The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#1001 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] More Nvidia 340xx woes .... » 2022-03-22 23:05:56

Hello:

myself wrote:

... seems the problem is with the wrong version of the dkms package.

I was able to fix it all by doing a manual installation:

apt -t beowulf-backports install nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver --no-install-recommends

Now ...

~$ apt list | grep installed | grep legacy-340xx
--- snip ---
libegl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libgl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx-glx/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libgles1-nvidia-legacy-340xx/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed]
libgles2-nvidia-legacy-340xx/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed]
libnvidia-legacy-340xx-cfg1/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed]
libnvidia-legacy-340xx-eglcore/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libnvidia-legacy-340xx-glcore/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libnvidia-legacy-340xx-ml1/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
nvidia-legacy-340xx-alternative/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver-bin/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver-libs/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed]
nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-support/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
nvidia-legacy-340xx-vdpau-driver/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
nvidia-settings-legacy-340xx/oldstable,now 340.108-1~deb10u1 amd64 [installed]
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-legacy-340xx/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
~$ 

I think (?) what was happening is related to what rolfie points out here:

https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35311#p35311

In any case, now it works.

Best,

A.

#1002 Installation » [SOLVED] More Nvidia 340xx woes .... » 2022-03-22 21:17:38

Altoid
Replies: 1

Hello:

After my success with updating the backported kernel in my main Beowulf box, I decided to do the same with my parallel Beowulf installation.
It lives on a separate drive in the same box, albeit with a spartan Openbox desktop which is operational but unfinished.

As I was going through the update, I noticed that it was going to Linux devuan 5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64 which when I did the same in my main box had not yet been signed.

On reboot, just like with my main box, I was not able to get X started so followed the steps I took here to get things fixed:

https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=4948

Basically install what was missing via ...

# apt -t beowulf-backports install linux-image-amd64
and
# apt -t beowulf-backports install linux-headers-amd64

But no, no cigar.

There seems to be some sort of dependency problem somewhere.
Here is what I could fish out of /var/log/apt/term.log:

Log started: 2022-03-22  17:32:49
Setting up nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms (340.108-3~deb10u1) ...
Removing old nvidia-legacy-340xx-340.108 DKMS files...

------------------------------
Deleting module version: 340.108
completely from the DKMS tree.
------------------------------
Done.
Loading new nvidia-legacy-340xx-340.108 DKMS files...
Building for 5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64
Building initial module for 5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64

Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64 (x86_64)      <---------------------------------------                    

Consult /var/lib/dkms/nvidia-legacy-340xx/340.108/build/make.log for more information.
error processing package nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms (--configure):
installed nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10
dependency problems prevent configuration of nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver:

nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver depends on nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms (= 340.108-3~deb10u1) | nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-340.108; however:
  Package nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms is not configured yet.
  Package nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-340.108 is not installed.
  Package nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms which provides nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-340.108 is not configured yet.

error processing package nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms
 nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver
Log ended: 2022-03-22  17:33:20

I did not encounter any problems when I later updated my main box from Linux devuan 5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64 to the now signed Linux devuan 5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64.

I then went looking to see what may be amiss:

uname -a gave the same printout and cat /etc/apt/sources.list shows the same in both installations:

~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
## package repositories

# Changed - 20210218 - upgrade to Beowulf

# beowulf stable
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ beowulf main contrib non-free 
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ beowulf-security main contrib non-free 
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ beowulf-updates main contrib non-free 

# needed x virtualbox backport - enable to update package
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged/ beowulf-backports main contrib non-free 

# virtual box repository x installation
deb https://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/ buster contrib non-free 
~$ 

Then I looked for anomalies in the installed 340xx packages and found that the lists were not the same:

My main box has 17 packages:

libegl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libgl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx-glx/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
	
        libgles1-nvidia-legacy-340xx/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]    <---- missing
	libgles2-nvidia-legacy-340xx/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]    <---- missing
	libnvidia-legacy-340xx-cfg1/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]     <---- missing

libnvidia-legacy-340xx-eglcore/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libnvidia-legacy-340xx-glcore/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libnvidia-legacy-340xx-ml1/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
nvidia-legacy-340xx-alternative/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver-bin/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver-libs/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed]

	nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed]    <---- bad version

nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-support/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
nvidia-legacy-340xx-vdpau-driver/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]

	nvidia-settings-legacy-340xx/oldstable,now 340.108-1~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]    <---- missing

xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-legacy-340xx/oldstable,now 340.108-3~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]

But the parallel installation has only 13 packages and the wrong version for the package that is not able to complete its job: nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms/oldstable-backports.

ie:
The working installation has nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms /oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64
The non-working installation has nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms /oldstable-backports,now 340.108-3 ~deb10u1 amd64

340.108-10~bpo10+1 is the backported driver
340.108-3 ~deb10u1 does not seem to be.

