We are social beings, we need a small community to survive.  But depends how you really ask this question.  I couldn't really care less if most perceive what I do and how I do it as wrong.

Do you care if neighbors inquire at your smelly yard due to your composting, which I am willing to bet you do?   

Do you care getting dirty looks for picking up leave and weed cutting bags from the garbage area taking it back home?

How about undressing outside so you don't drag all the tear gas contaminated clothing back in the house?

But going back to your initial question, what happens to me is unimportant.  I can only see important what society perceives as important, whether bad or good by my judgement.  If you were out defending whales, would that be about you, or about what you believe as a necessity for whales to survive the human slaughtering.  You can choose to keep on sailing or you can fire that torpedo you are carrying around to that Japanese ship.

@miyo Wikipedia in most counts, except for some political/philosophical/historical biases, seems as good as an encyclopedia can be.  It is also pretty democratic in the sense that if you have reasonable evidence to contest an article it gets revised or inclusive of the "other" view.  Try doing this with Britanica or something similar.

Then it all fits in a little disk, English still being twice as big as the second language which I think it was Spanish.
So at a cost of a cheap pc and a couple of 1TB disks you could have the whole thing available in some community that has no electricity, let alone internet.  I think it is one of the first things I would miss when the internet goes off (!!)

I am gearing into investing in backing up wikipedia locally.  There is plenty of good scientific (true scientific no technology selling) information for making food, remedies, building homes, cleaning water, producing energy,
alternative ways to deal with human and other waste, ...  identifying things in nature in all parts of the world.
I see it as a good tool to keep around.  If I could hit a button and get rid of all the sports and show businesss crap
it would even be better.

Capitalism, by very wide agreement, begins with mass production with mechanical means.  The place is Netherlands and England in the early stages and in textiles.  This is why cotton production in the colonies became of prime importance.  The only way to capitalize is to massively buy and resell labor.  Nobody debates on that one.  Previously wealth was created only by raiding neighboring communities by armies (feudalism).
And so has the development of the modern state and its domination over specific borders taking place around the same time.  A couple centuries later this development leads to a 'class revolution" in the US and later in France against the nobles, so the capitalists can be free and can rule without taxation.  The non-effectively revolting states quickly reform to prevent such revolution and resemble those capitalist states.  So a century later there is not much difference between France, UK, or US.  In the UK and colonies a pact is made by the capitalist class and the nobles to keep the later around as ornaments.
Nowhere in political theory does anyone claim that capitalism existed anywhere else or at any time before.  Trading is not capitalism.  Trading alone was never too benefitial under the rule of nobles and their armies.

What design, whose design, what prosperity?  In Chiapas whaever prosperity they enjoy is in very equal terms within the organized communities.  The rest live out of drug-running, prostitution, or as slaves to landowners.  In the zapatista communities you can say there is equality by design, that is what the decided to do and that is how they live.  Capitalism never had a design or a theory, till neoliberalism was formulated, but exists due to massive societies being socially unorganized.  This is why communities declined and later family structures.  Unorganized individuals are helpless and dependent on economic blackmail.

There are 2 scenarios, at its extreme evolution, the final stage of neoliberalism, as it will be unable to return to state controlled national capitalism, this globalized hydra will be overthrown in a sequence of uprisings, but capitalism seems to be able to adopt quickly to prevent total loss.  The other scenario is that its accelerating destruction of the environment that seems now unstoppable will create a living crisis for all species on earth.  There may be so few left living that it would be impossible to recreate capitalism.  Most predictions are that when the decline in living things reaches a certain point there is no return.  Surely with 90% of the human population sick and starving nothing good can come out then, except for canibalism.    Mining, single-crop agriculture, and energy transformation has already reached a point of no return.  It may very well be already too late to save life for the next century.  Even we, older people, we should expect epidemic crises of new forms to erupt at even the most affluent corners of the planet within our life time.   The kids being born today are doomed to live through this hell.

You can only destroy the monster, you can never reform it.  Every head you chop more come out.

I hope you don't mean state capitalism as "other systems", but I only know of that one.  Economic systems by definition are "systems" designed and run from top down.  Those have all failed humanity miserably.  They are all variations of the same industrial model.  Social organization systems that spring from the bottom seem to be doing very well, socially, politically, and economically.  It would be illogical to blame yourself for shortcomings resulting from decisions  you made (nu active participation).  So that creates an endless political stability.  It turns out that in such communities true environmental protection is of primary importance as it this environment that ensures food for tomorrow and nobody else.  Humans being sustainably part of their community's environment, as one specie among the many, in harmony.   

But if we are willing to trade destruction of "others' environment"  so we can have the luxury of buying two smart phones a year and a new vehicle every two years, which run out of green fuel (chopped rainforests), and keep piling with toxic minerals landfills everywhere, then there shall not be any hope for all of humanity or any other living thing on the surface.  Deep ocean life seems to be resilient to extinction events.

Is the goal for all of us to get rich or is it to be able to survive for generations to come with a higher degree of dignity?  Because the middle class in industrialized ( or previously industrialized) societies are the worse kind of whores that the system needs to survive on.  Happy whores, but whores (in a non-sexist meaning).  We are becoming more conscious that it takes a lot of killing and destruction to have certain industrial goods, and that is ok, it is not our fault but the "design of the system".   We are being good little Germans feeding the oven with the bodies of others.  We are just doing our job.

