You are not logged in.
Also do not rely on information at https://talk.devuan.org/ . There should be a notice at the top of every page to "PROCEED WITH CAUTION". It is there for a reason - the info is about a year old and may no longer be correct.
I'm not sure quite what you're talking about. But if it is those maddening disappearing scrollbars . . . I went through that doing the clearlooks-phenix-darkpurpy theme for ASCII. This thread on the Xfce forum got me to a solution which is here. If you're talking about something else, excuse the noise. I think it's just a different way of skinning the cat.
Happy to hear that worked out for you.
When the repos were new, backports had the wrong priority. That's been fixed.
As I remember it . . . the first Valentine iso merged backports with the main Devuan repos. That was a test to see how Amprolla would do with merging repos. There was no way to comment it out so one had to be really careful about upgrading. But not before I got bit. I still have some bpo remnants on this system. Everything is appropriately commented now.
golinux wrote:Yes, but don't install everything in backports - that could get you into big trouble. Just download what you need and comment that repo again.
IIRC, you shouldn't actually have to deactivate the repo again, as nothing should be pulled from backports automatically, except for updates of those packages you've installed from that source. Maybe someone can confirm that.
That depends whether it's pinned or not. If not pinned . . . oops. I know from experience. Someone else (fsmithred?) will have to provide the details.
But wouldn't hurt to try would it?
Why not boot a live disk to eliminate Libreboot as the culprit?
Yes, but don't install everything in backports - that could get you into big trouble. Just download what you need and comment that repo again. There is also some magic that can be done with pinning but I don't know the details. Maybe someone else will put it here.
fsmithred wrote:You could start with a minimal install and add packages from the parrot package list...
That idea has been ringing-in-my-ears...
1 - Figure out howto get a beowulf-minimal-install, (modify jessie/ascii source.list?) or...
beowulf has appeared quietly in pkgmaster. fsmithred has upgraded rather smoothly. iirc there were no problems with openbox but there may be with other DEs. Be prepared for breakage. You would have to upgrade from ascii as there obviously are no beowulf isos yet.
Do not use Debian repos directly or ubuntu PPAs at all. Look in Devuan backports for more recent versions
There is order in the chaos of the universe. Nice image BTW.
If I keep finding these annoying little bugs . . .
gnome2 was buggy out of the gate so no surprise . . .
I never knew of that key control but just tried it and it works perfectly in Thunar. Probably won't ever use it though because I am blind without seeing hidden files at all times. The reason I moved on from gnome2 years ago were little bugs like that.
Today, KatolaZ posted instructions for setting up a local mirror here. Copied below for reference:
Dear D1rs,
Since we are talking of creating a local or LAN Devuan mirror, I
thought that posting a working configuration for apt-mirror could be
found useful. Please find at the bottom an example of what you should
have in your /etc/apt/mirrors.list in order to get a full local Devuan
repo for amd64, i386, and sources. You can use deb.devuan.org instead
of pkgmaster.devuan.org, if you like, or any of the package mirrors
listed at:https://pkgmaster.devuan.org/mirror_list.txt
Notice that the program apt-mirror must be executed by the user
"apt-mirror", who should have rwx access to the base_path specified in
the mirrors.list file. For more information, man apt-mirrorUseful information on setting up a Devuan package mirror can be found
at:https://pkgmaster.devuan.org/devuan_mir … hrough.txt
If you want to setup a *public* Devuan package mirror instead, please
follow the instructions reported in the walkthrough and get in touch
as specified therein.HTH
KatolaZ
-+-+-+-
############# config ################## # # base_path is the local path where your mirror will be created set base_path /srv/apt-mirror # # set mirror_path $base_path/mirror # set skel_path $base_path/skel # set var_path $base_path/var # set cleanscript $var_path/clean.sh # set defaultarch <running host architecture> # set postmirror_script $var_path/postmirror.sh # set run_postmirror 0 set nthreads 20 set _tilde 0 # ############# end config ############## # mirroring package sources deb-src http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii main contrib non-free # mirroring binary architectures deb-amd64 http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii main contrib non-free main/debian-installer deb-i386 http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii main contrib non-free main/debian-installer deb-amd64 http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/devuan ascii main contrib non-free main/debian-installer deb-i386 http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/devuan ascii main contrib non-free main/debian-installer # cleanup obsolete stuff clean http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged
Okay, I have all of the code boxes removed on the site; the codes are back as plain text.
Another option would be to link to the code in a text file that could be opened in an editor that can "save as". Less possibility for error that way.
Remembering history . . . here we go again. It seems our species never learns.
Welcome to both of you. Devuan love is always appreciated. ![]()
Why are there systemd files present in Devuan? That question has been asked and answered several times including recently on the DNG mail list at the end of this post. Sadly that link is now fubared:
I issued $locate systemd
and got 200 lines of output, including
/etc/systemd/system/* (23 files)
/lib/systemd/system/* (60 files)
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsystemd.so.0 (and 0.17.0)
/usr/lib/systemd (25 files)
/usr/bin/deb-systemd-helper ((and deb-systemd-invoke)
/var/lib/systemd/deb-systemd-helper-enabled/* (68 files)
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libsystemd):amd64* (5 files)This seems a lot to me. Please could you confirm that an ascii
installation should contain 200 systemd files as part of a normal
ascii installation. Sorry to trouble you if these are trivial
questions, but they feel far from that.
Many thanks
leloftMost of those "alarming" files are just systemd units files, put there
by daemons/packages/utilities who "also" support systemd in a way or
another. So they are not alarming but just *totally* *harmless* if you
don't have a running systemd as PID 1, since only systemd understands
and can run them. It would be *totally* *useless* (and utterly
*stupid* IMHO) to fork, rebuild, and maintain a few more hundred
packages only because they happen to provide a systemd unit file for
those systems where systemd is used.libsystemd0 is used by some daemons to verify if systemd is running or
not. If it's not, libsystemd is *totally* *harmless*.HND
KatolaZ
How are http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ and http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged different? Is one more "correct"?
http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ serves from a pool of http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged package mirrors (a 'round robin'). It is still being tested.
Thanks . . . but I can't even read xterm - font and colors are impossible. I suppose I could just switch to xfce terminal in that launcher.
That's how I move files into /usr/share/themes/ or /usr/share/icons or even make quick edits in a config file here and there. In Thunar I can open any file or folder as root with a custom action. If you knew how I type, you'd understand why . . .
Rant on . . .
There is a simple solution to all of your gksu and policykit problems: stop running X11 graphical shit as root...
$ man sudo $ man su
What about choice then??? I use gksu a lot in X11. All my launchers in the panel and in Thunar use it. It would break my workflow not to have it. I WILL find a way to continue use it.
Maybe that's related to your other duplicate icon post?
https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1910
Have you duplicated a config file somewhere? Maybe fire up a vm and if it doesn't duplicate icons, start comparing directories/files
@stanz . . . Maybe this will help:
http://www.ibiblio.org/refracta/documents.html
There might be newer versions on your machine.
That attitude will not gain points here. We have a history that should not be blown off and rewritten. "VUA" does not and never will refer to Devuan users in general. A VUA would be answering not asking your question (but they don't hang out on this forum often so not much chance of that).