You are not logged in.
After the initial confusion I managed to regain access to the actual email accounts by re-entering credentials. But, the recovery account is still unavailable. When the problem first hit I wasn't reading carefully. Not sure if the error messages were the same for all accounts. But with this one Thunderbird is currently saying it cannot get a 'secure connection' and to inform the site owners. Looks like a CERTIFICATE error on a major email provider? Bizarre. Well, if only Yahoo had some sort of service contacts for real people...
But this is still baffling. Why would this occur only for certain accounts? The other two are working fine now. No inability to form a secure connection. Do they really host different accounts on different servers?
In any case, a mistake like that on major provider is really concerning.
Yeah, I do the same. At least for desktops. I have a separate Wifi server for laptops only, and only turn it on to update them so they are ready to go into the field.
The rest of the time, it stays off and this is a Wifi free house.
Sometime in the last few hours, as I checked email this morning, I have been locked out of all my Yahoo Mail accounts. Is this another one of those "configuration changes" that requires messing with server settings? Why wasn't there any notice, if so? Or has Yahoo gotten aggressive about forcing people to use their preferred access methods?
DNS spoofing is one use of the new attack(s). There are several and some applications are discussed in the article.
Incoming security issue. A whole new set of attacks has been discovered that can affect nearly any public Wifi network.
AirSnitch Breaks Wiki Encryption in Homes and Offices
I rarely use Wifi at all. But I'm now wondering if Stubby actually works in Devuan 6 yet? Or is it still in 'development'? That's one possible useful defense. Or a full VPN. Which I guess I ought to learn to configure. ![]()
Listening to audio files in VLC, if I click on the desktop AT ALL, an icon or empty space, the sound gets turned off. I can look at the player and see the audio is still being played. And VLC itself doesn't show the sound as being muted. Nor does the sound control of the toolbar. But the sound is OFF. I cannot fix it without completely closing VLC and starting it again.
WTF is happening?
LOL... this thread has gone off the rails.
But the first few replies raise some interesting issues. Yes, I have Lutris on the system(s) I am currently using. One is Devuan 5, the other is MX Linux 23.6, and both have games. So this is a quirk of Lutris? Here's the addition problem then. When I accidentally click on the Windows notepad entry that appears in some 'choose what to open this with' dialogs, I get a pop up telling me that the Wine config in one of those game directories is being 'reconfigured' and there is a ridiculous amount of disk thrashing. I have to wait a full minute or more for the mistaken choice to pop up so I can kill it. And then when I go to run that game, I get a similar pop up and a similar amount of disk thrashing before the game will load. Could that be WHY the developers of Lutris chose to do what they did? Does Wine "reconfigure" its files for every program that you start with it? That would be very annoying. I can see why they have the separate prefixes and directories if that is how it behaves.
And now I can confirm that installer doesn't work. I'll have to try again with this 'hot fix' some other day. But what an annoying glitch in a supposed official release!
Though there are many good things in Linux, not everything is completely/perfectly duplicated from the Windows ecosystem. Nice utilities like IrfanView, for example. In the process of trying to figure out how to move completely to Linux, I am finding an annoying problem. As it currently works, wine makes a completely separate custom installation for each and every Windows program you want to accommodate. Why is this? Some sort of technical limitation? It threatens to make a real mess in the user account if you want to bring over a dozen utilities or more. Why couldn't you have a single 'virtual windows' install with many utilities running in the same directory with the same virtual windows files? (Is this maybe a specialized question for the wine developers? Where could I ask them this question directly?)
Cinnamon is the one I have favored. It's most like the "standard" interface on Windows for a long time -- before the attempt to make desktops function like tablets (8.0 / 8.1) and then the switch to forcing everyone to use a kiosk full of advertising (10/11). It's great to hear that I can just install that and not have any of the buggy Poettering poo on my system.
It sounds to me like GKrellm should be looking in sysfs if it does not. How long since it was updated? Maybe it's time for someone to hack it? ![]()
What's the status of Excalibur / 6 in regards to pulse audio? Can you have a completely Poettering-free system with a default install? Or do you have to remove it from that as well? Has anyone done it yet and figured out how hard it is? Would the steps discussed here already work the same for the new version?
Well, does Gkrellm read from sysfs? If it can be configured to do that, it would solve a lot of problems I have had setting it up on various systems.
Hmm, an SSD is basically a very large USB stick. I guess it would heat up. I wonder if the internal temperature sensor is available through the interface? Does hddtemp work with SSDs? Or would you have to use some other utility to make the sensor available to GKrellm?
That's interesting. Now you're talking about the 'card' drives that don't even use SATA connectors. Power usage doesn't seem to be linear there, either.
