You are not logged in.
For more context, the AMD FX-6350 had the same single core performance as my overclocked AMD FX-8320, which itself had almost exactly 50% of the performance of my Intel i5-10400. The FX-8320 still felt like a super computer when doing desktop stuff in Linux (with 24GB of DDR3 1600MHz RAM). I think the RK3588 will be very usable for every day computing.
The Intel i5-1240P (2022 model) in my laptop is significantly faster in single core performance than the i5-10400 in my desktop. The downside is that it is a "thin and light" laptop, so it can't sustain the full clockspeed, where as the desktop can run full tilt until the job is done. Even still, for tasks like zip/unzip, the laptop is faster.
You're not going to get that kind of performance on ARM unless its with a new Snapdragon X, which they say will be close.
Nowadays, however, with the likes of MS and systemd-style software, it's no longer about empowering the user; it's all about how the author / company / whoever else gets to dictate how you should use the device that you purchased
Exactly. I paid for the hardware (and software in some important cases). I pay for the electricity. It's my computer in the same way that my toothbrush is a tool that intimately belongs me and me alone.
or worse yet, in recent years you don't even own anything anymore, your device is no longer a tool for your own empowerment; it's merely a service rented to you for payment. The renter gets to decide how, when and what you do with your device -- it's no longer the user who is empowered, but the renter. The author or the company that he works for.
Rent-seeking in a nutshell.
...back to the MS paradigm of the user being too dumb to do anything except what we enlightened developers have decided beforehand is simple enough for the user's dumb brain to comprehend. The user doesn't know how to configure the system and shouldn't be expected to do so, we know better, we make the hard decisions for them and they're just consumers waiting to be spoonfed.
It really is simply hubris, rather than an indictment on the lack of intelligence of the end user. Microsoft, Apple, Google, and RedHat honestly believe that the way they do things is "the right way" and that they're simply making it available for everyone's convenience.
Open source has always been about user empowerment: what got Richard Stallman started with open source is the desire for user empowerment: if the user has the expertise to fix the printer driver or write his own printer driver, why should he be artificially restrained from doing so? The printer is a tool meant to empower the user; it should not become a vehicle for the manufacturer to squeeze more pennies out of the user's pocket. The user already paid for the printer; he should be able to do what he wants with it.
The social contract which led to the prosperity and intellectual freedom of Stallman's generation is over, replaced by a rent-seeking bourgeoisie who has an unprecedented concentration of wealth and thus influence. A rising tide may lift all boats, but these people only care that the water is deep enough to keep their yachts afloat and the plebeians struggling to tread water - waters never quite rough enough for the suffering masses to die off, just inhospitable enough to ensure the bourgeoisie have an ample supply of desperate labor. The dream has died, again. This is what genuinely hurts; Like Stallman, I truly believe in the goodness of Man.
Tatwi wrote:"Well you're free to make your own distro if you don't like what others are doing", some truly ignorant trolls would say
Braaaaa...fsmithred has made it easy with his refracta tools.
Set up your system the way you like, then run refractasnapshot. YOU CAN DO IT!
Refracta is just a tool for creating one's own configuration of the Debian distribution. Using Refracta is not the same thing as designing, building, and maintaining Debian/Slackware/Void/PCLinuxOS/etc from scratch.
In the context of this discussion, this distinction is paramount; Should Debian reach a point where it's infeasible or impossible to use as a base system, tools like Refracta will cease to function.
The first time I used Linux was Slackware, after I heard about in college in 1998. This was also the same time I got my first PC, having only puttered on a Commodore 64 at home and the PCs at school. I didn't have a problem with Microsoft, Windows, or DOS, I liked them well enough and had been using them since the late 80s, but something about the freedom to be found with Linux was inspiring to me in a unique way. Sadly, I had neither the skills nor the focus to forge a path through the FOSS landscape, so until more things "just worked" (due to the amazing efforts of folks far smarter than me), Linux was mostly just a thing a I installed, configured, and never actually used for much; Windows was always easier to actually use.
