The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#1 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » [SOLVED] external NVMe SSD is piggish » 2022-09-23 18:32:12

@chris2be8

Toshiba/Vantec gives the same piggish results as Samsung/Vantec. Actually it's worse than that, because I've realized that the Vantec has been causing errors which are getting worse. The last time I plugged the Vantec into my laptop, it caused the system to react as if I had unplugged the system drive, for example, showing unprintable (if that's the right word) icons in the start menu and elsewhere. I'm really disappointed with Vantec, as all of my 2.5" HDD/SSD external enclosures are Vantec and they work perfectly.

#2 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » [SOLVED] external NVMe SSD is piggish » 2022-09-22 18:06:03

UPDATE:

I simplfied the story somewhat before. I actually had two NVMe SSDs -- Toshiba and Samsung -- and two external enclosures -- Vantec and Plugable. Like any situation with multiple variables, sometimes it's difficult to know what to blame.

I reformatted both NVME SSDs to EXT4. First I tried Toshiba/Plugable, which worked as above. Then I wrote my last post. But then I tried Samsung/Vantec -- and it still was piggish. This time I tried Samsung/Plugable and the response was fast as with Toshiba/Plugable. So I actually had two problems: NTFS and defective Vantec. I'll recycle the Vantec.

#3 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » [SOLVED] external NVMe SSD is piggish » 2022-09-21 22:26:21

@andyprough

Wow! Reformatting to EXT4 made an amazing difference. Transfers are at least five times faster. And I'm running 5.18, though there's something amiss about the drivers it provides for my laptop (but that's another story). Thanks for the help.

#4 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » [SOLVED] external NVMe SSD is piggish » 2022-09-19 19:56:56

Thanks to all for the replies.


@Head_on_a_Stick

Ah, yes, the relevant driver would be for USB 3.0. I was chasing the wrong tail, or whatever that metaphor is.


@andyprogh

Actually I have a Plugable unit too which I bought first, though it exhibited the same piggish performance. I noticed in the Plugable reviews that some people were angry that the performance was only USB 2.0. There's got to be some combination of factors that results in piggish performance.

As soon as I make sufficient backups, I will try your suggestion and reformat the NVMe SSD to EXT4 and recopy the data from the aforementioned backups. I'm running NTFS now, but that's a legacy from Windows systems.

I ordered a cable from Startech, a vendor I've had nothing but good luck with. We'll see if it makes any difference.

#5 Hardware & System Configuration » [SOLVED] external NVMe SSD is piggish » 2022-09-18 20:37:51

nobodyuknow
Replies: 10

The system is Devuan Cinnamon Chimaera installed on an external SSD connected via USB 3.0. The laptop has an AMD processor and 16 GM of memory.

The additional hardware is an NVMe SSD (Samsung PM961 with about a hundred hours on it) inside a Vantec NST-205C3-SG external enclosure. The Vantec is advertised to support USB 3.1.

Two relevant lines from lspci are:

04:00.3 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Raven USB 3.1
04:00.4 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Raven USB 3.1

I copied music files to the external SSD, but the performance is no better than an external HDD. I've tried a few changes -- different external enclosure, different cable, different USB port -- but the performance never improves. And often when I double-click on a folder, it takes a few seconds or even longer to respond, exactly the same as with a HDD.

USB 3.0 should be saturated with the hardware. Of course, the USB 3.0 port could be having problems.

The only thing I can think of is that the Linux driver is some kind of generic one, in other words, slow. The driver for the SSD's cousin, Samsung 960 EVO, would be nice, but Samsung probably never released one for Linux. Does this sound right?

#6 Re: Installation » name of log for error/warning messages seen during boot » 2022-09-07 20:46:17

@GlennW

Bingo (the first one). The error messages are the same.

