The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#926 Re: Devuan Derivatives » An example of how Trinity Desktop Env (TDE) can look on Devuan ASCII » 2021-08-13 22:24:24

Ron wrote:
Micronaut wrote:

Every time I have asked about Trinity desktop in any Linux forum I see these claims that it is hugely insecure due to being such an old code base and no one with any sense would dare use it.

This is the same ignorant claim made against Pale Moon browser. As long as it's maintained with bug and security fixes, it's no more insecure than any other comparable app. (Unless there's something about TDE I don't know yet.)

Micronaut wrote:

Second, is this claim of 'ancient code' remotely true? Just because they forked it from KDE 3.x doesn't mean they haven't fixed any bugs since then. That's the point of the fork, to get control of the code. smile

You answered your own question.

Agree with you wholeheartedly Ron,

that being said, some code that the palemoon devs use is newer, also, they deprecated jetpack at one point.

Which I fully agree with, due to the nature of its bloat.

I don't use palemoon btw, I use a fork of Basilisk Browser.

But yeah, they focus on stability and security, both bug fixes and security fixes on both their projects, Basilisk Browser and Palemoon.

On the subject of Trinity Desktop, KDE3 may be older, but imo, the newer KDE is way too much stimula for me, even KDE3 is a bit too much sometimes.

Although I think Trinity Desktop looks cool, for some reason, I have wanted to go for a more arcane since maybe more than half a year ago? I think?

I like using low amount of cpu for my WM or DE, thus I use JWM full time now, helps battery life. smile

But if I had to choose a DE on devuan, Trinity would be it.

My only reason not using any DE, they bloated, and in Trinity Desktop's case, it requires some crap... dbus for example... sad

Four of my laptops use Hyperbola now though. They are the ones I use most, and the newest, not counting that thinkpenguin one that is falling apart that I never use.

Hinge breaking, etc...

I have probably said way more than required, but yeah,  I like my system to be as minimal as possible, within reason.

Stuff redhat tries to cram into GNU and Linux,  is mostly not within reason, dbus, systemd, networkmanager, pulseaudio, pipewire, avahi, etc...

I use devuan much less than I used to, but its still interesting to see what people do here, thus I remain on here.

It's good you guys are around though, the more init freedom projects, the better! smile

#927 Re: Devuan » Debian has fallen. What now? » 2021-08-07 18:41:38

mckaygerhard wrote:

take into account that all the post that said somethig hard but true.. is banned as "are you tyrolling" .. interesting from Devuan forum administrations..

the problem is not Debian .. the problem is the position of the Devuan conclave.. it must work aside with Debian cos it depends of debian ..

antix team is a good aproach.. +1 for.. but i guess is more an idea of anitx/mxlinux team rather an idea of devuan teams.. that's the point

CAN YOU GUYS CHANGE THEIR MIND, well i back to work.. i must talk with tdenetwork packagers.. i found some details in the php packages.. and i remade many of them fixed for Devuan

???

I must have missed something...

Although it would be awesome if devuan had enough devs to maintain devuan without needing to fork debian.

Not the reality yet though, but someday maybe!

#928 Re: Installation » Beowulf Live Image Booting Problem » 2021-08-07 18:36:28

ixp123 wrote:
zapper wrote:
ixp123 wrote:

Specs,

Mobo: Asrock Z77 Extreme 4
CPU: i7-3770k
GPU: Radeon RX 570

Here's an imgur link with a pic: https://imgur.com/a/cvIm9RZ

I don't think I have ever seen that issue...

There is an intel processor called that, its ivy bridge I noticed when I did a search, but when I looked for Asrock, Z77 Extreme 4, I realized it must be an amd, judging by the rest of the info...

EDIT:  I think I spoke too soon...

I would check to see if hazardous boot is on,  its technically called secure boot, but I don't think that name makes any sense.

When the hazardousboot/secureboot is on, it gives some operating systems a hard time...  some linux distros operate this way alas...

Also, do you need the Radeon GPU? If not, I think intel processors come with their own version. Which in ivy bridge requires no blobs.

This would also be more likely to work in my experience.

