You are not logged in.
Peppermint OS
Devuan based option.
https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distr … peppermint
As I was unable to get system suspend to work with Daedalus (either with kde or xfce) despite several re-installations and it having worked under Chimaera I looked around and found that Peppermint is a distro which is based on either Debian or Devuan - your choice at installation. This seems a relatively recent development of Peppermint which was originally based on Ubuntu. This is called the 2023-07-01 version, which is obvioulsy its date.
It was a fairly smooth installation with a minimal set of packages, not even a browser, which suits me so I can choose things myself, but not beginner friendly. On the first try it stuffed everything except swap into a single partition despite my defining separate root and home, but I wiped and re-installed and realised I'd missed a step the first time, one that was easy to miss.
It was also a bit annoying that it does not allow you to set up a root account during installation, expecting you to do the "sudo says" nonsense. I set it up post installation. I have never understood the point of the sudo method as it has little security and is a real nuisance if you need a long admin session, like I have been setting up my 15 disk partitions and other stuff. I suppose it is to remind you that you are doing something at admin level, but my root has a red bash prompt for that.
It goes to "Sleep" but won't wake. Desktop PC using Daedalus, image 6.1.0-27-amd64, on a ASUS M5A97 R2.0 Mobo, with AMI BIOS 2603, XFX Radeon RX 480 graphics, PS/2 keyboard.
From the web, this seems a common problem across many distros, with numerous "solutions" which work for some but not others. "Solutions" have included increasing the swap file size, keeping USB ports open to signals, and waggling the mouse around. Frustratingly, the problem is often declared "Solved" and a thread closed when it is only solved for the one OP user, or when someone points to a "solution" given years ago.
When I try to wake by pressing a key or the power button, the system unit fans restart but the monitor screen stays black and its indicating lights show no signal being received. As an experiment I have sent it to sleep with a terminal session open, "woken" it by pressing a key, and then blindly typed in a command to make an audible beep - and get no beep. I can only do a full power off and restart.
Maybe related, when I go to a full screen text session (Ctrl-Alt-F1) and then return to GUI session (Ctrl-Alt-F7), I am placed at the GUI log-in screen and find nothing has been saved.
Things that don't work for me, some being those suggested solutions :
Trying to wake by pressing a key, waggling the mouse, pressing the power button, or pressing the reboot button
Trying to wake after sending to sleep by the menu in the GUI
Trying to wake after installing pm-utils and sending to sleep with "pm-suspend" from a su command line
Ensuring swap partition/file is larger than RAM (surely this would only affect Hybernate and not Sleep?)
Not sharing the swap partition/file with another distro
Ensuring swap partition in fstab has same UUID as in cfdisk as "Filesystem UUID"
Ensuring /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume file points to same UUID as swap in fsstab
.. followed by update-initramfs -u and reboot
Fresh install of Daedalus on a dedicated drive with three partitions - root, home and unshared swap. (My data is on another drive)
There have been suggestions that it is a kernel bug, also a plot between Microsoft and the BIOS makers. My money is on the kernel bug, or some oversight in the installation scripting.
Anyway, I 'm not prepared to work without the sleep mode so I wiped that Daedalus drive and intalled Chimaera, image 5.10.0-9-amd64, in the same way, adding pm-utils. Sleep from "pm-suspend" and waking with the power button works in Chimaera.
Any better ideas, or future bug fix, would be welcome.
Thanks for that.
During Daedalus installation (and previous Devuan versions) from an ISO image there is a point at which I am asked to choose between :
linux-image-6.1.0-27-amd64
linux-image-amd64
(There is also an option of no kernel). What is the difference and which should you choose? AFAIR the latter was already highlighted as the default. This might not be the latest kernel version as I downloaded this image a while ago, but the question stands.
... a selection box near the bottom left corner, really hard to see...
Yes, white screen, and found it. Thanks for that. It is invisible until you roll the mouse over it whereupon it shows a thin rectangular outline. Clicking in it brings up a choice between Wayland and X11. Did they intend that only the cognoscenti are aware of the option? Simple Screen Recorder now works, so it must have made a difference
The login manager is sddm.