For a lot of tasks, Windows still is a lot easier to use. No surprise there really, software designed for Windows works well Windows. Wow, what magic is this! No harm in that. I actually liked Windows 98/2000/XP/7 and I still think that Vista Home Basic was the pinnacle of Windows UI cohesiveness and visual appeal. It makes me sad that every version since has forced me compromise, forced me to either accept Microsoft's terms and Microsoft's way of doing things, else I just don't get to use my computer the way I like to use it.
Linux never made me feel this way, until Unity in Ubuntu. As difficult as it could be and as limited as the functionality may have been, at least it was possible to run the GNU/Linux software I wanted on my computer in the way I wanted to run it. But since the time that Unity was thrust upon us, the options available to me to use Linux the way I would like (basically Ubuntu 2006, where it Debian that "just worked") has diminished considerably.
It really does feel like we can have all the Linux software freedom we want, so long as it is the Linux software freedom that RedHat et al. like and support.
"Well you're free to make your own distro if you don't like what others are doing", some truly ignorant trolls would say and while they're technically correct, actually doing this is not within the realm of possibility even for people like me who are modestly well versed in "Linux" and have been using it ~25 years. Making one's own distro for daily use isn't feasible. Heck, even trying to wrangle a sensible base system like Devuan into the setup that I want to use takes a few days of configuration and tinkering. Telling people to "roll their own" is disingenuous, perhaps even malicious - failure puts the user right back in the situation of having to use their computer in a way they don't want, simply because other people like using their own computers in that way.
Anyway, in an ideal world I'd be able to use all the software and hardware that I want in the ways I would like; I care about my freedom to privately do as I please and not really about what operating system I am using.
I sincerely appreciate the Devuan team for allowing me to continue to "Debian" like it's 2010, because it's the most comfortable and productive way I have found to use Linux since the enshitification of Ubuntu/Mint.
Thumbs up from me as well! I'm testing an exclusily QT based desktop setup at the moment, for giggles, but I normally use MATE. I'm not a fan of GTK3. Really miss good o'l GTK2 Xfce and GIMP...
Anyway, cool!
We don't live in a magical utopia...
Maybe you don't, but how else could one describe being able to go a giant building filled to the brim with food and being able to leave with a tiny portion of what one used to be able to afford? I mean, if that's not magical, what is?
I have always hated the concept of computer security. It's a real non-topic. Anything made by a person can be broken by a person. Whoopdeedoo. As an end-user, all computer security amounts to is a bunch of super nerds making my computer run slower, because they just couldn't leave well enough alone. I don't want to know about computer security; I don't care.
I do care about surveillance and profiling by corporations for profits, especially all of those corps who are totally keen on exploiting people while also doing their very best to avoid paying the taxes which fund the development and maintenance of human civilization. Those abhorrent leaches can fuck right off.
I also care about the ineptitude we witness at all levels of the Canadian government, but there's literally nothing I can do about it, so... oh well, I guess. Ultimately, the world isn't mine to change anyway. I am certain that we average everyday people truly believe that those we elect to represent us will get their shit together, make rational decisions, and carry on with improving our lives like our post WWII representatives did. After all, that's what we sensible, common folks would do. Sadly, the monetary system is the system with the greatest influence on human civilization, at all levels, and it's also a system that most easily rewards the worst people; lie, cheat, steal, exploit, one's way to riches and influence over the fabric of society itself. That's not such a great system, is it? But that's how it works, even in a relatively safe and peaceful democratic country like Canada.
What were we talking about?
I've found that the ASCII was the last version that ran well on my Celeron N3450 based laptop. I have Daedalus installed on it, but even disabling the mitigation protection, the standard suit of software for Xfce is pokey. I mean, it works, but it's slow for anything modern, especially Electron based apps.
That said, I'm old and I was thinking of this little machine in relation to the 8 bit computers of yore. In a way, running this Lenovo Ideapad 100e as a terminal-only computer, using Devuan 5, it's a Unix-like super computer compared to a 1980s machine. And this sturdy, small black chassis with its so-so quality 11" screen makes it feel a bit like a ZX Spectrum laptop. Very "retro"!