No, soon as I got the motherboard and essentially rebuilt my PC, I made sure to turn secure boot off, and I checked just now and it's off

If that's the case, your image must be broken, I think...

I would try to reburn it such as this: 

sudo dd if=~/folderwhereyourisois/your.iso of=/dev/sdx bs=8M; status=progress sync

if you don't see /dev/sdx, then make it whatever your usb is seen as,

which you check by using lsblk.

If you know this, I apologize, I just wanted to make sure I explained myself... its a habit.

Just curious, but how did you burn your devuan image before? I just wondered in general...

hope this helps!

Also, glad to see you knew to turn off that feature known as secure boot.

#929 Re: Installation » Beowulf Live Image Booting Problem » 2021-08-07 03:22:02

ixp123 wrote:
chris2be8 wrote:

What make and model of system is it? CPU, motherboard, manufacturer, etc? Are you booting from a USB drive or a DVD? In either case what model?
Do any messages come out during the boot process?
If you have more than one system does it respond to pings from another system? If so can you log on to it over the network?
Exactly what message came out about the "live-boot" package when booting the minimal install? Can you take a photo of the screen and post it somewhere?

Chris

Specs,

Mobo: Asrock Z77 Extreme 4
CPU: i7-3770k
GPU: Radeon RX 570

Here's an imgur link with a pic: https://imgur.com/a/cvIm9RZ

I don't think I have ever seen that issue...

There is an intel processor called that, its ivy bridge I noticed when I did a search, but when I looked for Asrock, Z77 Extreme 4, I realized it must be an amd, judging by the rest of the info...

EDIT:  I think I spoke too soon...

I would check to see if hazardous boot is on,  its technically called secure boot, but I don't think that name makes any sense.

When the hazardousboot/secureboot is on, it gives some operating systems a hard time...  some linux distros operate this way alas...

Also, do you need the Radeon GPU? If not, I think intel processors come with their own version. Which in ivy bridge requires no blobs.

This would also be more likely to work in my experience.

#930 Re: Installation » Beowulf Live Image Booting Problem » 2021-08-06 15:30:58

Camtaf wrote:

Did you check that your download/s was/were good?

(Personally, never had a problem with the 'live' image.)

Possibly, your graphics aren't supported, but rare these days.

Check all physical connections, etc.

Yeah, but keep in mind, intel and amd keep pushing more crap into their processors...

More binary blobs/proprietary requirements, etc...

That being said, I have never had problems installing devuan either unless I broke the image, aka it didn't burn properly, or broke the drive it was installed on... wink

Both of which has not happened in a very long time... since I started using dd for burning images to usbs.

lsblk, is a must for dd though...

Thus I say,   caution is wise.

#931 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Browsers and the demise of Adobe Flash Player » 2021-08-03 03:34:16

Altoid wrote:

Hello:

Altoid wrote:

... filed a question here for the tabs drop down issue: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1344723

Maybe it is now a moot point.
Seeing that Pale Moon did not suffer from this and other innovations, I asked at the Pale Moon forum.

ron_1 wrote:

Pale Moon is a hard fork of Firefox. There isn't any new mozilla code that will find its way into PM. It's been this way for quite a while now.

I did not know that.

It seems a good reason to stay with Pale Moon, LibreWolf does not follow the same path.
As always, YMMV.     

Best,

A.

I wouldn't say they don't use new code, 29.2 and onward got rid of legacy extensions, aka, ones supported by firefox esr52.9 and older.

XUL hasn't been deprecated to be clear, just the ones that worked on firefox before ESR60 and firefox 57+,

As for new code, the new code is, mostly code to fix the problems firefox developers refused to, such as telemetry, tracking, data collection, insecurities,  stuff like that.

The last type of code, that is new, is the useragent stuff...

That's about all I think that is new code. But they do it differently then mozilla, so I imagine it is far more stable/secure.

Anywho, you can find out about many of these misconceptions on palemoon's forum:

https://forum.palemoon.org/viewforum.php?f=24

PS, I don't use palemoon, I use a fork of Basilisk Browser, known as Iceweasel-uxp.

