You are not logged in.
If i try custom xrandr modes but monitor go to "out of range"
only this two modes work
>>>"75" 164.64 1920 1928 1960 1960 1080 1105 1113 1120 + - >>>> radeon works
>>>"75" 164.81 1920 1928 1960 1962 1080 1105 1113 1120 + - >>>> radeon works
but how set refresh above 75Hz?
>>>"75" 174.57 1920 1968 2000 2080 1080 1083 1088 1119 + -
>>>"120" 285.55 1920 1968 2000 2080 1080 1083 1088 1144 + -
>>>"120" 264.00 1920 1944 1976 2000 1080 1083 1088 1100 + +
>>>"120" 274.56 1920 1928 1960 2000 1080 1130 1138 1144 + -
>>>"100" 220.00 1920 1944 1976 2000 1080 1083 1088 1100 + +
>>>"100" 235.67 1920 1968 200 2080 1080 1083 1088 1133 + -freeartist-devuan@devuan:~/Downloads/amd-catalyst-15.9-linux-installer-15.201.1151-x86.x86_64$ xrandr -q
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1920 x 1080, maximum 8192 x 8192
DisplayPort-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
HDMI-0 connected primary 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 527mm x 296mm
1920x1080 60.00*+ 50.00 59.94
1920x1080i 60.00 50.00 59.94
1600x900 60.00
1280x1024 75.02 60.02
1152x864 75.00
1280x720 60.00 50.00 59.94
1024x768 75.03 60.00
800x600 75.00 60.32
720x576 50.00
720x576i 50.00
720x480 60.00 59.94
720x480i 60.00 59.94
640x480 75.00 60.00 59.94
720x400 70.08
DVI-0 connected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
1920x1200 59.95 +
1920x1080 60.00 50.00 59.94
1600x1200 60.00
1680x1050 59.88
1280x1024 60.02
1440x900 59.90
1280x960 60.00
1280x800 59.91
1280x720 60.00 50.00 59.94
1024x768 60.00
800x600 60.32 56.25
720x576 50.00
720x480 60.00 59.94
640x480 60.00 59.94
DVI-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
freeartist-devuan@devuan:~/Downloads/amd-catalyst-15.9-linux-installer-15.201.1151-x86.x86_64$ freeartist-devuan@devuan:~/Downloads/amd-catalyst-15.9-linux-installer-15.201.1151-x86.x86_64$ sudo get-edid | parse-edid
[sudo] password for freeartist-devuan:
This is read-edid version 3.0.2. Prepare for some fun.
Attempting to use i2c interface
Looks like no busses have an EDID. Sorry!
Attempting to use the classical VBE interface
Performing real mode VBE call
Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f00 bx=0x0 cx=0x0
Function supported
Call successful
VBE version 300
VBE string at 0xc01f0 "ATI ATOMBIOS"
VBE/DDC service about to be called
Report DDC capabilities
Performing real mode VBE call
Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f15 bx=0x0 cx=0x0
Function supported
Call successful
Monitor and video card combination does not support DDC1 transfers
Monitor and video card combination supports DDC2 transfers
0 seconds per 128 byte EDID block transfer
Screen is not blanked during DDC transfer
Reading next EDID block
VBE/DDC service about to be called
Read EDID
Performing real mode VBE call
Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f15 bx=0x1 cx=0x0
Function supported
Call successful
EDID claims 1 more blocks left
*********** Something special has happened!
This happens a lot with TV's, and other devices
with extension blocks. If you have a TV, don't bother.
Odds are good that I2C will work for you. Try 'modprobe i2c-dev'.
Otherwise, please contact the author, Matthew Kern
E-mail: pyrophobicman@gmail.com
Please include full output from this program (especially that to stderr)
Reading next EDID block
VBE/DDC service about to be called
Read EDID
Performing real mode VBE call
Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f15 bx=0x1 cx=0x0
Function supported
Call successful
EDID claims 1 more blocks left
EDID blocks left is wrong.