Any idea as to why this is so?
Can't figure out what is wrong or how it got like this.

I tried manually installing the missing packaged but it seems the problems is with the wrong version of the dkms package.

Thanks in advance.

Best,

A.

#1003 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Backported kernel update » 2022-03-20 18:39:15

Hello:

rolfie wrote:

... why I don't use NVidea at all.

The pair of cards were at a really great price.
Impossible to pass up or resist, for that matter.

rolfie wrote:

... run a setup for your drivers that builds the modules.
... need the headers for the new kernel ...
... need them for building the VBox kernel modules.

Yes.
I saw from the terminal that the VM that runs pihole was not up and the printout when atempting to run /sbin/vboxconfig put me up to speed.
Much more verbose in that respect than the nvidia drivers.  8^/

rolfie wrote:

... a manual process.

Sure.
Like installing a backported kernel.

rolfie wrote:

Try that:

# apt -t beowulf-backports install linux-headers-amd64

Done.
Booted into my SLiM log-it as always.

groucho@devuan:~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 (2022-02-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux
groucho@devuan:~$ 

Apparently everything runs as it should.
There may be a problem with the wicd daemon not starting right away, I'll have to look into that.

Thanks a lot for your input.

Best,

A.

#1004 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Backported kernel update » 2022-03-20 16:25:21

Hello:

rolfie wrote:

Run the previously posted command, that will  do the job.

Done.
But the system does not find the nvidia driver module so I cannot get a desktop.
Just command line.

X.Org X Server 1.20.4
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[    63.984] Build Operating System: Linux 5.10.0-10-amd64 x86_64 Debian
[    63.985] Current Operating System: Linux devuan 5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 (2022-02-03) x86_64
--- snip ---
[    64.025] (EE) NVIDIA: Failed to initialize the NVIDIA kernel module. Please see the
[    64.025] (EE) NVIDIA:     system's kernel log for additional error messages and
[    64.025] (EE) NVIDIA:     consult the NVIDIA README for details.

Makes sense that it cannot find it.
ie: whereas there are 340xx modules in /lib/modules/5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/updates/dkms ...

~$ locate 340xx
--- snip ---
/lib/modules/5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/updates/dkms/nvidia-legacy-340xx-uvm.ko
/lib/modules/5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/updates/dkms/nvidia-legacy-340xx.ko
--- snip ---

... there is no /updates or /updates/dkms directory in /lib/modules/5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64

~$ ls /lib/modules/5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64
kernel         modules.alias.bin  modules.builtin.bin      modules.dep      modules.devname  modules.softdep  modules.symbols.bin
modules.alias  modules.builtin    modules.builtin.modinfo  modules.dep.bin  modules.order    modules.symbols
~$ 

I did find this one via apt list but it is the one I have installed:

~$ apt list | grep nvidia-legacy-340xx | grep dkms
--- snip ---
nvidia-legacy-340xx-kernel-dkms/oldstable-backports,now 340.108-10~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed]
--- snip ---
~$

System's working with the previous version so it's not a serious problem.
But I don't get what has happened.

Thanks in advance.

Best,

A.

#1005 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Backported kernel update » 2022-03-20 11:54:02

Hello:

rolfie wrote:

Besides the backports kernel you may also install the backports metapackage.

I see ...
Sort of.

rolfie wrote:

... you will lose the updates of the main kernel packages ...
... get the updates from backports.

rolfie wrote:

I am using backports headers and images only, my Chimaera is running now with 5.16.

It would seem, if I understand correctly, that you have with your Chimaera) installation what I want to have with my Beowulf installation.

ie: Beowulf with a an up-to-date 5.10 backported kernel
Eventually, a couple of (or all, don't know yet) backported applications.

Not Chimaera because of the reasons posted previously.

How can I get this done?

Thanks in advance.

Best,

A.

#1006 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Backported kernel update » 2022-03-20 01:13:47

Hello:

GlennW wrote:

... use the bpo kernel.
... search for upgrades for it, linux-image...
... grab the kernel headers packages too.

I see.

apt says this:

groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo | grep -i amd64/oldstable 
--- snip ---
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
groucho@devuan:~$ 

and this:

groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo | grep -i amd64/oldstable 
--- snip ---
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
groucho@devuan:~$ 

This is what I have installed:

~$ apt list | grep linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo | grep -i amd64 | grep installed
--- snip ---
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/now 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,local]
~$ 
~$ apt list | grep linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo | grep -i amd64 | grep installed
--- snip ---
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/now 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,local]
~$ 

So ...

I just do apt install linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64?
I'm assuming the matching linux-image gets dragged along although it seems it is unsigned:

~$ apt list | grep linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64
--- snip ---
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64-dbg/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64-unsigned/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64    <-------------
~$ 

Thanks in advance.

