You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
This is definitely bad news.
End-to-End Encryption (E2E) is Dead. Killed By New Tech.
https://rumble.com/v52cc3w-end-to-end-e … tech..html
Offline
ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steganography
Be Excellent to each other and Party On!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rph_1DODXDU
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_%26_Ted%27s_Excellent_Adventure
Do unto others as you would have them do instantaneously back to you!
Offline
This is definitely bad news.
For people running proprietary black-box systems... Which is, at least for the most part, not us.
Video summary: Windows bad, Apple bad, Google bad, AI bad, everyone and their dog wants endpoint control and uses FUD and "think of the children" to get it.
IOW, corporate big-tech abuses their power and their users, and normies just don't care because herd-mentality and convenience. Same old, same old. *yawn*
All this really does is incentivise me to avoid buying SNS hardware (instead donating further to the FSF), and keep a weather eye on FreeBSD and OpenRISC in preparation for the day GNU/Linux finally falls to Microsoft EEE and the horde of clueless ex-windows users pushing non-FOSS software and non-FOSS attitudes.
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
Offline
and keep a weather eye on FreeBSD
Just curious...why FreeBSD instead of OpenBSD? No long answers needed...just want to know your basic thoughts.
Online
No real reason, mostly just more familiarity.
For a security-focused appliance (e.g. router / server etc) I'd probably pick OpenBSD, but last time I played with the desktop usecase FreeBSD had better hardware support and was easier to get the software I wanted installed.
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
Offline
Okay. Thanks.
I guess I've been lucky. I've had better luck with OpenBSD on a desktop than FreeBSD.
I suppose it's all a hardware issue.
Online
All this really does is incentivise me to avoid buying SNS hardware (instead donating further to the FSF), and keep a weather eye on FreeBSD and OpenRISC in preparation for the day GNU/Linux finally falls to Microsoft EEE and the horde of clueless ex-windows users pushing non-FOSS software and non-FOSS attitudes.
Im not up to speed on my acronym's, what are these?
As long as there are those who maintain non systemd FOSS linux distros, then hopefully we wont have to put up with non FOSS software and attitudes.
Offline
Im not up to speed on my acronym's, what are these?
I see SNS for the first time so idk, the second one is the infamous Embrace, Extend and Extinguish
Last edited by pl (2024-06-28 08:13:25)
"Czy ja jestem jeden, czy nie ma więcej dzikich?"
Offline
Im not up to speed on my acronym's, what are these?
Shiny New Shit
Embrace, Extend, Extinguish
As for FOSS and systemd... systemd is FOSS, and while I don't particularly agree with the design or the attitude of the designer(s), that's not really what I was referring to.
Last edited by steve_v (2024-06-28 10:56:12)
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
Offline
Pages: 1