You are not logged in.
Better to download from the devuan merged non-free repos so that updates (if any) will be picked up.
Got a link? I can't find any packages at packages.devuan.org, and I can't even get to us.mirror.devuan.org in a web browser.
Once the package is installed, updates will not be a problem - the package manager will know the package is there and the system will be able to connect to the internet because the package is installed. Please note that I am NOT saying to add debian to sources.list. I'm just saying to get the package from a place that's accessible with any web browser and any operating system.
It's a known problem - the beta2 installer doesn't find the wireless drivers. You might find them on the CD/DVD in /cdrom/firmware during installation, and you can probably find them if you pop the CD into a running system. Or you could download it. Either way, just install with dpkg as you suggested.
I'm pretty sure you need firmware-ralink which is in the non-free repo, and it's a package that devuan does not alter. That means you can get it from debian:
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/firmware-ralink
I was chrooting into an old wheezy installation to run apt-file until someone showed me these:
To find what package a file comes from:
dpkg -S <file>
To find what files come with a package:
dpkg -L <package>more...
https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/2 … 61.en.html
Author: Adam Borowski
Date: 2017-01-28 05:08 -500
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Backports priority(snip)...
Temporarily bump the priority of stable above 1000, it will downgrade
everything to that release.
I think I collected all of these from forums.debian.net (and I have not tested all of them.)
Edit: I'm adding code boxes to the ones I test. Note that some of these commands may give you strange results if you have multiple repos enabled, like jessie,ascii,ceres. Don't do that!
-fsr
------------------------
To find which installed packages are from debian-multimedia (works as user):
dpkg-query -W --showformat='${Package}\t${Maintainer}\n' |grep "Christian Marillat"To show packages from contrib and non-free, either one of the following. The second is more specific. (e.g. the first one gives a false positive on libclucene-contribs1 because "contrib" is in the package name.)
dpkg-query -W --showformat='${Package}\t${Section}\n' | egrep -e "non-free|contrib"
dpkg-query -W --showformat='${Package}\t${Section}\n' | awk '/non-free|contrib/ { print $0 }'Re: List installed software from non-free repo
bugsbunny » 2011-01-30 08:50
aptitude search ~i~s"non-free~|contrib"
or
aptitude search ~i~snon-free ~i~scontrib
If you want package names, section, and archive (testing, stable, unstable):
aptitude search ~i~snon-free ~i~scontrib -F"%p# %s# %t#"or maybe name, version, archive
aptitude search ~i -F"%p# %v# %t#"get package names and sizes, sorted by size:
dpkg-query -W --showformat='${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' > package_sizes
awk '{ printf "%.7d %s\n", $1, $2 "\n" }' package_sizes | sort
Show which repo (which release) packages came from:
aptitude search "?narrow(?installed,?archive(stable))"
aptitude search "?narrow(?installed,?archive(oldstable))"
Or did not come from:
aptitude search "?narrow(?installed,?not(?archive(stable)))"
To get a list of dependencies from a .deb file:
$ dpkg -e d4x_2.5.7.1-5_amd64.deb
$ su
Password:
# DEPS=$(grep ^Depends DEBIAN/control | sed 's/,/\n/g' | sed 's/(.*//;s/Depends: //;s/^ //')
# apt-get update
# apt-get install $DEPS ### Bad idea!!! This installs everything in the list. There may be redundancies.
# apt-get clean
# exit
This line works if there's a "|" in the output.
DEPS=$(grep ^Depends DEBIAN/control | sed 's/,/\n/g' | sed 's/(.*//;s/Depends: //;s/^ //;s/|.*$//')
Better way:
dpkg -i my-deb_5.0-6_i386.deb
apt-get -f install
Good stuff. I'm gonna play with that when I get a chance. I don't have the answer to your last question, but this might be helpful -
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xresources
xinitrc
If you are using a copy of the default xinitrc as your .xinitrc it already merges ~/.Xresources.
If you are using a custom .xinitrc add the following line:
[[ -f ~/.Xresources ]] && xrdb -merge -I$HOME ~/.Xresources
Warning: Never background the xrdb command within ~/.xinitrc. Otherwise, programs launched after xrdb may look for resources before it has finished loading them.
Instead of editing grub.cfg, you should edit /etc/default/grub and change the first item:
GRUB_DEFAULT=6and then you must run update-grub to apply any changes you made. Then grub.cfg will be automatically edited the way you want.
BTW, entries 7 and 8 get you some geek points, and you get extra points if those things really boot. (Now I can't get that brick wall out of my head.)
You have to add code tags manually here.
I had a problem with refracta2usb in vdev. For some reason, it didn't recognize /dev/disk/by-id so I changed it to by-uuid. On the command line, it seems to work normally.