Best,

A.

#1007 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Backported kernel update » 2022-03-19 22:24:22

Hello:

alphalpha wrote:

why not use the standard kernel?

First there's the issue of the nvidia-legacy-340xx drivers and then the demise of python 2.7.18.
There are a couple of applications that will not work in chimaera, which is why I use the backported kernel.

Thanks for your input.

Best,

A.

#1008 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Backported kernel update » 2022-03-19 22:17:34

Hello:

fsmithred wrote:

... no metapackage for backports kernels ...

I'll take your word for it.
No idea what that does.  8^/

fsmithred wrote:

... only updates you would get would be if the kernel version didn't change.

I found out about this by chance while skimming through the synaptic lists, which I do every so often.
Otherwise I have become used to apt for updating and installing.

Maybe it is because the backported kernel was installed locally?

groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo | grep installed
--- snip ---
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/now 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,local]
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.3-common/now 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 all [installed,local]
groucho@devuan:~$ 
groucho@devuan:~$ apt list | grep linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo | grep -i amd64
--- snip ---
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.11-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.92-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.12-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.103-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64/now 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 amd64 [installed,local]     <--------------------
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-cloud-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.9-rt-amd64/oldstable-backports 5.10.70-1~bpo10+1 amd64
groucho@devuan:~$ 

Thanks in advance.

Best,

A.

#1009 Installation » [SOLVED] Backported kernel update » 2022-03-19 21:01:13

Altoid
Replies: 12

Hello:

My Devuan Beowulf runs on a backported kernel:

~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 (2021-02-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux
groucho@devuan:~$ 

When I installed it I assumed it would be updated as it evolved, but I have just noted that it has not.
And that the latest version is 5.10.0-0.bpo.12-amd64.

I think I may omitted something when I installed it?
Some priority setting perhaps?

Please advise, don't want to screw up something.

Thanks in advance,

A.

#1010 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » Important - log4j exploit alarm affecting Linux » 2022-03-19 11:56:15

Hello:

pcalvert wrote:

... LibreOffice installed and a search for "log4j" found nothing.

I got rid of it by purging libreoffice-nlpsolver and libreoffice-report-builder.

pcalvert wrote:

... don't allow software to install recommended packages ...

I followed fsmithred's advice and set up a system wide block for any and all recommends:
https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35176#p35176

pcalvert wrote:

... installed LibreOffice Writer ...

I use Writer, Calc and Draw quite often.
But none of the crap that subreptitiously also comes with the stock installation.

By weeding out a lot of recommends, my java load has been somewhat reduced:

~$ apt list | grep installed | grep -i java
ca-certificates-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 20190405 all [installed,automatic]
java-common/oldstable,oldstable,now 0.71 all [installed,automatic]
javascript-common/oldstable,oldstable,now 11 all [installed,automatic]
libatk-wrapper-java-jni/oldstable,now 0.33.3-22+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libatk-wrapper-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 0.33.3-22+deb10u1 all [installed,automatic]
libel-api-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 3.0.0-2+deb10u1 all [installed,automatic]
libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-18/oldstable-security,now 2.34.6-1~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libjsp-api-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 2.3.4-2+deb10u1 all [installed,automatic]
libreoffice-java-common/oldstable,oldstable,now 1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7 all [installed]
libservlet-api-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 4.0.1-2 all [installed,automatic]
libservlet3.1-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 1:4.0.1-2 all [installed]
libwebsocket-api-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 1.1-1+deb10u1 all [installed,automatic]
groucho@devuan:~$ 

Most (not all) due to LO.
To be quite honest, I'd rather use Lotus 123 than Calc or Excel and a standalone Word 6.0 instead of Writer.

I recently installed Lotus Smart Suite 9.8.2 on a XPSP3 VM.
I was then reminded of how the installer provided you with the means of choosing exactly what parts of the Suite you wanted to install.
Cannot understand how Linux, so much choice oriented, did not take up on that basic idea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think Linux packagers should look back and take note of that important feature.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

pcalvert wrote:

... long preferred to use AbiWord and Gnumeric instead.

I keep/maintain few essential spreadsheets that have been growing/evolving over the last 20 years.
Originally in *.xls format, I keep them that way and run the risk of using LO to maintain them instead of using Excel in a VM.
Had a few unpleasant glitches at the start but they have been fixed.

Hopefully these spreadsheets will not be needed in a year's time.
Then I will see about ditching Calc/Writer to try gnumeric and AbiWord.

Thank you for your input.

Best,

A.

#1011 Re: Installation » apparmor foisted on, by default? » 2022-03-18 21:13:28

Hello:

rbit wrote:

An alternate option for this particular case ...

Hmm ...
No thanks.

I'd prefer that any and all recommends be something I get to consider installing to then decide and not something that is installed because some Debian packager though it was a good idea.

