The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#126 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Display problems with 6.1.1 live » 2026-02-26 08:45:31

So those where reports of the graphics setup of the virtual machines?

#127 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Display problems with 6.1.1 live » 2026-02-26 08:30:11

In which world are those two logs "much the same"??? Maybe in a world where you ignore differences...

#129 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Inability to install printer » 2026-02-24 02:54:26

@Atalnte: you should have installed the package printer-driver-escpr and not confused yourself and your system with dowwnloaded drivers. You will still need to go through the printer setup after installing the package.

#130 Re: Off-topic » HexChat's GTK3 Successor: ZoiteChat » 2026-02-23 06:28:18

Everyone makes their own choice about what is important.
I jumped off github when I learnt they sold out to Microsoft.

#133 Re: Packaging for Devuan » [Lxqt] Qps package not working in non-AVX arch » 2026-02-20 23:13:24

You may check devuan repositories using pkginfo.devuan.org
For example, type https://pkginfo.devuan.org/qps to your browser.

Then, typically, a version code without "devuan" in it indicates that the package is directly a Debian package, whereas a package with "devuan" in it is a Devuan package; i.e., forked typically from Debian packaging sources, modified and built in the Devuan build pipeline and published in the Devuan specific repository overlay.

#134 Re: Freedom Hacks » About installers » 2026-02-20 23:02:13

I really would like people to put just a little bit of thought into how their posts may reflect on them, before posting.

#135 Re: Freedom Hacks » UDisks2: Security Considerations » 2026-02-15 21:57:57

Find some other place for chatting please.

#136 Re: Freedom Hacks » UDisks2: Security Considerations » 2026-02-15 04:34:08

Yes we don't want AI output copied to here at all.

Feeling insecure about language or whatever is not an excuse: No AI output copied to here.

We are all grown-ups; a range of ages, from very old and down to quite young. Just show respect for everyone's language ability.

#137 Re: Freedom Hacks » UDisks2: Security Considerations » 2026-02-14 22:54:00

Don't copy AI output to here, @igorzwx, or anyone.

#138 Re: Other Issues » errors with apt update on Daedalus » 2026-02-14 13:38:59

If the limitation is on "number of requests" you might want to try using socks5 tunneling over tcp, to a socks server... I can probably provide you with one such (on email) if you like.

#139 Re: Other Issues » errors with apt update on Daedalus » 2026-02-14 12:02:52

It appears you are using a VPN or http proxy where that VPN or proxy service is unhapy with the number of requests (per second?).

If that is the case, then you may need to choose a different provider; (I suppose it's technically possible to set up outbound bandwidth limitation but that might require working package system to get set up)

#140 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Devuan 6.1.0 desktop installer has no options for modern filesystems » 2026-02-11 20:39:41

Yes, one does not need to select any of those options. They are all "extra". But the dialog flow includes installing unmentioned default components, and the dialog must be ok-ed for that to happen.

Thus, one must bring up that dialog and click ok, even though one may opt for not picking any of the pickable additions.

#141 Re: Freedom Hacks » About installers » 2026-02-11 11:19:02

Interesting. So your great idea is that someone else should go and actually do something because you think it appears to be an easy thing?

#142 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Weirdness with runit and slim/xfce; slim starts even when disabled? » 2026-02-11 01:23:56

Yes, the Devuan wiki attempt is abysmal. It's certainly far from ready for fly-by contributions. It will take someone with editorial interest and commitment to get involved and make soemthing happen.

#143 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Devuan 6.1.0 desktop installer has no options for modern filesystems » 2026-02-11 01:14:07

The expert installer needs to go through the "load components" dialogue with an OK, but with or without selecting any additional components. Doing so will still load the  "default components", which includes various partman packages for different filesystems. Otherwise those "default components" are not loaded.

It's a fairly odd UX design, but the udeb involved is included straight from debian installer and noone has felt the urge to fork it only to deal with that quirk; there is always the issue of maintaining forks.

#144 Re: Freedom Hacks » Turnstile: security considerations and potential issues » 2026-02-10 03:09:17

So where did you go wrong in your study of turnstile?
It's not a login manager and it doesn't provide any root services.
Iit merely runs user scripts as user.

#145 Re: Freedom Hacks » Turnstile: security considerations and potential issues » 2026-02-10 00:57:17

Mmm, I give you that; though I do think your first post could be way less alarmist, if that was your intention.

#146 Re: Freedom Hacks » Turnstile: security considerations and potential issues » 2026-02-09 22:56:19

No, turnstile does not "handle login sessions". It gets notified about login and logout happening, and then it runs (or terminates) user scripts qua the user (not as root). I think it'd be much less of a hacker's attraction than, say, dbus, since turnstile is very well contained in what it does.

But for sure, there are many other ways for users to run programs, and there is no real need for a system to have a turnstile daemon to manage running them with "session control". I agree on that aspect smile

EDIT: btw, which thread title would you set?

#147 Re: Freedom Hacks » Turnstile: security considerations and potential issues » 2026-02-09 21:12:51

Too much writing so it got it's own thread.

It is also the case that nothing what you raise as criticism has any value. Just very opiniated.
Turnstile does achive the notion of "user services" without comromising on security.

If you are the admin of your system, you don't need to use it, Use something else.

#148 Re: Freedom Hacks » what about "turnstile" for user services? » 2026-02-09 01:47:59

Yes, I wouldn't have mentioned it otherwise.

In my experience the packaged turnstile daemon is quite stable and safe. The package default backend, despite its name "suss", also works quite well. (I haven't explored the other backends) It provides a reliable "user service" process control including both one-shot actions and session-based services.

The expected "normal" use is straight-foward. A user that wants many services with start-up inter-dependencies may of course need to design that start-up somewhat carefully.

In short: a good option.

#149 Re: Freedom Hacks » what about "turnstile" for user services? » 2026-02-09 00:41:59

Ah, so you just repeated a phrase from the upstream README.

I read your post as if you knew about something particular.

Refering to source would best be https://git.devuan.org/devuan/turnstile as it then would include patches and packaging deployed for the Devuan (and proposed Debian) package.
(Done by Mark Hindley and myself)

#150 Re: Freedom Hacks » what about "turnstile" for user services? » 2026-02-08 23:11:22

@igorzwx: I don't understand what you mean with that "warning"? Have you been using it and ran into issues?

Board footer

Forum Software