The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#751 Re: Off-topic » Anyone know how to compile firefox from source from Devuan? » 2021-11-13 12:51:53

hevidevi wrote:

I dont know anything on compiling FF but i use arkenfox user.js with a custom user-overrides.js

arkenfox github page has all the instructions you need.

https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js

and this for the user-overrides.js that i have edited for my own personal use.

https://codeberg.org/12bytes.org/Firefo … supplement

Does it work before or after its compiled?

#752 Re: Off-topic » Anyone know how to compile firefox from source from Devuan? » 2021-11-13 01:26:37

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

Never tried this myself but Arch PKGBUILDs are good for checking this sort of thing, the prepare() function lists the steps and it looks like the option can be added to mozconfig file like this:

ac_add_options --disable-dbus

But it's probably best to build a modified package from the Debian source:

apt source firefox-esr

Then edit debian/browser.mozconfig.in and build the package (debuild -us -uc).

Good luck though. Are you sure you have enough RAM & disk space to build it? If not you could upload the source tarball, debian directory tarball and .dsc file to the openSUSE Build Service and let that build it for you. They only offer Debian repositories but it should be compatible.

EDIT: BLFS says it needs 5.2GiB of disk space and will take 28 SBU (on a four core machine).

https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/v … egacy.html

I think you probably have some idea of this already, but yeah I was in fact doing this to make it usable with Hyperbola, but I am curious which glibc would be required to make it work wherever...

Quick note though what about the other part I mentioned, the arkenfox part? its basically a way of disabling a lot of firefox bs that is enabled by default.

Also, I wondered if glibc required is too new, is there a way to fix that as well?

#753 Off-topic » Anyone know how to compile firefox from source from Devuan? » 2021-11-12 22:54:33

zapper
Replies: 19

Before you reply though, a few things:

I want to add arkenfox's preferences as default
I also want to add --disable-dbus as an option
Also I should add, mozilla's bloody source code only allows so called "supported distros" to compile it from source, which is really annoying, aka it blocks devuan for some reason... its extremely irritating.

Can someone who knows something about how to do this give me some clear instructions?  The --disable-dbus thing, I have some idea how to do, but the rest is a complete mystery.

EDIT: I should have said from devuan.

#754 Re: Devuan Derivatives » JWM KIT love fest » 2021-11-07 13:11:03

brday wrote:
zapper wrote:

As I have said before, I myself prefer JWM.

The JWM  for 64 bits ? Can you post here a screenshot that displays in the terminal data and consumption of the machine with the command neofetch ? It would be nice if you could leave the link of  jwm kit to test with devuan.

I could post a screenshot, but I would have to reboot to get a good idea of how much is actually consumed.  then go into a terminal and type in free -m

I am using 64 bit, so no worries there.

https://codeberg.org/jwmkit

I recommend checking the consumption for yourself though, RAM is used more on machines with more RAM.

So what I mean I guess is, I have 16GB RAM on this laptop. Well on my comp with 8GB it uses less of the RAM.

Andyprough can correct me if he wants, but I think he said it used like somewhere from 60-70 megabytes to use it, even with jwmkit.

Or maybe jwmkit said that? anywho, it uses less the dwm according to Andyprough for sure. I recall he said that on a forum. wink

On boot though, it uses less than 70mb for me though for my 16GB T430 with coreboot + me cleaner.

I can reboot to check if you are interested. I will do so now...

Interesting... It seems on one of my laptops its like 110mb total usage including jwm being used. That one has Hyperbola though, 16gb or not. I will try my devuan one and see what that shows.

Here is a picture of it, https://upload.disroot.org/r/KhKbZ0Vd#3 … I4v3+DbPs=

just download it to see it.

Btw, I looked and Hyperbola uses 89mb without any wm/DE.

so that means... 21mb for jwm? insane... it has 16gb of ram so I didn't expect this lol.

I will check devuan now.

