You are not logged in.
Hello:
... Dell 9020 reboots on every shutdown unless I explicitly hit the power button after shutdown ...
I have had a similar issue with my Sun U24 WS for years, fortunately it is not at every shutdown but just when the %$#"¿ crap BIOS feels like it.
I have found that it occurs when there are sharp changes in ambient temperature between booting and shutting down, most probably due to a badly written BIOS + a faulty/wrong on-board sensor spec, so it is an issue I decided to ignore.
That said, yours seems to be a well known issue with that Dell rig.
A quick web search with the unsolicited Google IA intervention (?) brought up this*:
If your Dell OptiPlex 9020 is randomly rebooting on Linux, it is usually triggered by a kernel panic upon hardware conflict, failing storage, or power supply issues.
* to be taken with a few grains of salt. 8^°
See here.
If sudo halt works, you may want to write up a script to shut it down via sudo halt && sudo shutdown -now.
Check the respective man files for the proper syntax.
Best,
A.
Hello:
And quite relevant at that.
Article by Liam Proven in today's edition of The Register.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That an app 'Fits on a Floppy' is still a useful measure in 2026
In a world of mass-produced bot-slopware, small is more beautiful than ever
by Liam Proven Published Fri 29 May 2026 // 09:15 UTC
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a good week-end.
Best,
A.
Hello:
No idea as to why it is there.
Doing some more digging found that, at some point and for reasons unknown, I did ...
# ldconfig -p
#... which can only be executed with elevated priviliges.
From man ldconfig:
-p
--print-cache
Print the lists of directories and candidate libraries stored in the current cache.
As it was just a print I tried it, with the result being a huge printout in the terminal:
[root@devuan ~]# ldconfig -p
1442 libs found in cache `/etc/ld.so.cache'
libz3.so.4 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz3.so.4
libz3.so.4 (libc6) => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz3.so.4 ...
--- snip ---
ld-linux.so.2 (ELF) => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (libc6,x86-64) => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
Cache generated by: ldconfig (Debian GLIBC 2.36-9+deb12u14) stable release version 2.36
[root@devuan ~]# No idea as to how that got in the /root directory but I deleted it.
The cache itself is in /etc/ld.so.cache.
That's all I could find, so I guess I can mark it solved.
Best,
A.
Hello:
What kind of file is it?
It has no extension.
According to mc:
Size: 106771
Modify time: Apr 26 2025
Can you see inside it with ...
Yes.
... text editor and have a look?
It has some code (?), starting with the string glibc-ld.so.cache1.1 and ending with ldconfig (Debian GLIBC 2.36-9+deb12u10) stable release version 2.36.
No idea as to why it is there.
Can't remember what I was doing last thursday, much less on Apr 26 2025.
My guess is that it can be safely deleted but I have been wrong many times so I thought I's ask. 8^°
Thanks to both for the fast reply.
Best,
A.
Hello:
Doing some clean-up of leftovers from the various dist-upgrades I have gone through since jesse/ascii (actually found a netscape.desktop file) I came across a strange file.
#/root/fpvAny idea as to what it is?
I cannot find a reference to it save 'first person view' drones setups which I do not have.
Please advise.
Best,
A.
Hello:
"but wouldn't boot cleanly"
... should have been more explicit.
Indeed ... 8^D
... would boot as far as GRUB ...
Ahh ...
So, as I thought, the system did boot.
You just did not get a desktop because (most probably)* as you did not install the GRUB bootloader, the system booted into GRUB2.
No fault of yours as it seems that the GRUB package is not included in the available installation images from Daedalus onwards.
See here:
https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7970
https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=63791#p63791
Probably because ... 'reasons'?
ie: the desperate need of imposing all that UEFI crap of anyone and everyone.
* My memory is a bit hazy, the last Linux Devuan I installed on a clean drive was either Jesse or ascii, long ago.
From then on, it has been dist-upgrades for my BIOS (non-UEFI) Sun U24 WS.
... lacked the skills or knowledge to get it go any further.
At this point it does not matter.
ie: you have installed Mint, which found a Devuan installation and solved the issue you had by installing the GRUB bootloader*.
* educated guess, corrections welcome.
