You are not logged in.
Oh, thanks Calamity . . . That gives me some confidence that I might not screw something up! Hopefully I can get to that soon . . .
Thanks to everybody for the suggestions. I will ponder the possibilities for a while before jumping into action. Experimentation is not easy for me these days so I will wait until the stars are aligned before jumping into action. I really don't want to screw something up and make it worse . . . If you live long enough, you will understand some day . . .
Thanks to both of you.
@fsmithred . . . There was a time when I experimented a lot with about:config customization. That was then . . .
An about-blank page has always had "about:blank" in the urlbar until the last update after Chimaera moved to old,old stable and DDG decided to appropriate that "empty" space. I don't understand why there even has to be a default search engine. I have removed all the other search engines I use from the list. I'm not that happy with any of them
@HardSun . . . Thanks for taking the time to respond. The tab is not the problem it is the ddg icon which precedes it that I find annoying. Why can't I just choose whichever search engine I want at that time! I think the point is to box us all into patterns that will move us further down the chute to the abattoir . . .
/me longs for the idylic pre-digital days . . .
Yes, I am still on Chimaera. Decided I would update after it went to old,old stable. My habit is to always open a new browser page to about:blank but now DDG has inserted it's icon in the address bar. I never search from the address bar and really don't want to have to look at that icon. I visited about:config which used to be useful but like everything else in the digital world, has mushroomed into an impenetrable complexity.
Note that chromium and palemoon still respects about:blank.
Is there any way I can get FF to go back to opening a blank page without that stupid DDG icon when it is told to do so?
Everybody should have such catastrophic problems . . . LOL!
UPDATE . . .
There has been no substantive response from Dyne regarding the OP's question. ![]()
Nope. Slim is called that for a reason. ![]()
Not necessarily. I sent them an email and now we wait for a response.
Perhaps this will be helpful?
Devuan Package Information
https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/poli … .68.126.15
Working on it . . .
@Altoid . . . Thanks for tracking that down! If verified that it is accepted for Devuan, Xenguy will want to add it to Devuan's WWW.
Dyne.org handles all of Devuan's finances. You'll have to ask them.
You have to log in as root to make that change. ![]()
Thanks for that. Not surprising at all!
I am still all wired and don't even own a functional cell phone!! And my vacuum is over 30 years old but still gets the job done even with parts of it being taped together.
Thanks for that, greenjeans!
Welcome to Devuan, rosun . . .
I can't begin to answer your question (for many reasons) but probably no one else can either because there is no information about which installer you used or any other important installation data. Please do try to give us more details.
Many thanks for the clarification tux_99. ![]()
This addition is a bit off-topic but possibly historically relevant/interesting, especially to the younger generation who might be unaware of its existence over 25 years ago. I have used this method several times over the years and it never failed me:
HowTo Build a Package from Source the Smart Way (from Soul Singin')
https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=38976
My package building days are long over but I am wondering if reinventing the wheel is just a face-lift or something completely different.
Suggestion . . . paragraphs exist for a reason. ![]()
Please do not quote entire posts. Trim them to essential points you want to hi-light. Thanks.
/me sends greenjeans a hug . . .
I've been boycotting github for years . . . MS can kiss my skinny behind. ![]()
Those of us who have been using Linux for decades have done our part. Now, it's up to the younger generation to acquire that knowledge or it will just be a footnote in history . . . or not even that. So saddle up if you want to save apt or any of the other code that is being hijacked to turn Linux into windows.
What is this mania of late of removing older stuff just for the sake of it?
We are like "cattle" being herded into the abattoir of commerce and control to enrich the rich and eliminate personal freedom.
You did not mention which desktop you are using. IIRC, in the newest Xfce the gtk(4?) will not allow changing the desktop wallpaper. Last I heard, there is no "nocsd" option available . . . yet. That is one reason I am still happily using Chimaera . . .
/me is reluctant to search what NSFW stands for (and I don't want to know) but 2 seconds of viewing the home page was quite unpleasant . . .