[    0.264961] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.GPP2.BCM5], AE_NOT_FOUND (20211217/dswload2-162)
[    0.265128] ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20211217/psobject-220)
[    6.134372] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Field [D008] at bit offset/length 128/8 exceeds size of target Buffer (128 bits) (20211217/dsopcode-198)
[    6.134558] ACPI Error: Aborting method \HWMC due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.134709] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.WMID.WMAA due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.134888] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Field [D008] at bit offset/length 128/8 exceeds size of target Buffer (128 bits) (20211217/dsopcode-198)
[    6.135068] ACPI Error: Aborting method \HWMC due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.135212] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.WMID.WMAA due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.135559] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Field [D008] at bit offset/length 128/8 exceeds size of target Buffer (128 bits) (20211217/dsopcode-198)
[    6.135767] ACPI Error: Aborting method \HWMC due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.135932] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.WMID.WMAA due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.136124] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Field [D008] at bit offset/length 128/8 exceeds size of target Buffer (128 bits) (20211217/dsopcode-198)
[    6.136322] ACPI Error: Aborting method \HWMC due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.136478] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.WMID.WMAA due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.136665] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Field [D009] at bit offset/length 136/8 exceeds size of target Buffer (136 bits) (20211217/dsopcode-198)
[    6.136862] ACPI Error: Aborting method \HWMC due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.137018] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.WMID.WMAA due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.137205] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Field [D009] at bit offset/length 136/8 exceeds size of target Buffer (136 bits) (20211217/dsopcode-198)
[    6.137402] ACPI Error: Aborting method \HWMC due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.137561] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.WMID.WMAA due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.137765] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Field [D008] at bit offset/length 128/8 exceeds size of target Buffer (128 bits) (20211217/dsopcode-198)
[    6.137991] ACPI Error: Aborting method \HWMC due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[    6.138152] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.WMID.WMAA due to previous error (AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT) (20211217/psparse-529)
[   20.461856] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: failed to get tx report from firmware
[ 1362.038359] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 1668.022511] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 1712.054375] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 1918.042159] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 2206.038375] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 2664.117912] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 2961.901327] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
[ 3370.966356] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 3588.022456] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 3622.042265] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 4027.990374] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 4325.014380] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 4669.014370] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 4989.013917] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 5094.037917] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 5778.101932] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 6453.973919] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 6515.990138] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 7508.029887] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 7579.029869] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 7697.082108] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 7766.998392] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 7783.029873] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 7850.042228] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 7908.021877] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 8193.014399] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 8220.053905] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 8222.037922] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 8336.021916] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 8507.033918] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 8559.009881] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 8770.038370] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 8805.045958] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 8825.014373] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 8830.966241] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 8854.998381] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 9020.021916] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 9042.037909] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 9180.053884] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 9202.041905] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 9273.993881] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 9340.021950] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 9385.017888] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 9512.985911] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 9524.985880] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 9568.993880] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
[ 9605.029869] rtw_8821ce 0000:03:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state

Let me think about those messages. I have Devuan MATE installed on a different external SSD -- the one in question is Cinnamon, with both being Chimaera -- so I can compare the boots.

Another strangeness is that maybe last month I updated the BIOS to the most recent one (F.62). I tried reinstalling the previous one (F.61), but the error messages remained the same. I downloaded the last seven BIOS updates and I think I'll try each one, going back in time.

By the way, because of the Realtek wireless chipset, I installed linux-image-5.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64_5.18.2-1~bpo11+1_amd64.deb. Otherwise there was no connectivity.

#7 Re: Installation » name of log for error/warning messages seen during boot » 2022-09-06 19:55:03

/var/log/boot was the first one I tried, but it does not contain the error messages that fly by. My eyes never were good, but I swear the messages have something to do with BIOS.

#8 Installation » name of log for error/warning messages seen during boot » 2022-09-06 19:19:55

nobodyuknow
Replies: 5

Something is going on during boot, but the messages fly by too fast to read. I looked at a few logs in /var/log, but my eyes are glazing over. What's the name of the log for error/warning messages seen during boot?

#9 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » [SOLVED] 5.18 kernel installed, yet apt wants to install newest 5.10 » 2022-08-16 23:10:58

@Head_on_a_Stick

"an autoremove operation will delete them so be sure the new one works before running that"

I found that out the hard way once when I thought the newer kernel was running properly, so I autoremoved the old kernel -- and the system kinda died. <chuckle>

#11 Hardware & System Configuration » [SOLVED] 5.18 kernel installed, yet apt wants to install newest 5.10 » 2022-08-15 20:05:22

nobodyuknow
Replies: 4

This system is Devuan 4.0 Cinnamon. 5.18 kernel is installed (linux-image-5.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64_5.18.2-1~bpo11+1_amd64.deb) because the hardware includes Realtek wireless RTL8821CE. Today the following was seen after executing "apt update, apt upgrade":

The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
  linux-image-5.10.0-9-amd64
Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove it.
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  linux-headers-5.10.0-17-amd64 linux-headers-5.10.0-17-common
  linux-image-5.10.0-17-amd64
The following packages will be upgraded:
  linux-compiler-gcc-10-x86 linux-headers-amd64 linux-image-amd64
  linux-kbuild-5.10 linux-libc-dev

Why is Devuan worrying about a kernel that's not being used? Does Devuan keep two kernels, one for the current state of the distribution and another if a custom one was installed?