1 - 5 look right.
6. I never looked in that file before.
7. My guess is that gvfs needs some function in udev to tell it something. I run without gvfs here, so I wouldn't have noticed that.
Does your trash icon work?
8. You might need to alter some action files or a helper script. The most I've done with that was edit a pattern to find a device and change permissions.
Read Jude's documentation on the action files, (Appendix A)
https://git.devuan.org/unsystemd/vdev/b … to-test.md
https://github.com/jcnelson/vdev/blob/m … to-test.md
Look inside the helper scripts for clues. (in /lib/vdev)
Sorry I can't be more specific. It's a big black box. That I was able to do anything with the action files and permissions.sh was a surprise to me.
I can't get vbeinfo to work, but videoinfo shows me the three resolutions that work right plus 800x600.
I just tried it with a splash that's 640 x 480, 8-bit/color RGB, non-interlaced png, and 800x600 still does not work. (garbled boot text). That appears to be the same as the grub splash in the exegnu iso. (according to the file command). I think I need to do some more tests.
Edited to correct "works correctly" to "still does not work."
set gfxpayload=auto doesn't work, either. The only resolutions that work on this laptop are 640x480, 1024x768 and 1366x768. I tried it with the test snapshot and also with editing the grub entry at boot time. Same result. I'm guessing that there are netbooks that won't do 1024x768. Anybody know for sure?
Isoyhybrid uefi boot is fixed in exegnulinux_amd64_20161225.iso ![]()
BTW, 800x600 doesn't work right on my laptop. Boot messages are scrambled and take up the top third of the screen. I changed the mkefi function in snapshot to use 640x480 for that reason. I hope that works for everything.
Run 'fdisk -l' on the iso, and it should look something like these:
# fdisk -l devuan_jessie_1.0.0-beta2_amd64_DVD.iso
Disk devuan_jessie_1.0.0-beta2_amd64_DVD.iso: 4.4 GiB, 4668088320 bytes, 9117360 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x30c02860
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
devuan_jessie_1.0.0-beta2_amd64_DVD.iso1 * 0 9117359 9117360 4.4G 0 Empty
devuan_jessie_1.0.0-beta2_amd64_DVD.iso2 9059432 9060263 832 416K ef EFI (FAT-12/16/32)
# fdisk -l refracta8_xfce_amd64-20161013_1314.iso
Disk refracta8_xfce_amd64-20161013_1314.iso: 648 MiB, 679477248 bytes, 1327104 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x25061aae
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
refracta8_xfce_amd64-20161013_1314.iso1 * 64 1327103 1327040 648M 0 Empty
refracta8_xfce_amd64-20161013_1314.iso2 1314680 1317559 2880 1.4M ef EFI (FAT-12/16/32)Watch out for newer versions of refractasnapshot. I removed 'union=aufs' from live.cfg so it wouldn't conflict with overlay.
If you upload a rebuilt iso, I'll test it on uefi.
Further testing:
Iso boots uefi in qemu and virtualbox.
Re-imaged usb with isohybrid. Hardware boot fails (doesn't find a bootloader at all.)
So I tried booting from the hard drive - at grub menu I dropped to grub prompt:
set root=(hd0) #usb is first drive, tab-complete shows no partitions
chainloader +1gives error something like "Invalid EFI path..."
So then I tried
set root=(hd0)
linux /live/vmlinuz boot=live union=aufs nocomponents=xinit
initrd /live/initrd.img
bootand it boots normally.
(note: 'union=aufs' is also needed if you use encryption.)
I found the same as you with the grub-*-bin packages. In Refracta, I started with grub-efi then replaced it with grub-pc but didn't autoremove efibootmgr or (whatever else came with it). The grub-efi packages are included in the iso. There is a refractainstaller-uefi (yad) included in the iso. For a uefi install, when it gets to the grub install, it opens a terminal in a chroot in /target and allows you to install the grub-efi packages, which then install the bootloader to the efi partition. It works, but it needs some refinement.
There's a reason for installing both grub-efi packages instead of just grub-efi-amd64, even though the -bin package is already installed. But I don't recall exactly what that reason is. Maybe debconf runs? Maybe update-grub runs? Not sure, but it might be in my notes.
The new exegnulinux looks nice. I just installed it on uefi. Ran into a couple of minor problems, but it works.
First I dd'd the iso to usb, and it wouldn't boot on uefi. There's only one partition in the iso.
Then I used refracta2usb to make the usb, and it did boot on uefi. Chose uefi mode in the installer and let it install the bootloader. Installer told me that the grub install failed, but the log shows that grub claimed success. I rebooted. Exegnulinux is now the first entry in my boot menu, and I think it found all the other installations. (It's a long list.) It works.
