You are not logged in.
Wayland is futureless non-working garbage made by incompetent wannabe-programmers.
You might want to read this blog post:
https://drewdevault.com/2019/02/10/Wayl … unked.html
Drew DeVault is the author of sway, I think he knows what he's talking about
Only idiot can remove working package in favor of wayland.
Well it certainly doesn't make much sense in Devuan, I think golinux is right and we'll see it back at some point.
Not that I would miss it...
You may find yourself sitting in a corner . . .
Yeah, that's fine: I'm only here for any interesting problems, I don't really want any social interaction
EDIT: damn pagination...
HOAS you are the odd man out here.
That's the way I like it, baby.
Hi Roger, welcome to the forums!
seek some reassurance that I could run my current set of some 800 packages on Devuan. They include compilers, apache2, samba and the usual utilities.
The Devuan repositories have almost all of the Debian packages so the transition should be pretty painless.
I love your website btw
you said "genuine hackers" - not "hackers"
Yes, OK, fine, I admit it: I didn't know that the "correct" term for a person who maliciously infiltrates computer systems was "cracker" and that "hacker" is in fact an old term used by computer nerds. What an idiot I am
I've never read Eric S. Raymond's seminal How to Become a Hacker text and I certainly didn't get my avatar from his site here: http://www.catb.org/hacker-emblem/
So will you please stfu about this now and stop dragging this thread off topic? Thanks!
Wikipedia is bullshit.
You are aware that words can have more than one meaning, right?
Anyway, I think we're begging the question here — language is fluid and meanings shift over time.
The synaptic package was removed from the Debian buster repositories because it doesn't work under a Wayland session in GNOME:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo … bug=818366
As beowulf is derived from buster then it has been removed from there as well.
Try this for a replacement:
# apt install aptitude
# aptitude -u
Ncurses ftw!
Did you post your full /etc/default/grub contents?
Yes, it's here: https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=15271#p15271
Perhaps the OP could also try un-commenting the GRUB_GFXMODE line to set the resolution to 640x480
This should show the available framebuffer resolutions:
# apt install hwinfo
# hwinfo --framebuffer | grep 'Mode '
Try one of those if 640x480 isn't supported.
Its a made up pejorative word
Erm, aren't all words made up?
Anyway, think whatever you want, I really couldn't give a crap
What's bullshit?
"Cracker" is used as a derogatory term for Caucasians, as my Wikipedia link shows and also as you yourself commented.
I just meant that for me "cracker" is a racist term for Caucasian people and that's why I used the inaccurate "hacker" term instead.
EDIT: reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracker_( … tive_usage
It seems you don't know who genuine hackers are.
and no a cracker is not that white skinned person in a black skinned neighborhood!
Yes, I'm aware that I used the terminology incorrectly but only because to me a "cracker" is exactly what Panopticon's quote describes so I just used the lazy, inaccurate term.
@Ron: grow a thicker skin, perhaps? I was observing rather than insulting. But whatever.
And I don't think the Devuan developers are in this for the money so "marketing" isn't really relevant here.
When I shut it down, it works. restart doesn't work.
I'm not sure I understand you.
So if you shutdown the machine then you can see the GRUB menu when you start it up again?
But when you just reboot you can't see the menu, is that correct?
And to ask again: is there a 5 second delay before the system starts when you don't see the menu?
That GRUB_TERMINAL option only works for non-UEFI booting anyway so it was a poor suggestion (sorry).
What is your graphics hardware? Is it NVIDIA?
Thanks, that's better
So you are booting in UEFI mode using Devuan's grub.cfg, which has the timeout set to 5 seconds.
I don't know why you're not seeing the menu, it should appear for 5 seconds.
Is there a delay of about 5 seconds before the system boots?
Perhaps the selected graphics mode is incompatible with your system.
EDIT: try editing /etc/default/grub and replace
#GRUB_TERMINAL=console
with
GRUB_TERMINAL=console
(Remove the # symbol.)
Then save the file and run
update-grub
I see you brought the same level of maturity to Dev1 that you display at FDN.
And I see you bring the same level of noise...
Can we also see
efibootmgr -v
find /boot/efi
Please edit your post and use code tags for the command output, it makes it *much* more readable and easier to scroll through.
Use the "Quote" button on this post to see how I do this:
This text is in code tags
(But don't submit it.)
Why would anyone want to pretend their website was hacked, and then go on for several hours via social media, irc and the forum, pretending and reinforcing that it was hacked?
Because they were laughing at the clueless idiots, perhaps?
I may have my head on a stick but you folks seem to have a stick up your arse, please get over this and move on.
Making your own website looked hacked, that's the real stupidity.
Why would genuine hackers change the home page if they wanted to plant malware? Think about it...
Puffy and I have been making each other’s acquaintances and I’m now comfortable enough to switch over completely.
Be warned that the OpenBSD devs also have a wicked sense of humour: when sudo was included in the base system it had insults enabled by default
Awesome operating system though, good choice.
FWIW I reckon the Devuan devs just didn't think anybody would be stupid enough to think the joke was real.
I just went to 8gb of memory on a 32bit pae kernel and it often shows more than 4gb in use.
I tried a 32-bit VM with 6GiB assigned and I couldn't get over 4GiB used but I didn't try very hard and I only have 4GiB machines available now so I can't test again.
According to Linus it is possible to use more than 4GiB with multiple applications running but they don't work very well (see the link I provided).
MS Windows 32 bits had this limitation
Some 32-bit versions of Windows can use PAE as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_ … ft_Windows
But anyway, a 32-bit operating system will be less secure and will run slower than the 64-bit alternative so there really is no reason to choose that for a 64-bit capable processor.
Did you install in UEFI mode? Check if /sys/firmware/efi exists when you boot the stick on the working computer.
Is the non-working laptop a UEFI machine?
If the USB stick is a non-UEFI system and the non-working machine is UEFI capable then check the firmware ("BIOS") menus in the non-working computer for an option to boot in "CSM" or "Legacy" mode, this will emulate a non-UEFI system.
You probably encountered the so-called metapackage problem, explanation here:
Where did you tell the installer to place the bootloader?
Are you sure you selected the USB stick?