Your EDID is probably invalid.
Looks like VBE was successful. Have a good day.
Checksum Correct
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "DELL S2421HGF"
ModelName "DELL S2421HGF"
VendorName "DEL"
# Monitor Manufactured week 23 of 2020
# EDID version 1.3
# Digital Display
DisplaySize 530 300
Gamma 2.20
Option "DPMS" "true"
Horizsync 30-170
VertRefresh 48-144
# Maximum pixel clock is 340MHz
#Not giving standard mode: 1152x864, 75Hz
#Not giving standard mode: 1280x1024, 60Hz
#Not giving standard mode: 1600x900, 60Hz
#Not giving standard mode: 1920x1080, 60Hz
#Extension block found. Parsing...
I only know about extension blocks of type 02h. PLEASE email me!
Something strange happened. Please contact the author,
Matthew Kern at <pyrophobicman@gmail.com>
freeartist-devuan@devuan:~/Downloads/amd-catalyst-15.9-linux-installer-15.201.1151-x86.x86_64$ freeartist-devuan@devuan:~/Downloads/amd-catalyst-15.9-linux-installer-15.201.1151-x86.x86_64$ xrandr --prop | edid-decode
edid-decode (hex):
00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 10 ac 6d a1 42 59 39 30
17 1e 01 03 80 35 1e 78 ea 72 b5 a7 55 52 a0 27
10 50 54 a5 4b 00 71 4f 81 80 a9 c0 d1 c0 01 01
01 01 01 01 01 01 02 3a 80 18 71 38 2d 40 58 2c
45 00 0f 28 21 00 00 1e 00 00 00 ff 00 35 44 38
54 4c 32 33 0a 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 fc 00 44
45 4c 4c 20 53 32 34 32 31 48 47 46 00 00 00 fd
00 30 90 1e aa 22 00 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 01 ff
02 03 2f f1 51 90 05 04 03 02 07 16 01 14 1f 12
13 06 11 15 3f 40 23 09 07 07 83 01 00 00 67 03
0c 00 20 00 00 44 68 1a 00 00 01 01 30 90 e6 86
6f 80 a0 70 38 40 40 30 20 35 00 0f 28 21 00 00
1a d8 83 80 a0 70 38 30 40 30 20 35 00 0f 28 21
00 00 1a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4b
----------------
Block 0, Base EDID:
EDID Structure Version & Revision: 1.3
Vendor & Product Identification:
Manufacturer: DEL
Model: 41325
Serial Number: 809064770
Made in: week 23 of 2020
Basic Display Parameters & Features:
Digital display
Maximum image size: 53 cm x 30 cm
Gamma: 2.20
DPMS levels: Standby Suspend Off
RGB color display
First detailed timing is the preferred timing
Color Characteristics:
Red : 0.6533, 0.3349
Green: 0.3203, 0.6269
Blue : 0.1542, 0.0654
White: 0.3134, 0.3291
Established Timings I & II:
IBM : 720x400 70.081663 Hz 9:5 31.467 kHz 28.320000 MHz
DMT 0x04: 640x480 59.940476 Hz 4:3 31.469 kHz 25.175000 MHz
DMT 0x06: 640x480 75.000000 Hz 4:3 37.500 kHz 31.500000 MHz
DMT 0x09: 800x600 60.316541 Hz 4:3 37.879 kHz 40.000000 MHz
DMT 0x0b: 800x600 75.000000 Hz 4:3 46.875 kHz 49.500000 MHz
DMT 0x10: 1024x768 60.003840 Hz 4:3 48.363 kHz 65.000000 MHz
DMT 0x12: 1024x768 75.028582 Hz 4:3 60.023 kHz 78.750000 MHz
DMT 0x24: 1280x1024 75.024675 Hz 5:4 79.976 kHz 135.000000 MHz
Standard Timings:
DMT 0x15: 1152x864 75.000000 Hz 4:3 67.500 kHz 108.000000 MHz
DMT 0x23: 1280x1024 60.019740 Hz 5:4 63.981 kHz 108.000000 MHz
