You are not logged in.
Congratulations and many thanks :-)
Offline
thanks to all involved for the great work.
I was using ascii (2.1) After including the beowulf repositories in sources.list and running
suo apt-get update
I ran
sudo apt-get upgrade
everything went smoothly.
I want to work for a few days before I run
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
Will it be correct to claim that I am now running beowulf, or am I still on ascii.
Offline
Hi
You are on ascii-stein (as in Frrankenstein the monster). Almost no new features are being installed. Only packages that requires no new dependencies or removals are being updated. But if it stable at the moment wait until you feel ready to finish the upgrade. Good luck with your upgrade
Have a nice day
Lars H
Offline
Note that the Debian buster release notes advise to use
# apt full-upgrade
to upgrade from stretch so that should probably also be used for ASCII.
Reference: https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/ … ng.en.html
EDIT: your system will be far less reliable if you've just added the beowulf sources and used apt-get upgrade.
Last edited by Head_on_a_Stick (2020-06-20 11:09:42)
Brianna Ghey — Rest In Power
Offline
Looks like it's been this week's DistroWatch Weekly review.
Offline
Looks like it's been this week's DistroWatch Weekly review.
Pretty good review too, brings up some minor details like runit and the installer but overall pretty decent.
Edit: interesting tidbit Jessie brought up in regards to the difference in the live installation and the install media, apparently the live installer which is refracta-installer gains 20% percent more resource usage over the devuan/debian installer? Perhaps refracta is picking up more resources than it needs to in some instances?
Last edited by HevyDevy (2020-06-22 13:53:29)
Offline
Edit: interesting tidbit Jessie brought up in regards to the difference in the live installation and the install media, apparently the live installer which is refracta-installer gains 20% percent more resource usage over the devuan/debian installer?
I saw that, and I don't know what's causing it. The live does have some extra packages and some of those have scripts in /etc/init.d, but I don't see anything running in 'ps ax' such as live-boot or haveged. Maybe the difference is due to the desktop-live having gvfs-backends installed. I don't have two clean installs to compare right now, and I'm kinda burned out on installing. Will have to remember to look at this later.
Offline
Looks like it's been this week's DistroWatch Weekly review.
to save seaching for it, it's here:
Offline
Edit: interesting tidbit Jessie brought up in regards to the difference in the live installation and the install media, apparently the live installer which is refracta-installer gains 20% percent more resource usage over the devuan/debian installer?
I saw that, and I don't know what's causing it. The live does have some extra packages and some of those have scripts in /etc/init.d, but I don't see anything running in 'ps ax' such as live-boot or haveged. Maybe the difference is due to the desktop-live having gvfs-backends installed. I don't have two clean installs to compare right now, and I'm kinda burned out on installing. Will have to remember to look at this later.
Ive enough bandwidth now to see if this is true or not, ill likely do some installs over the weekend.
Last edited by HevyDevy (2020-06-22 15:12:51)
Offline
Ok i did some installs today.
one netinstall and one minimal live install on bare metal partitions multibooting.
Not much difference in the two in my opinion, slightly higher ram for refracta not much though only 5mb.
So uptime of 1 minute from bootup refracta install had 91 mb and netinstall had 86.
cpu usage was nominal on both same with processes at around 130 for both.
I did notice brltty was running as a top process on the refracta install and not on the netinstall, could this be a performance hit?
Edit: ill keep them installed for awhile if there is anything specific you would like to see fsmithred.
Last edited by HevyDevy (2020-06-23 12:13:17)
Offline
HevyDevy, thanks for checking that. If you have ps_mem.py, I'd like to see the output.
Offline
here you go.
netinstall ...
