You are not logged in.
Cinnamon is the one I have favored. It's most like the "standard" interface on Windows for a long time -- before the attempt to make desktops function like tablets (8.0 / 8.1) and then the switch to forcing everyone to use a kiosk full of advertising (10/11). It's great to hear that I can just install that and not have any of the buggy Poettering poo on my system.
It sounds to me like GKrellm should be looking in sysfs if it does not. How long since it was updated? Maybe it's time for someone to hack it? ![]()
What's the status of Excalibur / 6 in regards to pulse audio? Can you have a completely Poettering-free system with a default install? Or do you have to remove it from that as well? Has anyone done it yet and figured out how hard it is? Would the steps discussed here already work the same for the new version?
Well, does Gkrellm read from sysfs? If it can be configured to do that, it would solve a lot of problems I have had setting it up on various systems.
Hmm, an SSD is basically a very large USB stick. I guess it would heat up. I wonder if the internal temperature sensor is available through the interface? Does hddtemp work with SSDs? Or would you have to use some other utility to make the sensor available to GKrellm?
That's interesting. Now you're talking about the 'card' drives that don't even use SATA connectors. Power usage doesn't seem to be linear there, either.
Out of curiosity, I popped the cover on a laptop I have to see the tiny little HD. It's only got a 5v rating, and it's .55 amps. The motor must be running in the 5v feed along with the electronics. So now I'm really questioning whether SSDs are automatically less power hungry than spinning disks.
At least these disks I have already bought are intended for desktops. I just want the faster load times. But if I decide to get SSDs for my laptops, I will be shopping very carefully...
If it's drawing from BOTH 12v and 5v at the same time, yes, it would clearly use more power. It's not clear from the label that it does so. Those ratings could be for different modes or different power connections. It's been a while since I had to worry about HD power.
But now I have a new thing to check on SSDs. Another brand I got access to, PNY, shows only 1 amp for a 2TB SSD. Quite a difference from the Crucial, and for more storage. Hmm....
The SSD just gives a 5v rating, and that's 1.7 amps. It's a 1 TB model. All of the Western Digital spinning disks I own say 0.68 amps at 5 volts and 0.55 at 12 volts. These are either 1 TB or 2 TB models. So that power calculation doesn't seem to work out for these. Maybe it's something peculiar to this brand? I'll have to see if I can look at the labels of other SSDs somewhere. Maybe I can get a closeup on a website or see one in a store...
For a long time now I've been reading / hearing that SSDs use LESS power than old fashioned spinning disks. But today I happened to actually read the label on my Crucial BX500 SSDs and it says they can draw 1.7 amps!? The spinning drives I have are rated .48 to .55 amps. Is this a 'peak' vs 'average' usage thing? The SSD doesn't draw power when not being accessed but the drive with a motor has to be spinning all the time? Though I'm still puzzled that the SSD would have so much higher peak power draw...
This is sort of vague since it doesn't say exactly what is slower. But I can say there is a large difference in disk performance between Devuan and MX Linux, which is apparently much closer to Debian. I've got different disks that I plug in to the same machine, and when I am copying large files -- like the data files for games -- I can see the speed on my Gkrellm and it's literally twice as fast copying the files with MX Linux. Possibly something in the drivers that they had to alter in Devuan to completely remove that fake 'init' wrapper that is taking over everything. But MX Linux may have been able to leave in place since it's just trying to neutralize it without purging the system?
OK, I finally remembered to use the solution I found in certain threads. Disabling the automatic download of currency exchange rates does indeed solve the problem. It now loads and runs normally.
https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=441309
dconf write /org/gnome/calculator/refresh-interval 0It seems bizarre. Why did they do such a clumsy thing? Wasn't it easy to predict that the URL might be moved, or more likely, the owners of the website would notice the odd traffic and move it?
My printers are all ancient and suffering various problems. Rather than continue to struggle to keep them running, I am thinking of buying a newer printer. The one I favor, the Brother HL-L2400D is especially appealing for NOT having fancy networking options that just make it hackable. Wifi printers??? No. Just no.
But on researching it, one of the things I have learned is that there is no MacOS driver for this printer. That normally wouldn't be a concern since I don't own Apple hardware, except I thought Apple used the CUPS system like all other *nix based OSes? Do they? How would I check if there is a CUPS driver for this printer before buying one and plugging it into a computer running some flavor of Linux? I would hope there is a reference somewhere that can be checked?
This is just one aspect of the drive to lock down 'general purpose' computing. Remember, there is DRM functionality built into our CPUs since at least a decade ago. I forget when they started, but it's been there a while. Generation after generation of equipment, they add more of this stuff. The point is going to come where they can lock it down and the old stuff will be too far behind to be useful.
How much work is there on "Open Source BIOS" for lack of a better term? We will eventually need to be able to flash something new into our motherboards with fewer corporate control options.