DMT 0x53: 1600x900 60.000000 Hz 16:9 60.000 kHz 108.000000 MHz (RB)
DMT 0x52: 1920x1080 60.000000 Hz 16:9 67.500 kHz 148.500000 MHz
Detailed Timing Descriptors:
DTD 1: 1920x1080 60.000000 Hz 16:9 67.500 kHz 148.500000 MHz (527 mm x 296 mm)
Hfront 88 Hsync 44 Hback 148 Hpol P
Vfront 4 Vsync 5 Vback 36 Vpol P
Display Product Serial Number: '5D8TL23'
Display Product Name: 'DELL S2421HGF'
Display Range Limits:
Monitor ranges (GTF): 48-144 Hz V, 30-170 kHz H, max dotclock 340 MHz
Extension blocks: 1
Checksum: 0xff
----------------
Block 1, CTA-861 Extension Block:
Revision: 3
Underscans IT Video Formats by default
Basic audio support
Supports YCbCr 4:4:4
Supports YCbCr 4:2:2
Native detailed modes: 1
Video Data Block:
VIC 16: 1920x1080 60.000000 Hz 16:9 67.500 kHz 148.500000 MHz (native)
VIC 5: 1920x1080i 60.000000 Hz 16:9 33.750 kHz 74.250000 MHz
VIC 4: 1280x720 60.000000 Hz 16:9 45.000 kHz 74.250000 MHz
VIC 3: 720x480 59.940060 Hz 16:9 31.469 kHz 27.000000 MHz
VIC 2: 720x480 59.940060 Hz 4:3 31.469 kHz 27.000000 MHz
VIC 7: 1440x480i 59.940060 Hz 16:9 15.734 kHz 27.000000 MHz
VIC 22: 1440x576i 50.000000 Hz 16:9 15.625 kHz 27.000000 MHz
VIC 1: 640x480 59.940476 Hz 4:3 31.469 kHz 25.175000 MHz
VIC 20: 1920x1080i 50.000000 Hz 16:9 28.125 kHz 74.250000 MHz
VIC 31: 1920x1080 50.000000 Hz 16:9 56.250 kHz 148.500000 MHz
VIC 18: 720x576 50.000000 Hz 16:9 31.250 kHz 27.000000 MHz
VIC 19: 1280x720 50.000000 Hz 16:9 37.500 kHz 74.250000 MHz
VIC 6: 1440x480i 59.940060 Hz 4:3 15.734 kHz 27.000000 MHz
VIC 17: 720x576 50.000000 Hz 4:3 31.250 kHz 27.000000 MHz
VIC 21: 1440x576i 50.000000 Hz 4:3 15.625 kHz 27.000000 MHz
VIC 63: 1920x1080 120.000000 Hz 16:9 135.000 kHz 297.000000 MHz
VIC 64: 1920x1080 100.000000 Hz 16:9 112.500 kHz 297.000000 MHz
Audio Data Block:
Linear PCM:
Max channels: 2
Supported sample rates (kHz): 48 44.1 32
Supported sample sizes (bits): 24 20 16
Speaker Allocation Data Block:
FL/FR - Front Left/Right
Vendor-Specific Data Block (HDMI), OUI 00-0C-03:
Source physical address: 2.0.0.0
Maximum TMDS clock: 340 MHz
Vendor-Specific Data Block (AMD), OUI 00-00-1A:
Version: 1.1
Minimum Refresh Rate: 48 Hz
Maximum Refresh Rate: 144 Hz
Flags 1.x: 0xe6 (MCCS)
Detailed Timing Descriptors:
DTD 2: 1920x1080 119.982181 Hz 16:9 137.260 kHz 285.500000 MHz (527 mm x 296 mm)
Hfront 48 Hsync 32 Hback 80 Hpol P
Vfront 3 Vsync 5 Vback 56 Vpol N
DTD 3: 1920x1080 143.855701 Hz 16:9 162.269 kHz 337.520000 MHz (527 mm x 296 mm)
Hfront 48 Hsync 32 Hback 80 Hpol P
Vfront 3 Vsync 5 Vback 40 Vpol N
Checksum: 0x4b
freeartist-devuan@devuan:~/Downloads/amd-catalyst-15.9-linux-installer-15.201.1151-x86.x86_64$ linux/bsd at desktop its sado-mazo game/toy for geeks/nerds with absolutely no warranty and antifool protection ©![]()
linux have unprofessional bazar type of development by amators and to amators ![]()
pyzNi 3.14zDa! ![]()
Offline
how set refresh above 75Hz?
