The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#2326 Re: Other Issues » Problems with an update/grub-customizer. » 2018-11-12 20:22:53

Please post your sources.list.  When I searched our pkginfo.devuan.org I got this:

0 results for "grub-customizer_4.0.6_i386.deb" in any (in 16.058632ms)

#2327 Re: Installation » How do I create a configured raspberry image? » 2018-11-10 17:56:52

I think that the arm-sdk toolkit should do what you want.  There are other flavors of SDK here if you want to explore further.

#2328 Re: Devuan Derivatives » Anyone install Kali tools on Devuan? [solved] » 2018-11-10 00:42:57

ball wrote:
golinux wrote:
ball wrote:

I'm well aware. I was suggesting using katoolin on Devuan or MX Linux.

MX Linux just has sysvinit enabled according to Debian's instructions.  All of systemd is still intact and can be enabled at user's request.  So how would that be different than trying katoolin on Debian itself?

MX Linux does not have systemd installed by default, and they strongly urge users not to use it.

You just repeated what I said.  I suspect you don't understand that systemd disabled by default still leaves active systemd elements and hooks.  Devuan removes those.

#2329 Re: Devuan Derivatives » Anyone install Kali tools on Devuan? [solved] » 2018-11-09 19:54:08

ball wrote:

I'm well aware. I was suggesting using katoolin on Devuan or MX Linux.

MX Linux just has sysvinit enabled according to Debian's instructions.  All of systemd is still intact and can be enabled at user's request.  So how would that be different than trying katoolin on Debian itself?

#2331 Re: Forum Feedback » Disconnect / Reconnect » 2018-11-08 14:56:59

Welcome! I don't quite understand your question but I may know the answer.  When you login, there is an option to stay logged in (or something like that).  Just tick that box and you won't get bit by the timeout bug.

#2333 Re: Installation » Sources List all Non-Free ? » 2018-11-08 00:59:15

kuleszdl wrote:

Well, the question that remains open to me is why such an important question is asked only in expert installs? I see a heavy conflict with this behavior of the installer and the statement posted on the website about non free-firmware (at https://devuan.org/os/source-code)

The website warns about enabling these repositories and even recommends consulting a lawyer before using non-free firmware, but the installer loads it by default without asking? I thought this must have been some misunderstanding, but I just actually tested this on a system with Intel 5300 Wifi and indeed the installer does not ask at all and silently loads the non-free firmware. mad

That statement was written a long time ago and I agree that section should be updated to explain the current policy.

Imho, even if the installer finds hardware that needs non-free firmware, who says the user wants to use this hardware at all? If the Devuan policy is that non-free firmware might be harmful and only enabled with care, the installer imho should not decide this for users only in expert mode.

I remember the debate but not the details for the decision to install non-free make non-free available to install if needed so have requested clarification of how that came about.  As soon as I know, you will too.

#2334 Re: Installation » Sources List all Non-Free ? » 2018-11-08 00:09:53

kuleszdl wrote:

Not sure how this is implemented, but personally, I find it unacceptable to enable these sources without asking the user for confirmation first (is this really the case?). I was also rather  disappointed to find these repos enabled by default in the embedded builds.

fsmith red explained it very clearly.

#2335 Re: Devuan » Can Devuan have kFreeBSD? » 2018-11-06 15:55:19

No chance of that happening unless we have a massive influx of devs willing to take it on.

#2336 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » How to get more up-to-date libraries & dev tools » 2018-11-05 17:33:38

@skink . . . try backports first.  You can search for newer packages here

#2337 Re: Other Issues » How to authorize for the IRC channel? » 2018-11-05 00:42:52

@sgage . . . freenode did that because of the relentless spammers,

#2339 Re: Installation » Devuan for K6-2 - 64 MB RAM - 4.3 GB HDD ? » 2018-11-03 14:33:45

Try the minimal-live disk.  You can read about it here.