#12 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] install either Firefox Beta or Nightly » 2022-08-09 21:21:39

Thanks to everyone who responded.

I decided to chance it and follow Camtaf's advice, as I already do that for Pale Moon. I know how to edit a desktop-file, so I now have Nightly running via an icon on the Cinnamon taskbar. In .mozilla/firefox, there is now an entry of somestuff.default-nightly, so my fears of Nightly clobbering ESR's configuration was unfounded. I found a suitable icon in firefox-nightly/browser/chrome/icons/default, so this is a happy ending.

#13 Installation » [SOLVED] install either Firefox Beta or Nightly » 2022-08-07 22:09:02

nobodyuknow
Replies: 5

Devuan offers Firefox ESR, but what about also installing either Firefox Beta or Nightly? Would they overwrite configuation files at /home/user/.mozilla? Does either offer an advantage over the other, given that it would be used simply as a second browser?

#14 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » [SOLVED] When will 5.13 kernel be available? » 2022-07-21 18:30:39

@golinux and GlennW

Thanks for the warning, as I was already looking at Debian packages.

I looked at the link, and the packages (https://pkginfo.devuan.org/), but my eyes glazed over at all of the rt, dbg, cloud, etc., images and headers. I'll have more tea and look again.

#15 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » [SOLVED] When will 5.13 kernel be available? » 2022-07-19 23:56:50

@GlennW

Thanks for that. I've never used Debian backports. I guess I just add "deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports main" to sources.list.


@Head_on_a_Stick

So the philosophy for Devuan (and Debian, I assume) is to release one kernel with the original release? That explains why the only available kernel is 5.10.

#16 Hardware & System Configuration » [SOLVED] When will 5.13 kernel be available? » 2022-07-18 19:43:24

nobodyuknow
Replies: 7

Is there an estimate for when 5.13 kernel will be available in Devuan packages?

#17 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] new systems lose wireless (RTL8821CE) connectivity » 2022-07-14 14:46:52

It seems that the 5.15 kernel is needed to run Debian-based systems with RTL8821CE.

#18 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] new systems lose wireless (RTL8821CE) connectivity » 2022-07-13 21:47:41

After doing some surfing, I discovered that a driver for RTL8821CE is problematic. Some distributions include it and some (Devuan) don't. I suspect that when a new kernel is installed, my external systems die. I still don't understand why an internally-installed system does not die as well. I think I'll make make multiple backups of the internally-installed system.

#19 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] new systems lose wireless (RTL8821CE) connectivity » 2022-07-13 18:53:01

On the Devuan Xfce system, I tried dpkg-ing the .deb file again, but then I was informed that kernel headers were missing.

And things could be worse. A Linux Mint MATE system I created the same way on another external SSD has completely died, refusing to boot with never-ending "read-only filesystem" errors.

Maybe this laptop is Arch-only for external systems. Good thing the extra SSDs were bought cheap.

#20 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] new systems lose wireless (RTL8821CE) connectivity » 2022-07-13 18:41:20

Below is the output. I had to go back and verify that in the "ip link" section, the USB-connected system really was missing the wlan0 entry. Also, in the lspci output, the entries for Realtek wireless are rather different, even though I dpkg-ed the same .deb file. This is bizarre. I will never again buy a "refurbished" laptop from Newegg.

