You are not logged in.
You can see what packages depend on a package via rdepends:
apt rdepends gstreamer1.0-pulseaudio
And you can "try-out" a purge of a package by use of the -s option, to see what would be removed along with it:
apt -s purge gstreamer1.0-pulseaudio
I ran apt rdepends gstreamer1.0-pulseaudio and this is the result. What does the line before some of the items on the list mean, if anything? At first I thought it meant that those are installed apps since I noticed Handbrake has one, but I checked some of the others and they weren't installed. Is there a way to get results of only installed apps on my system?
gstreamer1.0-pulseaudio
Reverse Depends:
Depends: gstreamer1.0-plugins-good-dbg (= 1.10.4-1)
Recommends: totem
Recommends: rhythmbox
Depends: quodlibet
Recommends: plainbox-provider-checkbox
|Depends: pitivi
Recommends: pidgin
|Depends: phonon4qt5-backend-gstreamer
Depends: phonon-backend-gstreamer
Recommends: mopidy
|Recommends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37
Depends: knowthelist
Depends: kazam
|Recommends: handbrake
Depends: gnome-core (>= 1.10)
Recommends: gst123
Depends: gnome-sound-recorder
|Depends: banshee
Suggests: gnome-control-center
Depends: empathy
Recommends: clementine
Suggests: cinnamon-control-center
|Depends: buzztrax
Recommends: banshee
Out of curiosity I checked what I had installed. While I don't have pulseaudio installed, I do have gstreamer1.0-pulseaudio, libpulse-mainloop-glib0, and libpulse0 installed. Can I delete these 3 without any adverse effects? Thanks.
Handbrake uses ffmpeg already so you could look around in the Handbrake documentation for options on the codec you are looking for.
BTW SMPplayer is also using ffmpeg for playing your video.
I look around in Preferences and there's nothing there to select/switch codecs. I'll see if I can find anything on their website.
Thanks. I'm used to Handbrake, but maybe I'll give ffmpeg (i.e., winff) a try.
Handbrake doesn't recognize the audio portion on videos made with my camera. I have to first convert the audio with Audacity to m4a format, then mux that new audio together with the original camera video, then use that new file to reencode the video to a manageable size (I use passthrough for the audio since it has already been converted with Audacity). I noticed when I play the original video file with SMPlayer that is uses the pcm_mulaw codec (which I guess is an internal SMPlayer codec). Is there a codec I can install via Synaptic that Handbrake would use to recognize this? I searched Synaptic for "mulaw" but that search came up empty. Then I search "pcm" and that gave a few hits, but I'm clueless if anything there would solve this problem. One entry, morse2ascii, says "tool for decoding the morse codes from a PCM WAV file." This seems to be what I need (EDIT: on further research, this does not seem to be what I need). Any ideas? Thanks.
My next donation will not go thru dyne! We'll chat about that one day.
Is there another way?
MiyoLinux wrote:
Speaking of Glen Campbell...his guitar playing was amazing. People like to talk about shredding a guitar. He could shred it, put it back together, and then shred it again.
Fun fact: he played guitar on quite a few Beach Boys songs. I got to see him in Vegas in 2006 (or maybe it was 2007).
MiyoLinux wrote:
Fun music!Conway Twitty: It's Only Make Believe
Good song. I like Glen Campbell's version best:
I've been using Pale Moon for years and love it. If you run into any problems (because Pale Moon has diverged far away from Firefox things that work in FF may not work in PM, but there are usually alternatives) I'd suggest searching the PM forums. Or post here (in off topic I suppose). I usually visit this forum at least once a day.
Okay, thanks for the confirmation Ogis1975.
Well, I just retried it today before trying anything else, and everything installed like it normally does without any kind of messages.
So is everything good to go and I got a fully up-to-date system? ?
When trying to install updates tonight, I got a message box that read:
Some of the packages could not be retrieved from the server(s).
Do you want to continue, ignoring these packages?
So I clicked "no." Below is the message I got afterwards:
W: Failed to fetch http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/debian-security/pool/updates/main/g/gst-plugins-base1.0/libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0_1.10.4-1+deb9u1_amd64.deb
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/debian-security/pool/updates/main/g/gst-plugins-base1.0/gstreamer1.0-plugins-base_1.10.4-1+deb9u1_amd64.deb
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/debian-security/pool/updates/main/g/gst-plugins-base1.0/gstreamer1.0-x_1.10.4-1+deb9u1_amd64.deb
404 Not Found
I've never had this happen before. Should these 3 things become available later on? Should I just redo this again and click "Yes" this time, or just wait?
MiyoLinux wrote:
I also change the number of minutes that elapse between update checks, but that's voluntary on my part.
Can it be configured to only check about 1 minute after boot up? (Each boot up, that is.)
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
Because they were laughing at the clueless idiots, perhaps?
Real good marketing ploy . . . exposing your own user base as supposed idiots. That makes the "jokers" the idiots.
Lysander wrote:
Can we please stop this before it starts and not pollute a third forum with the same bullshit that infected FDN and DUF?
Okay, I'm done. Now tell that to Head_on_a_Stick who keeps insulting people.
Head_on_a_Stick
I reckon the Devuan devs just didn't think anybody would be stupid enough to think the joke was real.
Making your own website looked hacked, that's the real stupidity.
ChuangTzu wrote:
How would you feel if your bank said "we were hacked today etc..." then announced just kidding a day later. Your Dr. says, you have cancer...nah just yanking your chain.There comes a time when people need to grow up, its not about being frat boys and sorority girls anymore. The dev's need to stop hiding behind some false hacker ethos to shrug off poor judgement. Big difference between honest mistakes and poor judgement.
Nicely put. And so true.
Saying 1 + 1 = 3 is human error. What this guy(s) did was just plain stupid. If I were in charge, he'd be gone.
dxrobertson wrote:
I thought the joke/page display was done internally, by a Devuan admin, as a joke.
Well, that's what I thought also. Can somebody who knows what happened please inform the rest of us on the whole story, joke, or whatever it was?
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
Fooling you is awesome, yes. You actually took time off work because of this?
Your powers of reading comprehension are amazing. Read what I wrote again.
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
I though it was an awesome joke, the more so for all the people it apparently fooled lol
So fooling people that use your product is "awesome"? That's just plain stupid. Yes, I'm angry over this. It didn't cost me work time, it cost me some time from my time off of work. There's a good reason why people and businesses that put out products for a profit don't fool their customers. This "joke" was not smart.
Ogis wrote:
That's right. It's a joke.
Making your own website look like it was hacked is not a joke. I wonder how many people it made wonder if their system or browser was compromised after visiting this "joke"? Not funny and may cost Devuan current and future users.
This was not harmless humor. I'd still like to know who did this, and how high up the Devuan food-chain they are. Making your own website look like it was hacked? How stupid can you get? If people don't take Devuan seriously, it looks like now they got a reason. Way to go.
P.S. I really do want to know how high this person is on the Devuan food-chain. The higher up they are, the dumber this "joke" was.
Really? Someone with Devuan did this? Unbelievable!
sgage wrote:
Hopefully we'll learn some details. I'd like to see more info here, and soonish...
That makes two of us.
This is bad publicity for Devuan. How did this happen? A weak password or something?
sgage wrote:
I tried copying the comment link, and when I tested it, it went to nothing. Just go to the article and search for 'defacement poster' or something and you'll find it.
I found it 3 minutes before your post.