The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#2977 Re: Devuan » Aggregate of Various Lightweight Alternatives to Common Software » 2017-10-24 21:43:21

Adhil wrote:

1) Replacing udev with eudev: https://github.com/gentoo/eudev https://gitlab.com/trios-linux

Eudev will help to distance Devuan further from udev and thus systemd. It is stable, actively developed, and accommodating. Barry K. of Puppy Linux has received help firsthand from presumably their lead developer, blueness (i.e., https://github.com/gentoo/eudev/issues/60)

I've used TRIOS Linux and it was one of the best out of the box experience for my Dell Latitude D630 hardware. They're software has stagnated for about a couple years, yet they're still active on the Serbian forums. They were recently removed from the Without-Systemd wiki due to inactivity. The reason I bring this up is  because they compiled and configured eudev for the Debian system which I failed to do after an attempt on AntiX yesterday. I'm unsure whether this already compiled eudev can be employed in Devuan's future or not. The main difference is TRIOS uses openRC whereas Devuan uses SysVinit. Perhaps eudev will be adopted simultaneously with openRC.

eudev is already available for testing on ascii and will likely be included in the ascii stable release.  There is plenty of discussion about this on the ML, irc and forum.

#2978 Re: News & Announcements » Amprolla3 is out for testing » 2017-10-24 20:16:20

Note there is no DNZ list.  Corrected to DNG above.  And here is the reference.

#2979 Re: Off-topic » Ambiguity in communication » 2017-10-23 19:00:44

FOSSuser wrote:
golinux wrote:

...Not impressed.  I had this knowledge deeply embedded in my brain by the time I was 10.

Then, I suggest, you use it!

I do every day, thank you.  We are just reading from different scripts.  Let's just agree to disagree.

I'm going to split those related posts to another thread.

#2980 Re: Off-topic » Adventures of the systemd clownface » 2017-10-23 18:47:38

blinkdog wrote:

Clean those rational arguments, stow them away in the armory, then come help us build Devuan! smile

Amen to that.

#2981 Re: Off-topic » Adventures of the systemd clownface » 2017-10-23 17:41:22

cynwulf wrote:

Well before you start piling on with any further chastisement...  the OP was apparently issued with a 1 week ban on 08/10/17.

http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1637&p=2

If those were the terms, then this should have expired, but as yet they haven't returned.

It was removed exactly one week later.  But if the bad mouthing continues will be reinstated.

#2982 Re: Off-topic » Ambiguity in communication » 2017-10-23 17:35:23

Ah the great authority of the internet.  Not impressed.  I had this knowledge deeply embedded in my brain by the time I was 10.  Back then peeps actually knew what they were talking about and teaching

#2983 Re: Off-topic » Ambiguity in communication » 2017-10-22 15:24:30

FOSSuser wrote:
golinux wrote:
FOSSuser wrote:

. . .  since the demise of #! (Crunchbang), & Vuu-Do.

How can you go over to Vuu-do if it's 'demised'?  Of course it isn't and we all know that but that phrase doesn't.  wink

(I'm ever the editor)

Depends how you read it, there's a comma in there that separates the '& Vuu-Do' from the demised #1, & relates to the original statement about AntiX. smile
But, I suppose I could have put a semi colon instead. wink

That would still be a little murky.  Might have been better to say something like:

. . .  since the demise of #! (Crunchbang) & the arrival (or whatever) of Vuu-Do

Never, ever leave an ambiguity . . .

You can tell it's a slow day . . . LOL!

#2984 Re: Off-topic » 400 and growing! » 2017-10-22 13:53:41

fungus wrote:

If anyone has missed the video you should give it 2' of your time https://sysdfree.wordpress.com/113/

A golden oldie.

#2985 Off-topic » Ambiguity in communication » 2017-10-22 13:51:03

golinux
Replies: 10
FOSSuser wrote:

. . .  since the demise of #! (Crunchbang), & Vuu-Do.

How can you go over to Vuu-do if it's 'demised'?  Of course it isn't and we all know that but that phrase doesn't.  wink

(I'm ever the editor)

#2986 Re: Other Issues » Krack » 2017-10-19 15:46:30

I thought it was already fixed

#2987 Re: Off-topic » Why Commodore Failed » 2017-10-13 16:50:48

@macondo . . . even though this is the Off-topic forum, repeatedly spamming it with youtube videos is a bit much.  Just sayin'

#2990 Re: Off-topic » When you can't tell the difference between Windows and systemd » 2017-10-09 17:11:36

Greetings cynwulf!  Was wondering if you'd ever popup here.

#2991 Re: Off-topic » Arguments against systemd » 2017-10-08 01:31:33

@JoshuaFlynn . . . see you next week.

#2992 Re: Off-topic » Arguments against systemd » 2017-10-08 00:26:33

That is pretty twisted.  It's obvious to anyone with connected brain cells that devel was a troll.  But your first post was the flame into which the moth flew.  Your continuing argumentative responses defending your poor judgment indicate that you are STILL clueless.  That's why you're getting the heat.  It seems that not all trolls are pro-systemd . . .

#2993 Re: Other Issues » When is Amprolla3 coming? » 2017-10-07 22:35:05

No apology needed.  The #devuan logs are an excellent resource.  It's always good to remind folks.

#2996 Re: Off-topic » Arguments against systemd » 2017-10-07 06:57:59

If you think that reinventing the wheel is a good use of your time, go for it.   We have more important things to do.  Devuan will fail or succeed on its own merits,  There is no need to 'win' over users who should be intelligent enough to find the many excellent analyses that are already available (and have been for years).

#2997 Re: Off-topic » Arguments against systemd » 2017-10-07 04:00:27

This thread serves no purpose except as troll bait (and it worked).  So can you please take a deep breath, leave the dramatic gestures and defensiveness aside and take it down a notch.  Thanks.

#2998 Re: Off-topic » Arguments against systemd » 2017-10-07 02:58:32

We do not have a "lack have of code of conduct".  We have an (almost) No Code of Conduct.  I personally don't see how anything good can come of rehashing this topic (which has been beaten to death for many years).  it is also a waste of bandwidth,  But let it continue for a while.  Hopefully it will grind to a halt with not even a whimper.

#2999 Re: Off-topic » Arguments against systemd » 2017-10-07 02:06:03

Good grief . . . 2641 words (including quotes).  You really have outdone yourself this time.  Perhaps this might a good time to lock it?

Board footer

Forum Software