Having installed Daedalus with KDE, I am finding some stuff does not work, for example Simple Screen Recorder. This is because Daedalus installed with Wayland rather than the X window system (I don't recall being offered a choice) and eg Simple Screen Recorder does not support Wayland (or vice-versa). My package manager Synaptic tells me that x11 is installed, but it seems that Daedalus is not using it. What do I need to do to tell Daedalus to boot using x11 and not Wayland? To comment or uncomment some lines in /etc perhaps?
Googling for help found some discussion on how to do this for Gnome, but it involved some files that do not exist in my Deadalus/KDE installation.
Duke Nukem wrote:I will stop using YT is this goes on.
Statements like that are meaningless. Even if YouTube saw it, they don't care.
It is just a statement of fact, and means no more and no less than that. Yes, I'm sure YT won't care.
In the last couple of days I have had ads showing up at the start of YouTube videos (I use YT quite a lot). By using uBlock Origin on Firefox I have not seen ads for a long time, so I guess YT have recently upped their anti-adblocking game. There are usually two ads and can last up to a minute. In fact I hear the ad but the screen is black so I guess uBlock is half-working.
Anyone else found this? Perhaps there is a uBlock Origin update to counter it? I will stop using YT is this goes on.
I did a fresh install after re-formatting the partition (I could not upgrade from Ascii) and the sources.list is whatever it defaulted to. I first tried to install Chimaera (that was just before Daedalus was released) and found the same problem. Here are the lines with "non-free" in the sources.list that the Daedalus installation gave me :-
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
deb-src http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
I have a GeForce GTX460 card which worked under Ascii with driver version 390.116 (as nvidia-detect tells me)
I have now installed Daedalus, apparently successfully, until I try to boot it - when the screen goes blank during the boot messages just after the "populating /dev" message and a couple of lines after it changes font (going into a graphical mode?). The disk drive seems to stop shortly after that. Thinking I could go into a text screen (ie Ctrl-Alt-F1) to try installing drivers from a command prompt like it says on the Nvidia web page https://www.nvidia.co.uk/download/drive … 6226/en-uk, I found that was completely blank too. I guess the boot process had not just vanished from the screen, it had stopped completely. This happens in the advanced recovery boot mode too.
Fortunately I still have Ascii on a different partition (I'm using it now) and that does work with the GTX460. I have also tried an older GeForce GT430 and found that works with both Ascii and Daedalus, and the Nvidia website says both cards use the same drivers (the latest version of which is 390.157).
I would prefer to use the newer and faster GTX460 card (for games). Can anyone tell me what is going on?
My workaround has been to create a bash script with the above full command and save it as ~/bin/gpg_script. That allowed me to create a kde menu entry using that script name without needing the filename, options or pipes. Obviously I ticked the "Run in Terminal" box in the Advanced tab. It is a nuisance that the kde menu seems less powerful than it was before, unless I have missed something.
I have just installed Daedalus which came with kde v5.27.5. The menu editor is not allowing me to add an item such as this :
gpg -d /home/dukenukem/secrets.gpg |less
I was previously using Devuan Ascii with whatever its default kde version was, and it allowed me to specify a complete command line such as the one above. Now however the menu editor splits the command into a "Program" field and a "Command-Line Arguments" field. I have tried putting "gpg" in the "Program" field and the rest in the the "Command-Line Arguments" field, and also tried putting it all in the "Program" field. I have also tried omiting the "|less". But the best I get is a brief flash of a terminal window.
The above command works fine in a terminal. In the "Advanced" tab of the menu editor I have the "Run in Terminal" tab ticked.
Is there a way around this? What was the idea of splitting up the command - an attempt to dumb things down? It is very frustrating if you can no longer put a staightforward bash command into the menu editor.
I can't help you, but I'm posting to confirm I found exactly the same. Not only does it claim I have no internet connection, but it reckons I have nothing installed either - crazy.
