You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I've formatted one of my usb drives as ext4 as I wanted fast drive for linux systems.
Unfortunately the drive is facemeltingly slow, not only in write but in read too. And I don't now if this is hardware, or vendor related or if it's just a Linux thing (tm).
Should I unironically stick with NTFS, as it can give me better I/O? Are there any downsides of using Msft file system with Linux?
Last edited by uther (2020-10-11 09:49:15)
soystemd-free diet
Offline
Some thoughts to that:
* Use ext2 instead of ext3/4, no journal so should be faster. Linux permissions.
* Use exfat. Pro: can be read on Win7/8/9/10 too. Does not have the FAT32 limitations. Downside: no Linux permissions.
* Same for NTFS.
rolfie
Offline
Use ext2 instead of ext3/4, no journal so should be faster.
It is possible to disable the journal for ext4:
# tune2fs -O "^has_journal" /dev/sdXY
But f2fs is probably a better option for a USB stick and anyway I don't think the filesystem will make much difference because the USB port itself is the bottleneck.
@OP: is this USB2 or USB3? What are the actual speeds you experience?
See https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Benchmarking#dd for a simple, repeatable way to benchmark the device.
Brianna Ghey — Rest In Power
Offline
Thanks rolfie. After format to ext2 the drive is a lot faster.
HoaS - thanks for the tip, USB3. Sometimes the drive were completly unresponsive while browsing with Thunar. Every file transfer took several minutes to start. With mid-size and large files the transfer speeds dropped pretty quickly to ~10MB, and between every file during copying there was a 10-20 sec delay.
After format most of this issues are gone.
soystemd-free diet
Offline
Pages: 1