The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#1576 Re: Installation » Upgrading from Ascii to Beowulf » 2020-09-05 21:12:32

Hello:

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

Maintenance for SLiM stopped in 2013 so any security issues will not be addressed.

Yes, I know ...

That's why I said:

Altoid wrote:

A real pity.
With so many capable developers out there, going after the newest shiniest whatever instead of supporting/maintaining good software.  :^ *

~$ echo foo >&3
bash: 3: Bad file descriptor
groucho@devuan:~$ tail -1 /var/log/slim.log
slim: waiting for X server to begin accepting connections.
~$ ls -l /var/log/slim.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 403312 Sep  5 15:44 /var/log/slim.log
~$ whoami
groucho
~$ 

I really wanted to avoid using anything and just log in and startx from the command line.
But it proved problematic for a number of reasons related to other parts of the system, so I went with the simplest and (to me) less problematic DM.

Unsupported and all, I believe BSD had it as the default DM at least up to a couple of years ago.

I recall having seen an article on-line where it was voted the best DM out of 19. (found it!).

Cheers,

A.

#1577 Re: Installation » Upgrading from Ascii to Beowulf » 2020-09-05 16:37:48

Hello:

rdav wrote:

Hi fsmithred
... the ancient DM I use: "Slim".

After trying the two or three out there, I cannot but emphatically recommend SLiM to one and all.
It is not systemd compatible which is not an issue for us but probably the reason nobody is taking care of it these days.

A real pity.
With so many capable developers out there, going after the newest shiniest whatever instead of supporting/maintaining good software.  :^ *

Cheers,

A.

#1578 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » Startech firewire card » 2020-09-04 21:18:53

Hello:

viverna wrote:

... card with VIA VT6308P chipset. Works very well.

Glad to know you got the problem solved.  8^ )

It would be interesting (for future reference to others) if you would post whatever information you have (hardware, brand, source, etc.) as well as what is provided by dmesg, lspci, lsmod, etc.

Cheers,

A.

#1579 Re: Other Issues » sbin PATH problems on Beowulf [SOLVED] » 2020-09-04 19:40:25

Hello:

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

Because su can be used for things other ...

I see.

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

Read man su wink

Yes, my use of su is rather limited to the basics, so I really have quite a bit of reading to do.
That's what you get from arriving to Linuxland late in life.  8^7

Thanks for your input.

Cheers,

A.

#1580 Re: Other Issues » sbin PATH problems on Beowulf [SOLVED] » 2020-09-04 18:34:07

Hello:

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

... seems to be an error ...
... should be added to /etc/login.defs.

I see.

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

... call su correctly:

su -

^ The - is important.

Of course it is.
su won't work as intended expected without it.

Q:
Why not just get rid of the old su and let the output be command not found?

Now we have sudo, su and su - ...

Thanks for the link.

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

... a PITA to add a - after the command?

Yes.
I forget to do it because I am very much used to su.
And I don't like sudo although it is convenient if properly used/configured.

Cheers,

A.

#1581 Re: Other Issues » sbin PATH problems on Beowulf [SOLVED] » 2020-09-04 15:26:21

Hello:

altoid wrote:

Would have been mine also ... 8⁷ |

I did not have /etc/default/su and generating the file and adding ALWAYS SET PATH  yes did not work.

What did work was ...

root@devuan2:/home/groucho# export PATH=$PATH:~/usr/local/sbin
root@devuan2:/home/groucho# $echo $PATH
bash: /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/root/usr/local/sbin: No such file or directory
root@devuan2:/home/groucho# 

Got it from https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables:

--- snip ---
... after doing su, your PATH may not contain directories like /sbin, and many system administration commands will fail. There are several workarounds:
...

Put the system administration directories (/sbin, /usr/sbin, /usr/local/sbin) in your regular account's PATH (see EnvironmentVariables for help with this).

--- snip ---

BTW: whatever the reason for the change in how su works, I hope it is a good/justified one and not another one of Poettering's wet dreams. It is a PITA.