I don't even know what Discover is, partly because its developers must have thought it was cool not to enable (at least by default) a menu bar, so I cannot do a Help/About, and I can't be bothered to dig deeper. I'm guessing it is yet another front end for apt, but aptitude works fine for me. On the same subject I notice that Synaptic is not installed by default.
Thanks for that, now solved. Assumptions confirmed BTW.
As I had been using Ascii day-to-day until now (I had only installed Chimaera experimentally) I had not previously encountered the new need to add a dash suffix to the su command to get root's environment settings, and hence get the system apps in the path. I fail to see the point of this change, but still ...
I also needed to enable os-prober in grub (for the benefit of other readers, the file /etc/default/grub), by uncommenting the existing "false" line :
# If your computer has multiple operating systems installed, then you
# probably want to run os-prober. However, if your computer is a host
# for guest OSes installed via LVM or raw disk devices, running
# os-prober can cause damage to those guest OSes as it mounts
# filesystems to look for things.
GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=false
Shame that update-grub interpreted my DOS FAT partition as a Windows7 installation, but I guess you can't have everything, and I suppose I could change the name if I edited /boot/grub/grub.cfg, despite the dire warning at the top not to do so.
I updated Chimaera to Daedalus with the "apt-get upgrade" and "apt-get dist-upgrade" commands. I also have an Ascii installation on a different partition on the same HDD, and Windows and DOS on two further different HDDs. With Chimera I had the ability to boot into all those and I want to keep that ability.
For safety during the Daedalus upgrade I unmounted the Ascii partition, my data partitions, and physically disconnected the Windows HDD. I left the DOS HDD connected because it was too hard to reach.
As expected after the installation the Grub menu did not show Ascii or Windows, nor (surprisingly) DOS. So after reconnecting everything and mounting the Ascii partition I tried to run "update-grub" and it said "Command not found". So I tried "apt-get install update-grub" and it said "Unable to locate package update-grub". I'm using root of course. I then tried "grub-mkconfig" with the same result. Yet I can see the man pages of these commands. My sources.list is as recommended by Devuan's upgrade-to-daedalus page.
So is "update-grub" no longer avaiable and if so is there a replacement? According to aptitude I have grub-common, grub-pc, grub-pc-bin and grub2-common installed. How do I get out of this fix other than wiping the Daedalus partition and doing a fresh installation of it?
Kye ( www.kye.me.uk ) A puzzle game with hundreds of levels (+ design your own). There is a Python version for Linux. This website explains it, but for the Python Kye download, follow link from its Links page.
PRBoom ( https://sourceforge.net/projects/prboom/ ) A port of Doom, with a Linux version
Soma ( https://www.somagame.com/ ) Available for Linux, Mac and Windows
In order to deal with exfat file systems, you need to have the exfat-fuse and exfat-utils packages installed.
I had never heard of exfat and Wikipedia says it is a file system for flash drives etc. Surely my hard drives formated under Windows as NTFS would not be exfat? I understood that the "Type" shown eg by cfstab (Type 7 in this case and described as "HPFS/NTFS/exFAT") is purely nominal and is not used functionally by modern Linux - you could call it what type you like and it would make no difference, or so I thought.
Could we see the exact command you tried and the error you got? I mean, from the command line.
OK :-
[root@mesh-devuan:~] # mount -t ntfs-3g /dev/sdb2 /mnt/windows/
ntfs-3g: Failed to access volume '/dev/sdb2': No such file or directory
ntfs-3g 2014.2.15AR.2 integrated FUSE 28 - Third Generation NTFS Driver
Configuration type 7, XATTRS are on, POSIX ACLS are on
Copyright (C) 2005-2007 Yura Pakhuchiy
Copyright (C) 2006-2009 Szabolcs Szakacsits
Copyright (C) 2007-2014 Jean-Pierre Andre
Copyright (C) 2009 Erik Larsson
Usage: ntfs-3g [-o option[,...]] <device|image_file> <mount_point>
Options: ro (read-only mount), windows_names, uid=, gid=,
umask=, fmask=, dmask=, streams_interface=.
Please see the details in the manual (type: man ntfs-3g).
