The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#426 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Devuan bug #858 - just a heads-up » 2024-09-05 01:02:40

Hello:

golinux wrote:

A "bug report" is not necessarily a "bug".

Indeed ...

I was citing a post at [devuan-dev] and thought it was something to be taken into account.
See: https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/2 … a8.en.html

But also this:

altoid wrote:

Like the subject reads, this is just a heads-up on my behalf.
I know zilch about all this ie: is it really a concern?
--- snip ---
Opinions/suggestions on how to proceed from those who understand this better are welcome.

I think my post is a very (very) long way from even the possibility of being characterised as the spreading of FUD.
Or anything of the sort.

Same for the OP at [devuan-dev] who clearly acted in good faith and did his research
I did not see his post characterised as FUD by anyone there.

Quite the contrary.

As for me, after over seven years and 1.527 posts at Dev1 ...
FUD?

Do lighten up. 8^P !!!

Best,

A.

#427 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Devuan bug #858 - just a heads-up » 2024-09-04 12:11:56

Hello:

Delgado wrote:

Affected is version 6.7 or earlier ...

The article at arstechnica makes reference to an issue from ~15 years ago, (apparently) still unpatched.

If so, yes.
If it is from as far back as 2019, it would affect Devuan from Jesse onwards.

Best,

A.

#428 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Devuan bug #858 - just a heads-up » 2024-09-04 11:38:59

Hello:

sg1 wrote:

thanks ...
... we'll keep watching ...

You're welcome.

Concurrently with the bug report to Devuan, this was posted to the [devuan-dev] list.
So I expect that comments/clarifications will get posted there first.

I wonder ...

Does this only affect Devuan? Debian is not affected?

Best,

A.

#429 Installation » [SOLVED] Devuan bug #858 - just a heads-up » 2024-09-04 10:36:57

Altoid
Replies: 13

Hello:

Just received this.

My box runs on Devuan Daedalus, upgraded yesterday to 6.1.106-3:

~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 6.1.0-25-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.106-3 (2024-08-26) x86_64 GNU/Linux
~$ 

I ran the test and it seems my system suffers from this bug*:
*?

~$ ssh -G 2>&1 | grep -e illegal -e unknown > /dev/null && echo "System clean" || echo "System infected"
System infected
~$ uname -a

Like the subject reads, this is just a heads-up on my behalf.
I know zilch about all this ie: is it really a concern?
So I'll have to start reading up on it now, but not after I take my daily ration of espresso. 8^°

Opinions/suggestions on how to proceed from those who understand this better are welcome.
In any case, my workstation has no ssh access (port 22 closed), only the headless VM running PiHole+Unbound.

Thanks in advance,

A.

#430 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] This morning's apt update » 2024-09-03 11:27:48

Hello:

Nothing looks amiss ...
... Daedalus is running fine.

Same here.

Maybe the reason is that all these updated packages only work properly on/with 6.1.0-25.
ie: not the previous version 6.1.0-23

Thanks for your input.

Best,

A.

#431 Installation » [SOLVED] This morning's apt update » 2024-09-03 10:20:00

Altoid
Replies: 4

Hello:

An odd question, if I may ...

My box runs on Devuan Daedalus:

~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 6.1.0-23-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.99-1 (2024-07-15) x86_64 GNU/Linux
~$ 

I keep it up to date by checking with apt at least once a week and my upgrades are usually for few packages.

This morning my sudo apt update revealed an unusual (?) number of packages to update:

~$ sudo apt update
--- snip ---
Fetched 67.1 MB in 21s (3147 kB/s)                                                                                                                    
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
67 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.    # 67 packages
~$ 

I don't recall ever having seen this save when updating a system that had gone more than a few months without an update.
According to /var/log/apt/history.log my last update was on 20243108 when only four packages were updated.

Start-Date: 2024-08-31  07:16:44
Commandline: apt upgrade
Requested-By: user (1000)
Upgrade: libjavascriptcoregtk-4.1-0:amd64 (2.44.2-1~deb12u1, 2.44.3-1~deb12u1), libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-18:amd64 (2.44.2-1~deb12u1, 2.44.3-1~deb12u1), libwebkit2gtk-4.1-0:amd64 (2.44.2-1~deb12u1, 2.44.3-1~deb12u1), libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37:amd64 (2.44.2-1~deb12u1, 2.44.3-1~deb12u1)
End-Date: 2024-08-31  07:16:49

Is anything amiss, did something happen to trigger such a large package update?
Or is it because of linux-headers-6.1.0-25-amd64 | linux-headers-6.1.0-25-common | linux-image-6.1.0-25-amd64?