>>>"75" 174.57 1920 1968 2000 2080 1080 1083 1088 1119 + - >>>"120" 285.55 1920 1968 2000 2080 1080 1083 1088 1144 + - >>>"120" 264.00 1920 1944 1976 2000 1080 1083 1088 1100 + + >>>"120" 274.56 1920 1928 1960 2000 1080 1130 1138 1144 + - >>>"100" 220.00 1920 1944 1976 2000 1080 1083 1088 1100 + + >>>"100" 235.67 1920 1968 200 2080 1080 1083 1088 1133 + -
Probably by specifying modelines that aren't trash. Get rid of those and use xcvt (e.g. cvt -r 1920 1080 120) or a decent online calculator.
Are you copy-pasting random forum threads from 2012 or what?
Even with suitable modelines, a Radeon HD5770 has HDMI 1.3 and displayport 1.1. It won't have enough bandwidth to do 1080p at more than 75Hz over HDMI, and it probably won't over DP either unless you disable audio and screw around with module parameters.
Your monitor might be able to do 144Hz FHD, but it wasn't a thing when that GPU was made.
'read-edid' is almost as ancient, and it won't work as intended with a modern monitor either.
Aside, ahem:
free driver does not detect refresh rates above 60Hz
...
/Downloads/amd-catalyst-15.9-linux-installer-15.201.1151-x86.x86_64
That is not the free driver, it's an ancient (~2015) proprietary installer from outside the repositories (just like Don'tBreakDebian cautions you about), and I'm fairly sure it doesn't even support the HD5770 or load on a modern kernel. How and why is it involved?
Last edited by steve_v (Yesterday 09:48:06)
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
Offline
have employed or had so both cards, however for use on an old mac pro;
especially the 6770 was sought after at the time, since it could very well perform for mac os x 10.6+ ]
<>
however have sadly no real high refresh monitor so the "advice" is not tested since my monitor dont go over 75hz (on vga analog only, one monitor can do it also via dvi) ] besides older crt monitor but that one is not in use.
the chit-chat give passable responses for technical question, here is what he responded.
Max Resolution & Refresh Rates by PortDisplayPort 1.2 or Dual-Link DVI: 2560 × 1600 at 60Hz is the hard limit. You cannot run a 4K monitor at native resolution on this card.HDMI (Version 1.4a): 1920 × 1200 at 60Hz. Note that while the port can push standard 1080p (1920 × 1080), it is locked to a max of 60Hz over HDMI due to early generation firmware limitations.VGA (Analog): 2048 × 1536 at 85Hz.
that is what my experience would also have told you, if you have a high refresh monitor , and your resolution is not in the listing of the supported refresh modes (normally found in manual) you most probably would have to lower your resolution to achieve higher refresh rate (as was the case for most not-high-end crt probably)
Max Resolution Limits for HD 5770DisplayPort (or Mini-DisplayPort) & Dual-Link DVI: Hard limited to 2560 × 1600 at 60Hz.HDMI: Hard limited to 1920 × 1200 at 60Hz.VGA (Analog): Hard limited to 2048 × 1536 at 85Hz.