A.

#1582 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » Startech firewire card » 2020-08-27 16:39:31

viverna wrote:

I read another link:
https://sgcdn.startech.com/005329/media … V2_QSG.pdf
and startech says to offer Linux Ubuntu.

The *.pdf also says this:

Requirements
For the latest requirements, please visit www.startech.com/PEX1394A2V2

That link is to yet another *.pdf that says this:

Software
OS Compatibility
Windows® 2000, XP, Vista, 7, 8, 8.1, 10
Windows Server® 2003

There is no mention of Linux in what seems to be the *.pdf with "latest requirements" for this card/chipset.

The card selling at the site recommended by GNUser is the same one I made reference to.
If it turns out to be expensive, just shop around for any other PCIe card that has the same chipset.

ie: Texas Instruments XIO2213B controller

Cheers,

A.

#1583 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » Startech firewire card » 2020-08-20 00:20:50

Hello:

viverna wrote:

Seller wrote me that Startech firewire card seems recognized in Windows.

Windows is not Linux.  8-⁷
The Startech webpage for this card does not mention Linux support.

That said ...

The card uses the Texas Instruments Texas Intruments -TSB82AA2 chipset and Startech's vendorID is 14b0.

Looking up TSB82AA2+14b0 on the linux-hardware.org website, we get this.

----

Results for 'Texas Instruments', 'TSB82AA2', id='14B0-*', type='firewire controller', bus='PCI' (0)
No data sad

----

Given that it is a card you can probably replace for less than US$25, I suggest that you get one that has Linux support.
   
See this one with a different TI chipset.

There are probably a few others, you'll have to shop around.

Cheers,

A.

#1584 Re: Other Issues » Uploading file to email server - size vs. outgoing total discrepancy. » 2020-08-19 13:26:11

Hello:

Excalibur wrote:

... as you say ...
... contain images of various sorts ...
... would affect the efficiency of the base64 encoding ...

Quite so, the document's physical surface is roughly 50% magazine quality colour photos.

Learnt something new this week.  =^)
Thanks a lot for your input.

Cheers,

A.

#1585 Re: Other Issues » Uploading file to email server - size vs. outgoing total discrepancy. » 2020-08-18 19:59:59

Hello:

Excalibur wrote:

... will see a larger Email upload size than the actual data you are sending because the data is converted to base64 encoding.
This has a tendency to inflate the size of your data quite considerably. Hence, the discrepancy.

I see ...

This is just with Pegasus Mail or is it ...

Just read about it and it is probably common to all email clients or text to binary data conversions.
Like you say, base64 inflates the size of the data, but much less than decimal or hexadecimal:

Base-64 maps 3 bytes (8 x 3 = 24 bits) in 4 characters that span 6-bits (6 x 4 = 24 bits). The result looks something like "TWFuIGlzIGRpc3Rpb...". Therefore the bloating is only a mere 4/3 = 1.3333333 times the original.

https://stackoverflow.com/a/201536

Still, 15.5Mib x 1.3 = 20.15MiB, not 30.5MiB ...

What could be causing the other 10.35MiB worth of bloat?

Could it be that I am not sending a text file but *.pdf file, with all its complexities? ie: symbols, compression, etc. and the file is 15.5Mib 'on-disk'.

Thanks for your input.

A.

#1586 Re: Other Issues » Uploading file to email server - size vs. outgoing total discrepancy. » 2020-08-18 19:52:58

Hello:

golinux wrote:

... perhaps some wine overhead?

No idea, maybe with the CPU cycles.

Don't think it would affect transmitted data.

golinux wrote:

... my 2000th post!

Congrats !

A.

#1587 Other Issues » Uploading file to email server - size vs. outgoing total discrepancy. » 2020-08-18 19:09:42

Altoid
Replies: 6

Hello:

I run Devuan ASCII 2.0 and my email client is Pegasus Mail 4.73 under Wine Debian 1.8.7-2.

