You are not logged in.
This would be promising if they get their act together. HOAS, did it come with the newest version of Xfce (the one that fixed the folder views)?
I put this in Off-topic because I'm not sure if it's a problem with Devuan (I suspect it's not).
I'm noticing a problem on my monitor. It seems to have started about a month or so ago. For lack of a better way of explaining it, there's like a wiggle, or jiggle, that starts at the bottom of the screen and travels all the way to the top, and then restarts again at the bottom. Does anyone have any ideas what it is, and how to get rid of it? Does it sound like a problem with the monitor itself (the monitor is less than a year old), or something in the computer / OS / graphics card? Below are my computer's specs:
System: Host: ron Kernel: 4.9.0-14-amd64 x86_64 (64 bit gcc: 6.3.0) Desktop: MATE 1.16.2 (Gtk 3.22.11-1)
Distro: Devuan GNU/Linux ascii
Machine: Device: desktop System: ASUS product: All Series
Mobo: ASUSTeK model: H81M-C v: Rev X.0x BIOS: American Megatrends v: 3602 date: 03/26/2018
CPU: Dual core Intel Pentium G3220 (-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB
flags: (lm nx sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx) bmips: 11972
clock speeds: max: 3000 MHz 1: 1299 MHz 2: 1365 MHz
Graphics: Card: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller bus-ID: 00:02.0
Display Server: X.Org 1.19.2 drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
Resolution: 1920x1080@60.00hz
GLX Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Haswell Desktop GLX Version: 3.0 Mesa 13.0.6 Direct Rendering: Yes
Audio: Card Intel 8 Series/C220 Series High Definition Audio Controller
driver: snd_hda_intel bus-ID: 00:1b.0
Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.0-14-amd64
Network: Card: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller
driver: r8169 v: 2.3LK-NAPI port: e000 bus-ID: 03:00.0
IF: eth0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter>
Drives: HDD Total Size: 416.1GB (29.7% used)
ID-1: /dev/sdb model: ST3160815AS size: 160.0GB
ID-2: /dev/sda model: Crucial_CT256MX1 size: 256.1GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 234G used: 36G (16%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda5
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 29.8C mobo: 27.8C
Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: 0
Info: Processes: 145 Uptime: 7:10 Memory: 640.8/3826.3MB Init: SysVinit runlevel: 2 Gcc sys: 6.3.0
Client: Shell (bash 4.4.121) inxi: 2.3.5
Pulseaudio is installed and used in Devuan 3.x?
Protonmail. I've been using it quite a while and I don't think I've gotten any spam on it. It's based in Switzerland for privacy reasons.
uBlock Origin must be blocking a necessary script for the video to play. I got a video playing in a clean profile without any ad / script blockers. And I then promptly deleted that profile as that link has a "Caution" rating at Norton's Safe Web.
Do the movie sites use DRM? (Links please!) Pale Moon does not and will not support DRM. With that said, some movie sites will work with Microsoft Silverlight but since we're on Linux I don't think that's an option.
Well I would agree with the comment, yes. But I'm no expert so... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Well, you are more of an expert than I am. But, I'd like to hear what others have to say.
So if I'm reading your response right, you're saying the response I got on the other forum is correct?
On another forum, I made the comment that systemd violates the UNIX principle of "do one thing and do it well." Someone responded to that by saying "so does the Linux kernel." I'm not a programmer or coder or anything like that, but I have a feeling that that's an apples to oranges comparison. Am I right or wrong?
Perhaps you should ask on the PaleMoon forums. Be warned that the developers are complete arseholes though.
Why doesn't it surprise me that you of all who responded on this thread says that?
Basilisk might be different though, i believe palemoon is a derivative of basilisk ?
No. Pale Moon's initial release was October 2009. Basilisk's was November 2017.
For the Washington Post video, go to Tools > Preferences > Content, and at the bottom uncheck "Enable MSE for MP4 video." Didn't check the rest of your links, but if it's the audio that's the problem in all of them, they should all work properly now.