30 years on from the common use of windowing desktops, we tend to look at the terminal more as a command prompt to complete certain task rather than the complete computing environment that it is. Back on my Commodore 64 I could program in BASIC and that was about it for an average person. But with this terminal-only quad core system, which last 8+ hours on battery power, I can program in literally every language available to *nix based systems and it's fast! So that's something.
I bet that AMD E-300 would be pretty zippy in a terminal-only setup, where it was used as though it was the descendant of an early 80s Unix machine. Obviously that's not how we generally go about computing these days, but it's still a valid use case with an endless supply of genuine utility.
And all that said, I totally get ya man, it would be great if there were still a lightweight distro that could do all the modern things. Damn Small Linux and Salix were great for that when I played with them back in the mid 00s. Today it seems that everything is bloated, especially web pages.
Truly, it would be great to start a whole new "Internet", where the browser only supported Markdown text files and PNG image files. That's it, all the information, none of the kruft'n fluff!
Grumpy old man out!
Life has been very busy... I drafted replies a couple times, but only just now found the time to finish...
At one point between now and the last updates, I RTFM and found where there was a difference between Ubuntu 22.04 and Devuan 4:
/usr/share/X11/xkb/keycodes/evdev
However, when I updated my laptop to Daedalus the files are identical, save for Daedalus having a line about emojis.
That was my only lead, so I still don't know what's going on. I can say for sure that "Fn" key doesn't register at all in Devuan or Debian, using any of the software for finding keycodes. It stands to reason that's why none of its key combinations work. However, in this BIOS mode the F1-F12 keys should default to their special functions, but they're just being treated like normal function keys.
I went through every keyboard related config file in /etc and /usr and the initramfs of Ubuntu and Devuan and I RTFM, but I still wasn't able to find the difference. They "just work" in Ubuntu... must be magic, I guess.
Thanks, A.
I finally had some time to look into the the kernel log and the only keyboard related stuff I found was
Ubuntu 22.04-1 (Linux version 5.15.0-43-generic)
[ 0.740658] kernel: input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /devices/platform/i8042/serio0/input/input3
[ 23.149199] systemd[1]: Starting Set the console keyboard layout...
[ 25.390693] kernel: input: Ideapad extra buttons as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.0/PNP0C09:00/VPC2004:01/input/input8
Devuan 4 (Linux version 5.10.0-23-amd6)
[ 2.366659] input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /devices/platform/i8042/serio0/input/input0
[ 5.505134] input: Ideapad extra buttons as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.0/PNP0C09:00/VPC2004:01/input/input6
It's been a thousand years since I compiled my own kernel, so I can't say that I am in any way an expert, but looking at this output it would seem that both systems pick up the special keys at the kernel level. There must be some additional software configuration that makes them work.
OS: Devuan GNU/Linux 4 (chimaera) x86_64
Host: 81CY Lenovo 100e
Kernel: 5.10.0-23-amd64
Uptime: 1 day, 1 hour, 35 mins
Packages: 2066 (dpkg)
Shell: bash 5.1.4
Resolution: 1366x768
DE: Xfce 4.16
WM: Xfwm4
WM Theme: Clearlooks-Phenix-Deepsea
Theme: Clearlooks-Phenix-Deepsea [GTK2], Adwaita [GTK3]
Icons: Deepsea [GTK2], Adwaita [GTK3]
Terminal: xfce4-terminal
Terminal Font: Monospace 14
CPU: Intel Celeron N3450 (4) @ 2.200GHz
GPU: Intel HD Graphics 500
Memory: 947MiB / 3553MiB
This is a stock installation of Devuan. "Launch Gnome services at startup" is checked in the "Sessions and Startup" window, something Ubuntu (Gnome) and Mint (Xfce) also do.
I'm not really sure where else to look or what to look for, as I don't recall having any keyboard related issues over the years. Hmm...
Seems the end point of Devuan's keyboard startup is loading /etc/console-setup/cached_UTF-8_del.kmap.gz. I'll have to boot Ubuntu again and compare the content of its keymap file. Seems reasonable the difference could be in there.