~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 4.9.0-13-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.228-1 (2020-07-05) x86_64 GNU/Linux
~$ 

I keep tabs on my LAN with Conky using this configuration:

--- snip ---
NETWORK LAN
${hr 2}
IP address: $alignr ${addr eth0}
${downspeedgraph eth0}
Incoming: ${downspeed eth0}  /s $alignr total: ${totaldown eth0}
${upspeedgraph eth0}
Outgoing: ${upspeed eth0}  /s $alignr total: ${totalup eth0}
--- snip ---

The thing is that (had not noticed this before) I just sent an email with a 15.5MiB *.pdf document but Conky informs me there were a total of 30.5MiB transmitted. ie: outgoing.
That's almost 2X the original file size.

There was practically no incoming activity while the file was being uploaded so I don't think (?) it was retransmission of dropped/failed packets.

At the risk of revealing my ignorance, could anyone explain to me what is going on?

Thanks in advance.

A.

#1588 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » Cannot install VLC » 2020-08-13 22:48:37

Hello:

walterbyrd wrote:

... trying to install plexmediaserver, I added some debian sources ...
These are the debian sources that I had:

# deb [url]http://deb.debian.org/debian[/url] buster main contrib non-free <-- Error: it's either ascii or buster. Can't be both. 
# deb [url]https://downloads.plex.tv/repo/deb[/url] ./public main

fsmithred can surely expand on this more than I could, ie: how to fix it.

But what I'm sure of is that # deb http://deb.debian.org/debian buster main contrib non-free should not be/have been there.

BTW: please use code to insert code and quote to insert a quote.

Cheers,

A.

#1589 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » Cannot install VLC » 2020-08-13 14:00:04

Hello:

walterbyrd wrote:

Dependency hell.

Could you post your surces list?

~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list

I run on an updated Devuan ascii 2.0

~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 4.9.0-13-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.228-1 (2020-07-05) x86_64 GNU/Linux
~$ 
# apt-get update && apt-get upgrade && apt-get install -f
Hit:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii InRelease
Hit:2 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii-security InRelease
Hit:3 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii-updates InRelease
Hit:4 http://deb.devuan.org/devuan ascii-proposed InRelease
Hit:5 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii-backports InRelease
Reading package lists... Done
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
# 

Here's my sources.list, please disregard the comments:

~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list

deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ ascii main 
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ ascii-security main 
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ ascii-updates main 

# needed x virtualbox backport - enable to update package
deb http://deb.devuan.org/devuan/ ascii-proposed main contrib non-free 
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ ascii-backports non-free contrib main 

# needed x nvidia non-free drivers installation
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ ascii contrib 
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ ascii non-free 

# virtual box repository 
# deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/ stretch non-free contrib  

With those sources, if I try to install vlc, I get this:

# apt-get install vlc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
vlc is already the newest version (3.0.11-0+deb9u1).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
# 

Same with the plugin:

# apt-get install vlc-plugin-video-output
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
vlc-plugin-video-output is already the newest version (3.0.11-0+deb9u1).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
# 

Check your sources.list, maybe there's something there that should not be or maybe there's something missing.

Cheers,

A.

#1590 Re: Devuan » Fotoxx not complaining about low RAM » 2020-08-12 18:07:38

Hello:

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

... just a python script so you can fudge an "installation" ...

Right, I'll get to it.
Thanks a lot !   8^ )

Cheers,

A.

#1591 Re: Devuan » Fotoxx not complaining about low RAM » 2020-08-11 21:51:04

Hello:

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

... use ps_mem to analyse per-application memory ...

Is there a *.deb package available for ASCII?
Can't seem to find it.

TIA,

A.

#1592 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » Making Devuan more secure. » 2020-08-01 22:41:01

Hello:

freenet_bro wrote:

... tried Guix, Gentoo, Artix and a few others, but it always ended up with the same set of bullshit spyware.

Hmm ...

Just what is it that you do with your rig?

Did you sanitize your drive before each installation?

ie: with a bootable Linux install CD/DVD run gparted and clear the drive.
Then reboot, format it to FAT32, then reboot and clear it again.
Repeat till you have gone through ext3, ext4 and cleared one last time.

