You are not logged in.
Can you login via ssh from another computer?
Or boot daedalus and do a chroot into the excalibur installation?
To reconfigre the keyboard:
sudo dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configurationYou made my day!
gkrellm is just working and maintained - 13 houes ago, says https://git.srcbox.net/gkrellm/gkrellm
On my AM4-mainboard, the best collection of temperature sensors is at /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon[0-4]/temp[1-9]_input
This does not include the GPU, which gkrellm covers.
The following may or may not apply ... .
Assuming you already did
# update-grubDoes grub's "advanced options" menu show something useful?
Is a kernel installed?
Are you booting in UEFI or BIOS mode? Can you switch between them?
Did you mount the EFI-partition in excalibur?
chroot probably menas there is a functioning linux installation. Does this grub find devuan excalibur when running update-grub?
@Micronaut
I do not know how or where gkrellm gathers information, but it found a lot of temperature sensors on cpu, gpu, nvme, network, gigabyte-wmi, thermal_zone[0,1]. And presented them as a list to choose from to display. Only the (data-grave-)HDD's temperature was missing.
It's a good and convenient tool to monitor temperatures (and more).
e.g.: /etc/init.d/networking restart
@_mAL_4_th3_fl00r #1 : beside that the commands are to execute from right to left ... what is "cmac; .z" doing?
is package firmware-iwlwifi installed?
Ups!
I read RedGreen925 post and thought it was an update from the OP.
Sorry for the confusion.
Looks like the package usrmerge is not installed. It is mandatory to install before switching to excalibur or ceres.
# apt-get install usrmergesources file looks good.
((The repos "excalibur-backports", "excalibur-proposed-updates", "excalibur-updates", "excalibur-security" are probably not existing by now, but will when excalibur becomes stable.))
Assuming you did:
# apt-get update
# apt-get upgrade
# apt-get dist-upgradeIs there an error message afterwards?
Edit: I got this wrong!
('strike through' does not work on code blocks)
"unreadable" in case of an optical drive usually means "defective medium" - or more seldon "drive defective".
To find out: Try other CD/DVD's - as Altiod mentioned.
EDIT: if on mac it says "unreadable", there is high chance it is "readable" but contains a linux session or similar, that for mac is just not "readable" out of the box, but still perfectly readable for the drive itself.
No!
Iso file systems are readable on any OS. At least should be.
@rbit
Good to know.
Solution:
After an Arch Linux upgrade today in a chroot environment, update-grub creates the usual boot entry again.
The reason remains unclear.
It was NOT a problem with debian's grub / os-prober package.
Best guess: *Something* went wrong during the Arch Linux upgrade at 18-Aug-2025.
Thanks for all the replies and regards.
.
.
PS: chroot into Arch Linux as follows:
# mkdir /tmp/arch_chroot
# mount /dev/nvme0n1p3 /tmp/arch_chroot
# cd /tmp/arch_chroot
# mount -t proc /proc proc
# mount --make-rslave --rbind /sys sys
# mount --make-rslave --rbind /dev dev
# chroot /tmp/arch_chroot /bin/bash
# source /etc/profile
# export PS1="(chroot) ${PS1}"
# packman -Syu
# exitAnd unmounting the file system (maybe there is a better way).
# echo 'WD is still /tmp/arch_chroot'
# umount dev/shm
# umount dev/pts
# umount dev
# umount sys/fs/cgroup
# umount sys/fs/pstore
# umount sys/kernel/security
# umount sys/kernel/config
# umount sys/firmware/efi/efivars
# umount sys
# umount proc
# cd
# umount /tmp/arch_chrootIn case of umount errors: mount | grep arch_chroot shows remains.
$ grep 'Arch' /boot/grub/grub.cfgreturns nothing.
I'm out of ideas by now.
@rbit: thanks for the reply.
This Arch Linux installation has no grub - booting is devuan's job.
(Inconsistencies: mounting "/boot/efi" in an otherwise empty "/boot" directory is pointless.)
Some points in time:
* Last Arch Linux update: 18-Aug-2025 (kernel "linux-6.16.0-arch2-1")
--> boot entry was existing at the time.
* Package "os-prober": Version 1.83 exists in excalibur since middle of 2024.
--> there must be something else that made 40grub2 delete the boot entry.
... to be continued.
Thanks for the replies!
You should see Arch in the grub menu as selectable option.
That is excatly the point. Arch should be there, but it's not!
Silly me ... should have looked at /var/log/syslog before:
(...) 40grub2: debug: parsing: ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober ###
(...) 40grub2: debug: parsing: menuentry 'Arch Linux (rolling) (on /dev/nvme0n1p3)' --class arch --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option 'osprober-gnulinux-simple-4b419f03-1a7f-4fa8-836c-4018cd10c5ca' {
(...) 40grub2: Skipping entry 'Arch Linux (rolling) (on /dev/nvme0n1p3)':
(...) 40grub2: appears to be an automatic reference taken from another menu.lstSo 40grub2 skiped the detected boot entry! But why?
For now it's "/usr/lib/linux-boot-probes/mounted/40grub2". To be continued ... .
Edit: There is no "menu.lst" below "/boot" or "/etc".
@g4sra: There is one bootable SSD, with one booting grub2 from "Devuan 6". There is no shared "/boot" partition, only "/boot/efi" is mounted on all three.
Thanks for the reply.
os-prober is already executed by update-grub, just one detected OS is not shown anymore in the generated boot menu.
