You are not logged in.
In short I think you can reuse the debian boot setup and just replace the root filesystem.
If your debian system is on an SD-card, then you should copy that whole card (including the MBR sectors), then mount the root filesystem partition (of the copy) on another computer so as to replace the whole filesystem with a devuan/arm64 root filesystem. The latter you can set up using debootstrap, and the best is to just make a "minbase" variant; then you would install the rest oer the network on the target after bootup.
EDIT: BUT do remeber to keep the few extra files in /boot (boot.scr and the dtb tree), AND you should also make sure to keep the 99-uboot script (/etc/initramfs/post-update.d/99-uboot) that makes an uImage of the initrd as hook for update-initramfs.... it requires that you install u-boot-tools and device-tree-compiler. You may also need a light hand-edit of that script which otherwise will want to source enironment settings that are not needed for the function of the script.
Firstly, you have prepared the USB stick correctly. It does present itself as a disk image with two partitions where the first is an iso9660 partition (CDROM format) and the second is a FAT32 partition (also called vfat).
And the vfat partition is also an EFI boot partition that should be browseable with an EFI shell... are you able to do that?
I believe beowulf had a grub setup for EFI boot. Which files do you see in that partition with the EFI shell?
EDIT: yes, follow rolfie's advice..
then just change it back to http.
btw there are "code" tags to use for enclosing log text.
update-rc.d $service $actionEDIT: I'm pretty sure there is a man page for it...
One might also find grub documentation on the Internet if not installed.
Mmm, I take it that you followed the instructions and verified that the network works, rather than merely just assuming that it works because "it worked before"?
If you do have that network connection verified with a positive ping response, then it would appear being either an intermittent problem (typically due to DNS failure), or an active TCP blocking (while allowing ICMP traffic) in between. You might need to engage your service provider for the latter.
You should verify that the installation sets up the network properly.
One method for that is to:
1. start the installation, and advance to where it is asking for root password
2. then press ctrl-alt-f2 so as to shift to get a shell prompt in VT2
3. type: ping -c 1 deb.devuan.org
which should respond with success.
If not, then the network is not set up for some reason, and that would also be the reason for not connecting to the repository host(s).
I'd guess you a had a disruptive space on the linemaking it be "RESUME= none" .
Since the file gets processed as a shell script (i.e. sourcing it into the exection of /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs) you got to experience the shell script difference between the two lines lines:
RESUME=none
RESUME= noneThe first line sets RESUME to "none" within mkinitramfs while the second line sets RESUME to the empty string for a sub shell attempting to execute a program named "none".
It's a simple mistake to make and clearly the usability coefficient for initramfs-tools has room to be raised. In fact, one could say that that way of loading variables has big clown feets well into the security risk space.
Please show the file in that failing use case, when you set RESUME=none and run into the complaint when running update-initramfs.
Please show your file /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume.
Is there another file in /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/ ? If so, which, and please show it too.
does it wake up with ctrl-alt-7 ?
if so, which init system do you use? and does it start getty on tty1-6 ?
What do people expect from going to Microsoft for software? Sanity?
no! Don't destroy the loopback interface configuration!
Use "man interfaces"
EDIT. Btw the kernel will install an adapter for the wireless card if it has the software to do so. You may use "rfkill" to software-block the adapter, and then no networking will be configured for it. However, you will need that "rfkill" to happen early on, so will probably need to add it into initrd's init scripts. And that is a second cloud of knowledge to gain, perhaps starting with "man initramfs-tools".
Well, dbus service activation pre-dates systemd, but nowadays there's activation script mangling added... you can if you wish translate that systemd activation script into a proper dbus activation script and then get the normal dbus activation happening.
The limits on post editing is a dev1galaxy feature introduced by myself in late 2020.
The forum code started with FluxBB 1.5 a couple of years ago, and has then been subject to a few local adaptions (such as "spammer barrier" in 2015, "javascript reduction" in 2017, "improved i18n" in 2019, "trolling barrier" in 2020, "oath login" (failed) in 2022, "styling refresh" in 2023).