Only then install the OS again, from scratch.

freenet_bro wrote:

... a copy of my entire root directory from several different installs.

From what you say, I have the idea that whatever is dumping that crap into your installation is probably in your backups.
Have you gone through them and checked what was there?

Cheers,

A.

#1593 Re: Installation » Devuan ascii 2.1 - 'Kept back' packages » 2020-07-20 19:27:36

Hello:

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

The kernel & headers metapackages need to install new versions of their dependencies ...

Right ...

But why has this happened with my VM Devuan ascii ...

groucho@devuan:~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 4.9.0-12-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.210-1+deb9u1 (2020-06-07) x86_64 GNU/Linux
groucho@devuan:~$ 

... and not with my everyday rig:

groucho@devuan:~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 4.9.0-12-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.210-1+deb9u1 (2020-06-07) x86_64 GNU/Linux
groucho@devuan:~$ 

ie: what difference is there between them that causes those packages to be kept back? <- which was the reason for my OP.

There's more ... 

EDIT:
It seems that between running apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my rig and then doing the same on the VM used for the USB plug, the repos were updated.

So it looked like two different update/upgrade processes were taking place.

ie: one machine did it on the repos just before they were updated and the other just after they were updated.

Just what are the chances?  8^D

Thanks a lot for your input.

Cheers,

A.

#1594 Installation » Devuan ascii 2.1 - 'Kept back' packages » 2020-07-20 17:45:47

Altoid
Replies: 2

Hello:

I was in the process of updating/upgrading a Devuan image I burn to a USB plug as an emergency recovery tool.

groucho@devuan:~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 4.9.0-12-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.210-1+deb9u1 (2020-06-07) x86_64 GNU/Linux
groucho@devuan:~$ 

The image was built with refracta snapshot 10.2.4 (20190713).

It is supposed to live inside the box, plugged into a USB socket on the MB but I've been sloppy lately so it is outside and not updated.
But I digress ...

On starting the process I came across this:

---

groucho@devuan:~$ sudo apt-get update
[sudo] password for groucho: 
Get:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii InRelease [25.6 kB]
Get:2 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii-security InRelease [25.6 kB]
Get:3 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii-updates InRelease [25.6 kB]
Get:4 http://deb.devuan.org/devuan ascii-proposed InRelease [54.5 kB]
Get:5 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii-backports InRelease [25.6 kB]
Get:6 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii/main amd64 Packages [7198 kB]
Get:7 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii/contrib amd64 Packages [50.8 kB]                                                                  
Get:8 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii/non-free amd64 Packages [78.8 kB]                                                                 
Get:9 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii-updates/main amd64 Packages [3504 B]                                                              
Fetched 7488 kB in 9s (767 kB/s)                                                                                                           
Reading package lists... Done
groucho@devuan:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done

The following packages have been kept back:
  linux-headers-amd64 linux-image-amd64                           <------------ this

The following packages will be upgraded:
  glib-networking glib-networking-common glib-networking-services libcups2 libgnutls30 libneon27-gnutls libopenjp2-7 libperl5.24
  linux-compiler-gcc-6-x86 linux-kbuild-4.9 nfs-common perl perl-base perl-modules-5.24 tzdata wpasupplicant xdg-utils
17 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
Need to get 12.6 MB of archives.
After this operation, 63.5 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 

Makes me wonder because I have linux-headers-amd64 and linux-image-amd64 as essential.
¿Why are these packages being kept back?
¿Is there some application that would break if forced the upgrade?
If so, ¿how can I find out which one?

Thanks in advance,

A.

#1595 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » [SOLVED] Just bought HP 8025, not detected » 2020-07-18 00:15:52

Hello:

Debuser2018 wrote:

Another option is using CUPS.

+1

When (in a hurry) I purchased a M2020W, the only thing that worked almost right away (Devuan 2.0 ascii) was CUPS.
No issues since.

