You are not logged in.
I just realized that Devuan could *probably* use the .install files to create shim packages. Basically its own fork of the systemd package that *only* builds portions that work without systemd and aren't directly tied to it. Kind of like elogind. *kind of...* still at the mercy of upstream, though.
@Carolina In My Mind
Way ahead of you. I currently run a thinkpad t430s, have been almost a year. Its the fact that a laptop built in 2022 and cost almost a grand couldn't be worth a damn that I was really aggravated about. For me the main thing is the touchpad. So big, bulky, and buttonless...its a pain in the ass to use.
Something that has been on my mind for the last 3-4 years, now. Wondering if maybe its just me...
Does anyone else seem to notice that laptops these days just don't last, and are poorly designed? Its like build quality has gone down significantly over the years. Prime example: I bought a Lenovo Legion 5 circa December 2022, and within 4 months the rubber feet on it were peeling off and the adhesive got *everywhere*. Worse still, lenovo doesn't sell kits to fix this, so its just stuck with exposed plastic pegs that scrape against every surface this thing sits on and makes it hard for the laptop to stay planted at an angle (ie. a podium).
Worse still, those "buttonless" touchpads that do not have separated mouse buttons are a PAIN to use. So often I would go to open a tab in firefox, and find myself having accidentally closed the current one because my finger was on that "sweet spot' between the left button and right button areas. It got to the point that I *refused* to use that laptop without a mouse, because the touchpad was getting in the way of being able to work. After a certain point, I was carrying so many accessories just to compensate for the lack of ports and physical shortcomings of this thing that I may as well have been using a tower with a battery.
Is it just me? Am I just unlucky, or are there others who have had the same experience?...
For those who don't like reading past headlines...
For now though the systemd-boot support in the Debian Installer is limited to the expert mode. But with time it may be expanded to show by default, after sufficient testing as well as getting the UEFI Secure Boot integration ironed out. The plan though is for GRUB to remain the default bootloader of Debian.
It very explicitly says that there are no plans for it to be the default. Many architectures and platforms Debian is installed on couldn't even *use* systemd-boot, because they do not have UEFI. They're improving support for something, whoopty-do...besides, wasn't there a discussion a while back about making a standalone package in Devuan for it? I seem to recall doing a bit of research on that at one point...
'Sides, by the time things progress to the point that its all UEFI-only, I'm pretty sure most legacy-only machines will either be dead, dying, or too weak to handle a modern linux installation and still be reasonably useful. Hell, even the Kernel is reaching a critical mass at this point...
Of all the things to worry about right now (*cough* Windows Recall *cough*), this is the least of them
@golinux
Maybe we should train an AI on all yours and the other mod's responses over the years, call it GoGPT, and set it loose on the forums. Anytime weird, incoherent messes like this come up, it does the janitor work for you! XD
In seriousness though, all of these posts like this read like a poorly-trained natural language model. I hope people haven't figured out how to get bots like that on these forums...else the Dead Internet Theory is alive and well.
@mrnhmath may I suggest...codeberg?
If I understood correctly, I was told on another forums, that Debian kernel in the future may lack support for non UEFI mode of booting?
@Bimon can you elaborate on this? Maybe share a source?
@GlennW This is because you need to do one of two things, which I completely forgot to add to the above:
In order to NOT have issues with the untrusted CDROM source (Neither Debian nor Devuan can furnish release files in them, it would be pointless since they are static), you have to do one of the following...
When you update with apt, do
sudo apt update --allow-insecure-repositories
OR, alternatively, in /etc/apt/sources.list, change the cdrom entry from
deb cdrom_source_name daedalus main
to
deb [trusted=yes] cdrom_source_name daedalus main
I hope this helps! It will not cover all of your packages if you installed something outside of the CDROM from chimaera, but even if you only use this in conjunction with internet access on the actual daedalus repos, it can STILL save you trouble by not having to waste bandwidth on the packages you already have stored on the CDROM.
I should also mention that the above about saving bandwidth is also applicable to the server and netinstall ISO's, you can use those too!
While you cannot directly boot the CDROM and upgrade with it, you CAN upgrade your packages to a limited extent with it.
The following assumes you have the 4.5GB Desktop ISO, and that you have NOT added packages beyond what was available in Chimaera's Desktop ISO.
(I am putting this here in the hopes that others who look at this may find it helpful in some way)
Run the following:
sudo apt-cdrom add
from here, you will be prompted to insert the DVD into the DVD drive, at this point you should do so. If it is NOT on a DVD, but rather a flash drive, you need to open another terminal and run the following BEFORE proceeding further with apt-cdrom:
sudo mount /dev/(your usb) /media/cdrom
if that directory does not exist, create it with:
sudo mkdir /media/cdrom
and then mount the usb. Go back to the terminal that has apt-cdrom running, and press enter.