This is one of those laptops where the function keys have special action assigned to them. The extended functions "just work" in the Ubuntu based distros, where as the same is not true when using the Debian and Devuan distros of the same version. I've tested with Debian Bullseye, Devuan Chimaera, and Mint/Ubuntu/PopOS based on Bullseye. As I say, all the Bullseye based Ubuntu distros "just work" (Win10 does as well).
I don't need to change the setting in the BIOS; I can live-boot or install a *buntu and the keys work as expected.
What is the mad science they're doing to Debian to make these keys work in Ubuntu????
Ps. Loving Daedalus on my desktop. Thank you for all your hard work!
I find it hard to believe that it took some people till the 2010s to realize Bill Gates ideals were very problematic for people of the world and the planet's limate both as a whole.
To all detractors, yes, get rid of the richest top evil big tech corporations would be awesome.
Hint: Billionaire corporations need to vanish.
That only make a vacuum which will quickly be filled by similar opportunists, so history has shown us repeatedly. The only way to stop that cycle is to change "the system" such that exploiting others, getting away with theft, and committing self beneficial murder, etc. are no longer the easy road to becoming a wealthy, thus influential and "powerful" person. How can this be achieved? No idea. Sorry.
The original purpose of the monitary system made a lot of sense for it's time. Imagine travelling for months with a load of grain to trade iron, only to arrive and find that all the iron was sold already. If only they could give you something equally valuable that you could later trade for the iron you needed... money, it's handy! But, it's also a real big problem for humanity and this here ball of dirt in space.
@tawai I lost faith in Goggle on the mostly the same level, as early as 2014. What took you so long?
I've never been a Mac person, so when both the Blackberry and Windows phones took a dump, I went with Android. Prior to then, whenever that was, I had actually de-Googled. After re-Googling a little for the play store access, it just all piled on with the wife and kids using Chromebooks for school (and ChromeOS is kinda cool for what it is). My usage is still limit though. I really do only use gmail, drive, and Chrome/ChromeOS, though I use Chrome in an incognito window for everything other than gmail, drive, outlook, and spotify. I know incognito is not private, but it does prevent building a history in one's Google account.
Still, none of that speaks to why I heald faith for so long. Pragmatic optimism and the convenience of drive, I guess. That was, of course, before I learned that they have that really stupid culture that chases novelty and ignores the value of maintaining the quality of services; In my books, 800 days of 100% uptime for gmail is way more deserving of a raise than banging out yet another messaging app, etc. Google is broken, from the inside out, and it sucks almost as much as their search results.
Daedalus, Xfce with Cameo-ALU-Dark-1.5.1 theme, Aguqlemon borders ( from old deb package xfwm4-themes_4.10.0-2), and Deepsea icons. Geany theme is Himbeere, with some syntax customizations I've been using for a decade... where'd the time go??!!
This is my fav way to GNU/Linux!
That said, having slept on it, ideally I would like a Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger theme. I love those scrollbars and the skeuomorphism! I may take a crack at making one.
On a Devaun/Debian stable i would say "go steam 'flatpak' from backports". I noticed that if you stayed on flatpak 1.10, some proton and therefore some games no longer work, while with the same proton, same games with flatpak 1.14 works.
It's the same with lutris & Heroic so the interest is quite major for gaming.
Using the installer included in the apt repos, Steam updated itself the latest version. It's been a good experience with the games I have tried: No Man's Sky, Bejeweled 3, DiRT Rally (Original), Ghostbuster's Remastered, and Black Mesa. Bejeweled needed Proton 8.0-2, but the rest worked with Experimental. Man I wish I had more Windows games on Steam!
The first distro I used was Slackware, back '98, but I switched to Debian (Libranet) in 2001, because apt is awesome! I've played with Slackware since and I love it in principle, but I really don't miss using it at all! For Windows games in Devuan, I wish it were as simple as "apt-get install stardew-valley", with a prompt to log into your purchasing platform for verification. Hmm...
I like "doing one thing" and for computing, traditional Debian excelled at being a single, coherent OS. Maybe that's caused by my C64 and DOS heritage, but it's what I like. In fairness, I did think Damn Small Linux, Salix, and Knoppix were cool, but not really as daily driver systems.