That is how the Linux bloat we have today started ...

I think that a system-wide block on recommends is a great idea.
Of course, YMMV.

Thank you for your input.

Best,

A.

#1012 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] any chances to install nvidia-legacy-340xx on Devuan chimaera? » 2022-03-18 17:56:12

Hello:

deepforest wrote:

Thanks ...

You're welcome.

deepforest wrote:

... try and report here ...

Please do.
A step by step description and a printout of the terminal as the job progresses would be ideal.

eg: like I did here: https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=24694#p24694

deepforest wrote:

Arch AUR community patched this drivers for new kernels ...

Please post the link.
Maybe the Devuan team may be able to do something with that. (?)

Best,

A.

#1013 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] any chances to install nvidia-legacy-340xx on Devuan chimaera? » 2022-03-18 13:56:19

Hello:

deepforest wrote:

thanks for help!

You're welcome.

deepforest wrote:

... is it worth trying to install nvidia-legacy-340xx ...

The 340XX drivers were not dropped by Debian / Devuan.
It was Nvidia that dropped support for graphic cards working only with the 340XX driver.

The 340XX drivers are propiertary/closed source and Debian cannot supply a 340XX package because Nvidia will not update them for newer kernels.

True to their A1-asshole mentality, they will not release the code for the hardware to be used in newer kernels.
That said, it seems that it may be possible to run them on Debian Bullseye/Devuan Chimaera:

https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php … 73#p742573

I have not attempted to do it, no idea if it works without problems.

See here: https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php … 77#p745277
It is a patched proprietary driver "nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver_340.108-11" from "Debian Sid" repository.

If you try and succeed, please let us know how you did it and what results you got.

And yes, Nouevau does not seem to be up to scratch.

A few years ago (when XP was mothballed) and decided my definitive move to Linux, I was met with the fact that there were no drivers for my excellent Matrox G550 PCI cards as there were no available drivers for Linux, another proprietary fuck-up.

Between a rock and a hard place, I decided to invest in a whole new setup which is the one I have been using since, with a few HW upgrades.
A Sun Ultra 24 WS running 2xNVidia FX580 for three 19" monitors using the NVidia 340XX proprietary drivers, works perfect and do not need anything more.

If I can upgrade to Devuan Chimaera using these cards, fine.
And if Chimarea is the last kernel I can use with them, I'll probably stay there using a backported kernel for as long as I can.

Of course, YMMV.

Best,

A.

#1014 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] any chances to install nvidia-legacy-340xx on Devuan chimaera? » 2022-03-17 22:32:19

Hello:

rolfie wrote:

Search the forum ...

Indeed ...
Most of the time it is the best way to get help.  ;^D

That said, check here and the links listed:

https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=33932#p33932

Best,

A.

#1015 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » Important - log4j exploit alarm affecting Linux » 2022-03-17 13:43:43

Hello:

Altoid wrote:

... more than once been tempted to do something ...
... run Word 6.0 and Lotus 123 inside a W98 VM ...

Just downloaded Lotus SmartSuite 9.8.2 Millennium Edition from here:

https://winworldpc.com/download/bb07d55 … 00008a0da4

Installed without issues in my W98SE VM using an ISO mounting application.
Avoided all the unneeded stuff (dictionaries, MM files, database application, etc.) and kept only Lotus 123 and Lotus WordPro.
Both seem to work perfectly well and WordPro can save in quite a few MS-Word and WP formats, down to the good old rtf.

I'll see further on if can run properly on my Devuan Wine installation and set it up there.
If it works for me, it will finally be good-bye to the bloated mess LO is.

Best,

A.

#1016 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » Important - log4j exploit alarm affecting Linux » 2022-03-17 12:29:00

Hello:

Our posts crossed as I edited my last one with the results of removing some of the LO crud.

hevidevi wrote:

... dont use libreoffice. I generally may only need something nicely formatted ...

Ahh ...
In LO, I frequently use what Word 6.0 for DOS and Lotus 123 once offered me.  8^D
And once in a blue moon, something to make up a decent pie-chart.

But the rest of it is just unwanted bloat to me.
eg: optimizing nonlinear programming models and its java-esque consequences. Incredible.

I have more than once been tempted to do something about that.
ie: maybe run Word 6.0 and Lotus 123 inside a W98 VM but never got around to it.

hevidevi wrote:

... microsoft docx from me then they just wont get it.

I usually send a *.pdf file.

hevidevi wrote:

... only way to weed out java is to make sure you do a minimal install ...

I recently edited /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/, adding to do just that:

https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=4939

hevidevi wrote:

In the case of task xfce4 desktop ...

I'm on my way to getting rid of xfce4.
It has evolved into a bloated badly maintained POS and the people in charge do not listen.

