DeBIan has Raspberry kernel updates in their unofficial RPI images. Was kinda suicidal when I looked at it last summer. Kernel updates screwed up the boot config. Should work now.

IIRC the old official RPi images never got kernel updates.
Did that change now?

Look for mc.ext in man 1 mc.

I just wrote some lines elsewhere about backdoors and dataleaks in phone apps and that I think that 99.674352% of the users care more about having always the newest and flashy toys than for their privacy and security.

Systemd is for this type of users.
And they are many.

I'm only waiting for systemd additionally forcing some app stores into the systems and I'm damn curios about Debian's reaction when Mr.P. tells Debian to ditch APT in favour of his packages system.

Mwhuaaahahahahahahaahahahaa...

Not funny.

I think it's too early for last orders. Instead we just should continue to use Devuan.

The editor is fine!
Especially LP & RR with Org/Babel is fun. \o/

Ok. If I could get the same functionality based on e.g. Python, I wouldn't insist of doing it with a Lisp under the hood.

And unluckily with the De??an packaged Emacs I can neither use the WebKit features, nor Emacs as WM. But I'll get there... sommmmmmmmeday... currenly lots of more urgent things have a higher priority.

\o/
It should be written in org/babel/noweb.
;-D

For me sudo feels like a good idea. I do less as root if I only need to prefix the lines really needing superpowers with sudo. su -c '...' is ugly at best but de facto unusable for a focussed workflow and completely switching to a root shell makes one do everything as root and this increases the risks a lot. I did that long enough in my early Unix admin days and I did not cause disasters, but I really like being able to do less as root thanks to sudo and only can recommend using sudo or her younger sisters.

How long?
And what about the other BSDs?
In "The Tragedy of systemd" a FreeBSD member praises what systemd all does right and mentions experiments in FreeBSD to implement systemd like stuff that already have taken place but are fruitless up to now. I expect that to only be a delay instead of an end of such ideas in FreeBSD.

OpenBSD may resist a bit, byte or even longer. Never underestimate an angry Theo!   \o/
But...

How long?
What if the big players in the dimension userland start to insist that the systemd kernel extensions have to be present? Pulling systemd related implants from lots of ridiculously huge applications will converge to impossible because of the lacking woman power.

Optimism is caused by the lack of information.

If MS couldn't have used BSD's TCP stack for their 1st IP support, we'd have 2 only 82.783% compatible internets now.
Did that hurt BSD?
DFINITELY NOT!

I heavily doubt this.