You are not logged in.
If you want and need the latest firefox download the Debian package directly from Mozilla, unpack it to /tmp, mv to /opt/firefox and create a starter manually. Easy done, and no foreign repo in your sources.
rolfie
That your image grows tells me that you forgot to recompress again. There should be instructions how to do this.
rolfie
You must know why the openjdk-11 that is available in Beowulf isn't good enough. Have you tried that?
Nevertheless it might be possible to install openjdk-8-jre from ASCII. Depends on the dependencies.
Give this a try:
Uncomment #deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii main contrib non-free in your sources.list.
Run apt update
Then apt install -s -t ascii openjdk-8-jre
and look at the result. The -s simulates the installation only. If it looks good you may risk the installation without the -s option.
Don't forget to undo the uncomment and run apt update afterwards.
rolfie
Load from Debian:
Paket openjdk-8-jre
stretch (oldstable) (java): OpenJDK-Java-Laufzeitumgebung, verwendet Hotspot JIT
and install with dpkg -i package.
rolfie
My background: Beowulf installed from scratch, German setup and locale, works fine the way it is, menus ... all in German. My Beowulf is clean....
Based on this:
1.) Give HOAS proposal a try. You can't loose anything but your problem. When that fixes your locale problem you are done so far.
2.) If it doesn't, try to remove the extra stuff vs my post one by one. Play it carefully with simulating with apt -s remove what the consequences are before executing without -s. If in doubt, ask here again with what you got as output.
3.) Repeat HOAS proposal.
Good luck, rolfie
Followup on bad EFI memory:
Got two boards at home that suffer from strange EFI behaviour. Digged a bit in the internet and came across some threads that talk about that the Linux kernel tries to save some data in EFI variables when the computer crashes. I am pretty sure that happened to my hardware.
Is there any safe way to clear the EFI variables? ASUS denied it and told me to return the board.
Is there a way to prove my theory? To force ASUS to fix the lockup because that should not happen?
These rants also talk about that noefi as kernel parameter would stop the kernel to access the EFI variables. But that would mean the computer has to boot in BIOS mode. Am I right?
rolfie
From a native Beowulf install:
# dpkg -l | grep locale
ii krb5-locales 1.17-3 all internationalization support for MIT Kerberos
ii libdatetime-locale-perl 1:1.23-1 all Perl extension providing localization support for DateTime
ii libencode-locale-perl 1.05-1 all utility to determine the locale encoding
ii liblocale-gettext-perl 1.07-3+b4 amd64 module using libc functions for internationalization in Perl
ii locales 2.28-10 all GNU C Library: National Language (locale) data [support]
ii python-apt-common
My first candidate for removal would be the libboost-packages, then the util-linux from ASCII.
rolfie
Got the hint from here: https://sourceforge.net/p/veracrypt/dis … 04d12bba8/
There is some change between ASCII and Beowulf. This way it works.
rolfie
Fixed it by adding /usr/bin/uptime to the priviligues specification for veracrypt in the sudoers. Found it somewhere in the sourceforge forum for veracrypt.
The sudoers entry reads like this now:
$username$ ALL=(root) NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/veracrypt, /usr/bin/uptime
rolfie
Well, found this hint in the net on https://wiki.archlinux.de/title/GNOME#Tipps_und_Tricks
Add export NO_AT_BRIDGE=1 to /etc/environment.
The dbind-warning error when calling up the script directly as shown in the previous post is gone.
Does not bring the complete solution. Still getting asked for user or root passwd.
rolfie
Tried to call the script with a sudo in front sudo /path/to/script.sh, that does not work.
Then I directly started the script in a user terminal and got this error:
(veracrypt:5104): dbind-WARNING **: 17:05:21.998: Couldn't register with accessibility bus: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
How do I have to interpret this?
rolfie
rolfie wrote:Can't remember that I had to do this before, e.g. under Squeeze, Wheezy, or ASCII. Anyhow, I think I have got a solution now.
VirtualBox was in the repos back then (It was dropped for buster due to oracle being "uncooperative" IIRC), so presumably you were using those packages rather than the ones from oracle, no?
No, currently I am directly downloading the latest stuff from virtualbox.org and then using dpkg -i. I have been through all the methods from using the repo stuff, the following the sources.list setup as suggested by the VBox docs, then I found that I can ease my life. No enabling/disabling in sources.list, no key to care for .... Works for me.
Thanks, rolfie
Solution: the settings need to go to ~/.putty/sessions and not into ~/.putty.
rolfie
Well, I had all pre-requisites present like kernel headers, build-essential, dkms. Installation of VBox went smooth without any errors.
Instructions I am talking about: Repeated vboxsetup, modprobe vboxdrv, rcvboxdrv setup: all run smooth, no errors, each of them fixes the issue temporarily. Just after any reboot everything seems to be forgotten.
Digged deeper into logs like the vbox logs, syslog and boot: nothing that caught my eye. The entry in /etc/init.d/vboxdrv is present, all permissions set correctly (afaik) ...
Then tried to add to /etc/modules: the entry vboxdrv was a game changer, the error when starting my Win7 VM changed. I saw that I needed to enter also vboxnetadp and vboxnetflt, and now it works.
Can't remember that I had to do this before, e.g. under Squeeze, Wheezy, or ASCII. Anyhow, I think I have got a solution now. Thanks for picking my brain, your hint to the /etc/modules finally did the job.
rolfie
PS: I used keywords like "virtualbox kernel module" and "kernel 5.6 virtualbox" and others and tags from the error messages and read through a bunch of pages without getting a clue, just an impression that kernel 5.5 works, while 5.6 seems to create issues.