I think Devuan should consider using something else as the default installation.
ie: go the way pointed to by Philip Newborough with his truly excellent Crunch Bang Linux.
Probably the nimblest Linux at that time, unfortunately discontinued after the Waldorf version.

hevidevi wrote:

Meta packages in debian can be a win win ...

I think they are a curse and a source of needless bloat, these things go against the basic Linux philosophy.

ie: Meta packages = one file / too many functions
Functions added one on top of the other with no common sense in mind, not to mention the lack of sound criteria.   

Case in point: task-xfce-desktop having a recommends for libreoffice. WTF?

Thank you for your input.

Best,

A.

#1017 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » Important - log4j exploit alarm affecting Linux » 2022-03-17 11:20:53

Hello:

hevidevi wrote:

... must have a few packages installed that rely on java ...

apt list | grep installed | grep java reveals the existence of java-common and a vast array of xyz-java files, all of them automatically installed.

The printout of aptitude why java-common is:

~$ aptitude why java-common
i   libreoffice-nlpsolver Depends default-jre | sun-java6-jre | java6-runtime | jre
i A default-jre           Depends default-jre-headless (= 2:1.11-71)               
i A default-jre-headless  Depends java-common              

Further investigation made me start laughing ...

~$ aptitude why libreoffice-nlpsolver
i   task-desktop      Recommends task-xfce-desktop | task-cinnamon-desktop | task-kde-desktop | task-lxqt-desktop | task-mate-desktop
p   task-xfce-desktop Recommends libreoffice                                                                                         
p   libreoffice       Recommends libreoffice-nlpsolver    

[rant]
WTHF does task-xfce-desktop have a recommends for libreoffice?
Just who comes up with all this crap?
[/rant]

About libreoffice-nlpsolver:

docs @libreoffice.org wrote:

This extension integrates into LibreOffice Calc and offers new Solver engines to use for optimizing nonlinear programming models.

Really ...
Who was the braided idiot that came up with the idea that optimizing nonlinear programming models was something every TD&H would want to do with his LibreOffice calc?

No wonder LO is such a bloated POS.

When (long ago and far away) it stopped being possible to install Word and Excel on your PC as stand alone applications and the Office Suite was born, I recall thinking it was a really bad move for end users and I still do.

hevidevi wrote:

Lots of programs rely on java ...
... is such a clusterfuck.

hevidevi wrote:

... some java libraries is gettext-base and this is needed for grub, but log4j is not a dependency here.

With respect to log4j, it seems that it is also down to LO:

~$ aptitude why liblog4j1.2-java
i   libreoffice-report-builder            Depends libpentaho-reporting-flow-engine-java (>= 0.9.4)
i A libpentaho-reporting-flow-engine-java Depends libapache-poi-java                              
i A libapache-poi-java                    Depends liblog4j1.2-java          

And that libreoffice-report-builder being what specifically relies on it and every TD&H absolutely needs to have:

help @libreoffice.org wrote:

The Report Builder is a tool to create your own database reports. Unlike with the Report Wizard, using the Report Builder you can take control to design the report the way you want. The generated report is a Writer document that you can edit, too.
Note Icon

To use the Report Builder, the Report Builder component must be installed. In addition, the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) software must be installed, and this software must be selected in LibreOffice.

Removing this evidently absolutely indispensable extension from my system also removes a very long list of java related files, I spaced them out so it would be for easier to grasp how large this fuck-up is:

~$ sudo apt purge libreoffice-report-builder
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:

ant ant-contrib ant-optional libactivation-java
libaopalliance-java libapache-poi-java libapache-pom-java
libargs4j-java libasm-java libatinject-jsr330-api-java libbase-java
libbcmail-java libbcpkix-java libbcprov-java libcdi-api-java libcglib-java
libcodemodel-java libcommons-cli-java libcommons-codec-java
libcommons-collections3-java libcommons-collections4-java
libcommons-compress-java libcommons-io-java libcommons-lang3-java
libcommons-logging-java libcommons-math3-java libcommons-parent-java
libcurvesapi-java libdom4j-java libdtd-parser-java libehcache-java
libfastinfoset-java libflute-java libfonts-java libformula-java
libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java libgeronimo-interceptor-3.0-spec-java
libguava-java libguice-java libhawtjni-runtime-java libhttpclient-java
libhttpcore-java libicu4j-java libintellij-annotations-java libisorelax-java
libistack-commons-java libitext-java libjansi-java libjansi-native-java
libjaxb-api-java libjaxb-java libjaxen-java libjcommon-java libjdom1-java
libjetbrains-annotations-java libjsoup-java libjsr305-java liblayout-java libloader-java
liblog4j1.2-java libmail-java libmaven-file-management-java libmaven-parent-java
libmaven-resolver-java libmaven-shared-io-java
libmaven-shared-utils-java libmaven3-core-java libmsv-java
libpentaho-reporting-flow-engine-java libpixie-java libplexus-archiver-java
libplexus-cipher-java libplexus-classworlds-java libplexus-component-annotations-java
libplexus-interpolation-java libplexus-io-java libplexus-sec-dispatcher-java
libplexus-utils2-java librelaxng-datatype-java librepository-java librngom-java
libsac-java libsaxonhe-java libserializer-java libsisu-guice-java libsisu-inject-java
libsisu-ioc-java libsisu-plexus-java libslf4j-java libsnappy-java libsnappy-jni
libstax-ex-java libstreambuffer-java libtxw2-java libwagon-http-java
libwagon-provider-api-java libxerces2-java libxml-commons-external-java
libxml-commons-resolver1.1-java libxml-java libxmlbeans-java libxom-java
libxpp2-java libxpp3-java libxsom-java libxz-java

Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  libreoffice-report-builder*
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
After this operation, 406 kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 

I went ahead with the removal.
Worst that could happen would be to reinstall it.

After typing Y, doing autoremove and autoclean, the final test was apt install -f, which apparently has not detected anything missing.

So ...
It would seem (?) that the LO installed java crap can be weeded out with just uninstalling the libreoffice-nlpsolver and libreoffice-report-builder and extensions, most importantly log4j.

~$ apt list | grep installed | grep log4j
~$ 

.

Unfortunately, some java  files remain:

~$ apt list | grep installed | grep java

ca-certificates-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 20190405 all [installed,automatic]
java-common/oldstable,oldstable,now 0.71 all [installed,automatic]
javascript-common/oldstable,oldstable,now 11 all [installed,automatic]
libatk-wrapper-java-jni/oldstable,now 0.33.3-22+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libatk-wrapper-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 0.33.3-22+deb10u1 all [installed,automatic]
libel-api-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 3.0.0-2+deb10u1 all [installed,automatic]
libhsqldb1.8.0-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 1.8.0.10+dfsg-10 all [installed,automatic]
libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-18/oldstable-security,now 2.34.6-1~deb10u1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libjsp-api-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 2.3.4-2+deb10u1 all [installed,automatic]
libreoffice-java-common/oldstable,oldstable,now 1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7 all [installed]
libservlet-api-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 4.0.1-2 all [installed,automatic]
libservlet3.1-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 1:4.0.1-2 all [installed]
libwebsocket-api-java/oldstable,oldstable,now 1.1-1+deb10u1 all [installed,automatic]
~$ 

As to where all these come from, I bet good money it is all (mostly) due to LO.
I'll have to see about how to get rid of those too.

But for now it seems the log4j problem has been solved. (?)

Any comments on how to go from here will be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

A.

#1018 Hardware & System Configuration » Important - log4j exploit alarm affecting Linux » 2022-03-16 20:08:44

Altoid
Replies: 7

Hello:

Originally mentioned here (late December 2021) at Dev1 by hevidevi here ...

https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=4715

... and now (as expected) we now have this:

https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/16/ … net_log4j/

Jessica Lyons Hardcastle @The Register wrote:

It primarily targets Linux Arm and 64-bit x86 systems.

Running locate on my Beowulf installation brings me a heap of instances:

/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-apache-log4j.jar
/usr/share/doc/liblog4j1.2-java
/usr/share/doc/liblog4j1.2-java/README.Debian
/usr/share/doc/liblog4j1.2-java/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/liblog4j1.2-java/copyright
/usr/share/java/ant-apache-log4j-1.10.5.jar
/usr/share/java/ant-apache-log4j.jar
/usr/share/java/log4j-1.2-1.2.17.jar
/usr/share/java/log4j-1.2.jar
/usr/share/java/log4j-over-slf4j-1.7.25.jar
/usr/share/java/log4j-over-slf4j.jar
/usr/share/java/slf4j-log4j12-1.7.25.jar
/usr/share/java/slf4j-log4j12.jar
/usr/share/maven-repo/log4j
/usr/share/maven-repo/log4j/log4j
/usr/share/maven-repo/log4j/log4j/1.2.17
/usr/share/maven-repo/log4j/log4j/1.2.x
/usr/share/maven-repo/log4j/log4j/debian
/usr/share/maven-repo/log4j/log4j/1.2.17/log4j-1.2.17.jar
/usr/share/maven-repo/log4j/log4j/1.2.17/log4j-1.2.17.pom
/usr/share/maven-repo/log4j/log4j/1.2.x/log4j-1.2.x.jar
/usr/share/maven-repo/log4j/log4j/1.2.x/log4j-1.2.x.pom
/usr/share/maven-repo/log4j/log4j/debian/log4j-debian.pom
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/ant/ant-apache-log4j
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/ant/ant-apache-log4j/1.10.5
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/ant/ant-apache-log4j/debian
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/ant/ant-apache-log4j/1.10.5/ant-apache-log4j-1.10.5.jar
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/ant/ant-apache-log4j/1.10.5/ant-apache-log4j-1.10.5.pom
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/ant/ant-apache-log4j/debian/ant-apache-log4j-debian.jar
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/ant/ant-apache-log4j/debian/ant-apache-log4j-debian.pom
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/log4j-over-slf4j
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/slf4j-log4j12
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/log4j-over-slf4j/1.7.25
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/log4j-over-slf4j/debian
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/log4j-over-slf4j/1.7.25/log4j-over-slf4j-1.7.25.jar
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/log4j-over-slf4j/1.7.25/log4j-over-slf4j-1.7.25.pom
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/log4j-over-slf4j/debian/log4j-over-slf4j-debian.jar
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/log4j-over-slf4j/debian/log4j-over-slf4j-debian.pom
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/slf4j-log4j12/1.7.25
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/slf4j-log4j12/debian
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/slf4j-log4j12/1.7.25/slf4j-log4j12-1.7.25.jar
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/slf4j-log4j12/1.7.25/slf4j-log4j12-1.7.25.pom
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/slf4j-log4j12/debian/slf4j-log4j12-debian.jar
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/slf4j/slf4j-log4j12/debian/slf4j-log4j12-debian.pom
/var/lib/dpkg/info/liblog4j1.2-java.list
/var/lib/dpkg/info/liblog4j1.2-java.md5sums

