You are not logged in.
Hello:
why are you using apt list ?
Gives me information of what's installed from the apt repertoire?
I find why and why-not quite enlightening.
if you want to see what is on your system use dpkg
OK.
groucho@devuan:~$ dpkg -l | grep -i consolekit
rc consolekit 1.2.1-8 amd64 framework for defining and tracking users, sessions and seats
ii libck-connector0:amd64 1.2.1-8 amd64 ConsoleKit libraries
groucho@devuan:~$ Thanks a lot for the heads-up.
Cheers,
A.
Hello:
... see about trying to get it done this weekend.
Had an idle half hour while waiting for something, like we are all doing these days.
Upgrade worked, without issues. =^D
Then I checked to see:
groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep -i installed | grep consolekit
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts.
groucho@devuan:~$OK, consolekit is no longer installed.
I went further and found this:
groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep -i consolekit
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts.
consolekit-dbgsym/stable 1.2.1-8 amd64
consolekit-dbgsym/stable 1.2.1-8 i386
consolekit/stable,now 1.2.1-8 amd64 [residual-config] <-------
consolekit/stable 1.2.1-8 i386
libconsolekit-dev/stable 1.2.1-8 amd64
libconsolekit-dev/stable 1.2.1-8 i386
libconsolekit1-dbgsym/stable 1.2.1-8 amd64
libconsolekit1-dbgsym/stable 1.2.1-8 i386
libconsolekit1/stable 1.2.1-8 amd64
libconsolekit1/stable 1.2.1-8 i386
libpolkit-backend-consolekit-1-0-dbgsym/stable 0.105-25+devuan8 amd64
libpolkit-backend-consolekit-1-0-dbgsym/stable 0.105-25+devuan8 i386
libpolkit-backend-consolekit-1-0/stable 0.105-25+devuan8 amd64
libpolkit-backend-consolekit-1-0/stable 0.105-25+devuan8 i386
libpolkit-backend-consolekit-1-dev/stable 0.105-25+devuan8 amd64
libpolkit-backend-consolekit-1-dev/stable 0.105-25+devuan8 i386
libpolkit-gobject-consolekit-1-0-dbgsym/stable 0.105-25+devuan8 amd64
libpolkit-gobject-consolekit-1-0-dbgsym/stable 0.105-25+devuan8 i386
libpolkit-gobject-consolekit-1-0/stable 0.105-25+devuan8 amd64
libpolkit-gobject-consolekit-1-0/stable 0.105-25+devuan8 i386
libpolkit-gobject-consolekit-1-dev/stable 0.105-25+devuan8 amd64
libpolkit-gobject-consolekit-1-dev/stable 0.105-25+devuan8 i386
groucho@devuan:~$ So I asked:
groucho@devuan:~$ aptitude why consolekit
i slim Depends default-logind | logind | consolekit
groucho@devuan:~$ What does this mean in practical terms? eg: for slim which I am fond of.
Thanks in advance,
A.
Hello:
... think you will be ok upgrading from consolkit to elogind.
Thanks, I'll see about trying to get it done this weekend.
It seems that consolekit is deprecated and maybe on its way out. (?)
See https://bugs.devuan.org/db/42/425.html
Received: (at submit) by bugs.devuan.org; 23 Apr 2020 21:30:02 +0000
Return-Path: <alexispm_stellaluna@yahoo.es>
Delivered-To: devuanbugs@dyne.org
--- snip ---
Package: policykit-1
Version: 0.105-25+devuan8policykit-1 dependency is declared as "logind" instead of "elogind", forcing to use de deprecated (no buster yet) consolekit. <- my highlighting
Thanks a lot for your input.
Cheers,
A.
Hello:
Looks like you have backintime-qt4 installed ??
Indeed ... 8^/
What a (quite embarrassed) dick!
Sorry for the slip-up, that's what happens with not enough coffee after a bad night's sleep.
Yes, that's quite evidently backintime-qt4.
