You are not logged in.
Mate has the functionality you want in its standard file manager. Just FYI
Ah, ok, I see where you're coming from. Your quest could be summarized as "why does a UEFI boot partition have a short/small UUID whereas normal partitions don't." Right? I'm afraid I can't answer that, but you should be able to find it in the UEFI spec somewhere
Have a read:
https://www.funtoo.org/Successful_booting_with_UUID
I don't think booting with (U)EFI would change the use of UUIDs as the syntax is determined by that of the fstab file.
HTH!
From the image I see when it attempts to boot the guest, it fails to find LVM and subsequently fsck. This could be the result of incorrectly set permissions on the root-fs of the guest. I also notice, from your command, that the virtfs has a security_model as none, whereas fsdev has mapped. This might be the cause of the mismatch. (notice emphasis, I don't know enough about KVM to tell for sure)
@fsmithred: I don't think the quest here was about finding a program, but finding the config files of a program. Slight, but important nuance
I'm aware of mntui, used it several times even, but it's still a graphical front-end (be it console-based). Its man-page is rather limited in informational value though
man networkmanager
should tell you more, if it exists
Alsa-mixer is in the repo, so that shouldn't be an issue. For getting rid of PA, try aptitude as it's purportedly better in package conflict resolution then apt-get.
If the eth1 port isn't connected to anything, then yes, it would wait for the timeout before proceeding the boot process. You may want to investigate /etc/network/interfaces to see if you can disable eth1 there. (I should too, as I too have a dual-ethernet port mainboard but haven't paid much attention to it as it's not in my main desktop )
As for nForce: it's reasonably well supported in the kernel because it exists for a fair while now: I bought my first nForce board way back in the mid 2000's.
Usually, when I get a message like that (mounting a file system goes haywire), it can be resolved by running fsck on the partition:
fsck /dev/sdX1
My experience is that the drive behaves perfectly fine afterwards, but these are hard-drives, not removable media so I'm not sure it'll solve your issue.
It happens occasionally for me too (I install Devuan for my work, so I've done quite a few installs already ). Usually, restarting the installation process solves the issue, but sometimes another optical drive is needed. I'm still using the install media I made last year, so that shouldn't be an issue. (that is: aging disks or similar) Most likely the source of the problem is a worn-out laser-diode in the drive, which is an age-thing too.
RT? Oh yes, the Russian State sponsored propaganda & disinformation machine
aptitude -i iron-curtain common-sense
Just installed the earlier version (60.7.1) on Ascii. Didn't show up yesterday though.
IMO you're too paranoid about DHCP. I've noticed you mentioned your setup uses a router, so I assume that's also your gateway to the web via your ISP. That router has a firewall to prevent access from outside to your network. Therefor, your DHCP stack is protected from attacks. Re-install DHCP, re-enable it on your router so you can spend your time on other things.
Ah, ok. Thx for the explanation.
I'm no coder either, but scripts (and programs for that matter) follow a logical sequence. But I don't understand this section:
(from https://git.devuan.org/devuan-infrastru … _update.py)
if get_time(rem_date) > get_time(loc_date):
info('Remote Release is newer!')
return True
return False
What I think is happening here is that when a newer time code is found, the program returns, but only to one level up, where the next code line tells it to return false (i.e. the time code was not newer). But perhaps I misinterpreted (s'cuse the pun ) the code.
HTH!
SD cards only have a limited number of read/write cycles due to the Flash memory they use. The Raspberry Pi Foundation has modified/optimized Raspbian to minimize this and thus don't suffer as much. Devuan isn't. Depending on your definition of "new" I'd suggest claiming it as a defective card from the manufacturer/supplier.
First off, you should quote properly and learn some manners.
Sometimes I wonder why I bother to partake in these kinds of communities discussions Oh forget it, I'm done with that cr@p
You, but it would also apply to the OP. Unless one is a dev, on package-based distro's, like Devuan, building/installing software directly from source is kinda defeating the purpose of a package manager and if the reasoning behind installing from source is obtaining an enhanced performance from the hardware used, you'd be better off with a distro that facilitates this much better then Devuan. But that's just my opinion, feel free to ignore it
....now where did I put that chmod?
![]()
I think you'd need to look for it in Lost + Found
(sorry, couldn't resist!)
There's a few, perhaps not immediately considered for the job:
LibrCAD
OpenSCAD
Meshlab
May not check all ticks, but it's a start.
I'm beginning to get the impression you haven't (fully) grasped the purpose of package-based distro's yet. The whole purpose of packaging software is exactly that: preventing an installation nightmare and easy adding and removing software. Perhaps you should consider using source-based distro's like Linux-from-scratch, Slackware, or Gentoo/Funtoo.
On the network issue:
Fire up aptitude, Synaptic or your package-manager-of-choice and search for this package:
firmware-iwlwifi
Also, install the package wpasupplicant (which probably will pull in said firmware package as a dependency) and let it finish installing. Then, see if your wifi shows up in the command:
ip addr list
The ip command is very important in networking. You can learn more about it by studying the man page for it:
man ip
HTH!
pkgmaster.devuan.org should be replaced with deb.devuan.org. That way you will pull from the nearest mirror, and we won't have everyone hitting on the main server. Thanks.
I know, but deb.devuan.org gave me a lot of hassle not too long ago, so I switched. If the issues are resolved (missing Release files etc) I could consider changing back.
Do the following, as root;
mv /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list.bak
nano /etc/apt/sources.list
Then copy these lines into the editor:
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2.0.0-beta _Ascii_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 20180213-18:54]/ ascii main non-free
deb http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii main non-free contrib
deb-src http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii main non-free contrib
# ascii-security, previously known as 'volatile'
deb http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii-security main contrib non-free
deb-src http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii-security main contrib non-free
Press Ctrl+o to save the file, then Ctrl+x to exit nano. After that, do:
apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade
This ensures you have an up-to-date system.
This sources.list file is actually mine If you need the backports branch, add it manually later.
Alternatively, mark one of the named packages* for installation and everything it depends on, and of course the package itself, will stay on your system on autoremove.
*cleverly, choose one of the higher-level packages in the list, not the low-level ones that only add certain features I'd suggest xfdesktop4 to start with.
aptitude install xfdesktop4
Precede with sudo if you must (personal taste, I'd strongly (very) prefer the 'old' *nix way of su into the root account)
As the package is actually already installed, it won't do anything, except marking it in the database as manually installed and therefore not subject to an auto-prune event. Which is what you're after