Anyway... We're here on this forum, using this OS, because Devuan is the continuation of that original Debian experience. Personally, I really don't want a bunch of frameworks, subsystems, managers, launchers, stores, installers, and containers mucking up the experience of my "personal computer". As I said in my first post, that type of Rube Goldberg machine is a big part of why I no longer want to use Windows. I'm not going to muck up the nice, clean, reliable, enjoyable Debian experience that Devuan delivers.
Having mostly ignored using Windows games on Linux over the years (apart from WoW and SWG), I don't know much about the subject. I do remember trying Lutris around 2013, but as I said, with a dual boot, it wasn't worth the trouble. However, in 2023 Lutris does seem to be the path of least resistance to play the games I have purchased on GOG and Epic, so I will give that a whirl next. If Lutris worked with Steam games without having to launch Steam, I guess that would be an ideal "one thing" for Windows games on Linux, but I am absolutely not into chain loading launchers to use programs. Type command or click icon, that's my speed, man!
TL:DR:
- Apt is awesome. Log live Apt and Devuan!
- Steam is awesome! Almost like Apt for Windows games.
- Still exploring options for non-Steam Windows games.
Managing Lutris "bottles", various Wine prefixes, and so amounts to a "web of nonsense".
Steams,
1. Install Steam.
2. Install game.
3. Play game.
3a. Pick different Proton versions from a drop down until the game works.
on the other hand, is not.
It really does seem that the only way to preserve a bit of your history online is to become just famous enough to qualify for a modest Wikipedia entry. "Golinux was an upstanding member of the GNU/Linux community in the early 21st Century. Here is a picture of him at Uber Nerdcon Extreme Linux Edition '29 talking to a group of doting fans". Beyond that our data is so much dust...
Google... See, I want to like them and be all happy about using their products, as I type this on my Lenovo Thinkpad C14 Gen 1 Chromebook, with my Pixel 6a snoozing on the bedside table, but they sure go out of their way to be unlikable and in so many ways! Seriously, I upgrade to the 6a from my old-as-dirt Samsung Galaxy 6 and i swear to Richard Stallman, the Google folks took every mundane task one can do in Android 9 and added at least 2 levels of futzing to them in Android 13. Swipe down and turn off WiFi with a tap? Nope, now you have open Connections and then tap the Wifi toggle, because that's so much better! Honestly, there are at least 7 of this exact problem with features one uses all the time... The usability of my phone has cratered from that high point of Galaxy 6 (itself I had to go back to twice, after giving my giving my children my Galaxy 8/10e/A53 at various times, because they broke theirs).
Anyway, I like using Gmail, Goggle Drive, ChromeOS, and (older versions of) Android, but I've lost all faith in Google's ability to not suck, let alone actually be good at anything.
As for our memories outlasting our lives, nothing beats good old books! There are plenty of nifty tools and services for turning our photos (and even spoken thoughts) into awesome hard or soft cover books. I did a garden memory book for the kids back in 2013 using HP's service and it has held up well (sitting on a shelf most of the time). If your book tells a story, who knows how it may captivate someone in the future.
Hi, I have steam running ok.
I think it still needs 32bit libraries.
Enable multiarch:
dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
then install steam with...
apt install steam
that'll get you started.
Neat that the Steam installer is in the repos now. I guess the Nvidia proprietary drivers are too, but I am old so I had already installed them from the website, which necessitated installing libglvnd-dev, pkg-config, and Steam's dependancies to satisfy the driver's 32Bit compatibility.
Compared to the last time I tried it (a long time ago), No Man's Sky runs well enough to be playable. It ran smoother at higher settings in Windows, but it's still a bit better in Devuan with the i5-10400 than it was in Windows 10 with my FX-8320 (both using the same GTX 1660). I care more about consistent frame times than graphical settings and it's smooth at the 75Hz refresh rate of the monitor, so good enough. It's not like that time I tried playing it using my old AMD R9 270 2GB graphics card, which was still choppy in an 800x600 window at the lowest settings with FSR 2.0 performance mode enabled lol...