#932 Re: Devuan Derivatives » An example of how Trinity Desktop Env (TDE) can look on Devuan ASCII » 2021-07-28 01:02:32

Trinity Desktop looks nice, I only wish it didn't have dbus and other annoying dependencies...

Also, it is somewhat bloated, even like other DE's, even Lumina my favorite DE, is somewhat bloated aka.

#933 Re: Off-topic » [SOLVED] New kernel adoption policy in Debian » 2021-07-28 01:01:08

xinomilo wrote:

this is debian related question..

ceres/sid has 5.10 in. so no luck with unstable repos atm...
only 3rd party repos currently offer 5.13 kernel packages for debian based distros (eg. https://xanmod.org/) or,
you can build a kernel debian package yourself from sources.. : https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/ke … tasks.html

debian kernel probably can give more info : https://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel

I will add another one to the list for those who don't need non-free repos of any kind even optionally,

jxself.org/linux-libre

smile

Note, I think the linux kernel is a monolith and am anticpating other options in the future, but for now, till the distro Hyperbola makes their BSD version,  I recommend anyone who doesn't need binary blobs, etc...

to use linux-libre you need a system usually that doesn't even need binary blobs optionally,  however if you do so, use an LTS kernel first, also, have multiple kernels if you want to be 99% sure. 

This hasn't been a problem for me most times on devuan,  but 2-4 out of maybe 200+ uses or more it has happened. 

But it still happens...  wink

For those saying debian/devuan don't have non-free stuff, I am very much speaking of hdcp and other issues like them,

But if you use a non-free wifi card, non-free sound blob or non-free graphics card, THEN DO NOT!

Just a friendly warning... if you need any of those three things,  be warned! Linux Libre probably doesn't work with them.

To my earlier point btw, the linux kernel  alone, has grown to 27 million lines of code, openbsd in its entirety has only less than 4 million, let that sink in...

Anywho, I just mentioned jxself.org's repo, because it has slightly more sane defaults regarding things debian deems free that FSF doesn't.

Although even the FSF, is  flawed regarding init freedom... to each his own. wink

#934 Re: Installation » It's not just Wondows: apparently we have a problem » 2021-07-23 03:08:34

steve_v wrote:
andyprough wrote:

Moral of the story - don't give rogue users direct access to your system.

...And if you must give untrusted users a shell, at least put sane limits on the system resources they can consume. There aren't many legitimate reasons an untrusted user process needs 5GB of RAM and a million inodes.

Dutch_Master wrote:

systemd

Funny you should mention that, as there's an example of the inevitable consequences of running such a large codebase as PID1 linked in that same Reg article.

Remember how us old-school *nix nerds said PID1 should be as simple as possible, since a crash there will bring the whole system down?

In some 20+ years I have never seen nor heard tell of an unprivileged process crashing sysv init, yet here we are again with systemd.
This one was at least patched quickly, but the core design fault isn't going away - on the contrary, systemd is getting fatter with every release and the potential attack surface just keeps on growing.

Maybe then at some point, they will actually learn their lesson if a bad enough crash happens...

Although, that would be pretty damn frightening, so I really hope they don't have to go that far down just to learn a simple lesson.

#935 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Browsers and the demise of Adobe Flash Player » 2021-07-23 03:03:29

andyprough wrote:
Altoid wrote:

Hello:

andyprough wrote:

... project called "ruffle" that seeks to be a flash emulator.
... used by the Internet Archive ...

Thanks for the suggestion, but Palemoon does not support WebExtensions.

Best,

A.

Did you try the Palemoon forum? I'll bet moonchild and Tobin would just LOVE to argue with you over whether their browser should support pirated flash videos.

Let me know when you have that argument with them, I'll bring the popcorn and be a spectator.

This is my only problem with them...  ps, nobody pirates anything.  Why do I say that? Because pirates sink ships, steal everything and very often murder the people onboard the ship.   
Thus, "piracy" or "pirating"  is massively inappropriate for saying that someone is getting something for free.  Besides, as I said to them, the DRM built into most copyrighted non-free software,  cannot even be modified, you don't even hardly own full access of the hardware/software you bought, and in some cases its even worse... 

It's basically like you only have the right  to use 30% of the capabilities and the rest is a blackbox. 

aka, you are not allowed to modified your own bios without reverse engineering the hell out of stuff just to get it work. 