Not too sure what has to be done about it.

Please advise.

Thanks in advance.

A.

#1019 Re: Installation » apparmor foisted on, by default? » 2022-03-12 22:58:05

Hello:

fsmithred wrote:

... this could be avoided in packaging, but I doubt you can change the debian devs ...

On this or most anything, methinks.
I fear that they cannot help it.

They've all been inbued with the same dumb-down KoolAid.

fsmithred wrote:

... nobody around here is going to fork the kernel.

Ahh ...
If forking is required, I cannot but agree with you.

fsmithred wrote:

You can avoid that and a lot of other cruft with this:

cat /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00norecommends APT::Install-Recommends "no";

Right ...
Maybe add this as a commentary to the Release Notes most no one reads?  8^/

eg:
If you do not want the apparmor crap foisted on you without your knowledge when upgrading etc., etc., ...

NB:
For some reason it didn't work from the cmd line as root.
So I just created the file and then edited it.

fsmithred wrote:

... if adding '--no-install-recommends' will work with 'apt upgrade'.

Probably.

I'd also have to change the default /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99synaptic to false.

I really find it quite tiresome/annoying to have to be on alert for this everytime I upgrade the kernel.
It should not be so.

But then, here we are.

Thanks a lot for your input.
I'll follow your suggestion to avoid this and all recommends in a system-wide manner.

A sort of 'Kill the dog and get rid of the rabies' solution.
Well done.  8^D

Best,

A.

#1020 Installation » apparmor foisted on, by default? » 2022-03-12 21:49:23

Altoid
Replies: 4

Hello:

A question to something that has baffled me for the longest while ...

Why (in #$%&@'s name) does upgrading the kernel require that apparmor be installed?
Just whose bright idea was this?

And more important yet: is it in line with Devuan policies?

Start-Date: 2022-03-12  09:34:39
Commandline: apt upgrade
Install:
linux-headers-4.19.0-19-common:amd64 (4.19.232-1, automatic)
linux-headers-4.19.0-19-amd64:amd64 (4.19.232-1, automatic)
linux-image-4.19.0-19-amd64:amd64 (4.19.232-1, automatic)
apparmor:amd64 (2.13.2-10, automatic)   <-------------------------  why?
--- snip ---

Can't this be avoided when packaging for Devuan by removing it from the recommends list?

Just asking, because choice and all that.

Best,

A.

#1021 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Local mail issue after upgrading from Beowulf to Chimaera » 2022-03-07 11:05:24

Hello:

Marjorie wrote:

Thanks ...

You're welcome.

Marjorie wrote:

... had considered apparmor as a possible cause ...
... didn't include one for evolution.
... wasn't using firejail to confine evolution ...
... problem persists even when I stop apparmor.

I see.

From my limited understanding of the problem at hand, there is something (could be a bug) that is not allowing access to your mailbox.
My gut tells me that the issue is like the one that was affecting mutt.

Maybe there's something in the /var/log/auth file that could be of use.

Is there a log file for evolution you could look at?

I've seen that version 3.2.3 has/had a debug setting you can enable to start it from the command line:
See: https://askubuntu.com/questions/301665/ … -a-logfile

I do not use apparmor or any of the other 'security' applications like tomoyo that are quietly enabled by default (!) in Linux these days, so my kernel command line includes security=none apparmor=0.

You may want to try adding the same stanza at boot time to see if it has any effect as as well as temporarily disabling firejail while you are at it.

Hope that helps, can't think of anything else.