By this point, apt-cdrom will likely register the CDROM. From here, do:
sudo nano /etc/apt/sources.list
and ensure ALL Chimaera sources are disabled. After finishing with nano, and saving the new sources.list, run:
sudo apt update && sudo apt dist-upgrade
and look over what all will be upgraded and/or removed. If all looks good, you can press enter to proceed. From there, your system should upgrade, and once complete, a simple reboot will be sufficient to boot into your new Daedalus system.
This is the first I've seen of any real experimentation with s6 beyond GNUinos, this should be pretty interesting...maybe someday it'll be solid enough to upstream to Devuan? That'd be cool.
@golinux Those images are only good up to the Raspberry Pi 4 last I looked.
To the OP, The raspberry Pi 5 *shouldn't* need any special firmware anymore to boot, its all stored on the on-board ROM now. So, potentially, the RPi4 image should/could work, though performance may not be optimal without a kernel built specially for the board.
NVIDIA has historically not played nice with suspend. I have an old T61p that has NVIDIA graphics, and it doesn't suspend correctly, either.
if the xfce4 metapackage doesn't bring that in, you may want to file a bug report with Debian. IIRC Devuan doesn't modify that package from upstream.
Responsible behaviour based on a foundation of mutual respect is expected from visitors to this forum.
I second this version
check under /etc/modprobe.d and see if anything has blacklisted the pcspkr module
Very disappointed with the direction Ubuntu is moving in.
My first distro was Ubuntu 18.04. I have fond memories of her, genuinely, and i owe what I know today to that first experience. But alas, it also made me understand why systemd was so terrible, and regarding Ubuntu she has gone down the shitter the last two major releases. Its a sad, sad state.
As of now the only thing that would need to be provided by a downstream distro is the kernel, as it seems. But time will tell how bad the damage will be, Trixie still hasn't even been released.
This has been discussed before:
https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=4131
Would be amazing if you forked mint-menu (AKA MATE Advanced Menu) or brisk-menu as well, to go alongside her. She'd be unstoppable then! And it wouldn't have that awful regression where mint-menu can no longer have a custom icon.
^I'd just like to pitch in to the above and add, so does Void Linux
@aluma sometimes *a* carton of cigarettes, depending on where you look. You have a good point, for sure. And of course, nothing lasts forever. I keep my i386 machines around in order to have the tooling necessary to do data recovery and other things on other i386 machines that pass by me from various people. But, there again, do I really need the latest and greatest just for that? Its not as if installs from yore aren't still on some level inter-operable with modern installs, when push comes to shove, even in a post-sysv and post-x11 world.
I guess, deep down, its just a worry in the back of my mind that Debian will go the way of Ubuntu (snaps, etc.). I know that's highly unlikely, as it would be the ultimate identity death of Debian, but the thought still scares me.
I suppose this was bound to happen eventually, but admittedly I was not expecting this to happen this quickly. The last 686 CPUs were released in 2006, and the latter-day ones I have are still reasonably capable for their age...
Interestingly, having read the actual Debian announcement, they do not plan to make it a partial architecture like Ubuntu does -that's up to the package maintainers themselves. And from the sound of it, i386 could also possibly get relegated to the Ports branch. With this in mind, I feel like *maybe* some more-determined distros could continue i386 support at least for Trixie, depending on how bad things get between now and release. Best (read: highly unlikely) case scenario, all they need to supply is a kernel. Not a difficult task, by any means. More Likely case scenario: quite a few packages will bite the dust between now and then, and would need to be re-compiled, if they still can be. I get a feeling the browsers will be the first to go. the feasibility of such an endeavor goes back to the question of: What's the damage gonna be, come release time?
As long as the Init Diversity Team isn't abolished, and Snaps don't become the new default in Debian, we should be ok for now. Though it might be time for Devuan to give a bit more love to its other ports, in i386s' place...
GNOME is near-fully functional as of Daedalus, KDE has been for a while. I have used KDE with wayland on Devuan before, and at the very least on my Thinkpad T430s, it hasn't been an issue. I don't foresee your AMD GPU being an issue, but I'm not sure. Isn't ROCM also used for AI acceleration?
Anyone seriously interested in engaging with Devuan should monitor those sources. It is that simple.
Don't forget http://deb.devuan.org/bannedpackages.txt , so people have a sense of what packages might be worth making compatibility packages/patches for
@WDstudios God, I miss the Aero era...didn't have the Fischer-price coloring of XP, but didn't have the sterile and soulless theme of windows 10 either. It had life! KDE can mimic this somewhat, with oxygen, but its still not even close to perfect....XFCE with Bluebird is a little bit better, IMO