You could call that jumping through a huge amount of random hoops. 

Some even consider modifying copyright software and distributing a patch to the original software to be copyright infringement and thus "piracy"

I know most of you would probably agree o n the whole hardware issues I mention being completely and utter bull$hit. 
That being said,  I appreciate Moonchild and Tobin's work on the palemoon and basilisk browser, but they are dead wrong on this issue. 

sad

Also, the idea of blocking ads is even theft to a few people on those forums including Moonchild last I checked...

Thus he is misguided on some issues.  I wish him well, but I won't agree on those two issues, aka copyright and its powers and of course advertisements...

If blocking ads = theft, privacy will start to erode even more.

And if copyright infringement includes modifying software your computer or hardware, privacy will also die even more rapidly.

If both happen, kiss privacy completely goodbye.

Yeah, sorry for the long winded reply, but these issues kind of freak me out.

No one needs to own a blackbox computer,

the way it should work is this: 

Corporations, government = being spied on   the low class and middle class not spied on!

The opposite though happens more often than not.  It's bs really... 

smh...

#936 Re: Devuan » Windows 11 will _enforce_ Secure Boot » 2021-07-19 12:10:25

samhain wrote:

Not any difference in EU. Education system is transformed to create consume drones.

Microsoft doesn't care.

I think they care a lot. It's just they care for the wrong reason.

Okay, then in that case, they care, the same way google and apple care about privacy.

Which is to say, they want to be able to spy on people.

;(

Smh to that...

#937 Re: Devuan » Windows 11 will _enforce_ Secure Boot » 2021-07-18 20:13:27

chris2be8 wrote:
zapper wrote:

Secure boot is a misnomer, I prefer hazardous boot personally.

Yes, the microsoft loves linux thing is yet another deception that should have been obvious to most people, even linus torvaldo should see through the bs. 

Also, yes capitalism is a poison, clarifying to say out of balance.  Denialism is also a problem, which seems to prevent people from dealing with issues, including climate change. 

I roll my eyes at all the people who think capitalism is awesome and pure and perfect...

No balance, no hope.

Aka, no system by itself works, including capitalism...

The problem here is that microsoft is an effective monopoly. Capitalism works well if you have a choice of product to buy, eg cars. But most people have to buy the OS with most software written for it, and most software is written for the OS with most users. So just because microsoft got there first they won control of the desktop. Ditto Intel nearly control the hardware market, though AMD do provide some competition.

WSL is intended to help them keep control by allowing people who need software only available on Linux to stay on windoze.

Nothing but US government intervention could break microsoft's monopoly (eg by requiring that the source code for any OS be made publicly available). And don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen.

It's a similar story with facebook (most people use it because most of their friends use it). And google etc.

Chris

My point was that we need a blend of ideas from different government types to make a good government.

Capitalism seems like a good idea by itself, until you consider that businesses will do whatever makes them the most money and gives them the most control.   

But I agree with your post,  about WSL's purpose, as well as the one about facebook.

As for the government intervention thing,

I think that could backfire anyways due to the % of the population that is good at manipulating things, aka manipulating people. They would probably try to get people fired up to reverse it to the opposite end, aka, everything is proprietary... which would be very frightening to have happen.

Although,  I think there are a few problems: problem 1: is you cannot modify your own Hardware, to remove the evil restrictions such as hazardous boot which some call, secure boot. Though that is not an accurate description, quite the opposite...  and other bios issues too.
Problem 2:  you should be able to change the bios to your liking without worrying about all rights reserved copyright evil and  people being allowed to arrest you for doing such.  Even if they don't give you the specs, you should be able to study them to change it and not need to do some insane reverse engineering effort just to fix the problems they created and without anyone being able to retaliate against you/sue/have you arrested.

There might be a problem 3, but I think these two cover it nicely.
So yeah...

#938 Re: Devuan » Windows 11 will _enforce_ Secure Boot » 2021-07-18 05:42:33

Secure boot is a misnomer, I prefer hazardous boot personally.

Yes, the microsoft loves linux thing is yet another deception that should have been obvious to most people, even linus torvaldo should see through the bs. 