Best,

A.

EDIT:

It would seem that it's a bug ...

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo … 1006603#10

... albeit with a temporary workaround:

post #10 wrote:

Probably the same as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo … ug=1004484
which points to the possible problem source and also a temporary solution.

Best,

A.

#1022 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Local mail issue after upgrading from Beowulf to Chimaera » 2022-03-06 18:20:37

Hello:

Marjorie wrote:

The problem with evolution isn't.

You may want to try disabling apparmor temporarily to see if the problem subsists.

I also found this post which may have the answer (or some indication) as to how to solve the problem you are having.

https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/3478

Cheers,

A.

#1023 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » Severe damage to ext4 filesystem - advice needed » 2022-02-14 11:06:20

Hello:

ralph.ronnquist wrote:

... to recover an DOS partition table ...
... run fdisk to create a DOS partition table ...
... run fsck as per superblock advice at post #7 ...
Might work ...

It's well worth trying ...

First I zapped with sgdisk:

~$ sudo sgdisk --zap-all /dev/sdf

***************************************************************
Found invalid GPT and valid MBR; converting MBR to GPT format
in memory.
***************************************************************

GPT data structures destroyed! You may now partition the disk using fdisk or other utilities.
~$

Then I used fdisk to create a partition and delete the iso9660 signature:

~$ sudo fdisk /dev/sdf

Welcome to fdisk (util-linux 2.33.1).
Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them.
Be careful before using the write command.

Device does not contain a recognized partition table.
Created a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x0be77ae3.

Command (m for help): n
Partition type
   p   primary (0 primary, 0 extended, 4 free)
   e   extended (container for logical partitions)

Select (default p): p
Partition number (1-4, default 1):
First sector (2048-585937499, default 2048):
Last sector, +/-sectors or +/-size{K,M,G,T,P} (2048-585937499, default 585937499):

Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 279.4 GiB.
Partition #1 contains a iso9660 signature.

Do you want to remove the signature? [Y]es/[N]o: y

The signature will be removed by a write command.

Command (m for help): w
The partition table has been altered.
Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table.
Syncing disks.
~$

Unfortunately I was not able to recover anything from fsck and any of the listed superblocks.
ie: 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208, 4096000, 7962624, 11239424, 20480000, 23887872 and 71663616

They were all corrupted.  8^|

At this point I decided to cut my losses and cleared the #$%& drive, formatted as ext4 and put it back on-line.
Fortunately, I was able to scrape back some files using PhotoRec but, as I posted earlier, it is a huge mess I have to sift through by hand.

My sincere thank you to all who pitched in.

Best,

A.

#1024 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » Severe damage to ext4 filesystem - advice needed » 2022-02-12 13:26:25

Hello:

Andre4freedom wrote:

... know that dd is a disk-dumper, a block-copying program ...

Yes, I'm aware of that.

But the drive is 300G and the image I dumped into it is 7.2G.

The problem at hand, at least with TestDisk 7.1, is that (even if it says so) it does not write the partition structure to the drive.   
I think it  has to do with the *.iso structure, no idea if it can be changed.

Andre4freedom wrote:

... dd program starts to copy block by block, from the beginning.

Yes, I'm also aware of that.
But at7.2G + 1 block, it would have  stopped copying.

Andre4freedom wrote:

... reality can be hard.

And painful. 8^/

Thanks for your input.

Best,

A.

#1025 Re: Hardware & System Configuration » Severe damage to ext4 filesystem - advice needed » 2022-02-12 11:03:10

Hello:

GlennW wrote:

... done this once or twice,

Hmm ...
Nice club we belong to.

TestDisk has saved my hide once or twice.
But I had never before had to face such a screw up.

I dd'id the *iso file to a data HDD drive instead of dd'ing it to the USB stick. 8^/

~$ sudo dd if=/home/user/Downloads/chimaera_amd64_desktop-live.iso of=/dev/sdg1 bs=1M

I've realised that this happened because I used lsblk to re-check the USB drive's asigned letter.

This instead of checking it with gparted as I always do.
Big mistake ...

For some reason the USB drive did not mount.
As a result of that, /dev/sdg1 ended up being assigned to the data HDD drive drive instead of the USB drive.

I knew (from the last time I plugged it in) that the USB drive mounted at /dev/sdg1, so when I saw it in the lsblk printout, I assumed everything was all right.

Obviously, I did not notice that the size was 279.4G instead of 7.2G.     
Had I checked with gparted, this would have not happened.

GlennW wrote:

Generally just chose the last superblock before the trouble began.

superblock 884736, blocksize=4096 [300Gb]

No idea how to do that.
Would you mind explaining how to  do it?

GlennW wrote:

... used photorec to recover files...
... but the names are all machine-like.

Indeed ...
A real mess.
See my previous post.

Thanks in advance,

A.

Board footer

Forum Software