Steam has come a long way. Proton is great! I used to loathe Steam, because for 14 or so years our Internet was barely usable (rural wireless) and it would take hours sometimes to update Steam itself, let alone the single player game I was hoping to play. Offline play is why I bought a bunch of games on GOG back then, but we have fibre optic Internet now, so yeah, kinda wish I had purchased them on Steam. Ah well.
Any suggestions for GOG games? I'd rather not install a web of nonsense like Lutris, Winetricks, Protontricks, blah, blah... I'd just like to play the games, ya know? GOG Galaxy as straight forward as Steam/Proton? A boy can dream!
Incidentally, NMS and Bejeweled 3 both run more smoothly in Xfce than MATE. I tried JWM (with JWM Kit - so handy!) as well, but it seemed that both games played the same as they did when using Xfce. I'm actually fine with using Xfce, it was my main DE in the years between Gnome 2 and MATE post Mint 17.3. Thunar... I don't dislike it, but Caja is definitely more polished (and still usable in Xfce). Gotta say, Mousepad is the best basic GUI text editor, so Xfce wins some battles too!
TL:DR Answer:
dpkg --add-architecture i386
apt-get update
sudo apt install steam lutris libglvnd-dev pkg-config libopusfile0 libsdl2-net-2.0-0
Then use Steam to install your Steam games and Lutris to install your GOG games. You could use Lutris for both, but Lutris still needs to open Steam anyway, so you may as well use Steam directly. Interestingly, Lutris can add links into Steam for your GOG games automatically, so you can use a single interface/loader for your games.
The Epic game store would lock up after pressing log in. I didn't care enough to find out why, as I only own one game on it (Kena: Bridge of Spirits). If I fix it later, I'll post how it was done.
The games I own play well, either the same or close to how they played in Windows, using the default Steam or Lutris settings, except where noted below.
Steam Games:
No Man's Sky, Bejeweled 3 (Proton 8.0-2), DiRT Rally (Original), Ghostbuster's Remastered, Black Mesa
GOG Games (Windows):
Flatout 2, Grip, Lego Star Wars: Clone Wars, My Time at Portia, Potion Craft
GOG Games (Native Linux):
Spiritfarer, Stardew Valley, Terraria, Torchlight II
For reference, here are my specs:
Daedalus, Xfce, 1920x1200 resolution, Intel i5-10400, 2x8GB DDR4 RAM, Nvidia GTX1660 (not Ti/Super, Driver 535.54.03 manually installed), Kingston 1TB nvme SSD (root), Crucial MX500 250GB SSD (my previous SSD that I am now using as a sacraficial /tmp /var drive, with lots of over-provisioning).
Hope this helps!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Original Post:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
First, thank you again for Devuan. I really appreciate being able to install MATE and carry on with Debian'ing like nothing ever changed!
I've dual booted Windows for two decades, because for playing games using Winders was "100% the performance with 0% the effort", but I am thoroughly exhausted by the Rube Goldberg machine that Windows and its associated services have become. Seriously, the last straw was when I signed up for the PC game pass, went to play a Star Wars game, found that my Xbox account was somehow linked to my kid's EA account, and spent an entire afternoon determining that there really isn't a way to contact anyone at Microsoft to fix the accounts. It's all just layers of circular references, even calling the support number (which I could only find via Google, of course) just tells you to go to their website... I'm out.
I am quite adept with GNU/Linux, I've even used it to play Windows games over the years, but it's always been janky and annoying, so I just dual booted the issue away. Not this time though! As such, I thought it would be wise to seek the knowledge of those who regularly use Steam and GOG in Devuan.
I'm using Daedalus (6.1.0-9-amd64) with Nvidia (535.54.03), MATE, and Xfce. SuperTuxKart runs awesome; all the normal Linux stuff is setup again (just did a fresh install of chimaera net-install no-gui dist-upgrade today). I'm down with flipping over to JWM or Fluxbox to game if need be.
So before I start eating up those precious TBW by flailing software willy nilly onto the o'l SSD, how are the kid's gaming on Linux these days?
That's neat and the diversity is impressive.