BTW, now I understand why you add 'nocomponents=xinit' to the boot line. The desktop was psychedelic without that. Also required union=aufs which doesn't seem to be required on all jessie builds.
Quote from the author of figos:
you can always get the latest script (because fig os was originally meant to be something you put together yourself-- and customized if you wanted-- after all, its an automated process but you can tweak it if you like) at http://unofficialdistros.freeforums.org … tc-f4.html
fsmithred wrote:A derivative of a derivative is a derivative.
$0.02
I think figos is worth listing. It's the only distro I know that comes in a multi-boot iso. Maybe I've been spending too much time inside the box, but that just blows my mind.
That does sound useful, do you have a link to the homepage of figos?
Cheers
I don't think there's a home page at this point. I pinged figosdev to see if we can get a definitive answer to this question, but meanwhile, here's a short discussion about it with a link to the script that is used to make the iso:
http://refracta.freeforums.org/fig-os-c … -t591.html
-fsr
lxde is another metapackage. Same with xfce4. You can install xfce4-session, xfdesktop4 and thunar without pulling in libsystemd0. Also, remove lxde and install the parts you want. Here's the list of packages with lxde in the name.
aptitude search lxde
p education-desktop-lxde - Debian Edu LXDE desktop applications
p live-image-lxde-desktop - Live System Image Components (LXDE desktop)
p live-task-lxde - Live environment support for Lxde
p lxde - Metapackage for LXDE
p lxde-common - LXDE common configuration files
p lxde-core - Metapackage for the LXDE core
i lxde-icon-theme - LXDE standard icon theme
v lxde-session -
v lxde-settings-daemon -
p openbox-lxde-session - LXDE session manager and configuration files
p task-lxde-desktop - LXDE You can check what will be installed along with any package by adding the -s option. (apt-get -s install <packages> or aptitude -s install <packages>)
A derivative of a derivative is a derivative.
$0.02
I think figos is worth listing. It's the only distro I know that comes in a multi-boot iso. Maybe I've been spending too much time inside the box, but that just blows my mind.
I think the problem is task-xfce-desktop or some other metapackage that depends on a bunch of things, even if some of the components don't require all those things. For example, a normal xfce desktop will include gvfs and gvfs-daemons. The latter requires libsystemd0, but the rest of xfce does not. If all those items were installed under a metapackage, then removing any part will remove them all.
You might get away with just 'apt-get remove task-xfce-desktop'. But things might get marked for autoremoval. The ones you want to keep can be installed (or reinstalled?) manually, before they are removed. (it's either apt-get install <package> or apt-get --reinstall install <package>). The package will be marked as manually installed, and it wil bel un-marked for autoremoval.
debian/devuan get rid of the old kernel on upgrade.
To close lvm parttion manually goes something like this:
alt-F2 #to get to a console with a command prompt
umount <mountpoint>
vgchange -a n <volume_group_name>
cryptsetup luksClose labelwhere label is the name in /dev/mapper/<label>.
It is impossible to undo the setting up of the 2nd partition (usually /dev/sda2) as an encrypted partition. There's something amiss in the installer, it cannot properly let go of the encrypted partition. This means that in case I want to change the size of the /boot partition, I need to reboot (hopefully it's at the beginning of the installation process, so not much time wasted).
It's not clear to me what you're doing in the above. I don't use guided partitioning, but I thought it was not possible to change the settings that the partitioner uses. That's what manual partiioning is for. You should be able to make /boot and / partitions without encryption. I know I did it with the beta1, but I haven't tried it with the beta2.
250mb for /boot should be more than enough unless you're planning to do something unusual.
Sorry about that. I keep forgetting that yad is not in jessie.
This version works with jessie. (0.27.0-1)
http://debs.slavino.sk/pool/main/y/yad/ … _amd64.deb
http://debs.slavino.sk/pool/main/y/yad/ … 1_i386.deb
And in case those go away, I've got them here:
http://distro.ibiblio.org/refracta/file … _packages/
Wow. I read the article. That's a lot to digest. I've been using firejail for a few months, but just with the default settings. I also tried it with firetools, a graphical front end, but I didn't like it. Couldn't figure out how to edit the menu to show just the apps I wanted to use. So I wrote my own front end.
firemenu is a bash script that uses yad for a graphical front end. It presents a list of applications that have firejail profiles, and you can filter the list to just show the apps you normally use.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/refrac … nu-1.2.deb
https://github.com/fsmithred/firemenu
@figosdev
I have evidence that the year of the linux desktop (if you can count netbooks) was 2008. That evidence is in the form of an advertisement for a EEE netbook. The ad featured a bright red balloon with the words, Runs on Linux, as the main selling point. Got a screenshot of that as soon as I saw it.
-fsr