You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I know this is a dormant thread, but it just occurred to me that open source permits development of projects that would be s**tcanned in the purely commercial world for both good and bad reasons.
Wayland would have been killed by the 2nd or 3rd CEO to take the helm after the first few release failures, however, many other excellent projects would likely also have been killed off or not been attempted. However, I think it is safe to say that any project developed with an eye to either popularise, or commercialise linux, is unfortunately also bad for Linux as we know it. I used to really like Gnome - but then someone with "vision" took over and dumbed it down so simpletons would use it (and made it look more like windows) - news flash - instead of windows users adopting it, windows changed into something else, and gnome is still chasing that ghost.
The best projects have always been a developer scratching their own itch. Not someone "with a vision" for the OS as a whole.
@dimonic . . . please make your suggestions by responding to the threads/posts you think need to be improved.
I would, but I don't see a place on the FAQ that allows for conversation. There are no active links visible in my browser (although the page suggests that there are).
I would like to help with documentation - there are a number of items even on the FAQ page I could fill in.
I was able to install by downloading them direct from jessie-backports and using dpkg.
Pages: 1