at the moment for the older mac am using hd 4870 since found that the card is still capable and function thad better with newer macos ] but that is not what you have asked for.
basically, you will be "locked" into the capabilities of your gpu, and software-overrides wont "squeeze" the direct high-refresh rates say on one of those newer 100hz monitors it would suggest, but could be wrong on this (since it supporting 2560x1600 at 60hz it could or should very well support 1920x1200x100hz, but you most certainly will find difficulty finding it to support 2560-1600x120hz, if such a panel exists on market outside laptop space yet).
Last edited by kapqa (Yesterday 16:55:53)
Offline
since it supporting 2560x1600 at 60hz it could or should very well support 1920x1200x100hz
Over displayport or dual-link DVI, yes. Over HDMI (which OP appears to be using), not a chance. You'll likely find somewhere in the fine print that that "max" resolution is supported over DL-DVI only, and HDMI-out is specced for 1080@60.
HDMI was always about AV / home theatre, and it prioritises multichannel audio and long cable runs over raw video bandwidth. TVs didn't generally do 4k or high refresh rates in 2009 anyway, so nobody cared.
The limitation is the physical signal transport, no random modelines or screwing about with drivers will change it. Expecting to drive a modern "gaming" monitor to its full capabilities with a GPU from 2009 and a transport of the same vintage is an exercise in futility.
If one could find a modern monitor that still has (good) DVI support this janky quest might get a bit further, but good luck with that too - DVI is also thoroughly obsolete.
As for what that card can do over displayport... get a cable and find out. Should be as good as DVI, but firmware limitations may apply. DP was still kinda new at the time and all that.
Last edited by steve_v (Yesterday 10:49:54)
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
Offline
the chit-chat give passable responses for technical question, here is what he responded.
Max Resolution & Refresh Rates by PortDisplayPort 1.2 or Dual-Link DVI: 2560 × 1600 at 60Hz is the hard limit. You cannot run a 4K monitor at native resolution on this card.HDMI (Version 1.4a): 1920 × 1200 at 60Hz. Note that while the port can push standard 1080p (1920 × 1080), it is locked to a max of 60Hz over HDMI due to early generation firmware limitations.VGA (Analog): 2048 × 1536 at 85Hz.
AI slop? Sorry.
Are you copy-pasting random forum threads from 2012 or what?
Why? No, I take it from my previous Nvidia gf9800 card where 75, 120hz modes are work good
I used CRU utility for calculation.
https://customresolutionutility.net/
Also i i try this, but not help too
freeartist-devuan@devuan:~/Downloads/cru/cvt12$ ./cvt12 --h
Description: This program generates video timing descriptions using formulas
from the VESA "CVT" (Coordinated Video Timing) v1.1 specification, based
itself on the earlier VESA "GTF" (Generalized Timing Formula) v1.0
specification.
usage: ./cvt12 x y refresh [-v|--verbose]
[-r|--reduced-blank] [-i|--interlaced]
[-f|--fbmode] [-x|-xf86mode]
[-b|--rb-v2] [-o|--film-optimized]
x : The desired horizontal resolution (required).
y : The desired vertical resolution (required).
refresh : The desired refresh rate (required).
-v|--verbose : Enable verbose printouts (traces each step of the computation).
-r|--reduced-blank : Use CVT 1.1 "Reduced Blanking" timings
Only allows multiple of 60hz.
-c|--force-rb : Force CVT 1.1 "Reduced Blanking" timings
Do not check for multiple of 60hz.
-b|--rb-v2 : Use CVT 1.2 "Reduced Blanking" timings, this is more precise.
Allows any refresh rate.
-o|--film-optimized : Change refresh rate for better video support. Requires -b
(ie. converts 24hz to 23.976hz)
This is the same as passing 23.976 without -o,
-o does the calculation for you.