Here's all the qt I found:
groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep -i installed | grep -i qt
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts.
backintime-qt4/stable,stable,now 1.1.24-0.1 all [installed]
libdbusmenu-qt5-2/stable,now 0.9.3+16.04.20160218-1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libphonon4qt5-4/stable,now 4:4.10.2-1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-dbus/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-declarative/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-designer/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-help/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-network/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-script/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-scripttools/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-sql-mysql/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-sql/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-svg/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-test/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-xml/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt4-xmlpatterns/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5core5a/stable,now 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u4 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5dbus5/stable,now 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u4 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5gui5/stable,now 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u4 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5network5/stable,now 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u4 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5opengl5/stable,now 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u4 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5positioning5/stable,now 5.11.3+dfsg-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5printsupport5/stable,now 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u4 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5qml5/stable,now 5.11.3-4 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5quick5/stable,now 5.11.3-4 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5sensors5/stable,now 5.11.3-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5svg5/stable,now 5.11.3-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5texttospeech5/stable,now 5.11.3-3 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5waylandclient5/stable,now 5.11.3-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5waylandcompositor5/stable,now 5.11.3-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5webchannel5/stable,now 5.11.3-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5webkit5/stable,now 5.212.0~alpha2-21 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5widgets5/stable,now 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u4 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5x11extras5/stable,now 5.11.3-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqt5xml5/stable,now 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u4 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqtassistantclient4/stable,now 4.6.3-7+b1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqtcore4/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqtdbus4/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqtgui4/stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libqwt-qt5-6/stable,now 6.1.4-1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
phonon4qt5-backend-vlc/stable,now 0.10.2-1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
phonon4qt5/stable,now 4:4.10.2-1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
pinentry-qt/stable,now 1.1.0-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
python-qt4/stable,now 4.12.1+dfsg-2+b1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
python3-dbus.mainloop.qt/stable,now 4.12.1+dfsg-2+b1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
python3-pyqt4/stable,now 4.12.1+dfsg-2+b1 amd64 [installed]
qt-at-spi/stable,now 0.4.0-9 amd64 [installed,automatic]
qt5-gtk-platformtheme/stable,now 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u4 amd64 [installed,automatic]
qtchooser/stable,now 66-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
qtcore4-l10n/stable,stable,now 4:4.8.7+dfsg-18+deb10u1 all [installed,automatic]
qttranslations5-l10n/stable,stable,now 5.11.3-2 all [installed,automatic]
qtwayland5/stable,now 5.11.3-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
vlc-plugin-qt/stable,stable-security,now 3.0.12-0+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
groucho@devuan:~$ But ...
Where did qtwayland5 come from?
groucho@devuan:~$ aptitude why qtwayland5
i virtualbox-6.1 Depends libqt5gui5 (>= 5.4.0)
i A libqt5gui5 Suggests qtwayland5
groucho@devuan:~$ Suggests should be off by default.
Do you use any kde apps?
Seems not ...
groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep -i installed | grep -i kde
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts.
libblockdev-crypto2/stable,now 2.20-7+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libblockdev-fs2/stable,now 2.20-7+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libblockdev-loop2/stable,now 2.20-7+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libblockdev-part-err2/stable,now 2.20-7+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libblockdev-part2/stable,now 2.20-7+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libblockdev-swap2/stable,now 2.20-7+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libblockdev-utils2/stable,now 2.20-7+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libblockdev2/stable,now 2.20-7+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
groucho@devuan:~$ Thanks for your input.
Cheers,
A.
Hello:
... dont use backintime.
... see what happens when i install backintime.
Thanks.
... elogind is the preferred choice over consolekit?
Don't know.
... using the lxqt desktop maybe?
No, the XFCE that came by default with ASCII
groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep -i installed | grep xfce4
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts.
--- snip ---
xfce4/stable,stable,now 4.12.5 all [installed]
groucho@devuan:~$ ... no issues installing and using backintime-qt4 ...
Mine is not Qt:
groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep -i installed | grep backintime
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts.
backintime-common/stable,stable,now 1.1.24-0.1 all [installed,automatic]
backintime-qt4/stable,stable,now 1.1.24-0.1 all [installed]
groucho@devuan:~$ Thanks for your input.
Cheers,
A.
Hello:
That looks fairly normal to me. That should fix the libpolkit-qt5-1-1 issue, does it?
