You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Do you remember the "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD" project? It was closed for lack of volunteers but I think it was a great idea.
It would be fantastic if Devuan could inherit and revive this project!
Devuan GNU/kFreeBSD just the name rocks!
Last edited by Danielsan (2021-02-19 15:42:58)
Offline
there's a Debian/Devuan kfreebsd group in Telegram that try to "makes something" but it seems there's no interest in somthing interesting.. https://t.me/Debian_kFreeBSD
Offline
It was closed for lack of volunteers but I think it was a great idea.
It would be fantastic if Devuan could inherit and revive this project!
So I take it you're volunteering then? Thanks!
Black Lives Matter
Offline
Danielsan wrote:It was closed for lack of volunteers but I think it was a great idea.
It would be fantastic if Devuan could inherit and revive this project!
So I take it you're volunteering then? Thanks!
Online
Maybe see if Theo de Raadt can give you a hand lol....
Last edited by dice (2021-02-20 14:05:33)
“That which is below is like that which is above, and that which is above is like that which is below, to perform the miracles of one only thing.”
-Hermes Trismegistos
Offline
Danielsan wrote:It was closed for lack of volunteers but I think it was a great idea.
It would be fantastic if Devuan could inherit and revive this project!
So I take it you're volunteering then? Thanks!
we need a build environment.. currently only OBS provide this for persoinal test, the devuan build ci system forces people to follo devuan rules and in that way we cannot test property .. with OBS people can play with the package until get something refined and tuned! like my php fixed pacakges without shitstemd
Kfreebsd Debian/Devuan group: https://t.me/Debian_kFreeBSD
Last edited by mckaygerhard (2021-02-20 14:16:11)
Offline
So I take it you're volunteering then? Thanks!
I can try but I need some guidance on basically... everything!
Last edited by Danielsan (2021-02-22 06:59:00)
Offline
These projects died.
Gentoo's experiments with BSD kernels are fossiled history too.
Maybe digging out the last Debian/kFreeBSD and slowly upgrading from that status quo would work?
–▷ https://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/kfreebsd-amd64
–▷ https://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/kfreebsd-i386
Didn't find newer references in my currently undercaffeinated attention span.
Online
The wiki said it was been just a technical preview however it had been the only, working, alternative kernel available for Debian...
Offline
I don't remember the timeline good enough, but there was a very unfinished Debian/kNetBSD too, plans for Debian/kOpenBSD, and there still is Debian/(k?)Hurd.
"Debian, the universal OS" ... is this subtitle still in use?
The de facto (k?)Linux monoculture this world is aimimg at is a danger!
Online
I don't remember the timeline good enough, but there was a very unfinished Debian/kNetBSD too, plans for Debian/kOpenBSD, and there still is Debian/(k?)Hurd.
"Debian, the universal OS" ... is this subtitle still in use?
The de facto (k?)Linux monoculture this world is aimimg at is a danger!
That is actually the point, but this is not Linux monoculture, is Red Hat monoculture. I am totally fine with corporate shaping Linux the way they need with their distro, but it is disappointing when all the distros must follow its lead because it wants all the support available to develop and reduce the cost of the products of its portfolio, doesn't matter it is still free software. You kill free software when is developed with corporate mindset.
Offline
Don't forget the influence these big players have on the kernel.
That affects all Linux based systems.
Online
yeti wrote:I don't remember the timeline good enough, but there was a very unfinished Debian/kNetBSD too, plans for Debian/kOpenBSD, and there still is Debian/(k?)Hurd.
"Debian, the universal OS" ... is this subtitle still in use?
The de facto (k?)Linux monoculture this world is aimimg at is a danger!
That is actually the point, but this is not Linux monoculture, is Red Hat monoculture. I am totally fine with corporate shaping Linux the way they need with their distro, but it is disappointing when all the distros must follow its lead because it wants all the support available to develop and reduce the cost of the products of its portfolio, doesn't matter it is still free software. You kill free software when is developed with corporate mindset.
totally true.. but noted that most of that shit is windosers users .. in fact are hybrid people inflintrating in free softwware projects.. noted that almost haflt of them also works in some M$ project in some way?
Offline
totally true.. but noted that most of that shit is windosers users .. in fact are hybrid people inflintrating in free softwware projects.. noted that almost haflt of them also works in some M$ project in some way?
Online
mckaygerhard wrote:totally true.. but noted that most of that shit is windosers users .. in fact are hybrid people inflintrating in free softwware projects.. noted that almost haflt of them also works in some M$ project in some way?
facebook, micosfot, vmwaree, samsung, ibm nec, fujitsu, intel.. ORACLE!~ puiffff i retract .. not half or.. ALMOST ALL OF!
full of shit is linux today
Offline
Pages: 1