The dnssec-trigger package is just a configuration wrapper used to ensure that unbound is the local nameserver and that it ensures DNSSEC validation. DoT is not part of dnssec-trigger's remit but I am presuming that if requests are forwarded to a DoT-capable resolver then it will be used, this may not in fact be the case. Use wireshark & dig to confirm.

OTOH the stubby package is expressly designed to offer DoT validation so using that should ensure it. But you should probably still check.

When requesting help it is always better to provide actual command output rather than vague descriptions.

Code tags would be more readable than quote tags.

^ Looks like things weren't right to begin with

Try

# aptitude install falkon

It will offer several choices for resolution, keep saying "no" until it finds one that works. Hopefully.

Don't know about wicd but all you have to do is bring the interface up and assign some addresses:

# ip link set $interface up
# dhclient $interface

Replace $interface with the actual name of the tethered interface, which can be seen in the output of the plain ip link command.

Might be best to stop wicd first though to avoid potential conflicts:

# service wicd stop

If you want to tether permanently use /etc/network/interfaces: https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfigur … _Interface (but note that Devuan retains the traditional interface names) and remove wicd.

EDIT: if you choose to go down that route enable the networking service:

# sysv-rc-conf networking on

Remove /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules

Let's try debugging the resolver:

apt-get -s -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes install nvidia-driver

It should be installable

That presumes everybody is aware that noatime is set and also that it breaks mutt (which you didn't know).

But whatever, it's your distribution. I just thought you might like to know. Sorry for the noise.

Well that's not right

Are your sources still as posted earlier? What does APT think is available?

apt policy

You could try aptitude instead, it has a more advanced dependency resolution algorithm and should offer several choices.

^ I don't know, the article was linked over at the MX forums last week and that was the first I'd heard of it.

AFAIUI, the Devuan repositories are mirrored from Debian's (but without the init system that shall not be named) using special magic:

https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=3192

So there is no ceres pool, as such.

Yeah, Intel are planning to remove it completely: https://www.anandtech.com/show/12068/in … fi-by-2020

Bastards...

Yes, I use this method to create a full backup then reverse the process when the subvolumes are created and mounted as desired.

I don't use encryption[1] so just the fstab and bootloader need correcting. I use a custom grub.cfg but grub-mkconfig can deal with subvolumes and appears to create a working configuration file.

[1] I don't keep anything important on computers and in my country (the UK) I can go to jail if the Police want to see what's on it and I can't remember the password.

Install to the HDD and use the USB to hold the backup, that's what I do.