Private + Shared = RAM used Program
112.0 KiB + 61.5 KiB = 173.5 KiB sleep
120.0 KiB + 62.5 KiB = 182.5 KiB run-parts
88.0 KiB + 115.5 KiB = 203.5 KiB sh
100.0 KiB + 115.5 KiB = 215.5 KiB apt-compat
216.0 KiB + 91.5 KiB = 307.5 KiB anacron
300.0 KiB + 130.5 KiB = 430.5 KiB init
312.0 KiB + 169.5 KiB = 481.5 KiB cron
584.0 KiB + 282.5 KiB = 866.5 KiB dbus-daemon
452.0 KiB + 419.5 KiB = 871.5 KiB su
664.0 KiB + 319.5 KiB = 983.5 KiB login
616.0 KiB + 672.5 KiB = 1.3 MiB getty (5)
2.8 MiB + 330.5 KiB = 3.1 MiB udevd
2.8 MiB + 494.5 KiB = 3.3 MiB bluetoothd
2.1 MiB + 1.6 MiB = 3.6 MiB bash (2)
3.6 MiB + 258.5 KiB = 3.8 MiB dhclient
3.9 MiB + 121.5 KiB = 4.0 MiB rsyslogd
---------------------------------
23.7 MiB
=================================
refracta install ...
Private + Shared = RAM used Program
124.0 KiB + 47.5 KiB = 171.5 KiB acpi_fakekeyd
192.0 KiB + 86.5 KiB = 278.5 KiB acpid
208.0 KiB + 72.5 KiB = 280.5 KiB atd
224.0 KiB + 77.5 KiB = 301.5 KiB gpm
324.0 KiB + 113.5 KiB = 437.5 KiB init
316.0 KiB + 151.5 KiB = 467.5 KiB cron
616.0 KiB + 266.5 KiB = 882.5 KiB dbus-daemon
600.0 KiB + 681.5 KiB = 1.3 MiB getty (5)
1.0 MiB + 312.5 KiB = 1.3 MiB login
1.1 MiB + 404.5 KiB = 1.5 MiB sudo
1.3 MiB + 254.5 KiB = 1.6 MiB sshd
1.6 MiB + 207.5 KiB = 1.8 MiB rsyslogd
1.7 MiB + 113.5 KiB = 1.8 MiB elogind-daemon
1.7 MiB + 252.5 KiB = 1.9 MiB ntpd
2.4 MiB + 477.5 KiB = 2.8 MiB brltty
2.6 MiB + 217.5 KiB = 2.8 MiB bash
2.8 MiB + 263.5 KiB = 3.1 MiB udevd
---------------------------------
22.7 MiB
=================================
Edit: the netinstall was as basic an install as you can get, just standard system utils and nothing else under sysV as init on both. Looks like refracta installer is a bit better at user desired input like sudo, elogind-daemon and acpid etc, i suppose that is from what the live session uses as the install media for both live and netinstall differ a great deal in size. Still i dont see much of any resource hogging on either installs, but that is just my experience.
Last edited by HevyDevy (2020-06-23 14:25:31)
Offline
seems like the refracta one is not connected to the net.
Offline
I did find a relatively untouched desktop-live install in a VM. Here's 'ps_mem.py' and 'free -m' outputs. I don't have a netinstall desktop right now.