Can you provide a link to a problem video please? A quick look over at the Pale Moon forum doesn't show anybody else having a problem with videos on the new version. Do you have any extensions that tweak video playback? Another thing to do is test a problem video in a new profile.
There's a lot of bullshit responses in this thread. The real threat here are the ones who get to decide what is (so called) hate speech and what isn't. This IS a threat to free speech.
A good answer, . . .
Is it? I think this is a better answer: https://easylinuxtipsproject.blogspot.com/p/wine.html
Came across this via Distrowatch. I think this proves that Debian's vote about init systems was a complete farce.
zapper wrote:+1 for locking this dumb thread
Well, this wasn't a "dumb thread" when I started it.
Looking at how fast it went off the rails in several respects, though, I regret having opened it in the first place.
Some people, it seems, just can't have a civil discussion. And, apparently, you're one of them.
He's not the only one. Some of the words used by two posters here shows they have the mentality of grade-schoolers.
Yes, let us bow ourselves down to our overlords, Gooble and Mozilla. They have our best interests at heart. Over and out.
Did you bother to get the other side of the story?
https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.ph … 56#p134236
A lot of this stuff I really don't get, I admit. But from what I can glean from it, they made some changes that weren't allowed for it to still be called Pale Moon. What's the problem with that? That would be like me getting a Ford car, putting in a GM engine, but still labeling it and selling it as a Ford, which would clearly be wrong. Am I right or am I wrong? Also, they still had the opportunity to revert what they had done so they could use official branding, or they could have kept what they did and use unofficial branding, or they could have called it a fork and used their own branding. Yet the PM devs are called the assholes? What reality are you guys living in?
blackhole wrote:
. . . Threatening and talking trademarks, while quoting the MPL.
Anybody pushing for Chromium, Gooble, or their lapdog Mozilla, has no credibility in making this statement.
@Ron, is "old and obsolete, though still actively developed, code" better?
First off, old, yes; obsolete, no, yet more misinformation. Please stop with your misinformation. To answer your question, yes older code is better. Here is why (link below). I'd like to see how you will contradict it. The author of this article co-founded Fog Creek Software. He also worked with Jeff Atwood to create Stack Overflow and served as CEO of Stack Overflow from 2010-2019. He also served as the chairman of the board for Stack Overflow, Glitch, and HASH.
Twice you mentioned that Pale Moon is based on "dead code." That is a straw-man argument. Pale Moon uses code that is actively developed by Pale Moon. Therefore, it is not dead code. Pale Moon is updated whenever there are security issues that affect it, whether said issues affect Firefox or not. That is, any security issue that may not affect Firefox, but does Pale Moon, will be fixed in Pale Moon. So don't go around saying Pale Moon is based on "dead code." That IS misinformation.
There is some misinformation about Pale Moon in this thread, so at risk of being called a lackey, I'd like to correct the record. I'll just mention one inaccuracy.
I don't disagree with many of your points, but a largely unknown browser from a one man project . . .
According to the developer,
Pale Moon is not "just me" and hasn't been for the majority of its life. There are some talented and dedicated people at work in our community to make Pale Moon what it is, and actually has seen support in many ways by many people over the years.
The above quote is from here. If you want the facts on Pale Moon, I suggest giving it a read.
There was a thread about Mozilla recently on LQ:
The trouble is, that the alternatives to Firefox are worse. The 3rd party forks are what amounts to snake oil salesmen peddling their wares. I despise the UIs of both chromium anf Firefox, but just learned to live with them and disable the telemetry / data collection where possible.
Sounds like Stockholm syndrome to me. I can't speak to other FF forks, but your comments about them don't apply to Pale Moon.
Okay, I see python3-pyqt4 in Synaptic. But I don't see pyqt4-dbus (or python3-pyqt4-dbus). So I did a search of "dbus" and I see that I have the following installed:
python-dbus.mainloop.pyqt5
python-pyqt5
python-qt4
python-qt4-dbus
python3-dbus
python3-dbus.mainloop.pyqt5
So I tried to install pyqt4-dbus and pyqt4, and got this message:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package pyqt4
In the interest of completeness, I did not first uninstall hplip 16. Now I'm glad I didn't.