Cheers,

A.

#1596 Re: Off-topic » What other distro are you using (besides devuan)? » 2020-07-15 16:28:37

golinux wrote:

There is another distro?

No ...
Not really.   8^7

Don't know all I can do with just one, what would I want two for?

A.

#1597 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » no 'X' window on Beowulf with nvidia card » 2020-06-29 01:13:08

Hello:

erdos wrote:

... couldn't log into 'X' after rebooting ...
... been running 'xfce' for a week ...

So the rig was working perfectly well until "adding printer driver for a Brother laser printer"?
If so, maybe it is just the old and well known cause -> effect mechanism doing it's thing here.

Q: Just where did the driver come from?

erdos wrote:

any advice?

1.
Scan through dmesg for errors and see what /var/log/Xorg.0.log has to say about X not starting.

2.
Try seeing if there's something missing, as root do:

# apt-get install -f

Please post back results.

Cheers,

A.

#1598 Re: ARM Builds » [Solved] Why no netinst ISO for arm? » 2020-06-20 19:15:22

Hello:

kuleszdl wrote:

... please note that Devuan ships with an unmodified Debian kernel.
... a mainline LTS kernel with very few patches ...
... *does not* support any of the RPI boards.

Ahh ...
Petit dètail.

kuleszdl wrote:

... don't see any sound way for providing any sound RPI support in Devuan.

I understand.

kuleszdl wrote:

... build some kind of "Respuan" ...
... all the RPI-specific stuff but uses Devuan ...

I've not seen anything like that.

Where does the Raspbian kernel come from?
How do the Ubuntu people do it?
Surely they are both Debian based.

kuleszdl wrote:

... package a kernel for the RPI boards and then build installation images ...

Indeed ...
But like you say, no generic kernel.  8^7

kuleszdl wrote:

... images with a kernel that is not packaged and receives no security updates ...

Of course, I agree 100%, it is a false sense of security.
I was trying to make a point.

Thanks for your input.

A.

#1599 Re: ARM Builds » [Solved] Why no netinst ISO for arm? » 2020-06-20 14:41:05

Hello:

kuleszdl wrote:

... as the packaged Devuan kernel is not working for the RPI, I don't see much value ...
... images with a "hardcoded" kernels are definitely not what you want ...
... false sense about security of such systems ...
... with no kernel updates forever.

From where I stand ie: not a coder or developer, just a 65+ advanced (?) user, what you say makes a lot of sense.

But I also believe that it makes sense to take into account that for Devuan, which has a hard time as things stand, things won't get easier if it has no access to or ignores SBC hardware such as RPis of which over 35 million have been sold.

These inexpensive SBP are the entry point to IT for a great many people who maybe cannot afford something else, just want to play and see what it is like or just need an inexpensive solution to a small and simple problem.

And if you leave it all to Raspbian, you will have lost a lot of potential users many of which may eventually become IT staff or pros ie: just the people Devuan needs to survive in the future.

I'm afraid that spawning dozens of derivatives will not be enough.

The Devuan project is not just a distribution, it also represents a core philosophy (Unix) or an ideology if you will.
Exactly the opposite of what mainstream MS software represents today. 

It urgently needs to develop a strategy to occupy the RPi field or get permanently pushed out of it.

Just another point of view and as always, YMMV.

Cheers,

A.

#1600 Re: ARM Builds » [Solved] Why no netinst ISO for arm? » 2020-06-19 20:05:36

Hello:

tuxd3v wrote:

... for rpi 3B+ its the only arm64 image ...

I thought so.

tuxd3v wrote:

... but you can dist-upgrade it to beowulf.

I tried (just to test it) but it did not do anything because of the system lacking the proper entries in /etc/apt/sources.list.
Maybe when Beowulf reaches old-stable.

tuxd3v wrote:

... they are not mainlined.
... are always behind.

I understand.
But I don't want the mainline version, just the last stable one.

Thanks a lot for taking the time to explain this.

Best,

A.

Board footer

Forum Software