Today it sits there in full beauty and perfection, and just waiting for the next one or two responsible code caretakers. Please drop in to #devuan-dev at libera.chat to discuss how to make that a role of yours.
This forum does not offer inline display of images... or does it? Yes it does, if you have configured your profile thusly.
Click on the "Profile" link, then click on the "Display" menu entry and then decide about whether to set (or not) the toggle for "show images in posts", followed by a light poke at the "submit" button.
Well, I'd say those scripts are the right ones so adding "sleep 5" early on but not at the very top in them would be the test.
1. add a new line with "sleep 5"
2. run "update-initramfs -u -k all"
3. reboot
If a process race is happening and the cause for the issue, then those "sleep" should delay the decryption handshake enough to allow udev to do its thing beforehand.
Right. Yes, I mistook it for full-disk encryption.
WIth only the root filesystem encrypted the kernel and initramfs would be involved. And it needs the initial udev run to handle USB; you've tried unplug + plug in while it's waiting for input?
Upgrade of kernel should not in itself have effects on the initrd except for possible differences in the module setup. Though there may be interesting effects in process handling, and especially in this case there is an inherent race between udevd handling USB and cryptsetup reading password.
You can investigate the race option by locating the cryptsetup invocation in the scripting, either "/etc/initramfs-tools/..." or "/usr/share/initramfs-tools/...", and introduce a "sleep 5" before it (then update-initramfs and reboot).
It may be worth to consider that the software used for entering a decryption password prior to boot has nothing to do with the kernel or with anything on the encrypted part of the disk.
Apparently your system has older versions those packages, and your command asks for upgrading anything upgradable. You might try
$ apt-cache policy libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-18 libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37to get more information before accepting... or maybe that's too late now?
You should also point out that as it's github, it will require a Microsoft login for rising issues, and probably then also add that noone will want that.
(I edited this post since my first suggestion was bogus)
The devtmpfs filesystem is set up and initially populated by the kernel, and that uses 50% RAM as its limit.
The first mounting happens in the initrd's init scripts which are provided by initramfs-tools at /usr/share/initramfs-tools/. In my case it's at /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init:36, where you may add a size=nnn limit. Then use update-initramfs so as to include your fix in the initrd, and then reboot. Perhaps like the following hands-on:
# sed '/devtmpfs/s|-o |-o size=100M,|' -i /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init
# update-initramfs -u -k all
# rebootEDIT: This way worked for me and it's as early as possible (without rebuilding the kernel).
It may depend on what you mean by "Devuan" and "support for".
Technically "Devuan" (as organisation) is merely this small group of people that publish the collection of packages that includes all debian packages except some. Those that require systemd have been forked where possible and they are maintained (by these people) towards providing relevant functionality without systemd; most are forked but a few end up just being excluded from the devuan repositories. Currently supported (i.e. maintained, built and published) architectures are amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, riscv64 and ppc64el (all using debian's architecture labelling).
Though "Devuan" (as organisation) might also be understood to include the people that compose and publish filesystems and disk images that are installations of various kinds using devuan packages. Those works span a more limited range of architectures and they provide support (or not) individually for their published works. I'm aware of people having riscv64 installations of devuan packages but not of anyone publishing such for replication.
Sure does... ![]()
And you were right in that the libseat integration had lost the code path handling "devices added while VT inactive". I.e., the device got added "as per normal" and that of course failed upon opening file descriptor which resulted in Xorg dropping it. This lost code path captures the device when inserted, in a separate list, and then that list is used for "re-inserting" the device (as per normal) when VT is activated.
A patch for this is now moving through the QA and packaging steps. (step h)
Now we
go to our fork of https://git.devuan.org/devuan/xorg-server.git
check out suites/unstable
use dpkg-checkbuilddeps as guide for installing build dependencies
build a local Xorg with debian/rules binary
temporary "install" resulting debian/build/main/hw/xfree86/Xorg as /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg
perform a verification test
edit the code and repeat from d until the misbehaviour goes away without we adding some new misbehaviour
update the packaging and version and stuff
issue a merge request
wait while that gets merged, built and published by others
install the fixed version.
Easy Peasy