Just asking.

Thanks in advance.

Best,

A.

#432 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » tuir python3 issue » 2024-08-30 18:51:04

Hello:

amaro wrote:

... after upgrading to 'excalibur' 'tuir' stopped working.

Offhand, I can see two issues here:

1.
Assuming that 'tuir' was working in Devuan Daedalus (the Devuan stable suite) the first thing to consider is that Devuan Excalibur is the Devuan testing suite. ie: these things are actually expected to happen. 

2.
There is no package named tuir in any of the Devuan repositories.
Or in the Debian repositories.

There are packages by that name in other distribution's repositories.
https://repology.org/project/tuir/versions

From the printout (just guessing) I think there may be something wrong with the application's python scripts.
Or the python version 'tuir' needs to work properly.

eg:
My Daedalus installation has python3/stable,now 3.11.2-1+b1 where as from the printout, it seems that the Excalibur installation uses 3.12.5. 

Best,

A.

#433 Re: Installation » gnuinos-5 gsshaskpass missing » 2024-08-28 23:05:03

Hello:

klein wrote:

think this is him

Apparently so.

From what I can see his last post was on 2024-07-06, over a month ago.
Drop him an email, he'll show up eventually.
Maybe he's on vacation. (?)

Best,

A.

#434 Re: Installation » gnuinos-5 gsshaskpass missing » 2024-08-28 22:08:54

Hello:

Welcome to Dev1.

klein wrote:

... is there any way to fix this ?

Hmm ...
Have you asked at gnuinos about this?

The Devuan Daedalus (stable) repository has a similar package. ie: similar in name and most probably in function.

~$ apt list | grep -i sshaskpass
--- snip ---
ksshaskpass/stable 4:5.27.5-2 amd64    # 'k' instead of 'g'
ksshaskpass/stable 4:5.27.5-2 i386     # 'k' instead of 'g'
~$ 

See here.

pkginfo.devuan.org wrote:

--- snip ---
Description-en:
interactively prompt users for a passphrase for ssh-add
A front-end for ssh-add which stores the password
of the ssh-key in KWallet.
--- snip ---

But gsshaskpass (as you have found) is not in the Devuan repositories.

Notwithstanding, it can be found here.
It was the only hit I got by looking it up with the Google engine.

Read.me -> Gsshaskpass wrote:

Gsshaskpass
gsshaskpass is a gui dialog for ssh-agent.
To use it set SSH_ASKPASS to the gsshaskpass bin.

export SSH_ASKPASS=~/bin/gsshaskpass

Dependencies
gtk v3.10 or greater.

Does not appear to be a *.deb package, it has to be built from source.

There's one important note at the gnuinos web page which you should be taking into account:

gnuinos.org wrote:

--- snip ---
As in the devuan scenario, gnuinos package repositories are exclusive as well, that is to say they
shouldn't be mixed with other apt-based repositories, including Devuan, Debian, Ubuntu and the like.
--- snip ---

It would seem that gsshaskpass does more or less the same thing ksshaskpass does but I cannot speculate further.
I'd say the people at gnuinos may have the answer to your question.

Best,

A.

#435 Re: Devuan » Issues with the repo? » 2024-08-27 22:30:28

Hello:

greenjeans wrote:

... no connman, network manager.

I see.

greenjeans wrote:

... miss wicd.

Yes, me too.
I found it to be the best of all the network applications back in the time and I still think it is, by a good measure.

[OT]
I once contacted all (9) active members of the 'Wicd-devel' team to ask about what their plans were or to at least (instead of posting ambiguities) make it clear that the project was abandoned/dead in the water and ask for someone to take over but to no avail. My emails were not well received so I gave up.
Other people here have tried to get it up and running but something happened on the way there and they gave up/were not able to do much, don't know why.
[/OT]

Best,

A.

#436 Re: Devuan » Issues with the repo? » 2024-08-27 20:15:00

Hello:

You are probably using connman. (?)

If so, see here.

There is an explanation to the origin of the issue, somewhere here at Dev1.
Can't find it now.  8^/

Best,

A.

#437 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » X server - signal 4 (illegal instruction) loading glamoregl » 2024-08-27 10:58:41

Hello:

stultumanto wrote:

... old nvidia card to work reliably on the testing branch may be asking too much.

Indeed.