Also, yes capitalism is a poison, clarifying to say out of balance.  Denialism is also a problem, which seems to prevent people from dealing with issues, including climate change. 

I roll my eyes at all the people who think capitalism is awesome and pure and perfect...

No balance, no hope.

Aka, no system by itself works, including capitalism...

#939 Re: Off-topic » [SOLVED] Anyone with a 386 willing to satisfy a curiosity for me? » 2021-07-18 02:42:01

Tatwi wrote:
zapper wrote:

Although if all else fails, try dosbox-x maybe? idk... sad

The idea here in this post is to get results using real hardware so there is an accurate baseline for performance characteristics.

I do have results from various emulators, but these results show that the emulators aren't entirely accurate (PCem Pentium 233MMX is 30% faster than my real Pentium 233MMX machine), so I'd like to get some accurate results from real hardware. Incidentally, DOSBox and DOSBox-X performance is identical when set to the same cycles, regardless of any core/cpu related setting available in DOSBox-x, so it's not worth the hassle of compiling/using DOSBox-x for this use case.

steve_v wrote:

No 386 unfortunately, the oldest operational machine I have is an IBM PC 330 100-DX4 (AKA 6571-W5L).
Intel 486 DX4-100, 256k L2 (WT), 48MB 70ns FPM RAM, CL-GD5430 video (via VLB-PCI bridge).
I have a DX2-66 CPU I could drop in it for some extra slowness, and I could probably try underclocking it, if the IBM CrippleBIOS(TM) will let me of course.

It's running the latest FreeDOS, which I'm not overly keen to uproot, and the drive is a) FAT32 formatted, and b) a complete bastard to get at, so if you want such a data point you'll have to point me at a source for this QBasic whatsit. I was a Pascal nerd back when, so I never had need or desire to go near it.

That's a nice machine! Technically my first PC was a hand-me-down 486DX4 100 clone that I used for a bit in 1998. Getting it running taught me how to remove a Master Boot Sector virus, shortly after learning what a boot sector was!

If you're able to down clock you 486 to 33MHz that would be great, but the results at 66MHz or 100MHz would be excellent as well, because I could compare them to my results from emulated systems (using PCem version 17). Also, from what I have seen through emulated system, a 486DX2/66 ends up being exactly twice as fast in the benchmark as a 486DX33, so halving the results on a real 486DX2/66 should be an accurate representation of a 486DX33.

As far as running the software goes, Qbasic is included in the DOS 6.22 boot disk available here,

https://www.allbootdisks.com/download/dos.html

So it's possible to you write that image to a floppy and boot your computer using it rather than FreeDOS. If you copy my BENCHES.BAS file onto the floppy disk, you can run it like so

qbasic /run benches.bas

The results can be saved to a text file, results.text. To exit Qbasic, press Alt to open the menu, then arrow down the File menu and select Exit.

Alternately, you could download QBasic 1.1 from qbasic.net here,

https://www.qbasic.net/en/qbasic-downlo … preter.htm

and add it to your FreeDOS installation, as it's 100% compatible with FreeDOS.

I sincerely appreciate your time and consideration! Please don't feel obligated to help, especially if it means futzing with your hardware to do so. My burning curiosity is not that important. smile

Point taken, you raised a good point, emulation would ruin the effect.  heh...

I would expect dosbox to be faster though. wink

#940 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » Audacity and Musescore Spyware problem » 2021-07-18 02:34:11

golinux wrote:

OK everybody . . . please just take a deep breath . . .

Yeah... I did that after I replied...

That being said... this thread has run its course for me...

for the most part anyways....

I might make more replies, but I probably will do it in a more limited fashion...

only wish I had done so sooner....

I should've looked inward before I replied to him... aka, the 2-3 replies before this one. Or more even...

Feel free to laugh, but I feel so silly...

oh well...

But yeah, brocashelm, you don't have to leave. 

You are  right, I should have heeded my own advice...

Ironic, but it happens... sad

#941 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » Audacity and Musescore Spyware problem » 2021-07-16 14:44:47

brocashelm wrote:

Moderators, feel free to delete all the posts I've made including the replies to them. I will be stepping out gracefully from this forum. Cheers.