-i|--interlaced : Generate an interlaced video mode.
-f|--fbmode : Output an fbset(8)-style mode description.
-x|-xf86mode : output an XFree86-style mode description (this is the default
if no mode description is requested).
freeartist-devuan@devuan:~/Downloads/cru/cvt12$ It won't have enough bandwidth to do 1080p at more than 75Hz over HDMI, and it probably won't over DP either unless you disable audio and screw around with module parameters.
Your monitor might be able to do 144Hz FHD, but it wasn't a thing when that GPU was made.
'read-edid' is almost as ancient, and it won't work as intended with a modern monitor either.
And why all modes present and works under Windows 11 with old Radeon driver after i am apply this patch?
https://www.monitortests.com/forum/Thre … ck-Patcher
Aside, ahem:
free driver does not detect refresh rates above 60Hz
/Downloads/amd-catalyst-15.9-linux-installer-15.201.1151-x86.x86_64
That is not the free driver, it's an ancient (~2015) proprietary installer from outside the repositories (just like Don'tBreakDebian cautions you about), and I'm fairly sure it doesn't even support the HD5770 or load on a modern kernel. How and why is it involved?
Its just folder. I am downloaded but not used them when i seen that driver old.
Here my graphics info
root@devuan:/home/freeartist-devuan# glxinfo -B
name of display: :0.0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
Extended renderer info (GLX_MESA_query_renderer):
Vendor: Mesa (0x1002)
Device: AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.50.0 / 6.12.90+deb13.1-amd64, LLVM 19.1.7) (0x68b8)
Version: 25.0.7
Accelerated: yes
Video memory: 1024MB
Unified memory: no
Preferred profile: core (0x1)
Max core profile version: 4.5
Max compat profile version: 4.5
Max GLES1 profile version: 1.1
Max GLES[23] profile version: 3.1
Memory info (GL_ATI_meminfo):
VBO free memory - total: 1023 MB, largest block: 1023 MB
VBO free aux. memory - total: 1021 MB, largest block: 1021 MB
Texture free memory - total: 1023 MB, largest block: 1023 MB
Texture free aux. memory - total: 1021 MB, largest block: 1021 MB
Renderbuffer free memory - total: 1023 MB, largest block: 1023 MB
Renderbuffer free aux. memory - total: 1021 MB, largest block: 1021 MB
Memory info (GL_NVX_gpu_memory_info):
Dedicated video memory: 1024 MB
Total available memory: 2045 MB
Currently available dedicated video memory: 1023 MB
OpenGL vendor string: Mesa
OpenGL renderer string: AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.50.0 / 6.12.90+deb13.1-amd64, LLVM 19.1.7)
OpenGL core profile version string: 4.5 (Core Profile) Mesa 25.0.7-2
OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 4.50
OpenGL core profile context flags: (none)
OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile
OpenGL version string: 4.5 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 25.0.7-2
OpenGL shading language version string: 4.50
OpenGL context flags: (none)
OpenGL profile mask: compatibility profile
OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.1 Mesa 25.0.7-2
OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.10
root@devuan:/home/freeartist-devuan# So, its seems free radeon driver bug?
Last edited by deepforest (Yesterday 14:31:17)
linux/bsd at desktop its sado-mazo game/toy for geeks/nerds with absolutely no warranty and antifool protection ©![]()
linux have unprofessional bazar type of development by amators and to amators ![]()
pyzNi 3.14zDa! ![]()
Offline
I take it from my previous Nvidia gf9800 card
Which almost certainly has different pixel-clock and timing limits. Most 9800s don't even have an HDMI port.
I used CRU utility for calculation.
So, you're using a utility for writing mode entries to the registry on Window Vista... to generate modelines for X11. And you're actually wondering why that doesn't work? The mind boggles.
