You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
There is an amd64 microcode package. I reckon that you should install it. Sorry if I made a mistake, I don't have the best knowledge of hardware and firmware.
I simply installed the intel-microcode package. That was easy. But I searched online, and I'm amazed from how little info there is about this issue.
lscpu output:
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Address sizes: 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 8
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-7
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 CPU @ 1.00GHz
CPU family: 6
Model: 126
Thread(s) per core: 2
Core(s) per socket: 4
Socket(s): 1
Stepping: 5
CPU(s) scaling MHz: 28%
CPU max MHz: 3600.0000
CPU min MHz: 400.0000
BogoMIPS: 2380.80
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pg
e mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse
sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm cons
tant_tsc art arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xt
opology nonstop_tsc cpuid aperfmperf tsc_known_freq
pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ss
se3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2ap
ic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f1
6c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault epb
ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp ibrs_enhanced tpr_shadow flex
priority ept vpid ept_ad fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 a
vx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid avx512f avx512dq rdseed
adx smap avx512ifma clflushopt intel_pt avx512cd sh
a_ni avx512bw avx512vl xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsav
es split_lock_detect dtherm ida arat pln pts hwp hw
p_notify hwp_act_window hwp_epp hwp_pkg_req vnmi av
x512vbmi umip pku ospke avx512_vbmi2 gfni vaes vpcl
mulqdq avx512_vnni avx512_bitalg avx512_vpopcntdq r
dpid fsrm md_clear flush_l1d arch_capabilities
Virtualization features:
Virtualization: VT-x
Caches (sum of all):
L1d: 192 KiB (4 instances)
L1i: 128 KiB (4 instances)
L2: 2 MiB (4 instances)
L3: 6 MiB (1 instance)
NUMA:
NUMA node(s): 1
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-7
Vulnerabilities:
Gather data sampling: Vulnerable: No microcode
Indirect target selection: Mitigation; Aligned branch/return thunks
Itlb multihit: KVM: Mitigation: Split huge pages
L1tf: Not affected
Mds: Not affected
Meltdown: Not affected
Mmio stale data: Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microco
de; SMT vulnerable
Reg file data sampling: Not affected
Retbleed: Mitigation; Enhanced IBRS
Spec rstack overflow: Not affected
Spec store bypass: Mitigation; Speculative Store Bypass disabled via p
rctl
Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user poi
nter sanitization
Spectre v2: Mitigation; Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB conditi
onal; PBRSB-eIBRS SW sequence; BHI SW loop, KVM SW
loop
Srbds: Vulnerable: No microcode
Tsa: Not affected
Tsx async abort: Not affected
Vmscape: Not affected
.$$$$$` Uptime: 2 hours, 29 mins
;$$$$$P Packages: 2359 (dpkg), 6 (flatpak)
.:P$$$$$$` Shell: bash 5.2.37
.,:b$$$$$$$;' Display (CMN1388): 1920x1080 @ 60 Hz in 13" [Built-in] .,:dP$$$$$$$$b:'
.,:;db$$$$$$$$$$Pd'` DE: Xfce4 4.20
,db$$$$$$$$$$$$$$b:'` WM: Xfwm4 (X11)
:$$$$$$$$$$$$b:'` WM Theme: Clearlooks-Phenix-Sapphire
`$$$$$bd:''` Theme: Clearlooks-Phenix-Sapphire [GTK2/3/4]
`'''` Icons: Deepsea [GTK2/3/4]
Font: Sans (10pt) [GTK2/3/4]
Cursor: DMZ-White
Terminal: xfce4-terminal 1.1.4
Terminal Font: CodeNewRoman Nerd Font Mono (12pt)
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1035G1 (8) @ 3.60 GHz
GPU: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G1 (Ice Lake) @ 1.05 GHz [Integrated]
Memory: 2.45 GiB / 7.44 GiB (33%)
Swap: 0 B / 7.67 GiB (0%)
Disk (/): 15.57 GiB / 225.18 GiB (7%) - ext4
Local IP (wlan0): 192.168.1.135/24
Battery (UX325): 90% (2 hours, 56 mins remaining) [Discharging]
Locale: en_US.UTF-8
How to fix?
I would like to ask a question concerning the future of documentation in Devuan. Will all documentation for Devuan remain on this forum, or will there be some kind of wiki or another site to help out with documentation? Just asking!
I built ZoiteChat from source.
Now I get your nic. Hopefully you'll grow up some day .
Rude.
If it works, don't fix it. Shiny new s**t just stirs the pot and is a waste of time and resources IMO.
I see your point 100%. But I imagine that due to its age, sysvinit could lead to security vulnerabilities and just horrible bugs in general. If that ever is the case, will sysvinit ever be dropped or will it forever remain the main init system for Devuan?
Good thing I switched to XLibre!
Sysvinit is quite old, so why hasn't it been abandoned in favor of another init system such as dinit? Just asking, not stating that sysvinit SHOULD be removed.
Pages: 1