I wasn't going to respond, to this thread again, but you don't have to quit the forums. 

I mean... just relax, I was only trying to help you.

That being said, if you want to leave, that is your call. 

Peace man... hope things go better for you in the future regardless, no hard feelings.

#942 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » Audacity and Musescore Spyware problem » 2021-07-16 14:30:49

Steve, my bad lol, I was bit too over the top yesterday, I am sure. 

That being said, I agree it should be closed too.

Also, sometimes I try to help people who don't want help...

hmm

Anyways, last time I will reply here, its going nowhere good anyways.

#943 Re: Devuan » Windows 11 will _enforce_ Secure Boot » 2021-07-16 03:16:19

Camtaf wrote:

I think, if I remember right, you have only bought the right to use MS Windows, a kind of lease, you don't own it outright - which was another reason for using Linux for me.

I would prefer to use totally open software & hardware, but it won't happen, because companies spend billions to bring new products to market, to stay ahead of their competitors.

Indeed, I wish all hardware had to be mandatorily be under free licenses only.  Aka, fully open source ones. Whether permissive or copyleft.

That being said, I doubt that will come for a while if ever. And if it does happen, it will take a huge situation and possibly 500+ years to happen.

Basically, not in our future probably... sad

#944 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » Audacity and Musescore Spyware problem » 2021-07-16 03:12:09

brocashelm wrote:
zapper wrote:

If your laughing at it, its because you are antisocial probably... or you don't know the news of sneedacity and their 4chan bs trying to intimidate cookie engineer.

Yup, and I'm laughing at it more and more with each passing day. I only feel sorry for the gullible fools who buy into outright lies and deception.

zapper wrote:

Besides, you do realize that the trolls at sneedacity threatened cookie engineer and his family right?

There is no evidence of this, as I said already. Do you know what schizophrenia is? He could also be staging all this "drama" all along. Anyone can write numbers on sticky notes and make a house look like there was a murder. I've seen this time and time again on the Internet. Nothing changes.

zapper wrote:

Yeah... I would stop for that reason above alone.

Feel free to. As for myself, I'll keep calling a spade a spade. Sneedacity has barely been around for two weeks and is already proving to be the best thing since sliced bread. Even the Audacium developers admitted in an IRC conversation to borrowing code from Sneedacity for a commit. If Sneedacity wasn't a serious project, then why even acknowledge their existence? That's how I know Sneedacity is the true winner. Give it up.

zapper wrote:

EDIT: After seeing the commens you just posted, I realize I might have been right the first time.

Well, with a signature like that, I'm surprised you don't spend more time on the Antix forums. That's more your crowd, I reckon. Devuan has no politics (left or right).

You really shouldn't assume wrongdoing on the victims part without actual evidence...  which most users here seem to think is against him. 

I really hope I am wrong about you, but usually I see this from far right fringe people, this level of perceived sociopathic behavior. 

I hope I am misunderstanding who you are, that being said... you look very suspiciously maligant.  I am going to hope I am wrong though...

As for Antix... I don't know much about AntiX or their forums.

That all being said,  please don't assume anything about him without knowing the whole story. Perhaps I don't know the whole story, but 4chan has been part of a lot of harrassment type situations, so try not to assume people are making a scene as your first go to belief when it involves 4chan on the other end.

Last thought though will be this:

Please open your eyes, lest you lose your way any furher.

Such arrogance is dangerous...

I'll save you a trip down my memory lane and say,  less than a year ago, I discovered my pride problem... I am working on it more than I ever have before...  Be careful, lest, pride sneak up on you too...

Also, no one likes a boastful fool.  I am sure you are better than that.  Given all people are created by the Lord.

Pride is a form of boastfulness btw...

Confidence = Good
Pride = overconfidence thus bad...

Anyways, hope you find peace from the same pride I have been fighting for a long time.

#945 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » Audacity and Musescore Spyware problem » 2021-07-14 02:19:01

brocashelm wrote:

Audacity has been officially forked. Its new name is Sneedacity (DEB builds here). big_smile

I'm also laughing my ass off at that "Cookie Engineer" kook crying over a poll (because of the name being picked). Clown World at it again. lol

If your laughing at it, its because you are antisocial probably... or you don't know the news of sneedacity and their 4chan bs trying to intimidate cookie engineer.