Out of curiosity, I popped the cover on a laptop I have to see the tiny little HD. It's only got a 5v rating, and it's .55 amps. The motor must be running in the 5v feed along with the electronics. So now I'm really questioning whether SSDs are automatically less power hungry than spinning disks.
At least these disks I have already bought are intended for desktops. I just want the faster load times. But if I decide to get SSDs for my laptops, I will be shopping very carefully...
If it's drawing from BOTH 12v and 5v at the same time, yes, it would clearly use more power. It's not clear from the label that it does so. Those ratings could be for different modes or different power connections. It's been a while since I had to worry about HD power.
But now I have a new thing to check on SSDs. Another brand I got access to, PNY, shows only 1 amp for a 2TB SSD. Quite a difference from the Crucial, and for more storage. Hmm....
The SSD just gives a 5v rating, and that's 1.7 amps. It's a 1 TB model. All of the Western Digital spinning disks I own say 0.68 amps at 5 volts and 0.55 at 12 volts. These are either 1 TB or 2 TB models. So that power calculation doesn't seem to work out for these. Maybe it's something peculiar to this brand? I'll have to see if I can look at the labels of other SSDs somewhere. Maybe I can get a closeup on a website or see one in a store...
For a long time now I've been reading / hearing that SSDs use LESS power than old fashioned spinning disks. But today I happened to actually read the label on my Crucial BX500 SSDs and it says they can draw 1.7 amps!? The spinning drives I have are rated .48 to .55 amps. Is this a 'peak' vs 'average' usage thing? The SSD doesn't draw power when not being accessed but the drive with a motor has to be spinning all the time? Though I'm still puzzled that the SSD would have so much higher peak power draw...
This is sort of vague since it doesn't say exactly what is slower. But I can say there is a large difference in disk performance between Devuan and MX Linux, which is apparently much closer to Debian. I've got different disks that I plug in to the same machine, and when I am copying large files -- like the data files for games -- I can see the speed on my Gkrellm and it's literally twice as fast copying the files with MX Linux. Possibly something in the drivers that they had to alter in Devuan to completely remove that fake 'init' wrapper that is taking over everything. But MX Linux may have been able to leave in place since it's just trying to neutralize it without purging the system?
OK, I finally remembered to use the solution I found in certain threads. Disabling the automatic download of currency exchange rates does indeed solve the problem. It now loads and runs normally.
https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=441309
dconf write /org/gnome/calculator/refresh-interval 0It seems bizarre. Why did they do such a clumsy thing? Wasn't it easy to predict that the URL might be moved, or more likely, the owners of the website would notice the odd traffic and move it?
My printers are all ancient and suffering various problems. Rather than continue to struggle to keep them running, I am thinking of buying a newer printer. The one I favor, the Brother HL-L2400D is especially appealing for NOT having fancy networking options that just make it hackable. Wifi printers??? No. Just no.
But on researching it, one of the things I have learned is that there is no MacOS driver for this printer. That normally wouldn't be a concern since I don't own Apple hardware, except I thought Apple used the CUPS system like all other *nix based OSes? Do they? How would I check if there is a CUPS driver for this printer before buying one and plugging it into a computer running some flavor of Linux? I would hope there is a reference somewhere that can be checked?
This is just one aspect of the drive to lock down 'general purpose' computing. Remember, there is DRM functionality built into our CPUs since at least a decade ago. I forget when they started, but it's been there a while. Generation after generation of equipment, they add more of this stuff. The point is going to come where they can lock it down and the old stuff will be too far behind to be useful.
How much work is there on "Open Source BIOS" for lack of a better term? We will eventually need to be able to flash something new into our motherboards with fewer corporate control options.
I've setup the Devuan version of Peppermint OS, just to see what it's like. I installed Chrome because it seems to be necessary to access some sites. And when I start Chrome for the first time after a boot it wants a password for a keyring. When I installed Chrome on Devuan with XFCE, it also wanted a keyring and I couldn't get around it and couldn't run Chrome. Had to install with Cinnamon and then it was possible to get Chrome to run. Apparently it was something 'default' to Gnome, which Cinnamon is based on.
It looks like the people who setup Peppermint OS did something different. It is possible to get Chrome to run on XFCE by entering a password for the keyring. What do you suppose they did differently?
If it's a known issue it's something not linked to the word 'calculator' because nothing turns up. Could you possibly give me a pointer?
Here's a desktop app that doesn't get discussed much! ![]()
The default calculator in Daedalus just doesn't work. Any time I start it, it just freezes and I have to kill it. Not a really big deal since I usually install Galculator, and prefer that. But the default app gets launched by default when you push the calculator button on any MS sponsored keyboard. So I've seen it pop up a few times. And been puzzled that it's always unusable.
What could be wrong with it?