It's not a new boot setup.
grub always showed an "Archlinux" boot entry below "Devuan 6" and "Devuan 5".
Probably the entry for "UEFI Firmware Settings" (BIOS) is new.
Maybe that's a point: -"Archlinux" +"UEFI Firmware Settings" ? (no time to check by now)
I don't run archlinux often, so the boot entry may be gone since about two weeks (or a month or some single days).
The boot screen is just smaller than before (by two lines).
system: one bootable nvme-'drive'
Disklabel type: gpt
/ root_of_excalibur : /dev/nvme0n1p5 : main system; this grub installation is booting.
/ root_of_daedalus : /dev/nvme0n1p2 : testing; grub install at partition. occasionally replaced by artix or funtoo or ???.
/ root_of_archlinux : /dev/nvme0n1p3 : so-much-pain-to-install--I'll-keep-it; grub install at partition.
/home (excalibur) : /dev/nvme0n1p6 : home
/boot/efi : /dev/nvme0n1p1 : efi partitionRunning update-grub (in excalibur or daedalus just to be sure) still finds archlinux, but it's not shown in the boot menue afterwards.
# update-grub
Generating grub configuration file ...
Found theme: /usr/share/desktop-base/grub-themes/desktop-grub-theme/theme.txt
Found background image: splash.png
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-6.16.3-1-liquorix-amd64
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-6.16.3-1-liquorix-amd64
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-6.16.2-1-liquorix-amd64
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-6.16.2-1-liquorix-amd64
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-6.12.38+deb13-amd64
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-6.12.38+deb13-amd64
Warning: os-prober will be executed to detect other bootable partitions.
Its output will be used to detect bootable binaries on them and create new boot entries.
Found Devuan GNU/Linux 5 (daedalus) on /dev/nvme0n1p2
Found Arch Linux (rolling) on /dev/nvme0n1p3
Adding boot menu entry for UEFI Firmware Settings ...
doneThis setup worked for ages and there were no changes in the last months.
Any ideas?
@callmetango: Thanks for providing a xlibre package for devuan.
Unfortunately, the installation would remove the proprietary nvidia driver and virtualbox on my excalibur box.
Well it's an out-of-tree DKMS module, so yeah, obviously, if you don't need it just remove the package.
I assumed that since you had it installed, you wanted it.
This sounds strange but reasonable ... so checking for 'smapi'.
Result: Package 'tp-smapi-dkms' is installed. There is no reason why, but it is. This computer is a common ATX-PC, not a notebook.
And the liquorix kernel just compiles / works!
Thanks a lot.
EDIT: Knowing this makes your first reply even more understandable.
Most likely.
I don't "gui" system maintenance and hardly know synaptic. A more correct first reply might have been "Yes, this should do the trick.".
Thanks for the replies.
@JayneCobb: Welcome to the forum!
@steve_v: Nice explanation and thanks for the insight.
Still not sure how to proceed. Since I don't have a thinkpad, is the module needed at all? Maybe it's possible to disable the build of 'tp_smapi'.
Or more likely, just waiting and hoping for the next liquorix kernel; linux-6.16.1 is already released, with or without an updated driver.
I don't see me kernel-hacking these days.
Anyone running a liquorix kernel on excalibur these days?
After kernel '6.14.10-1-liquorix-amd64' I removed linux-image-liquorix due to multiple compiling errors, but kept and run this 6.14 kernel. Today I tried to install the current version.
# apt-get install linux-image-liquorix-amd64 linux-headers-liquorix-amd64
(...)
Autoinstall of module tp_smapi/0.44 for kernel 6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64 (x86_64)
Building module(s)...(bad exit status: 2)
Failed command:
make -j12 KERNELRELEASE=6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64 -C /lib/modules/6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64/build M=/var/lib/dkms/tp_smapi/0.44/build HDAPS=1
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64 (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/tp_smapi/0.44/build/make.log for more information.
Autoinstall on 6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64 succeeded for module(s) acpi-call nvidia-current virtualbox.
Autoinstall on 6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64 failed for module(s) tp_smapi(10).
(...)
$ cat /var/lib/dkms/tp_smapi/0.44/build/make.log
DKMS (dkms-3.2.0) make.log for tp_smapi/0.44 for kernel 6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64 (x86_64)
2025-08-17T21:52:51 CEST
Building module(s)
# command: make -j12 KERNELRELEASE=6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64 -C /lib/modules/6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64/build M=/var/lib/dkms/tp_smapi/0.44/build
HDAPS=1
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64'
make[1]: Entering directory '/var/lib/dkms/tp_smapi/0.44/build'
CC [M] thinkpad_ec.o
CC [M] tp_smapi.o
CC [M] hdaps.o
hdaps.c: In function ‘hdaps_suspend’:
hdaps.c:430:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘del_timer_sync’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
430 | del_timer_sync(&hdaps_timer);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[3]: *** [/usr/src/linux-headers-6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64/scripts/Makefile.build:203: hdaps.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: *** [/usr/src/linux-headers-6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64/Makefile:2013: .] Error 2
make[1]: *** [/usr/src/linux-headers-6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64/Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/lib/dkms/tp_smapi/0.44/build'
make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
make: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-6.15.10-2-liquorix-amd64'
# exit code: 2
# elapsed time: 00:00:01
----------------------------------------------------------------# apt-mark hold firefoxFrom my point of view, dist-upgrade just works.
@fsmithred: thanks for sharing.