You are not logged in.
That is not what is needed
My sources.list file has the following uncommented lines:
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus main non-free-firmware
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus-updates main non-free-firmware
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus-security main non-free-firmware
When I reload Synaptic, I get the following message at the end:
Could not download all repository indexes
The repository may no longer be available or could not be contacted because of network problems. If available an older version of the failed index will be used. Otherwise the repository will be ignored. Check your network connection and ensure the repository address in the preferences is correct.
Repository 'http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus InRelease' changed its 'Suite' value from 'testing' to 'stable'
Repository 'http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus-updates InRelease' changed its 'Suite' value from 'testing-updates' to 'stable-updates'
Repository 'http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus-security InRelease' changed its 'Label' value from 'Devuan Security' to 'Devuan-Security'
Hi Folks,
Have the system rocking after having to manually set SWAP in fstab because I forgot to check the associated Checkbox during install to use the Swap partition I created.
There's only 3GB RAM available, as per the following page, but that's 6x better than 512MB.
https://support.dynabook.com/support/vi … Id=1816242
Having trouble with the System Clock and can't find accurate documentation on how to fix it.
The clock in BIOS is correctly set to my local time.
I used dpkg-reconfigure tzdata to set the Region and Location but the time in the clock in the Task Bar is not correct.
As per some searching on the Devuan Forum, ntp is already installed.
The displayed time is 10 hours ahead of local time.
What is the correct way to fix this?
Thanks!!
It's very possible that it's related to this topic.
Yes, devuan_daedalus_5.0.0_i386_desktop-live.iso is the file I downloaded. It has a datestamp of "2023-08-15 03:38:06".
Thanks!!
Hi Folks,
Memtest won't load with the 32-bit Devuan 5 Live DVD I burned for use on the Toshiba Tecra A7 (2005/2006 vintage).
Is it something to do with this topic?
Thanks!!
went back and reread the entire thread
When I was first attempting to boot the Tecra A7 with Devuan 5, I was using a USB Flash Drive.
I didn't realise at the time that there was a Blank DVD in the Optical Drive Bay. I was going to buy a blank DVD but I can't remember now what prompted me to open the Drive Bay.
I have Devuan 5 installed on the Dell and used Xfburn to create a Live DVD of Devuan 5 and with that I was able to boot the Tecra A7.
So yes, I was using Thunar from the Live DVD on the Tecra A7.
Hope that helps.
Looks like the RAM could show up on Tuesday.
your description of boot messages beginning with "PXE"
Had another look in the BIOS just to reconfirm that the date and time is still current.
There's no setting for turning off PXE booting and the LAN option can't be removed from the list of Boot Device options given. Putting it last hasn't made any difference neither.
I'm curious as to whether the BIOS and Win XP OS could have been "hardwired" in the era that this Laptop was introduced like UEFI can.
If so, could the installation of the other Hard Drive have upset the apple cart?
There's usually no need to go after "branded" modules or those specifically mentioned in the manual, you just need supported technology
I got 2 x 2GB DDR2 667MHz KVR667D2S5/2G Laptop Memory SDRAM Kingston for $AUD12.59 for the Toshiba and 2 x 8GB DDR3L 1600MHz PC3L-12800S Laptop RAM Kingston HyperX Impact for $AUD29.99 for the Lenovo which I will test in the Dell also.
the BT on the description/title may denote this company
I think you are right about the BT based on the feedback I got a couple of days later from the seller whose English is not too bad and friendly in nature.
According to the Tracking the RAM cleared the local crooks clearance yesterday and Ozzie Post received it this morning. May get it by the end of the week, touch wood.
Never heard back from the USA sources.
There are more tips …
The major scum, that be not much longer, are already being taken down. Some (like HRC apparently) have already been executed. The mopping up of the low level useful idiots (e.g. Freemason Filth and other psychopaths, in the Police, Academia, Polity, Media, Education, Judiciary et al) will be one of the last tasks to be done but it's going to be ongoing for decades.