Don't know, havent tried.
The thing is that my Beowulf VM, which does not have BackInTime installed, does not have this problem:
root@devuan:~# uname -a
Linux devuan 4.19.0-14-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.171-2 (2021-01-30) x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@devuan:~# root@devuan:~# apt update && apt install -f && apt upgrade
Hit:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf InRelease
Get:2 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf-updates InRelease [26.0 kB]
Hit:3 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf-security InRelease
Fetched 26.0 kB in 6s (4455 B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
All packages are up to date.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
root@devuan:~#Seems that BackInTime needs this chain to be complete ...
[root@devuan ~]#
aptitude why libpolkit-qt5-1-1
i backintime-qt4 Depends backintime-common (= 1.1.24-0.1)
i A backintime-common Depends python3-keyring
i A python3-keyring Suggests libkf5wallet-bin
i A libkf5wallet-bin Depends libkf5configwidgets5 (>= 4.96.0)
i A libkf5configwidgets5 Depends libkf5auth5 (>= 4.96.0)
i A libkf5auth5 Depends libpolkit-qt5-1-1 (>= 0.112.0)
[root@devuan ~]#But then ...
groucho@devuan:~$ aptitude why-not libpolkit-qt5-1-1
Automatically installed, current version 0.112.0-5, priority optional
The candidate version 0.112.0-6 has priority optional
No dependencies require to remove libpolkit-qt5-1-1 <-----------
groucho@devuan:~$ And ...
groucho@devuan:~$ aptitude why-not libpam-elogind
i libpolkit-backend-consolekit-1-0 Conflicts libpam-elogind
groucho@devuan:~$ The often unread Release Notes for Beowulf say:
Both slim and lightdm will work with either libpam-elogind or consolekit.
Slim is the default login manager for Xfce. Lightdm is the default for
the other desktops.
If No dependencies require to remove libpolkit-qt5-1-1 it may be worthwhile leaving things as they are for the time being.
It could be that the libpolkit-backend-consolekit-1-0 conflict with libpam-elogind eventually gets sorted out. (?)
Makes sense?
Cheers,
A.
Hello:
What happens on
apt full-upgrade?
This:
[root@devuan ~]# apt full-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
libpolkit-qt5-1-1
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
[root@devuan ~]# why not apt update && apt dist-upgrade
Because it is the same thing in/with a different command?
[root@devuan ~]# apt update && apt dist-upgrade
Hit:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf InRelease
Hit:2 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf-security InRelease
Get:3 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf-updates InRelease [26.0 kB]
Fetched 26.0 kB in 2s (13.6 kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
1 package can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see it.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
libpolkit-qt5-1-1
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
[root@devuan ~]# I tried looking at reasons for this:
[root@devuan ~]# aptitude why libpolkit-qt5-1-1
i backintime-qt4 Depends backintime-common (= 1.1.24-0.1)
i A backintime-common Depends python3-keyring
i A python3-keyring Suggests libkf5wallet-bin
i A libkf5wallet-bin Depends libkf5configwidgets5 (>= 4.96.0)
i A libkf5configwidgets5 Depends libkf5auth5 (>= 4.96.0)
i A libkf5auth5 Depends libpolkit-qt5-1-1 (>= 0.112.0)
[root@devuan ~]# [root@devuan ~]# apt install libpolkit-qt5-1-1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libpolkit-qt5-1-1 : Depends: libpam-systemd
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.So then I tried to see if I could install the missing dependency:
[root@devuan ~]# apt install libpam-systemd
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Note, selecting 'libpam-elogind' instead of 'libpam-systemd' <------------ this is the clue?
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
libcgmanager0 liblz4-1:i386 libnih-dbus1 libnih1
Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them.
The following additional packages will be installed:
elogind:i386 libacl1:i386 libattr1:i386 libelogind0 libelogind0:i386 libpolkit-backend-elogind-1-0 libpolkit-gobject-elogind-1-0
Recommended packages:
libpam-elogind:i386
The following packages will be REMOVED:
consolekit libpam-ck-connector libpolkit-backend-consolekit-1-0 libpolkit-gobject-consolekit-1-0 libsystemd0 libsystemd0:i386
The following NEW packages will be installed:
elogind:i386 libacl1:i386 libattr1:i386 libelogind0 libelogind0:i386 libpam-elogind libpolkit-backend-elogind-1-0
libpolkit-gobject-elogind-1-0
0 upgraded, 8 newly installed, 6 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 1414 kB of archives.