FOR THE CINNAMON SYSTEM RUNNING ON INTERNAL NVME SSD:

~$ lspci -knn | grep -A3 Network
03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8821CE 802.11ac PCIe Wireless Network Adapter [10ec:c821]
	Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company RTL8821CE 802.11ac PCIe Wireless Network Adapter [103c:831a]
	Kernel driver in use: rtl8821ce
	Kernel modules: rtw88_8821ce, rtl8821ce
04:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Picasso [1002:15d8] (rev c2)

:~$ ip link
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
2: eth0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 14:cb:19:1a:4e:50 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP mode DORMANT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 64:6c:80:91:0a:a9 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff




FOR THE MATE SYSTEM RUNNING ON EXTERNAL SSD VIA USB 3.0:

~$ lspci -knn | grep -A3 Network
03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8821CE 802.11ac PCIe Wireless Network Adapter [10ec:c821]
	Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company RTL8821CE 802.11ac PCIe Wireless Network Adapter [103c:831a]
	Kernel modules: rtw88_8821ce
04:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Picasso [1002:15d8] (rev c2)
	DeviceName:  Onboard IGD




~$ ip link
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
2: eth0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 14:cb:19:1a:4e:50 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

#21 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] ungoogled chromium repository stops update » 2022-07-12 23:07:55

@Head_on_a_Stick

Thanks so much for that. I was rooting around in /etc/apt, but I never looked in /etc/apt/sources.list.d, which is where the offending file was.

#22 Installation » [SOLVED] new systems lose wireless (RTL8821CE) connectivity » 2022-07-12 22:55:05

nobodyuknow
Replies: 5

I have a strange laptop, with AMD hardware (it's a gray market from Asia). I've got Devuan Cinnamon installed on the internal NVMe SSD. It has gone through many updates.

But as a hobby, and because I had spare hardware lying around, I installed Devuan Xfce on a USB flash drive and Devuan MATE on an external SSD. Both were initially installed on a different laptop, one with Intel hardware, simply because it's older and can have its internal SSD easily removed (I don't like dual-boots). I installed the necessary hardware packages, same as I did with the internal system, and then tried to use it on the AMD laptop.

On all systems, I must install firmware-amd-graphics and rtl8821ce-dkms_5.5.2.1-7~mx21+1_all.deb, though with the latter, I must first install dkms and other prerequisites.

But that's where the trouble begins. The Xfce and MATE systems do not have wireless connectivity on the AMD laptop even though I followed the exact same steps as with the Cinnamon system.

Anyone have a guess why the internal system keeps running fine, while the two external systems died a premature death? I don't think the choice of desktop has anything to do with it. All of the above are Chimaera 4.0.

And some Linux distributions run fine on external SSDs and USB flash drives, for example, Manjaro KDE/Plasma and Xfce.

#23 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] ungoogled chromium repository stops update » 2022-07-12 18:24:12

Thanks for the replies, but we seem to be talking past each other. I know about appimage, but that won't help me now, as apt won't run. What is the full pathname for the config file I need to edit?

UPDATE: I went to /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d and deleted home-ungoogled_chromium.gpg, which allowed me to do update/upgrade, but I still see errors on update. I think I'll wipe the drive and reinstall.

#24 Installation » [SOLVED] ungoogled chromium repository stops update » 2022-07-11 22:07:36

nobodyuknow
Replies: 5

I installed Ungoogled Chromium, but then deleted it because I didn't like it. Obviously I did not clear its repository because I got the below error when doing "apt update":

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
47 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/ungoogled_chromium/Debian_Bullseye  InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 02456C79B2FD48BF home:ungoogled_chromium OBS Project <home:ungoogled_chromium@build.opensuse.org>
W: Failed to fetch http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/ungoogled_chromium/Debian_Bullseye/InRelease  The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 02456C79B2FD48BF home:ungoogled_chromium OBS Project <home:ungoogled_chromium@build.opensuse.org>
W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

Okay, so I thought I'd use Synaptic to eliminate that repository, but I got the below error after selecting Repositories:

An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/ungoogled_chromium/Debian_Bullseye  InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 02456C79B2FD48BF home:ungoogled_chromium OBS Project <home:ungoogled_chromium@build.opensuse.org>Failed to fetch http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/ungoogled_chromium/Debian_Bullseye/InRelease  The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 02456C79B2FD48BF home:ungoogled_chromium OBS Project <home:ungoogled_chromium@build.opensuse.org>Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead

How do I remove that repository?

#25 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » [SOLVED] edit music file properties as in Windows » 2022-06-09 17:47:30

Sorry, I was a bit obtuse. The leads were provided by alexkemp: kid3 and exfalso. The former appears to do what I need, so I'm playing around with it.

Board footer

Forum Software