I've setup the Devuan version of Peppermint OS, just to see what it's like. I installed Chrome because it seems to be necessary to access some sites. And when I start Chrome for the first time after a boot it wants a password for a keyring. When I installed Chrome on Devuan with XFCE, it also wanted a keyring and I couldn't get around it and couldn't run Chrome. Had to install with Cinnamon and then it was possible to get Chrome to run. Apparently it was something 'default' to Gnome, which Cinnamon is based on.
It looks like the people who setup Peppermint OS did something different. It is possible to get Chrome to run on XFCE by entering a password for the keyring. What do you suppose they did differently?
If it's a known issue it's something not linked to the word 'calculator' because nothing turns up. Could you possibly give me a pointer?
Here's a desktop app that doesn't get discussed much! ![]()
The default calculator in Daedalus just doesn't work. Any time I start it, it just freezes and I have to kill it. Not a really big deal since I usually install Galculator, and prefer that. But the default app gets launched by default when you push the calculator button on any MS sponsored keyboard. So I've seen it pop up a few times. And been puzzled that it's always unusable.
What could be wrong with it?
It's odd how you can ask the same question multiple times and never be understood. Is it so impossible to create an HDD that can boot on multiple systems like a "live" CD, that no one can even comprehend the question? I would think it would be possible to tell your OS to install all available drivers and use a slightly modified boot process similar to what a live CD uses.
Yeah, but they are fixed on CD. If I install from a "live" CD don't I get a system adapted to the hardware I installed on? If I want to take an HDD with a personal install (choice of applications) and use it in several different systems, can I make such an HDD with a typical "Live" disk?
Is there an option in the standard installer of Devuan -- or any other major distro -- to include all the files you need to test at boot time and choose the right drivers for whatever system the disk has been placed in? Or is that a special mode that has to be configured by expert devs?
Yeah, I had the impression from the way it was pushed in the installer that it was a 'normal' thing, but I guess LVM is not very widely used? I always opted not to use it because I realized that 'dynamic' resizing could only be possible by fragmenting the actual allocation of the partitions, with possibly major performance implications.
I guess what made me think about it again was preparing to use SSDs. Fragmentation of partitions would not be a performance issue on SSDs. But I've never had an SSD in any system yet. They always seemed too expensive, and somewhat unreliable. I keep hearing they fail little or no warning. Unlike spinning disks that usually give you SMART warnings for a while before actually becoming unusable. But the durability and reliability of SSDs has been increasing, and the speed advantages are tempting for uses like gaming.
It sounds like I still don't need to use LVM. Just plan my partitions well so I don't have to re-map them later. ![]()
Yes, I discovered the "Easy Fix" MSI. An amusing name. All it does is add TLS 1.2 support. Applying that solved many problems. It stopped whingeing that it was not a legitimate copy and was able to check for updates even beyond the antivirus. Many things turned up that I was not even aware of. Some of them dated 2021, after the end of public support. Maybe they released some of the 'extended support' stuff for free after the final end of all support? It's taking a while to download and install them. But it seems worthwhile to get them.
Edited to add: And yes, Firefox now works properly also.
So far I have always avoided using LVM as it seemed like an extra layer of abstraction, and to my mind code, on top of any other drivers needed to access the drives. Does LVM really add any overhead to disk access? Can it slow down a system at all? Or is it only relevant at the install phase, and then at the time of any modifications of the disk layout?
Well, my first thought was logging, which is supposed to be different on Windows when using an SSD compared to an HD. There is supposed to be much less, to reduce the wear on SSDs. Logging of everything has been so automatic in *nix for so long I wondered if there was any concession to hardware wear. And then there is the automatic disk optimization in Windows, but Linux doesn't do that at all.
There may be other operational differences, though, so I was just wondering.
When you use one of those 'whole partition' transfer utilities to copy a system from an old HD to an SSD, does the OS notice the change in hardware? I seem to recall there are differences in how an OS should behave on one vs the other, but I don't know if that is something fixed at install time, or if it should be manually changed, or if it's automatically recognized.
A strange problem has occurred on two Windows 7 systems/disks that I have maintained for a while, just because. I don't boot them often. Maybe once a year or so. This time Windows 7 OS itself seems to be cut off. The "Microsoft Security Essentials"/"Defender" anti-virus cannot update anymore. I guess MS has finally cut the hold-outs loose. But something much stranger occurred with the browsers.
On one of these systems Firefox still works. I can start it up and go onto the current web. Everything seems normal. On the other, Firefox thinks all websites have "security problems" and refuses to connect. The a certificate match problem, right? What would there be in a Firefox install that requires updating beyond what the standard update would perform? I ran the latest available update (115.24) on both. And both seemed to update successfully.
Or is this a problem fixable in the browser at all? Would there be some other update, something on the OS side, that I missed for one of those old disks?