Beowulf on Kernel 5.6 with Mate Desktop, VB 6.1.10 directly loaded from Oracle and installed via dpkg -i.
Situation is that I have to rebuild kernel modules after each boot before being able to start a Win7 VM.
I am getting:
Kernel driver not installed (rc=-1908)
The VirtualBox Linux kernel driver (vboxdrv) is either not loaded or there is a permission problem with /dev/vboxdrv. Please reinstall virtualbox-dkms package and load the kernel module by executing
'modprobe vboxdrv'
as root.
where: suplibOsInit what: 3 VERR_VM_DRIVER_NOT_INSTALLED (-1908) - The support driver is not installed. On linux, open returned ENOENT.
All the nice hints found do not fix the issue. When I read the announcement right my VBox version should already support the 5.7 kernel.
When I follow the instruction I can work with VBox, the game starts next day when I have shut down the PC the evening before and restarted or past any reboot.
What is going on here?
rolfie
Beowulf, Mate desktop. I run a script during user login that opens a Veracrypt volume. Veracrypt is installed same way as in ASCII, same settings in sudoers, script copied from ASCII with same permissions.
Situation is that in Beowulf I am asked to enter either a user or the root password. What can be the reason for this changed behaviour?
Thanks for any idea, rolfie
Beowulf with Mate installed in parallel to ASCII.
I selectively copied over the session settings from .putty in my ASCII home to .putty on the new Beowulf home.
Direct look into putty, log off and in again, reboot: no listing of the old sessions in the Beowulf putty. Access rights are to the user.
When reading posts from the internet a simple copy should be enough.
What else might have changed?
rolfie
With Beowulf, boot time takes almost 3 minutes due to udev waiting and time out. This happens with kernel 5.6 from beowuf-backports. I've posted here:https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=22907
No clues why this is happening.
Got Beowulf on kernel 5.6 running fine on two desktop machines. You must have individual hickups, hardware problems or a device that having issues.
rolfie
Guess its system specific. Got two machines here that work fine with Beowulf and kernel linux-image-5.6.0-0.bpo.2-amd64. Though I am using the openrc version that comes with Beowulf.
rolfie
Ok, Lars thinks your CPU does support 64bit, and the 64bit Life media also runs. Lets take that as granted.
Then lets look at the media used for installation.
CD: You got old mature HW including an older CD/DVD drive (at least I assume this). When you use oldfashioned CD or DVD drives to burn and read the media, the chance is high that it should work if the media quality is ok. From my experience: burning a CD on a BR drive and reading it in another PC with a BR drive may not work. Tried this with a gparted life CD: starting gparted is a gamble. I got lots of IO errors, sometimes gparted starts ok, sometimes not. The CD itself is fine, it booted perfectly with no IO errors in an older DVD burner. Same happened with Beowulf alpha and beta versions burned to CD, and installations typically fail when IO errors appear.
Memory stick: On my modern hardware I now only use flash drives for installation. I also used rufus on Win7 to generate the bootable sticks. Done that for ASCII, Arch, Beowulf in various steps, and gparted life, all worked fine.
Note: there are people around that insist in that only the dd copy is the correct way to generate a bootable flash drive. Never used this.
One thing that might cause an installation to fail is if the flash drive itself is dodgy. If you can exchange it and try a different brand. I use a Windows utility called h2testw to check the flash drives. Don't know if this is available in English too.
Another hint what might help: look on the other consoles if you see any errors showing up there.
Good luck, rolfie
Hi Lars,
yes I got Ryzen 7 2700X that is clearly a 64bit CPU, I am on amd64. The OP has a Core2 CPU 4300, whatever that is, I have no idea. His/her lscpu printout indicates a 686 CPU with 64bit capability. Is that enough for amd64?
rolfie
Perhaps because your CPU does not support x86_64 mode? You get: Architecture: i686, I think thats the i386 branch.
I am getting for a real 64 bit CPU:
# lscpu
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
Address sizes: 43 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
CPU(s): 16
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-15
Thread(s) per core: 2
Core(s) per socket: 8
Socket(s): 1
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: AuthenticAMD
CPU family: 23
Model: 8
Model name: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core Processor
Stepping: 2
CPU MHz: 2194.882
CPU max MHz: 3700,0000
CPU min MHz: 2200,0000
BogoMIPS: 7385.23
Virtualization: AMD-V
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 64K
L2 cache: 512K
L3 cache: 8192K
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-15
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl nonstop_tsc cpuid extd_apicid aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 fma cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 movbe popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw skinit wdt tce topoext perfctr_core perfctr_nb bpext perfctr_llc mwaitx cpb hw_pstate sme ssbd sev ibpb vmmcall fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 rdseed adx smap clflushopt sha_ni xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves clzero irperf xsaveerptr arat npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save tsc_scale vmcb_clean flushbyasid decodeassists pausefilter pfthreshold avic v_vmsave_vmload vgif overflow_recov succor smca
Have you ever had a 64 bit distro working?
rolfie
Make sure you have contrib main non-free enabled in your sources. It maybe worth also checking if there is an update of the firmware package available in backports.
rolfie
There is a 5.6 kernel in the backports already. I am running this on two machines, and a 5.5 on my file server.
rolfie
Without knowing that fact, I now see that under ASCII pulse was installed. Maybe thats why the setup was quite easy and comfortable.
My conclusion: pure ALSA is not really comfortable, it lacks a reasonable control center that allows to setup the sound system according to the real HW and the users demands.
rolfie