You do know that Devuan Excalibur is a testing suite, unlike Devuan Daedalus which is a stable suite, yes?

Getting from testing to stable takes time.
And (needless to say) a lot of work from the developers/maintainers.
ie: many, many updates and tests to run, rinse / repeat, etc.

So yes, I fully agree with you.
Expecting a testing suite to work without any issues is asking too much.

That said, my old Sun Ultra 24 workstation (ca. 2007) runs on Devuan Daedalus with a pair of old Nvidia Quadro FX580 (ca. 2009) using nouveau2/stable 2.4.114-1+b1 and picom/stable 9.1-1 (much better than compton) to feed tree old 19" monitors: a pair of SyncMaster 940n and a Dell 1914S.

~$ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep -i glamor
[    32.394] (II) Loading sub module "glamoregl"
[    32.394] (II) LoadModule: "glamoregl"
[    32.394] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so
[    32.404] (II) Module glamoregl: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[    33.104] (II) modeset(0): glamor X acceleration enabled on NV96
[    33.104] (II) modeset(0): glamor initialized
[    33.293] (II) Loading sub module "glamoregl"
[    33.293] (II) LoadModule: "glamoregl"
[    33.293] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so
[    33.293] (II) Module glamoregl: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[    33.303] (II) modeset(G0): glamor X acceleration enabled on NV96
[    33.303] (II) modeset(G0): glamor initialized
~$ 

Best,

A.

#438 Re: Other Issues » Unable to connect to a phone via USB. » 2024-08-11 13:22:34

Hello:

Mike-thinky wrote:

Thanks ...

You're welcome.

Mike-thinky wrote:

... the family sort of IT expert ...

Been there, done that.
But always steered clear of anything Apple and these days anything Android.
Unless it is mine to screw up if things end up awry.

Far too easy to do and not precisely by chance. In Android, it is all obscured by design.

Mike-thinky wrote:

... try adb to see where that gets me.

Odds are (100/1) are that your phone does not have Developer Options / USB debugging enabled, without which adb is useless.
It is, of course, usually done via the touch screen.  8^/

Check this page at XDA forums for that.
There is a lot of very useful data on that site, you have to thoroughly comb through it to find what you need.

Be aware that in many cases you may come up empty-handed. eg: rebranded OEM Android devices for odd brands / unpublished specs and such. And that only sometimes you will get feedback, but don't expect much.

Please let us know the outcome, be it success or failure.

Best,

A.

#439 Re: Other Issues » Unable to connect to a phone via USB. » 2024-08-11 12:26:57

Hello:

Mike-thinky wrote:

... messages about not being able to connect ...       ### <-- this
... configure to get access ...
... phone display has died ...

Seems that part is working properly.

But, being a touch thingy, if you don't/cannot [touch] you are in a pickle.

At least with phones running (?) Android > 4.4.4 (aka KitKat).
Note: I have an old Android 4.4.4 phone with no carrier access that does not do this.

That said, when I connect an Android 11 phone to my workstation, dmesg will declare* this:

--- snip ---
[ 1360.748466] usb 6-1: USB disconnect, device number 2
[ 3637.412472] usb 5-1.2: new high-speed USB device number 4 using xhci_hcd
[ 3637.539257] usb 5-1.2: New USB device found, idVendor=04e8, idProduct=6860, bcdDevice= 2.23
[ 3637.539265] usb 5-1.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
[ 3637.539269] usb 5-1.2: Product: SAMSUNG_Android
[ 3637.539272] usb 5-1.2: Manufacturer: SAMSUNG
[ 3637.539274] usb 5-1.2: SerialNumber: RXXRXXXXXXX   
[ 3637.594388] cdc_acm 5-1.2:1.1: ttyACM0: USB ACM device
[ 3637.594978] usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_acm
[ 3637.594983] cdc_acm: USB Abstract Control Model driver for USB modems and ISDN adapters

* make sure your USB cable is sound, a bad cable may/will not work properly and the file manager will complain about missing/bad data.

At the same time, in [Places] my file manager shows two icons:

mtp and SAMSUNG Android.   

Attempting to list/access the phone's files gets the phone's screen to show a pop-up:

Allow access to phone data?

The connected device will be able to access
data on this phone.
            Deny                                  Allow

So that is the catch ... 
If you don't touch Allow, you will not see anything in the file manager.