So then it all boils down to a moral issue.  Is selling your ass while justifying genocide worth the pretty dress you are wearing?  Once the population is massively demoralized to the point of resembling Rome of 1st-2nd century you can count the hours of the civilization's demise.  Only this time around there is no "other place" civilization will be reborn at, because this one is all around the earth.  This may very well be the last civilization, and we are living its last moments.  Rich or poor the fate is the same.

It is a global hydra that has been genetically modified to destroy all life on earth.  It is a man made abrupt extinction event.  The previous 4 were naturally caused, this one is clearly the product of a parasite numbering 7,5bil at the moment.  I am not refuting the class issue, it is as much of an issue now as it was in the 1880s (Chicago May-day, Paris commune, etc).  It is not as urgent as fighting for the survival of species though.  Not any more as the clock is ticking.

Note:  A parasite is a life form that is disrupting the balance and harmony of the eco-system so that ecosystem is no longer sustainable.  It is a dying ecosystem because of the parasite.  The question is whether the parasite is consciously suicidal or not.  Because even bacteria learn to stop killing their host as fast and alter their activity to keep the host alive the longest.  But bacteria are smart, we are talking about humans.

I was afraid this was going to happen but as Debian dropped support for some firmware, of my very unique gfx, between Jessie and Ascii, the installation fails when X is started.  So it is not miyo or devuan, it was a debian decision.  This is on an old Asus board with celeron on it, among the last generation of the 32bit systems, but the internal gfx seemed to be very rare.  It was one of those that had the capability of higher RAM handling (PAE... I forget).  With systems of a decade later being sold with a year warranty for $50 I doubt this would be much of a concern to anyone.
Unfortunately there are places in the world, quite a few, that such a machine would provide years of training and education to kids learning linux.  But western devs couldn't care less.

But, we can still test 32bit systems on our luxurious $50 machines

@cynwulf Ok, we will not talk about c....  I'll just call it hydra.
3  You disagree.  I don't see how, nor did I mention hierarchy anywhere.  But then hierarchy can also be reversed and hierarchy on itself does not necessarily constitute authority.  Meaning that hierarchy can start from below and end to the top.
4  Yes, if the means utilized don't seem to be any longer effective we must seek new means.  The hydra has evolved, transformed, cloned, to be "mass protest" resistant.  In the 1880s those same means seem to have gained the industrialized world at least a cushion of relief that lasted 100 years.  Since the virus developed resistance to the antibiotic and pesticide, a new vaccine is needed.

@golinux I hate to have to come to a point to agree with you.  Maybe intuitively this is why we have confronted each other so much.  I think the clock for ecological disaster and the 5th great extinction of surface life is accelerating beyond our wildest nightmare.  Hence my interest in the foundation of all life, fungi.
Also, no matter what the individual can ever do, it will still be socially insignificant.  What little thing society will do will always reflect on the individual, as there is no such thing as an individual outside of society.  Not for humans anyway, nor for wolves either.  Pumas may be different, I don't know any of them.  Does it make any difference if there was a person living in the forest alone and absolutely free?  Like the tree falling not making noise and nobody to hear it fall.

5  As long as the zapatista communities meet and decide on their lives and their course of action nobody can dare call it utopia or idealism.  Libertarian communalism is already a 23+ year old reality, but the revolution is still in infancy.

I suspect they don't use systemd in those communities, just a hunch.

And this is not UK specific, but globally true!

On those soho boxes, I don't think they actually retrieve them anywhere, recycling them costs more than making them, it is the actual legal status of the ownership that is of their concern.  The suspicion again is not so much in what is communicated but who it is that is communicating.  You can see light in the fog but a radio beacon is sending a signal telling you who it is sending the light.  Freedom of speech when your individual identity must be clarified before you speak is not much of an individual freedom, except for the very naive.

If there was a chance that gnu-net would work we wouldn't worry too much about it, but I don't think there is much more time left to develop it enough.  We may have enjoyed a brief period, a window of opportunity, to understand the potential of the internet, but by the time we did it was taken away again.  Most people don't email each other any longer, they "im" in social media.  If you are not "in" social media you don't actually exist, let alone have a voice.

How does a woman flipping off the president on the street with a bicycle get fired the next day?
Are there more people in the US being affected by a gag-order or journalists in prison in Turkey?

For the lack of a like button LIKE

https://sysdfree.wordpress.com/153/

If this does not work, there is also /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/00-keyboard.conf

To be able to alternate between keyboard mappings/languages (example us,fr,es) with right alt + right shift the file should read as follows:

Section "InputClass"
    Identifier "system-keyboard"
    MatchIsKeyboard "on"
    Option "XkbLayout" "us,fr,es"
    Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
    Option "XkbOptions" "grp:ralt_rshift_toggle"
EndSection

σετχκβμαπ -θσ

is not a linux recognizable command

I know exactly what you mean

$ setxkbmap -print -verbose 10

Try this command and see if it gives you any hints.
The command above (loadkeys) does not work unless you manually set up some keymap files, I think.

I am wondering whether in lxqt you are running into the same problems as in openbox with lxde.
The way to utilize the lxsession-logout in openbox is if lxpolkit is running.  I wonder if it is similar in lxqt's openbox.
I still haven't found a light solution for switchin keyboards (language) in openbox, without the function being part of a task/bar or panel.

Unless lxqt's logout is not working in lxqt session and I misinterpret it at all.  In this case lxsession-logout may be working on lxqt as well.

PS (edit)  If we had OpenRC working it would be easier I think