Lots of groaners, but whenever I want one, I will come here for them.

Yeah, discourse is a pile of horse crap. Although, javascript never was a good idea to use for the web anyhow.

The creators of discourse and webcomponents, are trying to solve a problem they created. No one should program anything like the web with any programming languages that are bloated or screwed up. Actually, EDIT: not merely screwed up, SCREWED UP on MULTIPLE levels!

lol.

Seems I missed some fun threads with a bunch of nonsense...

Damn, lol.

Btw, I don't see a reason to completely ban him, he was probably just way too high on coke when he was posting lately.

Then again, I will also say it is not my choice. Just my two cents.

If you do support arm sooner than later and it works well enough, I could potentially install on my rockpro64!

The discourse websites, such as nitrokey's forum or, mnt research forum, the creators of the mnt reform design anotherwords.

https://community.mnt.re/

https://support.nitrokey.com/

You may notice the your web browser isn't up to date nonsense and how you need to upgrade to browse happy bs.

There are fixes for some of those websites. It requires modify http response and specific filters such as this:

[["/^/",["/browser-detect-/",["/.*/g",""]],["/^\\/assets\\/discourse-[0-9a-f]{4}/",["(.d-modal-legacy\"","(.d-modal-legacy)\"","document.execCommand(\"insertText\",!1,","this._textarea.setRangeText("]]]]

Palemoon forums users have figured this out, which is awesome.

Blobbed device? Perhaps, but I got it because its 7 inch ARM64 modular device.

Its no more blobbed in my opinion then anything else on the market, much less actually.

I don't agree with FSF's standards on what constitutes RYF.

And actually, more specifically, it should be RYP

Respects Your Privacy

Another words, there is no device that respects freedom 100% out there, probably never will be. 95%? Maybe... but microcode always exists in a system to some extent.
It just ain't feasible and people should accept it. RYP however would work.

Disabling the network stack of backdoors? Possible, example intel me from gen 3-12. Not sure about gen 13+

Disabling all non-free aspects replacing with new code? That isn't possible... without breaking the law.

I am not assuming he will support ARM64. It was a request. If it doesn't happen, meh w/e.

I just asked in case he would be open to it.

Although, its possible Risc-V, Openpower Microwatt and Openpower Libre-Soc will be easier to support in the ultra long term.

No idea tho.

But yeah, basically privacy can be achievable if coreboot like bios and network stack backdoor issues can be disabled.  Otherwise, no.

I honestly wonder if the corporatization of software on linux, isn't the reason why xorg and other older standards are not secure today.

It isn't exactly the corporate motto to have no bloat in operating systems. They go the other direction, microsoft is a perfect example of this.

dbus, systemd, similar nonsensical crap like that, probably has only hurt security for linux.

I sometimes wonder another words, if they are fixing a problem they created themselves.

Hmm...

Tell me if you support ARM64 in the future. I would love to use this on my pocket mnt reform. it will be a while till other options, HyperbolaBSD for example... show up.

Agree with the above.

What is probably needed, is more people should contribute to palemoon. Best of all, since the drama dev is gone, palemoon is led by Moonchild only. And he is perfectly sane. Can't say the same for the dev who used to lead with him.

My only qualm and it is a very tiny one, is that dbus is still required to run the web browser as is unless you compile yourself, etc...

Beyond that? Nothing at all.

BTW MASSIVE THING TO MENTION:

https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=30655

Apparently, he might be having funding issues at the moment. Just a heads up!

I guess then, do I really need that serial console to get video output? And what do I need to make it function properly period.

Thoughts?

I don't have a usb serial console currently as a heads up.

Lumina Desktop + Acer Aspire with 1GB of ram. 1.66ghz processor.

I haven't done this persay, but I have run mate, lxde and xfce4, so I bet it would work with Lumina too.

It also requires the least bloat to use of the four...

I have run the other three desktop environments on that computer before just to clarify.

Although, this was around the days of debian 7...  but I was using a linux distro with upstart and other ubuntu garbage, so... yeah.

Very clever... insert smug smile below:

Or troll face smile if you prefer...