Fascinating... it uses 141mb on Devuan ceres...
https://upload.disroot.org/r/t6xNspMs#U … 2o+y6X8Ic=

Without a wm it uses close to that number.  Anywho, those links seem to indicate to me, that JWM is ultra lightweight. Anywho, that's all folks! smile

Except I should mention I am using 5.15.xx linux-libre kernel on the devuan laptop and 5.10.xx on the hyperbola one.

wink  just a heads up! smile

#755 Re: Other Issues » [SOLVED] ungoogled-chromium, Iridium, or LibreWolf, please » 2021-11-05 11:04:23

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
zapper wrote:

were you trolling or serious?

Both.

I have no idea what to say to this beyond this reply...

wink

#756 Re: Other Issues » [SOLVED] ungoogled-chromium, Iridium, or LibreWolf, please » 2021-11-04 00:31:15

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

I can't speak for the developers but I'm pretty sure they already have enough to do without packaging up some shitty browers that aren't good enough to make it into Debian's repositories.

I am going to have to disagree, chromium, iridium, firefox regular, firefox esr, all are shitty browsers. 

Librewolf, ungoogled-chromium are much better than their counterparts. 

Just curious, but were you trolling or serious?

I can't figure it out at the moment.

EDIT: I see what you mean about ungoogled-chromium in later posts, still think that librewolf is way better than the rest.

#757 Re: Installation » How to have updated firefox-esr in Chimaera? » 2021-11-03 00:25:38

I currently use ceres on one of my laptops, but I also have a vm of devuan on that laptop so I can test before I upgrade. Just in case of issues...

wink

As for snapd, some people say you can change the repository it pulls packages from, to one other than canonical's.  That being said, its still in my mind, as bad as flatpak or nodejs' package manager and various other likewise separate installation methods. 

Unless its built from source code of course, but in general I do not recommend nodejs, snapd, flatpak, appimage, pip or anything else besides compiling and regular installation. 

Just a heads up, I DELIBERATELY listed those in order from worst to best.  wink

Also, librewolf is an option for ceres. I believe? As far as I can see anyways.

#758 Re: DIY » Linux ports of OpenBSD's ksh » 2021-10-10 17:39:42

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

Version 7.0 of oksh is now available. So Linux has it before OpenBSD big_smile

That is ironic, but I wonder which has the more secure version... tongue

No offense, but OpenBSD devs probably are more security conscious... wink

#759 Re: Off-topic » It's a sad day . . . » 2021-10-10 17:37:19

uther wrote:

GPU rendering in Blender require OpenCL drivers if you have AMD GPU, otherwise Blender won't see your card at all.
However with recent Cycles rewrite AMD will have completly different backend (HIP) and OpenCL was dropped. We (Blender users) still don't know what drivers we will need or what hardware will be supported, as HIP implementation isn't finished.

So blender doesn't work with open source drivers... well okay.

That's a shame, but meh, it is what it is eh, at least for now.

#760 Re: Off-topic » It's a sad day . . . » 2021-10-10 02:32:17

uther wrote:

Open drivers don't have OpenCL support. And I need that.
Also I have installed only OpenCL parts of AMDGPU-PRO. Display is handled by mesa, and indeed it's great.

You have perked my curiosity, what do you need opencl for and/or the proprietary blob for? I am curious.

If you don't want or feel like telling me though, feel free to tell me.

It just sounds odd to me, given that those blobs are like mystery software.

hmm

#761 Re: Off-topic » It's a sad day . . . » 2021-10-08 23:24:21

golinux wrote:

Please take note of appropriately trimmed post.  smile

Point taken...

Either way, I decided to respond in a different thread if that helps,

wink

I am hopeful I was at least somewhat on topic.

wink

#762 Re: Devuan » As Debian 11 moves closer to Devuan. Is there any reason to stay on De » 2021-10-08 23:23:11

Minimalism isn't always pretentious, it depends on what you need and what you want from software whether it be a DE, WM, or what an OS is in general.

To be honest, if Devuan is more then a systemd protest distro, I guess I would've thought it would be fighting more the redhat nonsense...

Not trying to be critical, just sayin, systemd is not the only problem plaguing the linux atmosphere.

Aka, not just systemd, but also, at bare minimum, pulseaudio, networkmanager, wayland as well as systemd. The reason I don't use it as my main OS, is because of that and dbus as well as openssl and java. So meh... to each their own.

I should mention though, a dev I know looked at the dbus code even found in powerkit the application used with draco desktop, fingerprints your hardware...

