The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#1 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-26 13:38:44

What's the definition of parity?

- A parrot's favorite drink.

Why did the bartender refuse to give the parrot a drink?

- Because he was parrot-no-id.

What geometric figure most resembles a parrot?

- A polygon.

Why did the mathematician's parrot starve?

- He couldn't solve the polly-no-meals!

#2 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-25 07:45:52

You know that time when my wife gave me a big hug?

It was after I told her that she should embrace her mistakes.

big_smile

#3 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-24 22:37:06

As they say, the difference between "male factor" and "malefactor" is just a single space... tongue

#4 Re: Other Issues » Unusual kernel defconfigs » 2024-10-24 22:18:14

I regularly run kernels that I configure by hand.  Usually when I see things that I don't need that are turned on, I just turn it off.  If it breaks something later, then I know that I should've left it on. big_smile  For the most part, if you know what's in your hardware, most options can be turned off.  Recent kernels' configure scripts will automatically turn on stuff that are needed for features you explicitly turn on, so for the most part you won't run into any problems.

Many default kernel configs enable way too much stuff that I don't need, wasting time in compiling drivers I will never end up using and occupying RAM for nothing.  This kind of config makes sense for upstream distributors because they need to ship a kernel that works with everyone's (or most people's) hardware.  But when you're configuring the kernel for your own use, you already know exactly what hardware you have so most of the other stuff is just dead weight.

#5 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-24 17:52:28

@The-Amnesiac-Philosopher: I'm glad you didn't include maps or text containing the word "part" in your post, because otherwise, it'd be a spam trap.

tongue

On another note, last night I dreamed about my pet rabbits all lined up like in a parade, and hopping backwards.

Then I woke up, and realized that it was my receding hare line!

#6 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-18 17:17:27

Husband: I think you're right.
Wife: Wha... I haven't even said anything yet!
Husband: I'm just trying to save time.

big_smile

#7 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-17 20:33:49

Doctor says, "We cut the wrong leg off."

Which means that the other leg is the right one? big_smile

This would be the first time a leg that's left is the right one.  I guess when you only have one leg it's no longer important whether it's the left leg or the right leg? big_smile big_smile

#8 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-16 17:53:59

How did the police catch the murderer?  Because he didn't hide the body -- they saw him leaving the crime seen. tongue

#9 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » Firefox 128.3.1esr *not* clearing history on closing » 2024-10-16 17:30:59

No idea what's going on, but if you're paranoid, you can always

rm -rf ~/.cache/mozilla/firefox

to destroy all cached files.  This probably also includes profiles and settings, though, so if you want to save some things, you may need to refine that rm target appropriately.

#10 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-10 15:54:37

Yesterday while walking down an alley, I saw Schrödinger's dumpster.  It has this written on it:

"Empty when full."

big_smile

#11 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-10 00:29:12

Dad: I... I... think I'm having a heart attack. C-call me an ambulance, quick!
Son: OK.  Uh... dad, you're an ambulance.

🤦

#12 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-09 19:39:47

I saw a guy get run over by a shared library.
He was trapped under dbus, streaming his head off.
The driver got out and said, SSH!

big_smile

#13 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-09 18:20:33

A depressed guy was talking to his therapist.  "I can't deal with my problems anymore!"

The therapist replied, "Have you ever tried becoming a school bus driver?"

"What has that got to do with my problems?"

"Because then all your problems will be behind you!"

big_smile

#14 Re: Off-topic » Thank you Devuan » 2024-10-09 00:46:09

Anger? Lol boy do you have a warped view of who I am. This exchange has been quite amusing, in spite of being rather disappointing. Especially amusing (and disappointing) is "love and joy and cooperation" coming from someone who, as anyone can see for themselves above, resorted to ad hominem unprovoked.

But nevermind that. I'm perfectly fine not participating in this, shall I say, "interesting" community where ad hominem is equated with love and joy and cooperation.

I have nothing against you, and hold no grudge, but I hope you can see for yourself what you have just done. Perhaps, just perhaps, there's room for improvement somewhere? Just sayin'.

Anyway, that's quite enough from me. Time to shut up and return to my "cave". Have a nice day!

#15 Re: Off-topic » Thank you Devuan » 2024-10-08 22:03:49

Shoot the messenger?  Whoa, slow down, soldier.  I wrote a post explaining why I came to Devuan, which, might I emphasize, did not contain any insults or ad hominem, especially not anything involving you. And your response was, I quote:

You have no git account. AFAIK have never been seen on IRC or even the mailing lists, at least as quickfur. And one of our jitsi meets? Hahahaha! What have YOU contributed to Devuan besides an endless stream of wasted bits in OT and empty rousing rhetoric to encourage someone else to do the work for you. Epic fail . . ..

I guess I must have missed the memo, is this how people welcome each other in 2024?  Wow, I'm so outdated on what the new norms are on social etiquette.  Is this what they mean by "generation gap"?  Guess I should crawl back to my primitive cave and stay there until I learn how to treat another human being with ad hominem and derision as a way of encouraging their contribution.  It's certainly a novel idea, I must say.  Never thought of it before myself.  I guess I have you to thank for this enlightenment.