Example: ntfs-3g /dev/sda1 /mnt/windows
News, support and information: http://tuxera.com
FWIW I get exactly the same result with mount -t ntfs-3g /dev/sdb2 /mnt/windows/ and ntfs-3g /dev/sdb2 /mnt/windows/
blkid shows info about the other drives but sdb does not appear at all.
This is ASCII and ntfs-3g is installed. It would seem the problem is with non-recognition of the partitions' existence and it does not even get as far as trying to read the file system. I'm wondering if partitions created in Windows have a different indexing or header or something, which is why Linux does not recognise them. It is an older mother board without UEFI.
sdd1 and sdd2 are vfat partitions and they can be mounted with no problem in Linux.
I have four HDDs, one of which is dedicated to Windows and has four primary MBR type partitions. Windows works fine, but although Linux sees the drive as sdb, it does not see the partitions. I first noticed this because trying to mount the Windows partitions under Devuan failed.
[root@mesh-devuan:~] # cat /proc/partitions
major minor #blocks name
8 0 244198584 sda
8 1 51761398 sda1
8 2 51761430 sda2
8 3 51761430 sda3
8 4 88911742 sda4
8 32 976762584 sdc
8 33 156250112 sdc1
8 34 156250112 sdc2
8 35 156250112 sdc3
8 36 156250112 sdc4
8 37 8388608 sdc5
8 38 25165824 sdc6
8 39 318206663 sdc7
8 16 78150744 sdb
8 48 4202415 sdd
8 49 262206 sdd1
8 50 999810 sdd2
8 51 2940367 sdd3
11 0 1048575 sr0
Yet cfdisk does see them :-
Disk: /dev/sdb
Size: 74.5 GiB, 80026361856 bytes, 156301488 sectors
Label: dos, identifier: 0x2de32de2
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdb1 2048 206847 204800 100M 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sdb2 208845 31423139 31214295 14.9G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sdb3 31423140 110157704 78734565 37.6G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sdb4 110157705 156296384 46138680 22G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
Free space 156297216 156301487 4272 2.1M
What is going on here? AFAIR I created the sdb partitions under Windows, because in my experience Windows does not see partitions as the correct size if installed into partitions created earlier under Linux.
BTW, the 100Mb sdb1 was created by Windows 7 for some purpose.
I was puzzled by this screen too. For a moment I thought that Devuan had developed its own graphical desktop environment [DE]! But I took it to mean that the top tick box meant whether you wanted a graphical DE or not, and the next five chose which specific type of DE you wanted. So I ticked the top box and also KDE, with the other four DE boxes blank - that worked for me.
It seemed to me that the top box was redundant because if you ticked one of the five specific DEs then of course you wanted a DE. The five specific DE lines might have been indented like subheadings. I don't know what would happen if you ticked one of the five DEs but not the top box :-S
That's how I interpreted it - does anyone kow better?
Shouldn't be a problem, although I've never done it with Win10, only XP and Win7. Windows should be installed first (for a simple life) which you have already done. Now install Devuan, during which it will ask you where you want Devuan installed (at least it does so if you choose the expert installation, as I always have) and obviously you choose the other drive. You will later be asked where you want Grub installed and you can choose the Master Boot Record of the first drive. Grub will detect that there is also Windows available and will add it to the boot menu alongside Devuan.
The Pale Moon browser is not in the Devuan repositories, although it is in the Debian ones (I could try it from there). Is this an oversight? There does not seem much choice of browsers these days with Chrome almost taking over the world (even Microsoft have now switched to it), although Safari survives for Apple users. People are predicting the death of Firefox, but I've seen good reports of Pale Moon which forked from it.
Does anyone know how to change the console background colour in an SSH session?
I have Konsole set (via its Menu Bar "Settings"->"Edit Current Profile") to white text on black, but any changes apply to all sessions, not just the local one. I would like a background (eg dark grey) in SSH sessions that is different from that of other PCs on the network, so I can see at a glance which one I am using. Fiddling around with the PS1 variable in .bashrc in the remote PC I have only succeded in changing the background colour under the text itself, not the whole background.