#2340 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » ASCII - Some windows no scrollbars, no field borders » 2018-11-03 14:29:21

I'm not seeing gtk2-engines-xfce and gtk3-engines-xfce in that list.   desktop-base should have brought those in.  That's for jessie. I'll fire up VB later and check what's there in ascii.

Also, depending on your setup you may have to add the theme to /root

#2341 Re: Desktop and Multimedia » ASCII - Some windows no scrollbars, no field borders » 2018-11-02 17:33:02

Did you install desktop-base?  That should give you the default darkpurpy theme which uses Clearlooks-Phenix-DarkPurpy theme that includes an OB theme.  Or you can just choose that theme and not get the darkpurpy grub and login.   Note that since that was captured, the icons were recolored to a nice purpy color also.

OB theme

*Edit*  For this theme to work properly it needs GTK2 and GTK3 and something Xfce specific.   The regular clearlooks theme breaks badly in ASCII.  desktop-base pulls in all the necessaries.

#2343 Re: Installation » Sylpheed 3.5.1+2+b1 ---> 3.6.99 » 2018-10-29 22:47:18

Altoid wrote:

Hello:

golinux wrote:

Our pkginfo.devuan.org comes in handy.

Thanks for the info.

But I was using the package browser page: http://devuanpackages.viralds.it/ and could not find it.
Then I used SPM with the http://deb.devuan.org/merged/  ascii-backports  main contrib non-free repository checked and it did not show up either.

What am I missing?
.

I'm surprised that http://devuanpackages.viralds.it/ is still functional at all.  It was an early contribution to Devuan but now we have our own in-house version.  amprolla3 has a way of redirecting to Debian that might have stumped both those searches.  Links to https://pkginfo.devuan.org are all over the Devuan website along with other useful resources.  wink

#2345 Re: Other Issues » snapd on Devuan Ascii? » 2018-10-28 22:56:31

lvdave wrote:

. . . once I read here that snap on devuan was a no-go, I found that using the Clementine music program fixed that need . . .

Happy to hear that.  All's well  that ends well.  big_smile  With FLOSS there are as many ways to solve a problem as there are users.

#2346 Re: Other Issues » snapd on Devuan Ascii? » 2018-10-28 21:12:02

lvdave wrote:
sgage wrote:

Just curious - why do you need to run snaps?

Several apps I need are more easily installed/used as a snap.

Take a deep breath lvdave . . .  ( a moment of silent contemplation)

The operative phrase being "more easily installed/used".    These all-in-one apps are the fast food of software.  You can either go for a quick burger or learn how to cook and really nourish yourself.   That's a choice we all have to make.  But don't start whining if you don't find a burger on the menu at a 5 star restaurant.  And try to understand that the chefs might find it more than a tad insulting.   This community has an identity and a way of doing and liking things.  You might want to get to know us a bit better before you get all histrionic about not being able to order your favorite burger here.

#2347 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » Plymouth alternatives » 2018-10-28 15:41:10

Don't you WANT to see if there's a big red failure in those scrolling lines?

#2348 Re: Other Issues » [SOLVED] How to get these 2 apps to open maximized? » 2018-10-28 02:50:12

@willbprogz227 . . . You jogged my memory . . . A very long time ago, I used devilspie because of the lack of window management options in gnome2.   Eventually I dropped it - it was rather fussy and sometimes didn't work.  Perhaps it has improved since   I ended up using compiz to do the task which was more than a bit of overkill but great fun for a while.

#2349 Re: Other Issues » snapd on Devuan Ascii? » 2018-10-28 02:44:32

GNUser wrote:

Flatpak and AppImages work fine in Devuan ASCII and Devuan Jessie . . .

Unfortunately.  I find the concept behind these all-in-one dropins distasteful to say the least.  It just doesn't feel right in Linux . . . </rant>

#2350 Re: Other Issues » snapd on Devuan Ascii? » 2018-10-28 02:06:23

sgage wrote:

Just curious - why do you need to run snaps?

I was thinking the same exact thing.

@lvdave . . . If you want that feature, use a systemd-based OS.   It's that simple.

Board footer

Forum Software