You are not logged in.
Hi guys,
I am trying to figure out if Devuan Chimaera plays nice with Virtualbox, so far I encountered some issues that Debian testing doesn't have. For example I cannot share folders from W10 host to Devuan guest while I can with Debian Testing. There are some modules missing in Devuan, I have not idea if this depends by the fact that Virtualbox is so tied to systemd right now.
That is a real shame a Virtual Linux Machine is a fundamental part of my daily workflow and it would be fantastic working again with Devuan. Actually I used to work with Devuan Ascii for one year on a MacOS host with Virtualbox and stuff like shared folders worked fine.
Are there any known issues of which I am unaware?
Offline
No issues here with latest VB directly from Oracle on Beowulf and Chimaera as guest. No issues with systemd.
Have you installed the extension pack?
rolfie
Offline
Yes of course, I also installed the Guest Addition but no traces of vboxdrv, and vboxsf and vboxvideo exist as modules but won't load even if I put in /etc/modules/modules.conf.
On the same HOST I have also Debian testing which works perfectly with all these features available...
Offline
I am running 6.1.10 directly from Oracle, installed with dpkg -i. Extension pack installed, and guest extensions in each of my old and new virtual machines.
Had some fun to get it working on Beowulf, see https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=3641.
Maybe it helps. Good luck, rolfie
Offline
Are there any known issues of which I am unaware?
VirtualBox is a buggy pile of shite which is slower than QEMU/KVM and the developers have a tendency of covering up and ignoring security issues.
See also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo … bug=794466
And it relies on blobs.
Brianna Ghey — Rest In Power
Offline
Danielsan wrote:Are there any known issues of which I am unaware?
VirtualBox is a buggy pile of shite which is slower than QEMU/KVM and the developers have a tendency of covering up and ignoring security issues.
See also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo … bug=794466
And it relies on blobs.
I see, but the other alternative I have on Windows is hyper-v of M$ which is even worst.
Offline
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:Danielsan wrote:Are there any known issues of which I am unaware?
VirtualBox is a buggy pile of shite which is slower than QEMU/KVM and the developers have a tendency of covering up and ignoring security issues.
See also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo … bug=794466
And it relies on blobs.
I see, but the other alternative I have on Windows is hyper-v of M$ which is even worst.
So not a good alternative at all then, thread solved! LOL
Offline
but the other alternative I have on Windows is hyper-v of M$
QEMU is available for Windows: https://www.qemu.org/2017/11/22/haxm-usage-windows/
Brianna Ghey — Rest In Power
Offline
VirtualBox is a buggy pile of shite which is slower than QEMU/KVM and the developers have a tendency of covering up and ignoring security issues.
See also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo … bug=794466
And it relies on blobs.
Maybe you're right. But for me VBox does what I expect it to do. I can pass through USB drives w/o any problem, UEFI mode is sort of crap but available. I can boot a VM from an iso, ....
Tried the same with qemu/kvm and gave up when bold promoters of qemu/kvm didn't have any advise how to solve my issues. I guess this highly promoted piece of SW still requires a lot of brains to really make it a competition for VBox.
rolfie
Offline
pass through USB drives
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/QE … USB_device
UEFI mode
# apt install ovmf
kvm -m 4G -cdrom devuan.iso -bios /usr/share/ovmf/OVMF.fd
See also http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=144775
EDIT: or just use gnome-boxes, which offers USB pass-through OOTB with no configuration required.
Last edited by Head_on_a_Stick (2020-07-27 20:52:12)
Brianna Ghey — Rest In Power
Offline