There is probably a way to access the phone via adb, at least the files that do not require rooting the device to acess them.
ie: Android Debug Bridge version 1.0.41, find it in the Devuan repository.

eg:

~$ adb devices -l 
* daemon not running; starting now at tcp:5037
* daemon started successfully
List of devices attached
RXXXXXXXXXX            device usb:7-6 product:a02ub model:SM_A022M device:a02 transport_id:1
~$ 

I think that you can (?), if you know how to use it, do some [not-root rquired] file transfer/recovery:

~$ adb help
Android Debug Bridge version 1.0.41
Version 29.0.6-debian
Installed as /usr/lib/android-sdk/platform-tools/adb
--- snip ---
file transfer:
 push [--sync] LOCAL... REMOTE
     copy local files/directories to device
     --sync: only push files that are newer on the host than the device
 pull [-a] REMOTE... LOCAL
     copy files/dirs from device
     -a: preserve file timestamp and mode
 sync [all|data|odm|oem|product|system|system_ext|vendor]
     sync a local build from $ANDROID_PRODUCT_OUT to the device (default all)
     -l: list files that would be copied, but don't copy them
--- snip ---

For the rest [of whatever you may be able to do] you'll have to look up the pertinent instructions on the web.
I don't know more that this at the moment.

I don't like Android.
As far as I am concerned it is a POS on wheels, a Google infested meta-harversting device.
Unfortunately, these things run on it.

Good luck with your phone.
Please let us know how you fared with this, it may be useful to others in your situation.

Best,

A.

#440 Off-topic » Secure Boot? Yes, we've heard of it ... » 2024-07-29 09:56:15

Altoid
Replies: 10

Hello:

Great way to start the week:

From this morning's The Register ...

Brandon Vigliarolo @The Register wrote:

Secure Boot useless on hundreds of PCs from major vendors after key leak
Plus: More stalkerware exposure; a $16M TracFone fine; Ransomware victims don't use MFA, and more

Snippets from the article:

... research published last week by security boffins at firmware security vendor Binarily.
... found hundreds of PCs sold by Dell, Acer, Fujitsu, Gigabyte, HP, Lenovo and Supermicro – and components sold by Intel – using what appears to be a 12-year old test platform key (PK) leaked in 2022 ...

"An attacker with access to the private part of the PK can easily bypass Secure Boot by manipulating the Key Exchange Key database, the Signature Database, and the Forbidden Signature Database," Binarily's boffins wrote.

... not like the manufacturers using the offending PK didn't have reason to know it was untrusted ...
It said so right on the package.

Very interesting how secure the boot ended up being.

Best,

A.

Edit:
Just noticed another previous post here about this problem.
No matter: 50+ years later, Arte Johnson can still make me laugh out loud with his routines.
Much needed these days.

#441 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Android -> Linux screen mirroring software » 2024-07-28 15:44:08

Hello gl:

Howsyadoin'?

golinux wrote:

Even I have build a package or two ...

Indeed ...
But then you are a force of nature. 8^)

golinux wrote:

Give it a try ...

Basically, the problem is that my bucket list long and complicated.
ie: too many things in the air and too little time to tend to them while life happens.

But thanks for the link.

Best,

A.

#442 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Android -> Linux screen mirroring software » 2024-07-28 14:53:19

Hello:

igorzwx wrote:

... have to learn how to rebuild packages.

Yes, given the time and the need to actually do it.
But it is rather over my head and would have a steep learning curve for me.   

igorzwx wrote:

... cannot learn this, if it is impossible to compile.

Yes, that makes much sense.

igorzwx wrote:

... installed android-sdk-platform-23 and rebuilt scrcpy ...

No, I have not.

Like I mentioned earlier on (and thanks to the infomation you provided), I was able to install scrcpy and scrcpy-server in the version available from the Ubuntu repositories ie: scrcpy v1.25.

It seems to work properly for what my needs are so I will not be needing an updated version for the time being.
eg: it works perfectly well with a USB connection, I have no need for wireless.

I suppose that the latest version (2.50) will eventually make it to the Ubuntu repositories, so if the need arises I can always try that.

Once again, than you very much for your input.

Best,

A.

#443 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Android -> Linux screen mirroring software » 2024-07-28 07:38:46

Hello:

igorzwx wrote:

... interesting, android-sdk-platform-23 is also available ...
... these debs are native Debian packages, which were somehow appropriated ...

Don't know if appropriated would be the proper term to use.
After all, Ubuntu is derived from Debian ie: it is a Debian based distribution, composed of free / open-source software.
Which the Debian packages you mention also are.

igorzwx wrote:

Why isn't android-sdk-platform-23 available in the Devuan 5 Daedalus repository?