Where does Core2 Duo/Quad line up in the chronological order in relation to Gen 1, 2, 3, etc?
Rob Braxman Tech
Thanks for your input. I know of Rob Braxman from the Corbett Report. Need to look at his site again to see what the latest is.
Yes ...
Nothing theoretical about the Deep State. Pull your head out of the sand. The DS are the communists. Big Oil (Rockefellers et al, Banksters et al, Bill Gates et al) are the communists (Khazarian Cabal) which are being taken by the Military Alliance with DJT who has President and Wartime C-i-C (Commander-in-Chief) since 2016.
You just need to know about Laws and Orders, The Law of War Manual (revised May 2016) and the Executive Orders that DJT signed and are still in effect as they have not been rescinded by the "Joe Biden" who grew a few inches a few months back, funny that.
https://rumble.com/user/RattleTrap1776/videos
The White House is closed and has been for some time. The Federal Reserve is gutted and the IRS is all boarded up too.
Gday
My tips
Thanks for the detailed information mate!
Quite a bit I already knew about.
I used to have a Lenovo B590 Laptop with a 3rd Gen Intel Chipset that didn't have TPM etc and I made sure that the Lenovo L540 4th Gen Intel Chipset also didn't have such stuff. Some could though. I had to get the Serial Number of the Laptop first, before buying, in order to get its full specifications so as to know whether to buy it or not.
The reason I am asking about this is not for myself but for others to whom I will pass on this information.
I thought AMD was compromised also. Are some of the Ryzen Chipsets also compromised at all? What do you need to look for in order to determine which Ryzen Chips are "safe"?
Protonmail can't be fully trusted neither the last I knew according to a report by Derek Broze who you can find via the website of The Last American Vagabond.
Yep, the CEOs whom are part of the scum cabal are being taken down by the White Hat World Wide Military Operation which you may already know about. DUMBs and Tunnels and related infrastructure are still being destroyed in Oz and around the world.
Take Care brother!
I stopped reading there
Well you need to read on then mate. You probably think the convid jabs are safe and effective too.
Watch some of the videos from this channel and you will get the drift.
Sometimes they have to switch Internet connections in order to keep the podcast going.
https://rumble.com/user/melgraham
The next time it occurs, I will post the link.
Pocket MNT Reform is the one I ordered
Can these be penetrated by malevolent Black Hat Deep State Actors (a.k.a evil govern-ment)?
Hi Folks,
Which Hardware and Software platform combinations are effective in combating System Penetration by Deep State Actors when streaming and recording podcasts?
Various people in the Freedom Movement are having their Laptops tampered with whilst Live streaming News and Informative Podcasts about what is really happening in our world. It can be happening to a single Laptop or to multiple geographically separated Laptops used by different people all of whom can be talking and video streaming during the same podcast.
Thanks!!
I usually use the last partition (sda4) for swap.
Is there a technical/speed advantage or disadvantage to having SWAP at the end of the drive?
Does having SWAP at the end make it easier to reconfigure the other partitions when necessary?
Videos would go on the partition for User Files.
Thanks!!
Hi Folks,
Pull the SMART diagnostics from the drive
I used Gnome Disks to check the S.M.A.R.T. data and all Assessments were OK.
I used the Check option with GParted which produced the following results - OK again.
Partition Type Start End Flags Partition Name File System Label Mount Point
/dev/sda1 Primary 63 109675754 boot ntfs S3A2418D002
/dev/sda2 Primary 109675755 117210239 hidden, lba fat32 HDDRECOVERY
========================================
Check and repair file system (ntfs) on /dev/sda1 00:01:06 ( SUCCESS )
calibrate /dev/sda1 00:00:06 ( SUCCESS )
path: /dev/sda1 (partition)
start: 63
end: 109675754
size: 109675692 (52.30 GiB)
check file system on /dev/sda1 for errors and (if possible) fix them 00:00:35 ( SUCCESS )
ntfsresize -i -f -v '/dev/sda1' 00:00:29 ( SUCCESS )
ntfsresize v2022.10.3 (libntfs-3g)
Device name : /dev/sda1
NTFS volume version: 3.1
Cluster size : 4096 bytes
Current volume size: 56153952768 bytes (56154 MB)
Current device size: 56153954304 bytes (56154 MB)
Checking for bad sectors ...