Besides, you do realize that the trolls at sneedacity threatened cookie engineer and his family right?

...

Yeah... I would stop for that reason above alone.

EDIT: After seeing the commens you just posted, I realize I might have been right the first time.

...

#946 Re: Devuan » Windows 11 will _enforce_ Secure Boot » 2021-07-14 02:14:31

blackhole wrote:

No not OpenBSD's thinking, the actual definition which goes back more than a few decades:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_large_object

I don't place much faith in belief systems surrounding GNU/FSF.  Device firmware is just a fact of life  - some implementations are acceptable others are bad, some more are utter crap. But unless you have the money and resources to develop your own hardware, we're stuck with x86.  I think that situation is positively win, win for Microsoft.  Linux and 'BSD users stranded on old hardware, while it continues this latest "embrace" phase.

While we're talking "beliefs" I have the firm conviction that the new Microsoft is far more dangerous to free software than the old.

MS have been working on WSL/WSL2, Azure, etc for many years. All of those products are about /not/ running a Linux OS on bare metal but on proprietary software owned ad controlled by Microsoft. Its takeover of the github platform and other acquisitions are all part of the same strategy.

Hardware is "intellectual property". To maintain a competitive advantage there are "trade secrets". The hardware you use was developed by corporations who seek to profit from it

"All rights reserved" refers to copyright - it has nothing to do with software licensing.

The MIT license would not stop e.g. Intel from taking Nvidia's code, which they have spent billions and decades of research on, and just incorporating it in their own products - decreasing Nvidia's advantage in that market and share value. tl;dr - they won't do that.

I don't doubt that corporations won't stop using all rights reserved, my point, is that copyright license in itself, is pure evil. 

Because it allows DRM galore to be put into stuff, and making a patch to remove it, requires heavy reverse engineering under such tough conditions, that its nearly impossible to do what is needed to be done.

FSF/GNU you are however right about, although I say this, because they don't go nearly far enough on actual freedom issues, like systemd, dbus, networkmanager, pulseaudio, pipewire, etc...

aka, some software that is being developed by people for linux, is meant to break freedom and force adoption by breaking backwards compatibility.  FSF/GNU doesn't seem to understand this is a huge threat. 

As for x86, I think you are very wrong about the future,  I think Risc-V will one day be the main however, there is one question, that remains unknown,  how much of it will be, non blobbed Risc-V implementations... again, the actual definition, including non-free firmware.

But yeah,  non-free firmware being a fact of life is total hogwash.

It is unreasonable for corporations to have such unjust power to be allowed to put backdoors in all their software...

Anyways, that's my final thought. so... yeah.

#947 Re: Off-topic » [SOLVED] Anyone with a 386 willing to satisfy a curiosity for me? » 2021-07-13 06:50:05

Tatwi wrote:

I've been puttering with QBasic 1.1 (comes with DOS 5+) over the last year and to make a long story short, I'm looking for someone to run the following program on a computer that has real 386DX 33MHz CPU, so that I can compare the results to how it runs in DOSBox.

The program is here,

https://github.com/Tatwi/QBasic/blob/ma … ENCHES.BAS

and the description is here,

https://github.com/Tatwi/QBasic/tree/master/BENCHES

Part of the long story is included in the description, if you're interested.

Other CPUs I'd like to get data for are,
- Intel 386DX 16MHz
- AMD 386 40MHz
- Intel 486SX 25MHz
- Intel 486DX 33MHz
- Any Cyrix/IBM CPU in this age/speed range.

Why?

OCD and I can't afford to buy an old PC just to answer this question, basically. But mostly OCD. smile

Thanks!

I probably could, if I had a device that old, but I don't really know if I do... though. So... yeah...

Someone may be able to answer you, but I don't know...

Although if all else fails, try dosbox-x maybe? idk... sad

#948 Re: Devuan » Windows 11 will _enforce_ Secure Boot » 2021-07-13 06:46:10

blackhole wrote:

BLOBs are not the same as device firmware. The latter is part of most devices, either residing the device's NVRAM or as a firmware image which is loaded via the device driver/firmware loader.