Hmm ...
Could not say, I'm sure there's a reason for that.
That said, let's not forget how under-staffed and over-worked the Devuan crew maintaining this heroic effort acually is.

Thanks for your input.

Best,

A.

#444 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Android -> Linux screen mirroring software » 2024-07-27 19:09:27

Hello:

igorzwx wrote:

... installed them both (see may previous post) ...

Indeed ...
You are (of course) quite right.  8^°

Was so glad to see it that I rushed to get it installed without having read the whole of your post.
So I stand corrected, 2x my previous thanks to you.  8^)

That said, I have confirmed that the application works properly on both of the phones I have been gifted and will be able to use them as an on-screen microscope.
Some sort of an adjustable stand/holder for the things is now in the brewing stage.

Best,

A.

#445 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Android -> Linux screen mirroring software » 2024-07-27 18:30:42

Hello:

igorzwx wrote:

Ubuntu package scrcpy_1.25-1_amd64.deb  libavformat59 (>= 7:5.0)

Ahh ...

Tried it but GDebi asks for scrcpy-server_1.25-1_all.deb which I downloaded and installed from the same repository.
Seems to work properly and now I have to see if I can find the right version of the GUI for this application as there it looks like there is more than one.

If I find that it does what I want it to do, I will explore the possibility of building the latest version with the source provided by the author.

Many thanks to all those who pitched in.
Much appreciated.

Best,

A.

#446 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Android -> Linux screen mirroring software » 2024-07-26 22:47:56

Hello:

ralph.ronnquist wrote:

... try installing when adding/keeping a chimaera sources.list line (in addition to daedalus)?

No.

Never thought of doing something like that.
ie: I have mix and match sources as being a Linux no-no

ralph.ronnquist wrote:

... or does that raise conflict with the "59" package?

No idea.

That said, I would have thought that the "59" package would somehow be compatible with the "58" package.
ie: would cover the same functions but apt is is clear with respect to the unmet dependency.

I'll see about that possibility this week-end.

Thanks for your input.

Best,

A.

#447 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Android -> Linux screen mirroring software » 2024-07-26 22:40:29

Hello:

... a simple trick.
... may cause troubles ...

Playing with fire comes to mind.  8^D

I strive to be very (very) careful with what I do to my Devuan and try, above all things, to avoid risking havok.
Yes, I do have daily backups but still ...

That said, thanks for the tip.
It may come in handy should I want to experiment with a VM.

Best,

A.

#448 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Android -> Linux screen mirroring software » 2024-07-26 21:26:04

Hello:

igorzwx wrote:

... better try to rebuild. This sort of practical knowledge may liberate from frustration.

Yes, I have often thought about that specific aspect of the Linux 'experience'.
ie: building a package, not frustration (which is also part of it) 8^D .

Thanking you for your confidence in my abilities, I will see if I can get something done this week-end and if so, report back.

Thank you very much for your input.

Best,

A.

#449 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Android -> Linux screen mirroring software » 2024-07-26 20:29:40

Hello:

igorzwx wrote:

... try to rebuild the package ...

Thank you very much for taking the time to write that up.
Much appreciated.

But I would rather avoid having to do something like that.

fanderal wrote:

... one of several deb versions of libavformat58 at pkgs.org works?

Yes, I had thought of that.

But no.
GDebi will not install any of the three as there are unmet dependencies for all of them.
Seems that dependency hell is at the gates.  8^°

Thank you both for your input.

Best,

A.

#450 Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] Android -> Linux screen mirroring software » 2024-07-26 12:19:40

Altoid
Replies: 30

Hello:

Looking for a screen mirroring application to use with an old but working smartphone camera, I came across this one which is available for Debian Bullseye but cannot find in the Devuan repositories.

I downloaded it and passed it through the GDebi package installer and the result was that there was an unmet dependency: libavformat58

This was the only unmet dependency for this package and it seems that it does not require systemd's meddling to work.

When attempting to install libavformat58, apt says it is not available but that it is referred to by another package.

Looking at the Devuan packages page, I found that this library was available for both Beowulf and Chimaera and that there was a newer (?) version, libavformat59 available for Daedalus and is already installed in my system.

I also looked at the banned packages page but scrcpy_* was not listed there.

Any one know of a suitable alternative to this screen mirroring application?

Thanks in advance.

Best,

A.

Board footer

Forum Software