After this operation, 2204 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
Abort.
[root@devuan ~]# Now, seeing that I did an ASCII --> Beowulf dist-upgrade as per the pertinent instructions, why is this happening?
Was something missing in my ASCII?
Did I miss something whiole installing?
Do I have to install libpam-elogind?
Is consolekit no longer used?
I recall it was the one I had to use for the SLiM/XFCE combination.
Thanks you both for your input.
Cheers,
A.
Hello:
Do the movie sites use DRM?
What?
Not the ones I frequent ... 8^D !!!
uBlock Origin gets heavy use though.
Pale Moon does not and will not support DRM.
I don't go near any of those.
Cheers,
A.
Hello:
I had been putting off upgrading from ASCII to Beowulf for the longest while but now it is done.
A new upgraded VirtualBox installation is in place and everything seems to be working.
groucho@devuan:~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 4.19.0-14-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.171-2 (2021-01-30) x86_64 GNU/Linux
groucho@devuan:~$
I did get an unasked for Firefox-ESR, maybe it is part of a metapackage from the ASCII installation?
What I cannot seem to find information on is libpolkit-qt5-1-1 being kept back:
[root@devuan ~]# apt update && apt install -f && apt upgrade
Hit:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf InRelease
Hit:2 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf-security InRelease
Hit:3 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf-updates InRelease
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
1 package can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see it.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
libpolkit-qt5-1-1
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
[root@devuan ~]# Could anyone shed some light on this for me?
Thanks in advance,
A.
Hello:
Hello:
I'm having more problems with video feeds in Pale Moon 29.0.1 (64-bit).
I had been putting off upgrading from ASCII to Beowulf for the longest while.
The thought/possibilty of WINE/PMail/IrfanView or X acting up really put me off.
But then I saw Perseverance land on Mars (safely) and said to myself: iof NASA can do that, I can upgrade to Beowulf.
So ...
About maybe an hour or so later, here I am.
groucho@devuan:~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 4.19.0-14-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.171-2 (2021-01-30) x86_64 GNU/Linux
groucho@devuan:~$ A few configurations did not make it eg: custom terminal colours and window styles, but I'll manage.
Unfortunately, my VirtualBox installation went south. 8^-7
But that's for another thread.
With respect to Palemoon and the video feed problems: the one at the WP is fixed. It seems I can see it without problems.
But a couple of the movie sites I frequent still do not work.
It's still the same version 29.0.1 (64-bit) so it was not (?) a Pale Moon thing.
No idea what is missing.
Maybe some codec?
Just thought I'd send a heads up.
Cheers,
A.
Hello:
vlc is an option worth considering.
I have VLC installed.
Didn't know I could use it.
Thanks for the heads up. 8^D
A.
Hello:
I'd appreciate suggestions for a web radio streaming package, small lightweight and simple.
Lately my FM reception is giving me some grief.
TIA
A.
... getting truly off topic for this thread.
Indeed ...
As the OP, I quite agree.
Way off topic.
...mods could be kind enough to split this off ...
+1
Thanks for bringing it up.
A.
Hello:
I can hear it, do you have any addons blocking the video?
Works for me even with my adblocker running.
No.
Only have uBlock Origin 1.16.4.28 running.
But I get the same if I turn it off.
On a hunch, I tried enabling MSE for MP4 video: I get the slow motion sound/video I reported the last time I posted about video feed problems with Pale Moon.
I enable MSE for WebM video, get the same "Please try a different browser" advice. 8^7
This is the latest Pale Moon available.
Thanks for your input.
Cheers,
A.
Hello:
I'm having more problems with video feeds in Pale Moon 29.0.1 (64-bit).
Trying to see this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/?noredir … 2880468724
... I get this:
---
We’re sorry. Your browser does not support live video streaming.
Please try a different browser.
---
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
A.