Private + Shared = RAM used Program
156.0 KiB + 37.0 KiB = 193.0 KiB uuidd
188.0 KiB + 33.0 KiB = 221.0 KiB acpid
204.0 KiB + 30.5 KiB = 234.5 KiB sh
268.0 KiB + 61.0 KiB = 329.0 KiB rtkit-daemon
280.0 KiB + 53.5 KiB = 333.5 KiB init
312.0 KiB + 75.0 KiB = 387.0 KiB cron
360.0 KiB + 89.5 KiB = 449.5 KiB dbus-launch
436.0 KiB + 27.0 KiB = 463.0 KiB mdadm
488.0 KiB + 44.0 KiB = 532.0 KiB rpc.idmapd
692.0 KiB + 39.0 KiB = 731.0 KiB ssh-agent
508.0 KiB + 225.0 KiB = 733.0 KiB rpcbind
628.0 KiB + 126.0 KiB = 754.0 KiB gpg-agent
668.0 KiB + 177.5 KiB = 845.5 KiB xfconfd
380.0 KiB + 510.5 KiB = 890.5 KiB avahi-daemon (2)
692.0 KiB + 263.5 KiB = 955.5 KiB gvfsd-metadata
544.0 KiB + 448.0 KiB = 992.0 KiB su
276.0 KiB + 744.0 KiB = 1.0 MiB saned (2)
876.0 KiB + 197.0 KiB = 1.0 MiB rpc.statd
844.0 KiB + 291.5 KiB = 1.1 MiB at-spi2-registryd
740.0 KiB + 422.0 KiB = 1.1 MiB getty (6)
1.0 MiB + 403.0 KiB = 1.4 MiB at-spi-bus-launcher
936.0 KiB + 575.5 KiB = 1.5 MiB gvfsd
1.4 MiB + 167.5 KiB = 1.5 MiB ntpd
1.3 MiB + 274.5 KiB = 1.6 MiB xscreensaver
1.6 MiB + 115.5 KiB = 1.7 MiB exim4
1.7 MiB + 83.0 KiB = 1.8 MiB elogind-daemon
1.6 MiB + 309.5 KiB = 1.9 MiB bluetoothd
1.9 MiB + 121.0 KiB = 2.0 MiB rsyslogd
1.4 MiB + 809.5 KiB = 2.1 MiB gvfsd-trash
1.6 MiB + 641.5 KiB = 2.2 MiB upowerd
1.8 MiB + 525.5 KiB = 2.3 MiB dbus-daemon (3)
1.6 MiB + 761.0 KiB = 2.3 MiB cupsd
2.4 MiB + 352.5 KiB = 2.8 MiB dhclient
1.7 MiB + 1.1 MiB = 2.8 MiB cups-browsed
2.3 MiB + 469.5 KiB = 2.8 MiB polkitd
2.6 MiB + 260.0 KiB = 2.9 MiB udevd
1.8 MiB + 1.2 MiB = 3.0 MiB bash (2)
2.1 MiB + 1.2 MiB = 3.2 MiB gvfs-udisks2-volume-monitor
1.9 MiB + 1.3 MiB = 3.3 MiB panel-6-systray
2.2 MiB + 1.2 MiB = 3.4 MiB xfce4-session
2.2 MiB + 1.7 MiB = 4.0 MiB panel-2-actions
3.3 MiB + 1.4 MiB = 4.7 MiB xfsettingsd
4.3 MiB + 1.7 MiB = 6.1 MiB xfce4-notifyd
4.3 MiB + 2.0 MiB = 6.3 MiB xfwm4
6.3 MiB + 1.3 MiB = 7.6 MiB udisksd
5.6 MiB + 2.3 MiB = 7.9 MiB xfce4-panel
7.2 MiB + 1.4 MiB = 8.6 MiB wicd-monitor
9.2 MiB + 870.5 KiB = 10.1 MiB wicd
9.2 MiB + 978.5 KiB = 10.2 MiB slim
10.2 MiB + 1.6 MiB = 11.8 MiB tumblerd
12.0 MiB + 1.5 MiB = 13.6 MiB pulseaudio
8.3 MiB + 6.7 MiB = 15.0 MiB polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1
12.1 MiB + 5.6 MiB = 17.7 MiB xfce4-terminal
15.2 MiB + 4.0 MiB = 19.3 MiB xfdesktop
13.1 MiB + 6.2 MiB = 19.3 MiB xfce4-power-manager
12.7 MiB + 6.9 MiB = 19.6 MiB Thunar
17.8 MiB + 3.0 MiB = 20.8 MiB wicd-client
20.0 MiB + 1.5 MiB = 21.6 MiB applet.py
43.4 MiB + 6.7 MiB = 50.2 MiB Xorg
---------------------------------
333.6 MiB
=================================
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 1990 286 1456 3 247 1563
Swap: 255 0 255
Offline
Congrats for the release!!!
Until when, ASCII will be supported?
When is the time limit, for upgrading to stable?
Offline
Through Refracta, this is the Devuan that I was looking for. I can leave my previous daily distro behind and not feel bad at all about hating on Poetteringware now.
Many thanks to all the great developers, testers, and support community for getting us this far.
Last edited by brocashelm (2020-06-29 15:35:58)
Offline