And why all modes present and works under Windows 11 with old Radeon driver after i am apply this patch?
https://www.monitortests.com/forum/Thre … ck-Patcher
Because it's a hack. The HDMI 1.3 spec does not define the modes you are trying to use, so the GPU firmware and drivers do not define them or support the clocks needed for them either.
The open-source radeon driver aims to reproduce the functionality of the OEM AMD driver, not an unofficial third-party "patcher". ATI/AMD put those limits there on purpose, honouring them isn't a bug.
Here my graphics info
GLX has nothing to do with pixel clocks or mode timings.
So, its seems free radeon driver bug?
It seems that if you want to apply a similar hack to the radeon driver, it's open-source and you're free to do so. Not implementing hacks to support things the hardware was never designed to do is not a bug.
By all means report it, but don't expect anyone to get real excited about "fixing" it with any kind of urgency.
Last edited by steve_v (Yesterday 16:21:39)
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
Offline
So, you're using a utility for writing mode entries to the registry on Window Vista... to generate modelines for X11. And you're actually wondering why that doesn't work? The mind boggles.
it doesn't matter how generate timings
i tried original cvt and different variants all same - no signal
also 75hz is mode i take directly from my previous nvidia card and its works here
but all above 75hz not work for radeon but was working at gf9800, why?
GLX has nothing to do with pixel clocks or mode timings.
i just whant show that i use free driver
Because it's a hack.
maybe but its works
HDMI 1.3 spec does not define the modes you are trying to use
proof?
Last edited by deepforest (Yesterday 19:36:46)
linux/bsd at desktop its sado-mazo game/toy for geeks/nerds with absolutely no warranty and antifool protection ©![]()
linux have unprofessional bazar type of development by amators and to amators ![]()
pyzNi 3.14zDa! ![]()
Offline
proof?
Right in front of you: That card, with it's official drivers, is HDMI 1.3 compliant. It doesn't support 1080p at more at more than 60Hz according to it's spec sheet, or more than 75Hz without hacks, as you have found.
If 1080p@120 was required by HDMI 1.3 and the card couldn't do it, ATI couldn't put the HDMI 1.3 logo on the box.
The official HDMI specification documents are a pain to get, but one can snarf one here. HDMI is a spec written by cartels.
Here is a lazy table with *some* of the common specs in a more digestible format.
The HDMI 1.3 spec does not actually define resolutions itself, rather referencing CEA-861-D and VESA (2000). Most of the relevant documents can be found here.
Note there is no "maximum refresh rate" as such, but there is a maximum signal bandwidth in MHz - this is what your hack removes. There's no real hard limit on this frequency, but anything over the spec is effectively "overclocking", which is why the driver doesn't allow it unless you "patch" it.
The card can probably go higher, a good quality cable probably can as well if it's short... But there were no standard VESA or CEC modes and no capable monitors for (e.g.) 1080p@120Hz in 2006, so it's not a required capability to hit certification and ATI didn't check it was within their clock limits.
A more relevant question is probably "why". Unless this is just a "because I want to" exercise, there's not much point - nothing that will run on that card at such high framerates will actually benefit from them.
Last edited by steve_v (Today 10:54:35)
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
Offline
Right in front of you: That card, with it's official drivers, is HDMI 1.3 compliant.
Most 9800s don't even have an HDMI port.
ok, how at linux at gf9800 i can get 75, 120hz via dvi > hdmi connector without any hacks?
i try use same dvi > hdmi connector at radeon, yes i see many detected modes 75, 100, 120, 144 but no one works
ps
So, you're using a utility for writing mode entries to the registry on Window Vista... to generate modelines for X11
i take only numbers from cru to set up xrandr mode
Last edited by deepforest (Today 17:08:15)
linux/bsd at desktop its sado-mazo game/toy for geeks/nerds with absolutely no warranty and antifool protection ©![]()
linux have unprofessional bazar type of development by amators and to amators ![]()
pyzNi 3.14zDa! ![]()
Offline