Checking filesystem consistency ...
100.00 percent completed
Accounting clusters ...
Space in use : 13704 MB (24.4%)
Collecting resizing constraints ...
Estimating smallest shrunken size supported ...
File feature Last used at By inode
Multi-Record : 34135 MB 24633
$MFTMirr : 28077 MB 1
Compressed : 34148 MB 47537
Sparse : 1816 MB 101064
Ordinary : 33531 MB 6011
You might resize at 13703069696 bytes or 13704 MB (freeing 42450 MB).
Please make a test run using both the -n and -s options before real resizing!
grow file system to fill the partition 00:00:25 ( SUCCESS )
run simulation 00:00:05 ( SUCCESS )
ntfsresize --force --force --no-action '/dev/sda1' 00:00:05 ( SUCCESS )
ntfsresize v2022.10.3 (libntfs-3g)
Device name : /dev/sda1
NTFS volume version: 3.1
Cluster size : 4096 bytes
Current volume size: 56153952768 bytes (56154 MB)
Current device size: 56153954304 bytes (56154 MB)
New volume size : 56153952768 bytes (56154 MB)
Nothing to do: NTFS volume size is already OK.
real resize 00:00:18 ( SUCCESS )
ntfsresize --force --force '/dev/sda1' 00:00:18 ( SUCCESS )
ntfsresize v2022.10.3 (libntfs-3g)
Device name : /dev/sda1
NTFS volume version: 3.1
Cluster size : 4096 bytes
Current volume size: 56153952768 bytes (56154 MB)
Current device size: 56153954304 bytes (56154 MB)
New volume size : 56153952768 bytes (56154 MB)
Nothing to do: NTFS volume size is already OK.
Still getting the Intel Boot Agent message.
Is it possible that even in the era that this Laptop is from that Laptop Makers and Windows were screwing around with BIOS in order to lock people into their cage of control?
So, I've ordered RAM a couple of days ago from the Ebay seller in China who must have been a bit busy at the time I sent my first message. Their English is pretty good. The package is already on its way.
I have a 500GB Hard Drive with Windows 10 that came with the Lenovo Laptop I briefly mentioned before. I am going to use that for the Toshiba.
It was formatted with an msdos Partition Table as follows.
Disk /dev/sdd: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Disk model: ASMT1053
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x1baf4c42
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdd1 * 2048 1187839 1185792 579M 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sdd2 1187840 767057919 765870080 365.2G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sdd3 767057920 976773119 209715200 100G 83 Linux
My proposed partition scheme will be as follows.
/dev/sda1 30GB Devuan 5 ext4
/dev/sda2 30GB MX Linux ext4
/dev/sda3 10GB SWAP linux-swap
/dev/sda4 Remaining Space ext4
for User files.
The Toshiba Laptop is not mine. Is 30GB sufficient for a non-power user for Devuan 5 and MX Linux?
Is 10GB too much for SWAP for 4GB of RAM?
I am rusty with this stuff. After deleting the current partitions and creating the new ones is the Boot flag also removed and will it be recreated by the Install process?
Are there any gotchas I need to know about?
Thanks!!
Aside, also really not sure why all the buggering about
I just want to make sure there's nothing fundamental at a lower level that could be causing the problem.
If, after using chkdsk /F on the drive, the Intel Boot Agent problem has gone, then, it indicates the possibility that maybe I buggered something up with it when removing and reinstalling it.
Then I will feel more comfortable about getting a new drive and RAM for it.