I have no idea why that is even needed... or what they do with it. Aye...

Also, I don't care about DE's. wink WMs for the win man! smile

I do still have a Devuan VM in case I need it though. I noticed that chimaera has security, updates and regular repos.  I am guessing that means Devuan's newest version is coming out before the end of the year.  Or sooner, not sure which.

But yeah, I would be careful about trusting Debian again till they stop feeding on Redhat's ideas so much.

#763 Re: Off-topic » It's a sad day . . . » 2021-10-08 23:07:45

golinux wrote:

Morning check of this forum and EVERY new post is off topic.  Not quite sure what that says about Devuan . . . 

Troll appreciation thread

Fight for the Plasma Desktop Cube

Palemoon drama, has gotten bad

Music

Show your desktop (rebooted)

Just to be clear, that was not my intention whatsoever...

Although, I didn't comment on the last two... tongue

Although, the third one has been derailed a bit...

On further inspeection it seems I didn't comment on the 2nd one today either... lol.

#764 Re: Off-topic » Troll appreciation thread » 2021-10-08 12:48:53

I don't know, as long as trolls don't get cruel and evil, I enjoy feeding them sometimes... tongue

If they like to be nonsensical or spamlike, I enjoy watching and laughing.

#765 Re: Off-topic » Fight for the Plasma Desktop Cube » 2021-10-08 12:46:02

kjpetrie wrote:

If you use Plasma and find the Cube one of the most useful features and a major motivation for choosing it over other desktops, you will be shocked to learn KDE plan to abolish it at the next release (5.23.x).

Now, of course, that won't affect Devuan users immediately because the Plasma here is many versions back, so presumably will not be upgraded to 5.23 in the immediate future, but it may well bite when the next version of Devuan comes out. By then the cube will be long gone and any chance of persuading KDE to put it back will be long behind us.

I have opened a wishlist bug report at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443410 and a topic on the KDE forum at https://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=172850 and would welcome support there.

KDE have invited those who care enough to rewrite the effect using QML, but I imagine that's not a trivial thing to do unless you know both QML and the internal workings of Plasma well.

Not that I care about DE's much, but at least the KDE folks, are willing to allow someone to make those changes, that gives me a small amount of respect for them, whether they are bloated or not, which I think they are. wink

That being said,  I wonder if Gnome would be as willing to preserve features people like. I am not sure...

#766 Re: Off-topic » Palemoon drama, has gotten bad, » 2021-10-07 15:34:29

Hevidevi, if it doesn't work, you can PM me, also, if you want FDE with or without /boot encrypted, ask me that in a PM.

Peace!

#767 Re: Off-topic » Palemoon drama, has gotten bad, » 2021-10-07 15:19:13

hevidevi wrote:
zapper wrote:
hevidevi wrote:

dhcpcd-ui you mean?

Looks very much dbus free.

I tried installing hyperbola a few days ago but was stopped due to gpg / pacman key not found by the maintainer.

Yeah, you can bypass that actually, set SigLevel to never.

Its no big deal.

Did that, still failed. Im pretty sure the maintainers key is kaput. By that i mean that the key cannot be found on any key servers. When was the last time you had to refresh pacman keys?

They are working on 0.4 tirelessly lately, let me think for a second... I believe you need to  comment the other SigLevel, as well.. then it will allow you to update.

comment this:

#SigLevel    = Required DatabaseOptional
And have this non commented like so...
SigLevel = Never

If either is incorrect/missing make the changes.

#768 Re: Off-topic » Palemoon drama, has gotten bad, » 2021-10-07 15:05:49

hevidevi wrote:
zapper wrote:
hevidevi wrote:

zapper can i ask what programs you use for network on hyperbola?

dhcpcd-gtk is one of them

dhcpcd + wpa_supplicant both of which  seem to work without dbus in Hyperbola.

and yes, wifi with wpa2 and 2.4ghz as well as 5ghz works fine.

dhcpcd-ui you mean?

Looks very much dbus free.

I tried installing hyperbola a few days ago but was stopped due to gpg / pacman key not found by the maintainer.

Yeah, you can bypass that actually, set SigLevel to never.

Its no big deal.