If interested in learning your way around a non-systemd Linux, you may want to read up on how to properly install Devuan from the various files available for download.
Mint doing everything on 'automatic' is nice and straightforward.
But you won't learn much. 8^°
Best,
A.
Hello:
... my surprise when the Linux Mint installation told me I already had Devuan installed ...
As you surely know, Mint is a systemd distribution and I cannot but wonder if HP UEFI just plays nicer with systemd present than when it is not.
Just a thought.
When you say "but wouldn't boot cleanly" I understand (like the Mint installer) that Devuan was installed and actually booted, albeit with something not being right.
Could you please tell us just what you are making reference to?
Best,
A.
Hello:
... metric-ton of dev packages ...
Same here.
... and none end in ".devel".
But ...
Have you searched for packages using *-devel?*
* maybe not enough Joe? 8^P
My TimeShift snapshots stash say my system had these two years ago:
$ locate *-devel
/2024-03-09_07-37-32/localhost/usr/share/doc/libfontconfig1-dev/fontconfig-devel
/2024-03-09_07-37-32/localhost/usr/share/doc-base/fontconfig-devel
/2024-03-15_08-30-04/localhost/usr/share/doc/libfontconfig1-dev/fontconfig-devel
/2024-03-15_08-30-04/localhost/usr/share/doc-base/fontconfig-devel
/2024-05-23_08-50-02/localhost/usr/share/doc/libfontconfig1-dev/fontconfig-devel
/2024-05-23_08-50-02/localhost/usr/share/doc-base/fontconfig-devel
$ That said, my present Daedalus system has nothing with *-devel in the name.
A very quick look at the web (whatever that is these days) found that -dev is Debian/Ubuntu ware and -devel is RedHat/CentOS/Fedora ware. Take it with a few grains of low sodium salt.
Best,
A.
Hello:
... understood ...
No, I'm afraid you have not understood.
Maybe it is a language problem, the answers posted somehow lost in translation?
No idea.
... but why exactly lasted hplip do not want to install at Devuan ...
The answer to your question is really quite simple:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The package you are attempting to install has not been packaged for Devuan by the Devuan maintainers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you want to know why the hplip-3.25.8 package you downloaded (which is not a *.deb file) will not "install at Devuan" you will have to ask the maintainers:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/hplip/ … ip/3.25.8/
To be able to do that you have to join the sourceforge.org mailing list:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/hplip/lists/hplip-help
Once you have joined, you can log-in:
And post the question:
https://sourceforge.net/p/hplip/mailman/hplip-help/
Your argument [... debian repos always have unfresh old software.] is quite clearly not a valid one.
The hplip package in the Devuan repositories works as intended and (for the moment) is the only one available for Devuan.
I hope I have cleared up your doubts.
Best,
A.
Hello:
... for the most part those packages will install and work.
... .run file which is going to do nothing but pollute the system ...
+1
Best,
A.
Hello:
From yesterday's edition of The Register:
---
Brit mathematician lets AI agent loose with credit card – cue password leaks, CAPTCHA chaos and more
Professor Fry's AI experiment shows light and dark sides of agentic tech
by Richard Speed
---
https://www.theregister.com/software/20 … rd/5228654
Quite revealing ...
And here is the British mathematician herself explaining what went on:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnzR5aOElvw
Yet more revealing ...
Best,
A.
Hello:
... updated some packages ...
Is this a problem?
Yes, I would say so.
...how to fix it?
I'm afraid that you are not giving us enough information.
That said, something does seem to be amiss.
To wit:
My latest (recently updated) Devuan Daedalus system has a /lib/modules/6.1.0-45 directory.
$ uname -a
Linux devuan 6.1.0-45-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.170-1 (2026-04-30) x86_64 GNU/Linux
$
$ ls /lib/modules
6.1.0-45-amd64
$ A VM I run on an updated Devuan Chimaera system has a /lib/modules/5.10.0-9 directory
$ uname -a
Linux chimaera 5.10.0-9-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.70-1 (2021-09-30) x86_64 GNU/Linux
$
$ ls /lib/modules
5.10.0-9-amd64
$See the inconsistency?
ie:
Daedalus -> 6.1.0-45-amd64
Chimaera -> 5.10.0-9-amd64
What package are you attempting to install in your Devuan Daedalus system?