I will keep using System V Init, because it's old, and I'm old, and we know each other so well; Why bother messing with something else when what I already have/know works fine and there are plenty of other things I'd rather do (and need to do) with my time.
Forever ago I had used Single File PHP Gallery to host our family picture library from my Linux machine. It was (and still is) pretty great, but it doesn't handle video files and it's not great on mobile (Android browsers). So I was wondering if you folks had any suggestions for similar programs that will work better in those regards?
I don't want a dedicated NAS computer, in part because I don't want to be bothered managing it, but also because we don't happen to already own a suitable 24/7/365 low power PC and I don't want to buy one. The main reason though is that I know I won't live forever, so when I kick the bucket my wife and kids need to be able to actually use all our pictures and videos without my help. Truly, the best way for them is basically, "turn on Dad's computer, click the link he put on my phone" or "turn on Dad's computer, log into my account and click on the Family folder" or "plug the redundant back up external drive into my computer". We've tried both Windows and Linux shared network folders over the years and they're either unreliable or the end-users just don't "get it".
I was looking at Nova Gallery, but much like SFPG it doesn't handle videos and both of these tools require generating thumbnails inside the same dir as the original images, which is something I don't want. I'd rather symlink to the head media dir (on the hard drive) and store the thumbnails in /var/www/html/ (on the SSD where Devuan is installed).
If I can't find anything suitable, I will create something myself, but I'd rather not spend my time reinventing this wheel!
Know what? I changed my mind, the blue isn't bad. I recently reinstalled and haven't been arsed to customize the grub and slim themes and... it's fine. Sometimes I can be too picky.
Huh. It's been two years since that bug report. I suppose it's not a priority for the maintainers.
Earlier I was looking for a nice font to use the sticky notes program in MATE, when I found that there were like fifty bazillion Noto fonts installed in a million different languages. So that was kind of annoying to scroll through.
Turns out they were installed along with SuperTuxKart. That's fine, things require things, I'm OK with that, but every font option in every language for everyone who uses the program? That seems like a configuration error. I suppose it would be fine if we didn't have to scroll through a huge list of things we will never use literally every time we access the fonts list on our system.
I tried an "apt install --no-install-recommends supertuxkart", but that will still pull down all of the following packages:
fonts-noto-color-emoji
fonts-noto-core
fonts-noto-extra
fonts-noto-ui-core
fonts-noto-ui-extra
Anyone know how to, at the very least, limit this to a single language (English)?
I suppose this is one area where using an AppImage would be beneficial.
Wow that brings me back to when Slackware with KDE 3.5 was all new and shiny. I used that for quite a while. That was the same era as the Opera 12 browser. Such a good browser. It was also the only version of KDE I liked. For the longest time I preferred Xfce, but the screen tearing with Nvidia/compositing issue has become too much of a PIA to bother with given that Mate looks and works almost the same and has no such issues. KDE Plasma was OK I suppose, but I'd rather use Mate. The rest I have used, from JWM to Cinnamon, but really... all I actually want from a desktop environment is perfectly delivered with Mate. Newer does not mean better...
Oh you rock, steve_v! Thank you so much for taking the time to run those test. I sincerely appreciate it.
I added the results to the spreadsheet and I used it to make this comparison between real and virtual CPUs. I think it's kind of interesting, especially the math and logic related test that aren't potentially affected by a difference in graphics cards.
The virtual CPUs are faster than their real counterparts, so that's a good thing to know as it becomes harder to find functioning old hardware. Personally I have three old machines of the era that are just e-waste now, broken and dead for various reason despite my best efforts to revive them.
I just don't have the money to throw at a replacement, given the crazy prices for this stuff now. Back in 2003 I paid a whole $25 for my Deskpro 4000 desktop and something around $20 for my now-dead Compaq LTE/25 laptop (486SX 25MHz). My other two dead computers were free from the computer shop I worked at in 2005. Back then this stuff was worthless junk - my boss had a literal barn full of old computers and parts! Now though, you're looking at $500+ CAD for a verified working system that isn't beat to hell or otherwise abused. Heck, people want $150+ CAD for untested junk. It's kind of insane.
So yeah, I sincerely appreciate your time and effort!