#769 Re: Off-topic » Palemoon drama, has gotten bad, » 2021-10-07 14:49:14

hevidevi wrote:

zapper can i ask what programs you use for network on hyperbola?

dhcpcd-gtk is one of them

dhcpcd + wpa_supplicant both of which  seem to work without dbus in Hyperbola.

and yes, wifi with wpa2 and 2.4ghz as well as 5ghz works fine.

#770 Re: Off-topic » Palemoon drama, has gotten bad, » 2021-10-07 14:42:20

hevidevi wrote:

Just use firefox-esr with a decent user.js to filter out all the crapware.

if you opt for no dbus configuration, dbus is not activated as andyprough mentions. The libs still need to be available but dbus is not activated so is not used in the usual way by init thus negating any security vuln in my opinion. If you know a thing or two about openbsd you will know that messagebus needs to be activated for dbus to work and firefox will run as long as the libs are satisfied.

Saying that, i dont care these days, nothing i do on a computer warrants spec-ops type privacy, im actually looking to quit computing altogether. I think it has run its course and is a doomed endeavor and blight on human interactivity.

Perhaps, but dbus will be removed from Hyperbola, at some point, thus, I see no purpose in such things.

As for computing, I don't think its completely doomed yet, unless you want newer technology, that is x86 based or arm64 based.

Actually, I will just say, anything with a backdoor like intel me or in general is a problem.  Especially if it connects to the internet with that backdoor.  If the backdoor is non-remote, meaning it doesn't do anything over the network, its not a huge issue as far as I am concerned.

That being said, MNT Reform gives me some hope.  I await the pocket version, but yeah, 80% of hardware at least is crap due to backdoors that operate remotely and cannot be removed...

I had to add that part cause otherwise its more like 95% lol.

#771 Re: Off-topic » Palemoon drama, has gotten bad, » 2021-10-07 14:18:47

Ron wrote:
zapper wrote:

That being said, Hyperbola devs are in a bit of a pickle, because of palemoon devs going balisitic over some users not following their trademarks which resulted in a cascade of people removing their commits from uxp.

According to the "horse's mouth," your cascade of people is only 2. Where are you getting your information?

That's fair, to say, but yeah, one of the Hyperbola devs worked on UXP for a bit, but at one point, Tobin wanted nothing to do with him despite the fact that he only was trying to help make UXP better.

I would like to be wrong, but honestly, I trust Luke more in general, and long story short, they did hide their newest git development... they closed their github page. If you didn't notice, and the palemoon repo, here:

https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions

Notice how UXP is no longer there...

They seem to be developing behind the scenes now, meaning less people can participate.

Also this is no longer worked on:

https://repo.palemoon.org/mcp-graveyard/UXP

at least there anyways...

Hmm... although this may prove your point:

https://github.com/RealityRipple/UXP

Unless Ripple is doing it without moonchild's permission...

Meh...

I am getting mixed messages so far it seems...

I did support UXP for a while, if you recall on here.  To the point of arguing the same point you did which caused some threads to get locked xD.

Hmm.... I will have to think about this more...

Anywho, they still have been a toxic bunch, so I will wait and see what comes forward I guess.

#772 Re: Off-topic » Palemoon drama, has gotten bad, » 2021-10-07 11:56:10

If only, mpv was the solution for all videos online... ;P

Alas, I like old cartoons, and some sites work with iceweasel-uxp, and not mpv. 

sad

Epiphany might actually work like iceweasel-uxp in this sense.

Either way though, we will just have to see...

It turns out though, there are some dbus issues with epiphany, but one of the devs of Hyperbola thinks it may be fixable aka, it could work without it if he gives it enough time to work on. smile

We'll see eh?

Maybe this is the palemoon alternative I need...

#773 Re: Off-topic » Palemoon drama, has gotten bad, » 2021-10-07 00:45:26

andyprough wrote:
zapper wrote:

Long story short, I am not positive, but it may work as a replacement.  I gotta check when they are updated though.

Personally, I am not a fan of epiphany, but, whatever.

Netsurf is written in C, did you know that? And it's GPL2 - did I mention that? And it has its own independent browser engine, did I mention that also? Someone who hates Rust and is worried about free licensing might want to look into it, just sayin...