Is it from the Devuan repositories and installed through synaptic, apt or apt-get?
Best,
A.
Hello:
But after:
# apt-get install firmware-ath9k-htc firmware-atherosit works ok in either usb3 (blue) and usb2 (black) ports.
If your sources are the proper ones (Devuan), the firmware installed should be without any issues.
... how that happened.
Maybe you purchased a counterfit Techno N150?
Your description of the packaging would seem (?) to point in that direction.
That said, a USB wi-fi adaptor with 'N150' in the label could be one of a great many brands using that Atheros chipset in different physical formats.
eg:
https://tehnoetic.com/tehnoetic-wireles … earch=N150
https://tehnoetic.com/tet-n150hga?search=N150
You may want to contact Tehnoetic to ask if what you purchased is genuine.
ie: send photos of the hardware, the packaging and a *.txt file with the terminal printout when you run:
~$ lsusbBest,
A.
Hello:
... can't find any references to deborphan ...
Note that it is available but (presently) not for excalibur.
deborphan
1.7.35 http://deb.devuan.org/merged daedalus/main amd64
1.7.33 http://deb.devuan.org/merged chimaera/main amd64
1.7.31 http://archive.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64
1.7.28.8-0.3+b1 http://archive.devuan.org/merged ascii/main amd64
1.7.28.8-0.1 http://archive.devuan.org/merged jessie/main amd64
In all probability, because it is not (presently) listed in the Debian Trixie repository:
Package deborphan
bullseye (oldoldstable) 1.7.33: amd64 arm64 armhf i386
bookworm (oldstable) 1.7.35: amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el s390x
sid (unstable) (admin): 1.7.35+b1 [debports]: riscv64
Maybe they are looking for a way to make it dependent on systemd. 8^D
Best,
A.
Hello:
... the website in your signature has issues (or maybe it just doesn't like me).
Could be.
Seems that it does not like me either. 8^°
At least using Firefox 128.3.1esr and Firefox 148.0-1 to visit.
But not with PaleMoon 33.2.1
ERROR -- ERROR -- ERROR -- ERROR -- ERROR
RESOURCE DOES NOT EXIST -- RESOURCE DOES NOT EXISTYOUR IP ADDRESS IS
TO BE UNBLOCKED, CALL AND TELL ME
YOUR NAME AND YOUR IP ADDRESS
I'll sleep on it.
A.
Hello:
... to suppress confirmation prompts on any command is ...
Bad practise. *
Best,
A.
* so is not looking at the date on the posts. 8^°
Hello:
@Elyon ...
... external politics stuff ...
... doesn't belong in Linux ...
This: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Best,
A.
Hello:
... normal way on Linux...
Of course.
The pcmagos article made direct reference (~14 years ago) to "The Manner Of The Buntus" which, quite obviously subverted the way to use sudo properly and now RPiOS is catching up.
Best,
A.
Hello:
Article from yesterday's edition of The Register:
-------------------------------------------------------
Raspberry Pi OS ends open-door policy for sudo
Command prefix will require password by default
by Richard Speed
-------------------------------------------------------
https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/15/ … /?td=rt-3a
Good idea but not new, PCLinuxOS took this stance many years ago:
https://pclosmag.com/html/Issues/201205/page11.html
Best,
A.
Hello:
Searching for a way to disable wifi in my Samsung/HP printer, I have been doing the rounds visiting whichever relevant printer pages I could find and found out that it seems CUPS 3.0 is now being rolled out.
This is important because from CUPS 3.0 onwards only IPP type (driverless) printers will work with CUPS.
Way to go Till Kamppeter/Michael Sweet!
And whoever else actually thought this was a good idea. 8^/
Probably the Ubuntu crowd ...
See:
https://openprinting.github.io/current/
https://openprinting.github.io/driverless/
https://www.bchemnet.com/suldr/forum/index.php?msg=1758
Check here to see if your printer is supported:
https://openprinting.org/printers
If your printer is not on the list, consider yourself screwed.
Thoroughly.
One obvious option would be to pin CUPS to the latest available version (CUPS 2.4.16?), which is what I plan to do before anything else, which does not include buying another printer.