Hello:
... Tools > Preferences > Content, and at the bottom uncheck "Enable MSE for MP4 video."
Oooooooooopsssssssss ...
Seems I'm really not ending this week on the right frequency. 8^|
Too much time cooped up?
In any case, after unchecking everything MSE, things are working properly again.
Indeed, thank you Ron.
Thanks to all for their input.
And sorry for the slip-ups.
Best,
A.
Hello:
There is no Devuan Stretch.
Damn ...
How utterly embarrassing. 8^|
I stand corrected: I'm running Devuan ASCII.
Thanks for pointing it out.
Cheers,
A.
Hello:
I also use Palemoon and have playback problems ...
... audio sounds pitch-shifted down a couple of octaves...
Shifted down because of the speed, to the extent of not being understandable?
That's what I'm seeing.
Good (not really), I'm glad there's someone else affected by this.
Now to hunt for the reason. 8^7
I'm on Devuan Stretch ...
groucho@devuan:~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 4.9.0-14-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.246-2 (2020-12-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux
groucho@devuan:~$
... and Xfce 4.12.
Edit:
Could you please try the links I posted in previously and report back with the results?
Also, do you experience the same problem with YouTube video feeds?
Edit 2:
I can confirm it does not ocurr while streaming YouTube video feeds.
See this page: https://www.theguardian.com/culture/202 … eth-meyers
All the YouTube feeds can be seen/heard correctly.
Unfortunately, one of my favourites (Trevor Noah) which is a Twitter feed, cannot.
So it may be a Twitter/Palemoon thing. (?)
Thanks a lot for your input.
A.
Hello:
... go to Tools > Preferences > Content, and at the bottom uncheck "Enable MSE for MP4 video."
MSE is enabled for both MP4 video and WebM video.
Still no cigar ...
It's not just sound, it seems to be the playback speed.
I don't think it is Devuan related because Firefox does not have this problem.
Could it be because I'm running the portable version of Palemoon instead of an appimage? (can't find one)
Thanks for your input.
A.
Hello:
... it played fine in my older PM once I enabled video (which I usually have blocked).
It happens here ...
https://yesmovies.ag/movie/news-of-the- … ching.html
... but not here:
https://azm.to/movie/news-of-the-world (server 1)
I have to check, but IIRC it does not happen with YouTube video feeds.
TIA
A.
Hello:
Thanks for the prompt reply.
... a link to a problem video please?
Sure ...
This is one.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/to … video.html
Do you have any extensions that tweak video playback?
Not that I am aware of.
TIA
A.
Hello:
I use Pale Moon 29.0.0 (64-bit) 'portable' on my Devuan install:
groucho@devuan:~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 4.9.0-14-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.246-2 (2020-12-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux
groucho@devuan:~$ I run it directly from a folder in /home as it is not in the repository.
As of late (month or so) I have been having what seems to be a speed playback problem when watching (some) on-line videos, a problem which does not occur if I watch the same videofeed on Firefox 64 (64-bit) and I'd much rather not use Firefox.
I run Firefox from an appimage.
Could someone please point me to a suitable solution?
Thanks in advance,
A.
Hello:
Just a heads up so we're all on our toes:
This morning's article in The Register:
https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/03/kobalos_malware/
ESET page on the matter:
We reverse engineered this small, yet complex, malware that is portable to many operating systems including Linux, BSD, Solaris, and possibly AIX and Windows.
https://www.welivesecurity.com/2021/02/ … structure/
Best,
A.
Hello:
Just a shot note to wish one and all here at Dev1 a great [fill in your option here] and a Happy New Year [to those who change year these days].
Especially to the packagers and adminns taking care of Devuan and the forum.
Hopefully, 2021 will be better.
Could not be worse than 2020 ...
Cheers,
A.
Do you have please explanation for it ?
Hmm ...
Let's see.
Ah yes, found one you may like:
HoaS, golinux, our boss r.r and I are all members of a secret systemd cabal infiltrated here at Dev1 and, having nothing better to do, decided to gang up on you.
Nothing personal, just for business.
ie: fun and spite.
Lighten up ...
There's a deadly pandemic raging outside.
Cheers,
A.