EDIT: Oh my goodness, I'm running Netsurf, and my total system memory usage is 144mb. That's about a third of what the big bloaty browsers bring my system ram usage to. Where has this little gem been all my life?? It's got adblocking, it's not really fingerprint-able because javascript isn't fully implemented. It's a thing of beauty. It runs on RISC OS, on Haiku and BeOS. It has a framebuffer version that doesn't require GTK. What's not to love?

Some of us like to play videos online though... 

wink

Also, I am not sure if netsurf even is updated anymore.

Does netsurf work like that? I know there is adblocking in epiphany also.

#774 Re: Off-topic » Palemoon drama, has gotten bad, » 2021-10-06 23:34:56

andyprough wrote:

Latest librewolf and latest libreoffice running on Void without dbus.

The trick is to use the "ignorepkg" function, and after installing gtk3, remove the dbus dependencies that were installed along with it. librewolf and libreoffice need gtk3 to run, but they don't need dbus. gtk3 says it needs dbus, but there's no problem without it.

This should work on Hyperbola as well - I'll try it this week.

I was also able to install some other browsers once I had done this - surf, badwolf, epiphany, midori, netsurf, and vimb. Most of them are WebKit/GTK+ browsers. Netsurf is an independent browser with its own engine (and quite a nice one - GPL too).

https://trisquel.info/files/2021-10-06- … _scrot.png

Huh, its interesting you mention epiphany, because I tried it in devuan and sound works, also, I tried to build it in Hyperbola also, fascinating thing is...

It actually didn't build, but not because of any weird libraries, except for libportal, libdazzle and libhandy not being in the system as well as old libraries...

Long story short, I am not positive, but it may work as a replacement.  I gotta check when they are updated though.

#775 Re: Off-topic » Palemoon drama, has gotten bad, » 2021-10-06 03:57:32

Ron wrote:
zapper wrote:

That being said, Hyperbola devs are in a bit of a pickle, because of palemoon devs going balisitic over some users not following their trademarks which resulted in a cascade of people removing their commits from uxp.
. . .
Sadly, that's become what this situation has been reduced to.  Thank the palemoon devs for being a bunch of absolute morons.

I was wrong about Palemoon devs being any good it begins to seem...

Requiring people to respect their trademarks, and the open source license, which is what I think you mean, and is the latest problem, does not make them morons. If people don't respect the open source license, then what's the point? I think those who don't respect the open source license or their trademarks are the morons who are causing all the problems.

Also, the reddit shithole is run by rabid anti-palemoon folks, so you're not going to get the facts there. As a matter of fact, they have posted outright lies. And your links to the Pale Moon threads actually prove my point. If you go there and try to post facts, you get banned. It's already happened.

The point I am trying to make is more than that, in retaliation to those same people, Tobin began to change his commits from the BSD license to who knows what...
Also, they are making it much harder not just for those people to fork, but EVERYONE!

So yeah, its more than that... hate to break it to ya, but is not outright lies,  also, as I said, they doing the development on their own private repo now, and that hardly seems like its in the spirit of open source.  Even if it's legal so long as they provide the source code, which they are doing now.

Even a dev friend of mine, who had nothing to do with those people who  caused the problem,  said they noticed some conflicts of interest take place after that where the commits they had slowly were removed and changed from their current license.

I should also add, yes I know the reddit shithole is full of alot of anti-palemoon folks.  That was why I didn't give it much thought until after I saw the fate of forks thread and I waited to see  what would happen.

Long story short, at best they are as bad as mozilla, at worst,  much worse.

Also, I should add, their trademark doesn't do diddly to prevent every entity out in the world from doing harm. I really doubt there aren't safe havens where people can get away with stuff.

This all being said, I doubt you will care, you seem to have made up your mind.

This has become a crap fest of stupidity.

PS, I don't agree with mozilla's trademarks on rust or firefox either... aka, their trademarks and palemoon's trademarks are equally stupid.

Due to their restrictive nature.

That being said, I will change what I said, mozilla and palemoon are both bad.  Maybe better than chrome builds, but that's not much better in light of the problems that have occurred aka, they are supposed to be the better option!

Maybe they still are, but barely...

Board footer

Forum Software