The officially official Devuan Forum!

You are not logged in.

#51 Re: Forum Feedback » Attach File to post. » 2017-07-27 18:38:25

Hi,

Thanks for the reply. Any recommendations? Are there more used by forum members here than others?

Thanks,

#52 Forum Feedback » Attach File to post. » 2017-07-27 00:32:13

bbatten
Replies: 2

How do I attach - or otherwise provide access to - a file to a post. The file(s) in question are too large to include inline without totally cluttering up the message.

Thanks,

#53 Re: Installation » [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems » 2017-07-05 20:09:56

Hi PeteGozz,

Thanks for the feedback. Any ideas, pointers, tips on how I can fix up my xfce install?

Thanks,

#54 Installation » [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems » 2017-07-02 23:24:04

bbatten
Replies: 9

I upgraded my Wheezy installation to Devuan Jessie using the instructions at
https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/2 … 10.en.html
with these package sources:

deb [arch=amd64,i386] http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged jessie          main contrib non-free
deb [arch=amd64,i386] http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged jessie-updates  main contrib non-free
deb [arch=amd64,i386] http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged jessie-security main contrib non-free

The configuration I'm trying to upgrade is Debian Wheezy. I have no Debian kernel packages. I download kernels from kernel.org and build from source. Network-manager is not installed. I use a custom network configuration and wicd instead. My boot manager is lilo. Grub is not installed.

I used a terminal window from my xfce desktop to do the installation, which at first appeared successful, but which I soon discovered has the following problem areas:

  1. initramfs-tools emits bug message

  2. xfce only has 1280x1024 resolution

  3. network-manager ends up being installed

Cumulatively, these resulted in an unusable desktop and a non-functioning local network configuration serious enough that I needed to drop back to a backup disk image of Wheezy. Here's what I know about these problems:

initramfs-tools emits bug message

When initramfs-tools setup started, these messages were issued:

Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.120+deb8u3) ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.11.4
mkinitramfs: failed to determine device for /
mkinitramfs: workaround is MODULES=most, check:
grep -r MODULES /etc/initramfs-tools/

Error please report bug on initramfs-tools
Include the output of 'mount' and 'cat /proc/mounts'
update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-4.11.4 with 1.
dpkg: error processing package initramfs-tools (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-18+deb8u9) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
initramfs-tools
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-4.11.4 with 1.

I tried unsuccessfully (pilot error suspected) to use reportbug to report it.

Trying to install initramfs-tools separately resulted in this error:

"E: Internal Error, No file name for initramfs-tools:amd64"

First, I don't have kernel 4.11.4 installed. I do have 4.11.7 installed. Second, why is initramfs-tools being run in the first place? I haven't called out for any kernel packages to be installed, so the boot configuration is unchanged.

xfce only has 1280x1024 resolution

Xfce4 gets upgraded from 4.8 to 4.10 (good). When I logged into my upgaded xfce4 desktop, I found that it was set at 1280x1024. My display has 1920x1080 capability, which was being used prior to the upgrade. Running 'xfce4-display-settings' did not offer the option of 1920x1080. Furthermore, I found that my displays.xml file had been modified to change name="Default" with Resolution of 1920x1080 to name="active" (I think), then *append* a name="Default" set of properties with a max Resolution of 1280x1024. Running "xfce4-display-settings" did not allow me to increase the resolution above 1280x1024, even though the former "Default" Resolution continued show as 1920x1280.

My understanding is the it is conventional *not* to modify user specified settings. Getting back to a full display capability is something I need to be able to do before entering the fray once more.

network-manager ends up being installed

I don't know why this happened, but this and network-manager-gnome were both installed. My understanding is that 'upgrade' installs newest versions of currently installed packages while 'dist-upgrade' also installs dependencies. Doesn't seem that either of these should end up installing a package that's not currently installed.

Anyway, I need to know how to keep Network Manager out of my system in order to be able to proceed.

Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks,

Board footer

Forum Software