Well the CMOS problem hasn't reoccurred. I also can't find online where the battery resides on the Motherboard.
By Divine assistance I happened to press the F1 key when the Splash screen appeared which stopped the beeping when the Intel Boot Agent screen, that I previously advised of, appeared.
I waited a while and the following text appeared:
PXE-E61: Media test failure, check cable
PXE-M0F: Exiting Intel Boot Agent.
After that appears the Laptop boots to the Windows XP Login screen.
I click on the Turn off the Computer button and the Laptop starts beeping again. I can click on the Restart or Shut Down buttons and the Laptop restarts or shuts down.
The following page suggests that PXE-E61 "could be caused by a failing hard drive".
https://www.lifewire.com/pxe-e61-media- … re-4156811
Would using GParted from the Live DVD by using the Test feature on the drive's partitions be the same as using "chkdsk /f" in a Windows environment?
Could I put the Hard Drive in an enclosure and boot to Windows with the Dell Laptop I have and use "chkdsk /f" from there on the Toshiba's Hard Drive?
Happy New Day Folks,
I spoke too soon about solving the Intel Boot Agent problem.
I thought I would check it again this morning and it appeared again.
So, after disconnecting the Hard Drive and reconnecting it again, I got the same screen that I mentioned in Post #41 which can be viewed from the following link.
https://icedrive.net/s/jGG49ff4hkix7yXtDjFvWgRYSNaN
There is a Warning stating the following:
0251: System CMOS checksum bad - Default configuration used
Could it be that the CMOS (RTC) battery is coincidentally on the way out or could it be related to the removal and reinstallation of the Hard Drive?
So, I disconnected and reinstalled the Hard Drive again and after following the "Fourth Fix: Reset Power" of the following page I managed to get the Laptop starting again but the Intel Boot Agent problem still arises. If I enact the F12 Boot Menu option when the BIOS Splash Screen displays and select the HDD option the Laptop still boots Windows XP.
I'm starting to look into the CMOS checksum problem.
As for why it hangs on first-boot
There was another black screen that appeared that I quickly selected the Load BIOS defaults option but didn't think quick enough to take a photo of it. It mentioned the Chipset by name (Calistoga).
Well I found the following page today and my first test was to try the "Using the BIOS system" option of the Third Fix and it worked.
https://mobilecomputerrepair.com/proble … solutions/
edit: nothing here.
No problemo, gracias para la oferta.
I have 2 options I can try hear. Meanwhile I am hoping for a reply tomorrow from Data Memory Systems or Nemix Ram (www.nemixram.com) as per the email addresses given on the Data Memory Systems website.
use caution and patience with your experimentation
Thanks! for the great advice.
The Laptop will be used mostly as a Desktop whilst connected to the electricity supply.
I haven't been able to find any specific information regarding Phoenix BIOS 1.70 and which standards it supports.
The original drive is an Hitachi HTS541060G9SA00 (5400 RPM).
https://www.hdsentinel.com/storageinfo_ … 1060G9SA00
SATA 1 supports bandwidths up to 150 MB/s.
SATA 2.0, was introduced in April of 2004 and supports bandwidths up to 300 MB/s. So, maybe this Laptop could support SATA 2?
The following page suggests it could be possible.
https://www.gigabyte.com/lt/Motherboard … -S2-rev-10
According to Page 2 (19) of the Maintenance Manual:
The Laptop accommodates one 2.5-inch HDD with any of the following storage capacities:
• 40 GB (9.5 mm thick) SATA (5,400rpm)
• 60 GB (9.5 mm thick) SATA (5,400rpm/7200rpm)
• 80 GB (9.5 mm thick) SATA (5,400rpm/7200rpm)
• 100 GB (9.5 mm thick) SATA (5,400rpm/7200rpm)
• 120 GB (9.5 mm thick) SATA (5400rpm)
According to Page 7 (24) of the Maintenance Manual, it appears that this Laptop uses the Intel Calistoga 945GM Chipset as this particular Laptop has a dedicated Graphics chip.
