know where that network traffic is coming from? Do you know which process(es) are triggering this traffic? Are you sure the process isn't compromised? Do you know what exactly is being transmitted? Perhaps your files have already been uploaded to some basement server in Algeria and are right now being auctioned in the black market.
We're not even talking about Kernighan-level of surreptitious compiler compromise yet. Or hardware level backdoors, which are impossible to detect from software, needless to say naked eye inspection which tells you nothing. You say use only open source software, but have you personally reviewed every line of code to ascertain whether there's malicious stuff in it? What if your compiler is already backdoored? Or your hardware?
As long as you're online, there's a non-zero chance that your data is already compromised. The moment you hooked up to the internet, privacy is no longer guaranteed. It's as simple as that.
(Actually, in these days of IoT devices that come built in with WiFi connectors and other phone-home devices, you can't even be sure about privacy anymore even if you didn't personally connect your devices online: they can and do automatically connect themselves. One of my son's stuffed teddy bears came with a built-in Wi-Fi interface that I didn't even know existed until someone managed to download a custom voice clip into it. It's only a small step from this to a toy that contains a hidden microphone and transmitter that uploads your conversations to some unknown server somewhere out there. Still think privacy isn't dead?)
Yes it was a tpyo. 😉
I fixed it, but I guess a little too late. As Calvin once said, verbing weirds language. 🤣