Far from being unnecessary, they are actually the device's own OS.  In that they are code which runs on the device itself and not any kind of x86 OS binary.

Some firmware is "open source", some is proprietary.  Despite contributing driver code the Linux graphics stack, Intel and AMD graphics tech is every bit as proprietary as Nvidia - with closed source firmware and hardware. They won't release  code which could threaten their commercial interests.

Camtaf, you're correct in that modern CPU's actually use a firmware layer called microcode, which runs on the "hardwired" CPU. Microcode makes it possible, well most of time, for the vendor to "patch" the CPU. There are also "out of band" processors running on modern CPU's, running a small OS - e.g.  the Intel Management Engine.

The IME has been deliberately designed to prevent the end user disabling it.  Along with UEFI and Secureboot, all of this tech equates to less freedom, privacy and security for end users.

As headstick has said, raspberry pi and its Broadcom chips, is no escape - neither is in fact ARM, if/when Nvidia buy them out.

The raspberry pi people already made their intentions plain in the PR disaster regarding the vscode Microsoft repository. But if you're already in bed with Broadcom, signed NDAs and developing devices loaded with proprietary firmware, courting Microsoft is not such a big deal.

I think you misunderstood my position, anything non-free including firmware that has potential insecurities, or backdoors, is a blob to me.  You are thinking of OpenBSD's thinking on blobs, but that isn't the FSF/GNU or even my belief.

Also, their commerical interests are bullshit.  I know they couldn't care less, but I in fact do care, thus I will never use anything with an intel me equivelant enabled at all, as long as I can.   

I say their commercial interests are bs, though, because the way they accomplish their goals is just... phenomenally messed up.

Its not the fact that the hardware isn't open source that is the ONLY problem, its actually the fact that it is laden with pointless DRM that requires non-free firmware to run, for, things like wifi, graphics and sound even...

sad

I knew microsoft, apple, google were bad, but I didn't know raspberrypi people were bad also...

smh...

If all hardware was under at least an mit license instead of that absurdly corrupt all rights reserved license,  that would be a step in the right direction.

But nope, alas... that will probably never happen for most mainstream hardware.  Greed/Power is just too enticing for many of these big corporations.

I guess to end this thought, all hardware should have optionally free licenses.  Trademarks of course are a different matter as long as they don't go the road of mozilla, but yeah...

Anyways, rant done... tongue

#949 Re: Devuan » Windows 11 will _enforce_ Secure Boot » 2021-07-12 03:44:24

Dutch_Master wrote:

@Camtaf: Some people take issue with "binary blobs" in Linux. They feel "Open Source" isn't "open" if there's a binary blob (proprietary code) on their system. That's fine, it's their prerogative. Others have a more pragmatic stance, accepting that these blobs are necessary if certain vendors (mainly nVidia, but also the RPi/Broadcom chips) have their products work on Linux.

Blobs, are completely stupid to even require. Usually its just an excuse to force backdoors down people throats.

Smh...

btw, Nvidia and Broadcom can suck it if that's there way of doing things.

I will never, ever use their products  unless I have no choice, and more importantly, I will never buy or ask for their products most likely either.

That being said, blobs are not an issue to me, if it can be confirmed they do nothing shady. But that is very unlikely usually...

Mnt Reform being one example of this. Libreboot/Coreboot + Me cleaner being similar albeit not nearly as good.

#950 Re: Devuan » Windows 11 will _enforce_ Secure Boot » 2021-07-12 03:39:49

golinux wrote:

There will come a time when these abominations will be the only older hardware available.  Many of us will not live long enough to see that shift but it will eventually happen . . .

That is not a good sign to hear...

I really, really hope that this doesn't happen till the next millenium or never.

Such things are pure evil.

Unless Risc-V takes shape in the future... well you know.

That all being said, I recently learned that gen 5 processors and onward require blobs even for their sound! that's just plain bullshit.

It's bad enough that gen 5 processors have boot guard and blob for the graphics, but sound too now? lame...

sad

Board footer

Forum Software