Now excuse me while I retire to my cave to muse over the deep significance of this "revelation". big_smile

#16 Re: Off-topic » Thank you Devuan » 2024-10-08 17:19:15

Wow, by so little and we're already engaging in the ad hominem?  Based on unfounded presumptions, no less.  That must make you feel real good about yourself.  I hope you're happy now.

Since I'm clearly not welcome here, I guess I should just shut up and take my energy elsewhere.  Thanks for the tip, and have a nice day! big_smile

#17 Re: Off-topic » Thank you Devuan » 2024-10-08 16:09:36

Back in the 90's when the joke that was Windows 95 was still the talk of the kids, I decided to leave that world behind forever.  At the time, Linux was a (very) niche OS that nobody has hardly heard a thing about.  I reviewed the handful of distros that existed back then, and chose Debian for being the most flexible and convenient: I could leverage the package repo without having to compile everything by hand, yet I could customize the OS as I wished, trimming off unnecessary fat and installing only the bare minimum of what I needed, nothing more, nothing less.

Back then, I couldn't care less that nobody among my peers used Linux, or even knew what Linux was (except that one friend who recommended it to me at first).  Whenever I mentioned that I used Linux, I would get incredulous stares and blank looks.  Did I care?  Of course not.  The Debian of the 90's gave me the best balance between convenience and control, and I could finally be free of the tyranny that is the Windows ecosystem.  I didn't care that I had to leave behind a lot of popular software that the kids loved to boast about.  What I cared for is that finally, I had control over my own machine.  And as a then-aspiring programmer, that's all I cared about.  Who cares about the eye-candy that Win'95 offered?  It was a joke that I couldn't care less about.  Linux let me dig under the hood and modify things to my heart's content.  I, the user, was empowered.  That was what mattered.

Sadly, the Debian of 2024 is a very different world.  The hacker mentality of the 90's had long gone. People cared more for winning the approval of the masses than for what truly mattered: the empowerment of the user.  In place of that is the empowerment of the upstream.  Folks like the systemd guys wanted to control everything.  The proprietary mentality has infiltrated what was once an open mentality. (Ironically, it seems that in history, every time the word "open" became part of a project's name, the project became closed and controlled by the few rather than the many.)  In their efforts to please the masses, they are ready to compromise on anything and everything.  Who cares about the Unix philosophy of doing one thing, and doing it well?  "That results in something that's different from Windows!" is the underlying message.  "We must unify everything so that it becomes more like Windowsis more intuitive to the user!"  IOW, they wanted to bring Linux back to the very world I had decisively left in the 90's and never want to return to.

And so I found Devuan and left the systemd world behind.  Hardly anybody has heard of Devuan in my social circles, let alone know what it is.  Do I care?  Of course not.  At this point, I'm ready to leave it all behind to adopt an unknown niche OS -- if it cares about the empowerment of the user rather than the empowerment of the upstream.  I don't care if nobody has heard about it or even knows what it is.  I don't care about systemd, snap, cross-distro unification, or any such similar nonsense that has been hoisted on the Linux world in the past 2 decades.  If I have to give up 80% of popular software, so be it.  I did it in the 90's, I'm ready to do it again.

And I believe I'm not the only one.  Let the majority of today's so-called Linux crowd go the way of Poettering, I'm sure a minority will reject it and take a different route.  We will fork the Linux ecosystem and leave the unified world behind. ("Unified world" is an euphemism for "dystopia under the control of a few who took it upon themselves to control everyone else".)  We will develop it in a wholly different direction, where the empowerment of the user matters more than the agenda of the few.  The machine should be humanity's tool, not the other way round.  To hell with popularity, I will fight for my control over the machine.

#18 Re: Off-topic » Thank you Devuan » 2024-10-08 09:42:27

- Devuan would free itself from Debian, therefore allowing it's manpower to power innovation instead of fighting with upstream

This is a misrepresentation of the state of things. While it's true we have to fight with upstream w.r.t. what's related to systemd, without Debian we wouldn't even have a miniscule fraction of manpower to manage the huge package repository that we today inherit from Debian. The devs would be drowning in package maintenance, there would be no resources left for innovation.

#19 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-07 17:01:29

Have you noticed that the phrase "the IRS" spells the word "theirs"?  big_smile

#20 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-05 14:54:20

one of the leading causes of dry skin is a towel.

I'm afraid I'm gonna have to throw in the towel at this point. This sense of humor is just too dry.

tongue

#21 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-04 04:20:28

A bunch of crows were perched on a tree, eyeing a piece of food that someone dropped in the middle of a busy road, and wondering if they should risk flying down to get the food.

It was a tempted murder. big_smile

#22 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-03 15:39:45

I think those two vegetarians made a big missed steak. big_smile

#23 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-03 13:38:16

I generally listen to what my wife says, but when she told me to stop imitating a flamingo, I just had to put my foot down.

#24 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-02 16:22:55

All this talk about hot fusion and cold fusion and what-not, I think it's all just a con.

It leads to con-fusion. big_smile

#25 Re: Off-topic » The Joke Thread » 2024-10-01 19:52:39

What's the most terrifying thing in the science of nuclear physics?

The word "oops". tongue

Board footer

Forum Software