There is another option involving a the splix driver.
See: https://github.com/OpenPrinting/splix/
Driver for SPL2 and SPLc laser printers from Samsung, Xerox, Dell, Lexmark, and Toshiba
Support for printing to SPL2- and SPLc-based printers. These are most of the cheaper laser printers from Samsung, but also rebranded ones from Xerox, Dell, Lexmark, and Toshiba. This driver is especially for those models not understanding standard languages like PostScript or PCL.
Both monochrome (ML-15xx, ML-16xx, ML-17xx, ML-18xx, ML-2xxx) and color (CLP-5xx, CLP-6xx) models are supported, and also their rebranded equivalents like the Xerox Phaser 6100 work with this driver.
Note that older SPL1-based models (ML-12xx, ML-14xx) do not work. Use these printers with the older "gdi" driver which is built into GhostScript.
See installation instructions in the INSTALL file.
The driver was created by Aurélien Croc (aurelien at ap2c dot org) and contains many contributions from Till Kamppeter (till dot kamppeter at gmail dot com). Development is discontinued as most modern printers do not need drivers any more.
Seems complicated.
I wonder if I could put the RPi3B+ I threw in a drawer last year back in service and turn it into a print server to work with the M2020W? Using the USB cable, not wireless.
Food for thought.
Best,
A.
Hello:
... because it is broadcasting and I do not want it to.
Update:
As a last resort, I joined and signed in to 'HP Support' to 'start a conversation' to see if I could get some information regarding this issue.
What followed was an exchange with a Jerry_57, apparently an HP employee but most probably not a human one.
I say apparently because it was like speaking to a wall.
Not too surprised though.
Some years ago I had a similar experience with Intel regarding the on-board 82566DM-2 Gigabit controller which (yes, same issue) could not be disabled in any way.
Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard must be turning in their graves.
Best,
A.
Hello:
Let's see how long it lasts.
And we're baaaaaaaaack!
After rolling back on the previous 'not available' block, now you cannot see a YouTube video unless you sign in.
For the protection of our | their the community, obviously.
What were you thinking? 8^°
But Invidious still works.
For now.
Kudos to them.
Best,
A.
Hello:
... why does it matter if the printer turns on its WiFi ...
It matters because it is broadcasting and I do not want it to.
I do not have wifi enabled in my fibre router or in any of my boxes, netbook, RPi or cellphones.
Best,
A.
Hello:
Sorry for the late reply ...
I was wondering what became of your Z10. 8^°
... my work machine in the office.
No problem with that.
... don't know what else to look for to try ...
... consider burning a live Excalibur *.iso and testing it on your box to see how it behaves.
ie: freezes and such.
If you can upgrade system versions you should not have any issues doing what I suggested with your work machine.
Booting with a live *.iso is just that, it does not do anything to the existing system, configuration, data, etc. (unless you do it intentionally).
Running a live Excalibur for a few hours should give you a hint at what is going on.
Off the top of my head:
You could have a either memory or processor overheating problem.
Or both at the same time which is not frequent but not unheard of, particularly in workplace issued equipment which (in my experience) does not usually see proper maintenance.
So ...
You first have to try to isolate the problem.
To test the memory problem, run a long memtest from the live *.iso menu and see what happens. (check the man files)
If memtest finds a problem with the memory, the first thing to do is to remove the memory modules, clean the contacts, reseat them and run the test again in the same conditions. ie: close the box again, do not leave it open because you would be altering the test environment.
If memtest still finds a problem with the memory, run the test again with just one pair of modules and it if passes, add the next pair and so on till you find the offending pair.
If you have a spare matching module, do the same routine to find the offending module and then replace it.
If memtest does not find a problem with the memory and the machine still freezes, you most probably have a heat related problem which can be solved by checking the CPU / heatsink assembly.
Checking the CPU heatsink involves unmounting it, cleaning lint/dust from both the HS and the fan and then remounting it with fresh heatsink grease. You will also have to check that the fan turns freely and does not stall.
Goes without saying that at this point the inside of the box also needs to be checked for dust bunnies and be throughly cleaned up. (fans, nooks and crannies, etc.)
Please let us know how you fared.
Best,
A.