On Page 8 (25) of the Maintenance Manual, it states the following regarding Memory:
Two expansion memory slots were provided, They can hold 256/512/1024MB expansion memory modules available as options to grow up to 4.0 GB.
• PC2-4200 /533/667MHz DDRII SDRAM supported
• 256/512/1024MB modules supported
− 256 MB (16M x 16 x 8P)
− 512 MB (32M x 16 x 8P)
− 1024 MB (64M x 8 x 16P)
However, 2 x 1024 MB modules would only make 2 GB. I saw similar information on Page 23 of the official Intel document located at the following link.
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/p … asheet.pdf
It says:
System Memory Support
• Supports single-/dual-channel DDR2 SDRAM
• Maximum Memory supported: up to 4 GB at 400, 533 and 667 MHz
• 64-bit wide per channel
• Three Memory Channel Configurations supported:
— Single-Channel
— Dual-Channel Symmetric
— Dual-Channel Asymmetric
• One SO-DIMM connector per channel
• 256-Mb, 512-Mb and 1-Gb memory technologies supported
• Support for x8 and x16 devices
However, on page 17, Revision Number 002 (April 2006) indicates that support for 4-GB physical memory @ 667 MHz was included. Is that just a documentation revision? Did they forget to include 2 GB RAM modules perhaps?
Page 21 of the User's Manual (First Edition January 2006 - so I think this Laptop is actually 2006 vintage) states:
PC4200 256 MB, 512 MB, 1024 MB or 2048 MB memory modules an be installed in the two memory slots for a maximum of 4096 MB system memory.
It seems like some of the documentation may not have been properly updated in various documents?
I found on Ebay that it appears Toshiba did make a 2GB module whose naming convention matches that of the 1GB module Part Number that is in the User Manual (see post #32 above). The 2GB module has a Part Number of PA3411U-2M2G which is for the 533MHz frequency. There is also a PA3513U-1M2G PC2-5300 module for the 667MHz frequency. However, the RAM is actually unbranded.
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/392835396777
These 2 pages appear to indicate that the Laptop can use 2 GB modules.
https://www.datamemorysystems.com/dms-m … a7-100.htm
https://www.datamemorysystems.com/dm50-190/
I'll contact this shop as buying from the USA should hopefully be more secure anf communicative. Still no reply from the Ebay seller in China.
Yesterday morning, for the second time, I removed the original Hard Drive (with Windows XP on it) to check that a more modern and higher capacity Hard Drive (WD 500GB Blue, 5400 RPM) was detected by the BIOS and could be recognised and accessed with Thunar using the Devuan 5 Live DVD. That was successful.
However, after reinstalling the original drive, when I boot the laptop, the BIOS splash screen is displayed but then warning beeps are heard with the text displayed on the screen that you can see in the following image.
https://icedrive.net/s/DjxGzFTawuxGkF2azxzy76A5BV39
I have to press the power button to turn off the Laptop.
Starting the Laptop again, if I press the F12 key when the BIOS splash screen is displayed, I can access the Boot Menu and select the HDD option and it then boots normally to the Win XP logon.
The day before yesterday, when I first removed the original drive and reinstalled it, the Laptop booted without problems afterwards.
Did installing the 2nd Hard Drive cause something to be changed in the BIOS? The 2nd hard drive was formatted for booting on UEFI systems but I did not attempt to boot from it.
Off topic: Have you been below Cheyenne Mtn? Are you familiar with what's going on on the following page?
https://earthquakes.ga.gov.au/
Happy New Day Folks,
I've found some RAM on Ebay and I sent a message to the seller last night but still waiting for a reply.
Does anybody know what the BT at the end of the Item Title means?
"Laptop RAM Memory BT"
Next step is to see if a WD WD10SPSX 1TB Black 2.5" 7200RPM will work in this laptop. Along with 4GB of RAM, it should get a good boost in performance.
Thanks!